NATION

PASSWORD

UK Politics Thread X: Immigration, Housing, Strikes oh my

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Will Labour win the next General Election and if so, by how much?

Labour will win with a landslide majority of over 100 seats
6
14%
Labour will win with a big majority of between 50-100 seats
9
21%
Labour will win with a smaller majority of between 1-50 seats
12
28%
Labour will win but fail to achieve a majority (Hung Parliament leading to Minority government)
3
7%
Labour will win but fail to achieve a majority (Hung Parliament leading to coalition government with one or more parties)
5
12%
Labour will lose the next general election (Conservatives remain largest party)
3
7%
Sinn Fein will win the next general election
5
12%
 
Total votes : 43

User avatar
Celritannia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17291
Founded: Nov 10, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Celritannia » Wed Mar 08, 2023 4:12 pm

Shrillland wrote:
The Huskar Social Union wrote:SNP leads Labour by 11% in constituency VI for a Scottish parliamentary election.

Holyrood Constituency VI (2-5 March):

SNP: 40% (-8)
LAB: 29% (+7)
CON: 20% (-2)
LDEM: 7% (–)
GRN: 2% (+1)
RFM: 2% (+2)
OTH: 1% (–)

Changes +/- 2021 Scottish Election


Holyrood Regional List VI (2-5 March):

SNP: 29% (-11)
LAB: 26% (+8)
CON: 20% (-3)
LDEM: 11% (+6)
GRN: 10% (+2)
RFM: 1% (+1)
OTH: 3% (-2)

Changes +/- 2021 Scottish Election

Ayyoo


That's a hell of a swing to the Red though, and I see Labour growing further in the ensuing months.


Beautiful

Right-wingers will flock to reform
Tory voters will flock to the LibDems, seeing the sinking ship.
Left-wing and neutral on independence will flock to Labour.
Left-wing and pro-independence will flock to greens.
The remaining pro-independence will flock to ABBA.
Last edited by Celritannia on Wed Mar 08, 2023 4:17 pm, edited 2 times in total.

My DeviantArt
Obey
When you annoy a Celritannian
U W0T M8?
Zirkagrad wrote:A person with a penchant for flying lions with long tongues, could possibly be a fan of Kiss. Maybe the classiest nation with a lion with its tongue hanging out. Enjoys only the finest tea.

Nakena wrote:NSG's Most Serene Salad
Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman.
Atheist, Environmentalist, Pansexual, Left-Libertarian.

User avatar
The Notorious Mad Jack
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1579
Founded: Nov 05, 2018
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby The Notorious Mad Jack » Wed Mar 08, 2023 4:17 pm

I think it's a bit too soon to be proclaiming the end of the SNP's ascendency over Scottish politics.
Totally not MadJack, though I hear he's incredibly smart and handsome.

User avatar
Celritannia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17291
Founded: Nov 10, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Celritannia » Wed Mar 08, 2023 4:18 pm

The Notorious Mad Jack wrote:I think it's a bit too soon to be proclaiming the end of the SNP's ascendency over Scottish politics.


I don't think it will end, but their prominence will no longer be secured.

Minority governments will become the norm again. I can see Labour-LibDem coalitions in Holyrood in the foreseeable future.
Last edited by Celritannia on Wed Mar 08, 2023 4:20 pm, edited 2 times in total.

My DeviantArt
Obey
When you annoy a Celritannian
U W0T M8?
Zirkagrad wrote:A person with a penchant for flying lions with long tongues, could possibly be a fan of Kiss. Maybe the classiest nation with a lion with its tongue hanging out. Enjoys only the finest tea.

Nakena wrote:NSG's Most Serene Salad
Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman.
Atheist, Environmentalist, Pansexual, Left-Libertarian.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed Mar 08, 2023 4:53 pm

Mtwara wrote:To be fair if there was a system of using refugees as indentured servantsand coolies, we'd see a big increase in the number of refugees that we take in.

That's got to be a win-win, right?


*stares in Carnival Row*.

