Wayneactia wrote:What the fuck does any of this help? What does this achieve?
It makes people believe they have scored points for the afterlife, since they have already given up this one.
Advertisement

by The Alma Mater » Fri Jun 24, 2022 11:06 pm
Wayneactia wrote:What the fuck does any of this help? What does this achieve?

by Khurkhogur » Fri Jun 24, 2022 11:08 pm
Great Heathen Air Force wrote:"Pro-abortion" is absolutely a "colorful, propaganda-ish term." It is only used by the pro-life lobby, as a term of derision, and by virtually no one else.
In any case: Most abortions do not take place late in pregnancy, and when they do there are usually legitimate medical reasons why this is happening. Women do not generally just wait until the last minute out of laziness.
Instead they may have discovered, for example, that their baby has Harlequin Ichthyosis, and has about a 50% chance of dying in the first few weeks, and if they survive they will spend the rest of their life disfigured and in great pain. And they want to spare them that. Or, perhaps, the fetus may have died, but is not naturally passing on it's own, and must be removed through abortion. There are many reasons, and they're usually very personal, and very painful. Many of these women want to be mothers, and carried the pregnancy this far in the hope that they would be, but now their faced with a terrible circumstance, and must make a difficult choice. And it's quite intrusive for the government to barge into that.

by Torisakia » Fri Jun 24, 2022 11:08 pm
Wayneactia wrote:I just don’t understand. The world is approaching 8 Billion people and we are hanging on by a fucking thread just to try and support that. Millions are going hungry due to crop failures in California due to the drought. People can afford shit as it stands. The child welfare system is so overhwhelmed that it cannot cope. Women seeking an abortion are making a conscious choice to try and stem that tide. A mistake is made and a fetus is conceived. A woman knows that she cannot care for that child, due to whatever circumstances , and now she is forced to carry that fetus to term, and then have that child grow up in poverty.
What the fuck does any of this help? What does this achieve? Why do the beliefs of a minority, trump the beliefs of a majority? I have yet to ever see a single pro-life person come up with a single tangible argument, other than the bible says abortion is murder. I don’t shit on anyone else’s beliefs, but they will sure as fuck shit in yours when it comes to abortion. You don’t believe in abortion? Don’t get one.

by Khurkhogur » Fri Jun 24, 2022 11:10 pm
The Alma Mater wrote:Yes, absolutely.

by The Alma Mater » Fri Jun 24, 2022 11:13 pm


by Khurkhogur » Fri Jun 24, 2022 11:14 pm
Wayneactia wrote:I just don’t understand. The world is approaching 8 Billion people and we are hanging on by a fucking thread just to try and support that. Millions are going hungry due to crop failures in California due to the drought. People can afford shit as it stands. The child welfare system is so overhwhelmed that it cannot cope. Women seeking an abortion are making a conscious choice to try and stem that tide. A mistake is made and a fetus is conceived. A woman knows that she cannot care for that child, due to whatever circumstances , and now she is forced to carry that fetus to term, and then have that child grow up in poverty.
What the fuck does any of this help? What does this achieve? Why do the beliefs of a minority, trump the beliefs of a majority? I have yet to ever see a single pro-life person come up with a single tangible argument, other than the bible says abortion is murder. I don’t shit on anyone else’s beliefs, but they will sure as fuck shit in yours when it comes to abortion. You don’t believe in abortion? Don’t get one.

by The Alma Mater » Fri Jun 24, 2022 11:15 pm
Khurkhogur wrote:Wayneactia wrote:I just don’t understand. The world is approaching 8 Billion people and we are hanging on by a fucking thread just to try and support that. Millions are going hungry due to crop failures in California due to the drought. People can afford shit as it stands. The child welfare system is so overhwhelmed that it cannot cope. Women seeking an abortion are making a conscious choice to try and stem that tide. A mistake is made and a fetus is conceived. A woman knows that she cannot care for that child, due to whatever circumstances , and now she is forced to carry that fetus to term, and then have that child grow up in poverty.
What the fuck does any of this help? What does this achieve? Why do the beliefs of a minority, trump the beliefs of a majority? I have yet to ever see a single pro-life person come up with a single tangible argument, other than the bible says abortion is murder. I don’t shit on anyone else’s beliefs, but they will sure as fuck shit in yours when it comes to abortion. You don’t believe in abortion? Don’t get one.
The world is not buckling under the weight of the current human population, it's buckling under the weight of consumer capitalism and modern industrialized society. Communal societies don't suffer from problems like the child welfare system being overwhelmed, raising children is the duty of extended families and wider communities. If that's the sort of model we followed today, raising children would not be an issue.

