The Proud Transphobe wrote:Red Lake Circle wrote:You’re not “using correct terminology,” you’re asking everyone else to overhaul theirs because it doesn’t fit your exceedingly narrow view of what gender should be. You know that study that found that 40% of trans youth attempt suicide? This exact kind of position has been linked to just how horrifically high that statistic is. Your reasoning is pedantic at best and malicious at worst, and it’s results make the world an actively less safe place for a substantial portion of the population.
Suicidality is a personal problem that should be addressed by a therapist, not by thought-policing other people.Red Lake Circle wrote:Scientific literature also shows that humans have gender as a psychosocial category. We are not denying that sex is a thing, but you are very much denying that gender is. You’re just being deliberately obtuse.
At no point have I said gender isn't a thing. I just recognize it is a social construct, and therefore (unlike science) extremely subjective. Like I have said before, you are free to categorize different genders as we discover them, just bear in mind they're going to have to be different than the terms we use for sex categories if you want to avoid confusion between sex and gender.Vassenor wrote:
So you're still relying on biological essentialism because you know if you consider literally anything else your position becomes untenable.
Yeah. It's almost as if biology is a strong foundation of knowledge and truth you can't accept because your feelings are in the way.
Says the person who wants the whole of the English language rewritten to suit their feelings.