Carnival Row has the plot of the land of fantasy creatures being found during the age of imperialism. The Obviously British face off against "The Pact" (An alliance of the other Imperial countries who have decided to go in for genocide and slavery. The British do the good old "Divide and rule the fantasy creatures" thing, but lose the war as a result of their land forces being not up to snuff against what is implied to be literally everybody else. As a consequence they offer to "Evacuate" the fantasy creatures, offering them passage out of their doomed continent and back to Obviously Britain in exchange for entering indentured servitude, and hiring some of them to bust open the concentration camps and be like "I'm here to save you from the pact. Just sign on the dotted line.". This causes... issues... to say the least... as the Pact (And the Conservatives in Obviously Britain) endlessly raves about how we need to destroy them because they're dangerous, Obviously Britain (And it's Liberals) waffle loudly about barbarism and the rights of all creatures and mutters quietly about economic value being sourced in Labour not Land so they're a good workforce, and the creatures stare at the Obviously British and gradually their eyes start to narrow as they cotton onto it all. At some point a lovecraftian elder god is summoned into the Obviously London sewers as revenge.


Mind you. Given that the kind of refugee's we'll be dealing with can't summon cthulhu, we're probably doing alright if we decide to enslave them so carry on I suppose. Oh. Except the whole morals thing. Also it might have been a metaphor. But I can't imagine what for. Certainly nothing festering in the underbelly of society that threatens to destroy it in a cataclysm and leave devestating effects for generations.

Oh.

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/f58a ... 3c~mv2.png

Nah. Probably nothing.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Wed Mar 08, 2023 5:02 pm, edited 7 times in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Saor Alba
Diplomat
 
Posts: 530
Founded: Dec 22, 2022
New York Times Democracy

Postby Saor Alba » Wed Mar 08, 2023 5:36 pm

The Rio Grande River Basin wrote:The SNP blowing itself to pieces was vaguely amusing. They basically pulled what I do with one of my characters in a political RP, fire barbs at the opponent, hope you win, and then try and fix the smouldering wreck you created.

They've been in government for 15 years and there is no election for another four years. The SNP remains the strongest political machine in Scotland even if they are down a bit in the polls.

Celritannia wrote:
The Notorious Mad Jack wrote:I think it's a bit too soon to be proclaiming the end of the SNP's ascendency over Scottish politics.


I don't think it will end, but their prominence will no longer be secured.

Minority governments will become the norm again. I can see Labour-LibDem coalitions in Holyrood in the foreseeable future.

Based off of that most recent poll, a Labour-LibDem government would still need Green or Tory support to beat the SNP. If Labour and the LibDems formed government with Tory support, they would survive for a single term before the SNP surge back into power. The next minority government will still be SNP unless they suffer a Corbyn-esque collapse
• THE KINGDOM OF SCOTLAND • RÌOGHACHD NA H-ALBA •
Free Wales | Unite Ireland | Free Brittany
About Me | News from Scotland | Ministry of Foreign Affairs

User avatar
Celritannia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17291
Founded: Nov 10, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Celritannia » Wed Mar 08, 2023 6:38 pm

Saor Alba wrote:
The Rio Grande River Basin wrote:The SNP blowing itself to pieces was vaguely amusing. They basically pulled what I do with one of my characters in a political RP, fire barbs at the opponent, hope you win, and then try and fix the smouldering wreck you created.

They've been in government for 15 years and there is no election for another four years. The SNP remains the strongest political machine in Scotland even if they are down a bit in the polls.

Celritannia wrote:
I don't think it will end, but their prominence will no longer be secured.

Minority governments will become the norm again. I can see Labour-LibDem coalitions in Holyrood in the foreseeable future.

Based off of that most recent poll, a Labour-LibDem government would still need Green or Tory support to beat the SNP. If Labour and the LibDems formed government with Tory support, they would survive for a single term before the SNP surge back into power. The next minority government will still be SNP unless they suffer a Corbyn-esque collapse


I did say I'm the near future, meaning not the next election, but perhaps a couple after.

I highly doubt a Labour-LibDem coalition would work with the Tories. And likewise, the Greens won't work with non-independence parties.

The SNP for now are fracturing. They could move away from their independence position and actually focus on a the needs of the people.
Last edited by Celritannia on Wed Mar 08, 2023 6:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

My DeviantArt
Obey
When you annoy a Celritannian
U W0T M8?
Zirkagrad wrote:A person with a penchant for flying lions with long tongues, could possibly be a fan of Kiss. Maybe the classiest nation with a lion with its tongue hanging out. Enjoys only the finest tea.