by Khurkhogur » Fri Jun 24, 2022 11:19 pm
The Alma Mater wrote:So you suggest group marriages to solve the problem of unwanted children?

by WayNeacTia » Fri Jun 24, 2022 11:20 pm
Torisakia wrote:Wayneactia wrote:I just don’t understand. The world is approaching 8 Billion people and we are hanging on by a fucking thread just to try and support that. Millions are going hungry due to crop failures in California due to the drought. People can afford shit as it stands. The child welfare system is so overhwhelmed that it cannot cope. Women seeking an abortion are making a conscious choice to try and stem that tide. A mistake is made and a fetus is conceived. A woman knows that she cannot care for that child, due to whatever circumstances , and now she is forced to carry that fetus to term, and then have that child grow up in poverty.
What the fuck does any of this help? What does this achieve? Why do the beliefs of a minority, trump the beliefs of a majority? I have yet to ever see a single pro-life person come up with a single tangible argument, other than the bible says abortion is murder. I don’t shit on anyone else’s beliefs, but they will sure as fuck shit in yours when it comes to abortion. You don’t believe in abortion? Don’t get one.
You'll eventually learn that human rights do not exist in this world. We are all pawns of the government to line their pockets with money while committing to slavery every day of our lives until our premature deaths, where we'll be replaced by yet another pawn. It is a vicious cycle that will continue until the end of time. There is nothing to look forward to in the future, only despair and agony.
Send all "lol edgy" replies to my TGs
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait

by Great Heathen Air Force » Fri Jun 24, 2022 11:23 pm
Khurkhogur wrote:Those sorts of cases are complicated and I wouldn't make a judgement about them randomly. The world is a messy place.

by Torisakia » Fri Jun 24, 2022 11:26 pm
Wayneactia wrote:Torisakia wrote:You'll eventually learn that human rights do not exist in this world. We are all pawns of the government to line their pockets with money while committing to slavery every day of our lives until our premature deaths, where we'll be replaced by yet another pawn. It is a vicious cycle that will continue until the end of time. There is nothing to look forward to in the future, only despair and agony.
Send all "lol edgy" replies to my TGs
Seeing as how I am likely twice your age, I had figured that one out years ago.
I used to believe that the SCOTUS had the best interests of the people and the nation in mind. They have made some controversial calls over the years, but ever since Trump's three pawns have been on the bench, a shit show doesn't even been to describe what that court has become. Clarence Thomas and his perverted sense of the constitution are just the beginning folks. KI do wish you all of the luck in the world on this one. As a side note, they have ensured that Justin Trudeau wins the next election here in Canada, as I can guarantee you that none of the mouthpieces we have running to take of the Conservative party are going to be able to leave this alone. Not only is abortion legal all across Canada, it is healthcare funded and fully covered.
Congratulations on being set back into the 1800's again. Let us all know how it turns out...

by WayNeacTia » Fri Jun 24, 2022 11:27 pm
Torisakia wrote:Though I do like seeing the world go down in flames. It's fun to read comments and stuff.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait

by Torisakia » Fri Jun 24, 2022 11:31 pm
Wayneactia wrote:https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?p=39726757#p39726757
Kat had a great take here. This is fascism plain and simple. This does bring up an interesting situation though. Right after the WW1 (i.e. 1922), fascist leaning began to take hold in Europe. Pretty soon you had two fascist dictators in power. How many million people had to die in the subsequent years to end that shit back then? How many are going to have to die this time?
Wayneactia wrote:I have come to realization that is probably the best thing for this planet. A great reset. Maybe they will actually get it right next time....

by Spirit of Hope » Fri Jun 24, 2022 11:44 pm
Torisakia wrote:Wayneactia wrote:https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?p=39726757#p39726757
Kat had a great take here. This is fascism plain and simple. This does bring up an interesting situation though. Right after the WW1 (i.e. 1922), fascist leaning began to take hold in Europe. Pretty soon you had two fascist dictators in power. How many million people had to die in the subsequent years to end that shit back then? How many are going to have to die this time?
This is tyranny. This is fascism. But most of all, this is democracy manifest.
Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

by Torisakia » Fri Jun 24, 2022 11:48 pm
Spirit of Hope wrote:Torisakia wrote:This is tyranny. This is fascism. But most of all, this is democracy manifest.
Its hardly democracy manifest. Of the 5 Justices that voted to overturn Roe completely 3 were nominated by President Trump who lost the popular vote and a the 4th was nominated by President George W. Bush in President Bush's second term, after President Bush lost the national popular vote in his first term. Chief Justice Roberts, who only wanted to make restrictions after 15 weeks possible, was also nominated by President George W. Bush. So out of the conservatives 6 member majority, 5 were only nominated because of the US's backwards way of electing presidents.
Further Justices Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett were all confirmed by Senator's who represented a minority of the US population.
Based of off poling a large majority of Americans wanted Roe to remain in place, not for it to be repealed.