Nakena wrote:NSG's Most Serene Salad
Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman.
Atheist, Environmentalist, Pansexual, Left-Libertarian.

User avatar
El Lazaro
Senator
 
Posts: 4672
Founded: Oct 19, 2021
Left-wing Utopia

Postby El Lazaro » Wed Mar 08, 2023 7:02 pm

Celritannia wrote:
Saor Alba wrote:They've been in government for 15 years and there is no election for another four years. The SNP remains the strongest political machine in Scotland even if they are down a bit in the polls.


Based off of that most recent poll, a Labour-LibDem government would still need Green or Tory support to beat the SNP. If Labour and the LibDems formed government with Tory support, they would survive for a single term before the SNP surge back into power. The next minority government will still be SNP unless they suffer a Corbyn-esque collapse


I did say I'm the near future, meaning not the next election, but perhaps a couple after.

I highly doubt a Labour-LibDem coalition would work with the Tories. And likewise, the Greens won't work with non-independence parties.

The SNP for now are fracturing. They could move away from their independence position and actually focus on a the needs of the people.

Their independence position is the entire reason they’re in charge in the first place. They couldn’t present an electorally viable yet fairly distinct agenda from existing parties without being Scottish nationalists.

User avatar
Heloin
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26091
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Heloin » Wed Mar 08, 2023 7:06 pm

Celritannia wrote:
Shrillland wrote:
That's a hell of a swing to the Red though, and I see Labour growing further in the ensuing months.


Beautiful

Right-wingers will flock to reform
Tory voters will flock to the LibDems, seeing the sinking ship.
Left-wing and neutral on independence will flock to Labour.
Left-wing and pro-independence will flock to greens.
The remaining pro-independence will flock to ABBA.

Well you know what they say,
Waterloo, couldn't escape if I wanted to
Waterloo, knowing my fate is to be with you
Wa-Wa-Wa-Wa-Waterloo, finally facing my Waterloo

User avatar
Celritannia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17291
Founded: Nov 10, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Celritannia » Wed Mar 08, 2023 7:07 pm

El Lazaro wrote:
Celritannia wrote:
I did say I'm the near future, meaning not the next election, but perhaps a couple after.

I highly doubt a Labour-LibDem coalition would work with the Tories. And likewise, the Greens won't work with non-independence parties.

The SNP for now are fracturing. They could move away from their independence position and actually focus on a the needs of the people.

Their independence position is the entire reason they’re in charge in the first place. They couldn’t present an electorally viable yet fairly distinct agenda from existing parties without being Scottish nationalists.


They can be a Nationalist party without supporting independence. They can be a party that ensures the rights of Scots and Scotland as a whole are maintained within the UK.
Last edited by Celritannia on Wed Mar 08, 2023 7:09 pm, edited 2 times in total.

My DeviantArt
Obey
When you annoy a Celritannian
U W0T M8?
Zirkagrad wrote:A person with a penchant for flying lions with long tongues, could possibly be a fan of Kiss. Maybe the classiest nation with a lion with its tongue hanging out. Enjoys only the finest tea.

Nakena wrote:NSG's Most Serene Salad
Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman.
Atheist, Environmentalist, Pansexual, Left-Libertarian.

User avatar
El Lazaro
Senator
 
Posts: 4672
Founded: Oct 19, 2021
Left-wing Utopia

Postby El Lazaro » Wed Mar 08, 2023 7:11 pm

Celritannia wrote:
El Lazaro wrote:Their independence position is the entire reason they’re in charge in the first place. They couldn’t present an electorally viable yet fairly distinct agenda from existing parties without being Scottish nationalists.


They can be a Nationalist party without supporting independence. They can be a party that ensures the rights of Scots and Scotland as a whole are maintained within the UK.

They can also lose and fade into obscurity, but it’s generally understood that’s not what political parties are aiming for.

User avatar
The Matthew Islands
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6739
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Capitalist Paradise

Postby The Matthew Islands » Wed Mar 08, 2023 11:29 pm

The Archregimancy wrote:I've been invited to run for a very winnable seat on my local authority council.

Am torn.

I value my political neutrality and impartiality in my professional role; I often engage with political figures from all UK-wide parties, and my perceived professional neutrality often helps me access support and funding that might not be otherwise available.

But I'm also furious with Suella Braverman; and - freely acknowledging that my local authority isn't going to be dealing with small boat channel crossings - the government's new refugee policy, and its callous, cynical, deliberate, and considered political conflation of asylum seekers with economic migrants is tilting me towards saying yes.

I should also note that I used to work for a national Red Cross society, and am very familiar with international law on asylum, so I would be grateful if no one chose to take it upon themselves to lecture me over that asylum seeker / economic migrant distinction.

Do you think this likely to be a stepping stone into becoming a potential MP?
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

User avatar
Emotional Support Crocodile
Minister
 
Posts: 2574
Founded: Jun 06, 2022
New York Times Democracy

Postby Emotional Support Crocodile » Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:31 am

Put Arch in the House of Lords.
Just another surprising item on the bagging scale of life

Capturing fleshlings since 2020

Beware the Judderman my dear, when the moon is fat

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 29265
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Thu Mar 09, 2023 3:13 am

The Matthew Islands wrote:Do you think this likely to be a stepping stone into becoming a potential MP?


No.

Emotional Support Crocodile wrote:Put Arch in the House of Lords.


I was sounded out informally once; I said I wouldn't say no if it ever became a formal query, but that it wasn't a priority for me. There hasn't been any subsequent follow-through.

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 29265
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Thu Mar 09, 2023 4:07 am

Celritannia wrote:
El Lazaro wrote:Their independence position is the entire reason they’re in charge in the first place. They couldn’t present an electorally viable yet fairly distinct agenda from existing parties without being Scottish nationalists.


They can be a Nationalist party without supporting independence. They can be a party that ensures the rights of Scots and Scotland as a whole are maintained within the UK.


The rise of the Coalition Avenir Québec (centre-right, nationalist, autonomist, but not pro-independence) and the near-collapse of the Parti Québécois (centre-left, nationalist, pro-independence) is something that should be more closely studied by Scots, regardless of how they feel regarding independence.

The PQ used to be the dominant force in Quebec politics, but now only holds 3 seats in the province's National Assembly, squeezed over the last 20 years from the left by the more activist Québec Solidaire, and from the right by a CAQ that's more attractive to soft sovereigntists who are comfortable pushing for a distinct Quebecois identity and provincial autonomy within Canada.

It would be easy to push the comparisons too far, but Quebec's history after the 1995 independence referendum is worth a close look.
Last edited by The Archregimancy on Thu Mar 09, 2023 6:13 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Forsher
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21521
Founded: Jan 30, 2012
New York Times Democracy

Postby Forsher » Thu Mar 09, 2023 4:22 am

The Archregimancy wrote:It would be easy to push the comparisons too far, but Quebec's history after the 1995 independence referendum is worth a close look.


A real politician would push it too far. Or possibly not at all. You're clearly not cut out for local politics, Arch. Fortunately, I know how you can respond to any journalistic interest: "don't fucking come and talk to me".

(I'd say it's unbelievable but this is the same guy who fantasised in public about sticking a photograph of a journalist on a urinal and pissing on it. And he said this before the election. *sigh*)
Last edited by Forsher on Thu Mar 09, 2023 4:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
That it Could be What it Is, Is What it Is

Stop making shit up, though. Links, or it's a God-damn lie and you know it.

The normie life is heteronormie

We won't know until 2053 when it'll be really obvious what he should've done. [...] We have no option but to guess.

User avatar
Emotional Support Crocodile
Minister
 
Posts: 2574
Founded: Jun 06, 2022
New York Times Democracy

Postby Emotional Support Crocodile » Thu Mar 09, 2023 4:43 am

Sunak's success with the Windsor Framework seems to have made absolutely no difference to his party's UK polling figures.
Just another surprising item on the bagging scale of life

Capturing fleshlings since 2020

Beware the Judderman my dear, when the moon is fat

User avatar
Emotional Support Crocodile
Minister
 
Posts: 2574
Founded: Jun 06, 2022
New York Times Democracy

Postby Emotional Support Crocodile » Thu Mar 09, 2023 5:15 am

The Archregimancy wrote:

Emotional Support Crocodile wrote:Put Arch in the House of Lords.