by WayNeacTia » Sat Jun 25, 2022 12:08 am
Spirit of Hope wrote:Torisakia wrote:This is tyranny. This is fascism. But most of all, this is democracy manifest.
Its hardly democracy manifest. Of the 5 Justices that voted to overturn Roe completely 3 were nominated by President Trump who lost the popular vote and a the 4th was nominated by President George W. Bush in President Bush's second term, after President Bush lost the national popular vote in his first term. Chief Justice Roberts, who only wanted to make restrictions after 15 weeks possible, was also nominated by President George W. Bush. So out of the conservatives 6 member majority, 5 were only nominated because of the US's backwards way of electing presidents.
Further Justices Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett were all confirmed by Senator's who represented a minority of the US population.
Based of off poling a large majority of Americans wanted Roe to remain in place, not for it to be repealed.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait

by Torisakia » Sat Jun 25, 2022 12:13 am
Wayneactia wrote:Spirit of Hope wrote:
Its hardly democracy manifest. Of the 5 Justices that voted to overturn Roe completely 3 were nominated by President Trump who lost the popular vote and a the 4th was nominated by President George W. Bush in President Bush's second term, after President Bush lost the national popular vote in his first term. Chief Justice Roberts, who only wanted to make restrictions after 15 weeks possible, was also nominated by President George W. Bush. So out of the conservatives 6 member majority, 5 were only nominated because of the US's backwards way of electing presidents.
Further Justices Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett were all confirmed by Senator's who represented a minority of the US population.
Based of off poling a large majority of Americans wanted Roe to remain in place, not for it to be repealed.
You took the words right out of my mouth. Three of the Justices were appointed by a delusional narcissist who, as the evidence has overwhelming concluded tried to stage a coup to try and subvert an election he lost. This isn't about abortion, it is about politics. How many of the Trumpets on the bench, were in contact with the Trump campaign before issuing that ruling? I am willing to bet all three were. Thomas has close connections to Trump as well. Alito has always been out there in right field, so none of this out of him even comes as a remote shock.
This isn't about rights (although it sure as fuck should be), this is about dividing the American people. A divided people, are easily conquered. Every dictator in history has done it. So once again I ask, how many people are going to have to die this time to end fascism, once and for fucking all?
by Diuhon » Sat Jun 25, 2022 12:31 am

by Torisakia » Sat Jun 25, 2022 12:33 am
Diuhon wrote:NO, FUCK NO! That is not acceptable! You guys seriously think posterity will think well of the shit we hand them with once we're past retirement age? I DON'T WANT THAT! I WANT THE BEST POSSIBLE FUTURE FOR THEM!

by WayNeacTia » Sat Jun 25, 2022 12:51 am
Diuhon wrote:NO, FUCK NO! That is not acceptable! You guys seriously think posterity will think well of the shit we hand them with once we're past retirement age? I DON'T WANT THAT! I WANT THE BEST POSSIBLE FUTURE FOR THEM!
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait

by Prima Scriptura » Sat Jun 25, 2022 12:58 am

by Senkaku » Sat Jun 25, 2022 1:11 am
Wayneactia wrote:
I used to believe that the SCOTUS had the best interests of the people and the nation in mind.
by Diuhon » Sat Jun 25, 2022 1:14 am
Senkaku wrote:Wayneactia wrote:
I used to believe that the SCOTUS had the best interests of the people and the nation in mind.
I’m sorry but people pompously pretending to act mortally shocked that our political institutions aren’t the ultimate fonts of moral virtue in the universe is getting really fucking old lol

by WayNeacTia » Sat Jun 25, 2022 1:18 am
Senkaku wrote:Wayneactia wrote:
I used to believe that the SCOTUS had the best interests of the people and the nation in mind.
I’m sorry but people pompously pretending to act mortally shocked that our political institutions aren’t the ultimate fonts of moral virtue in the universe is getting really fucking old lol
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Bienenhalde, Google [Bot], Gun Manufacturers, Habsburg Mexico, Immoren, Saiwana, Umeria, Violetist Britannia
Advertisement