I was sounded out informally once; I said I wouldn't say no if it ever became a formal query, but that it wasn't a priority for me. There hasn't been any subsequent follow-through.


Cleary you have not paid for Boris Johnson to go on holiday.
Just another surprising item on the bagging scale of life

Capturing fleshlings since 2020

Beware the Judderman my dear, when the moon is fat

User avatar
The Matthew Islands
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6739
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Capitalist Paradise

Postby The Matthew Islands » Thu Mar 09, 2023 5:52 am

The Archregimancy wrote:
The Matthew Islands wrote:Do you think this likely to be a stepping stone into becoming a potential MP?


No.

I suppose if it's only a local council role, I personally wouldn't have thought that it would compromise the neutrality you maintain in your professional life, to any real degree.

Admittedly though, I don't really know much about the world of local politics.
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 29265
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Thu Mar 09, 2023 6:22 am

Emotional Support Crocodile wrote:
The Archregimancy wrote:



I was sounded out informally once; I said I wouldn't say no if it ever became a formal query, but that it wasn't a priority for me. There hasn't been any subsequent follow-through.


Cleary you have not paid for Boris Johnson to go on holiday.


No, but he did tell me an inappropriate sexist joke within 30 seconds of meeting me when he was Prime Minister; clearly that didn't count for as much as I'd hoped.

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 62662
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Thu Mar 09, 2023 6:27 am

The Archregimancy wrote:
Emotional Support Crocodile wrote:
Cleary you have not paid for Boris Johnson to go on holiday.


No, but he did tell me an inappropriate sexist joke within 30 seconds of meeting me when he was Prime Minister; clearly that didn't count for as much as I'd hoped.


30 seconds? He must've been tired if it took him that long.
The Blaatschapen should resign

User avatar
Celritannia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17291
Founded: Nov 10, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Celritannia » Thu Mar 09, 2023 10:02 am

El Lazaro wrote:
Celritannia wrote:
I did say I'm the near future, meaning not the next election, but perhaps a couple after.

I highly doubt a Labour-LibDem coalition would work with the Tories. And likewise, the Greens won't work with non-independence parties.

The SNP for now are fracturing. They could move away from their independence position and actually focus on a the needs of the people.

Their independence position is the entire reason they’re in charge in the first place. They couldn’t present an electorally viable yet fairly distinct agenda from existing parties without being Scottish nationalists.


Yes, they could.

The Archregimancy wrote:
Celritannia wrote:
They can be a Nationalist party without supporting independence. They can be a party that ensures the rights of Scots and Scotland as a whole are maintained within the UK.


The rise of the Coalition Avenir Québec (centre-right, nationalist, autonomist, but not pro-independence) and the near-collapse of the Parti Québécois (centre-left, nationalist, pro-independence) is something that should be more closely studied by Scots, regardless of how they feel regarding independence.

The PQ used to be the dominant force in Quebec politics, but now only holds 3 seats in the province's National Assembly, squeezed over the last 20 years from the left by the more activist Québec Solidaire, and from the right by a CAQ that's more attractive to soft sovereigntists who are comfortable pushing for a distinct Quebecois identity and provincial autonomy within Canada.

It would be easy to push the comparisons too far, but Quebec's history after the 1995 independence referendum is worth a close look.


Yeah, this is what I was thinking.
Last edited by Celritannia on Thu Mar 09, 2023 10:03 am, edited 1 time in total.

My DeviantArt
Obey
When you annoy a Celritannian
U W0T M8?
Zirkagrad wrote:A person with a penchant for flying lions with long tongues, could possibly be a fan of Kiss. Maybe the classiest nation with a lion with its tongue hanging out. Enjoys only the finest tea.

Nakena wrote:NSG's Most Serene Salad
Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman.
Atheist, Environmentalist, Pansexual, Left-Libertarian.

User avatar
Privateer Stockholm
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 402
Founded: Mar 01, 2023
Ex-Nation

Postby Privateer Stockholm » Thu Mar 09, 2023 10:31 am

Ok, without commenting on abortion rights themselves which some view as women defending their bodies and others view as unjust killing, what's your opinion of Tony Martin shooting dead Master Barras? And if you're against that what's your ulterior motive (by your own logic)?
News:
-Malmo taken as much of the rest of urban Sweden is nuked.
- The Captain-General is dead, long live the Captain-General!
- Captain-General dies leading his men.

User avatar
El Lazaro
Senator
 
Posts: 4672
Founded: Oct 19, 2021
Left-wing Utopia

Postby El Lazaro » Thu Mar 09, 2023 10:36 am

The Archregimancy wrote:
Celritannia wrote:
They can be a Nationalist party without supporting independence. They can be a party that ensures the rights of Scots and Scotland as a whole are maintained within the UK.


The rise of the Coalition Avenir Québec (centre-right, nationalist, autonomist, but not pro-independence) and the near-collapse of the Parti Québécois (centre-left, nationalist, pro-independence) is something that should be more closely studied by Scots, regardless of how they feel regarding independence.

The PQ used to be the dominant force in Quebec politics, but now only holds 3 seats in the province's National Assembly, squeezed over the last 20 years from the left by the more activist Québec Solidaire, and from the right by a CAQ that's more attractive to soft sovereigntists who are comfortable pushing for a distinct Quebecois identity and provincial autonomy within Canada.

It would be easy to push the comparisons too far, but Quebec's history after the 1995 independence referendum is worth a close look.

If anything, the slow demise of the PQ is a warning about flip-flopping on independence and focusing on other political issues as a big tent party. The Bloc is the only Quebecois party in the Canadian parliament, while the PQ cannibalized itself at the provincial level.

And Canada’s federal political system and Anglo-French relations aren’t a bullet-proof analogy for Scotland and the UK.

User avatar
Celritannia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17291
Founded: Nov 10, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Celritannia » Thu Mar 09, 2023 10:39 am

Privateer Stockholm wrote:Ok, without commenting on abortion rights themselves which some view as women defending their bodies and others view as unjust killing, what's your opinion of Tony Martin shooting dead Master Barras? And if you're against that what's your ulterior motive (by your own logic)?


I support the right to self defence of one's home, however, in the case, the "defence " seems to have been pemeditated, and the use of the shotgun to kill, rather than frighten the burglars away was overly excessive.

This is a case that was looked over alot in my 6th form law class.
Last edited by Celritannia on Thu Mar 09, 2023 10:39 am, edited 1 time in total.

My DeviantArt
Obey
When you annoy a Celritannian
U W0T M8?
Zirkagrad wrote:A person with a penchant for flying lions with long tongues, could possibly be a fan of Kiss. Maybe the classiest nation with a lion with its tongue hanging out. Enjoys only the finest tea.

Nakena wrote:NSG's Most Serene Salad
Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman.
Atheist, Environmentalist, Pansexual, Left-Libertarian.

User avatar
Privateer Stockholm
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 402
Founded: Mar 01, 2023
Ex-Nation

Postby Privateer Stockholm » Thu Mar 09, 2023 10:39 am

Celritannia wrote:
Privateer Stockholm wrote:Ok, without commenting on abortion rights themselves which some view as women defending their bodies and others view as unjust killing, what's your opinion of Tony Martin shooting dead Master Barras? And if you're against that what's your ulterior motive (by your own logic)?


I support the right to self defence of one's home, however, in the case, the "defence " seems to have been pemeditated, and the use of the shotgun to kill, rather than frighten the burglars away was overly excessive.

This is a case that was looked over alot in my 6th form law class.

Well answered.

Which political party would Oliver Cromwell support if alive today?
Last edited by Privateer Stockholm on Thu Mar 09, 2023 10:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
News:
-Malmo taken as much of the rest of urban Sweden is nuked.
- The Captain-General is dead, long live the Captain-General!
- Captain-General dies leading his men.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aguaria Major, Ardeall, Blothia, Cachard Calia, Google [Bot], Gyergyoszentmiklos, Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum, Hidrandia, Old Temecula, Ovstylap, Tarsonis, Tyrannical Nannerland

Advertisement

Remove ads