NATION

PASSWORD

UK Politics Thread X: Immigration, Housing, Strikes oh my

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Will Labour win the next General Election and if so, by how much?

Labour will win with a landslide majority of over 100 seats
6
14%
Labour will win with a big majority of between 50-100 seats
9
21%
Labour will win with a smaller majority of between 1-50 seats
12
28%
Labour will win but fail to achieve a majority (Hung Parliament leading to Minority government)
3
7%
Labour will win but fail to achieve a majority (Hung Parliament leading to coalition government with one or more parties)
5
12%
Labour will lose the next general election (Conservatives remain largest party)
3
7%
Sinn Fein will win the next general election
5
12%
 
Total votes : 43

User avatar
Celritannia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17291
Founded: Nov 10, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Celritannia » Tue May 30, 2023 3:25 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Celritannia wrote:
It is the ideal situation, but not always the case.
Again, the Civil Service, through experience, should be able to say something is unachievable.


This is where carefully worded replies come in

There's always options beyond usurping the ministers power.


To which I never mentioned. The major Civil Servants (Cabinet Secretary and the Permanent Secretaries) are still beholden to the HEad of the Civil Service (the PM) and can be replaced by them.
So it is impossible for the Civil Service to usurp the Secretaries of State.

Allowing them to point out flaws and impossible implications is not usurpation.

My DeviantArt
Obey
When you annoy a Celritannian
U W0T M8?
Zirkagrad wrote:A person with a penchant for flying lions with long tongues, could possibly be a fan of Kiss. Maybe the classiest nation with a lion with its tongue hanging out. Enjoys only the finest tea.

Nakena wrote:NSG's Most Serene Salad
Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman.
Atheist, Environmentalist, Pansexual, Left-Libertarian.

User avatar
Celritannia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17291
Founded: Nov 10, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Celritannia » Tue May 30, 2023 3:26 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Genuinely though, managing upward is a vital skill for a civil servant. I do understand Celrits frustration and his perspective, but it's not really best practice in my opinion.


You should talk to GVH. He just got a job in the probation service.


A friend of mine has a job in the Justice Department, and I am looking at jobs in the Civil Service as well, currently.

My DeviantArt
Obey
When you annoy a Celritannian
U W0T M8?
Zirkagrad wrote:A person with a penchant for flying lions with long tongues, could possibly be a fan of Kiss. Maybe the classiest nation with a lion with its tongue hanging out. Enjoys only the finest tea.

Nakena wrote:NSG's Most Serene Salad
Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman.
Atheist, Environmentalist, Pansexual, Left-Libertarian.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Tue May 30, 2023 3:37 pm

Celritannia wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
This is where carefully worded replies come in

There's always options beyond usurping the ministers power.


To which I never mentioned. The major Civil Servants (Cabinet Secretary and the Permanent Secretaries) are still beholden to the HEad of the Civil Service (the PM) and can be replaced by them.
So it is impossible for the Civil Service to usurp the Secretaries of State.

Allowing them to point out flaws and impossible implications is not usurpation.


I think i'm hung up on the "Impossible" here. If they tell you they want you to summon Princess Celestia to the mortal plane using the interest rate, telling them "That is impossible" or "That will not work" is a bit too much like a "No." for my tastes.

I would prefer something less committal like "I do not see how this would work, perhaps you can clarify" and "I think causing a stack overflow and this opening a portal to Equestria is untested, however, the impact of doing this would have severe implications on the housing market." so on. Which I get is extremely tedious and winds people up, but it's ultimately not telling them you refuse to even try.

By saying it's impossible there's an implication that you're not going to follow the order as opposed to just pestering them for constant clarification and pointing out how what they're asking is basically nonsense. It's a subtle difference but it's one I put a lot of stock in.

If you can say "That's impossible to achieve" then you're kind of stuck for justifying how you take any action at all.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Hirota
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7326
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Hirota » Wed May 31, 2023 4:42 am

Fartsniffage wrote:
Hirota wrote:I ideally want a civil service filled with people who do not have their private opinions influence their ability to do their work and may lead them to obstruct the policies of the democratically elected government on the basis of their personal morality - hence the "nonpartisan."

Right now, as demonstrated by the examples I cited regarding Benn and Corbyn, and experienced with this proposed strike action, we have an aggregate of civil servants sitting somewhere around the center who can sometimes curb the policies of the elected government (for good or ill) through action or inaction. I personally find that less desirable, but it's the reality of the situation at the moment, and they are not picked by the government - hence the "independent"

I personally don't want selected civil servants.

I can't make it much clearer than that. If you think any of that equates to "extreme centrism" that's your opinion, not mine.


You're asking for half a million people who want to work in the government to have no strong political opinions.

Never going to happen.
What I'm hoping will happen is you will read what I said.

"people who do not have their private opinions influence their ability to do their work"

That isn't the same as the absence of an opinion, as you've misread it.

Ostroeuropa wrote:Mildly disagree Celrit. The job of the civil servant is to inform the government what you expect the proposed action will cause based on your experience. If they disagree with you, then you say "We'll see" and then enact it anyway. Only the most obstinate idiots will continually ignore that advise after that happens a few times, at which point they start dragging their feet a little (Which I disapprove of).
You've made me remember a sketch.
Last edited by Hirota on Wed May 31, 2023 4:45 am, edited 2 times in total.
When a wise man points at the moon the imbecile examines the finger - Confucius
Known to trigger Grammar Nazis, Spelling Nazis, Actual Nazis, the emotionally stunted and pedants.
Those affected by the views, opinions or general demeanour of this poster should review this puppy picture. Those affected by puppy pictures should consider investing in an isolation tank.

Economic Left/Right: -3.25, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03
Isn't it curious how people will claim they are against tribalism, then pigeonhole themselves into tribes?

It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
I use obviously in italics to emphasise the conveying of sarcasm. If I've put excessive obviously's into a post that means I'm being sarcastic

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 62662
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Wed May 31, 2023 4:57 am

Fartsniffage wrote:
Hirota wrote:I disagree with "independent" and suggest "nonpartisan" instead.

But I'd much rather they were independent than selected.


You would want a Civil Service filled with extreme centrists?


Oh no, the civil service will be full of Lib Dems :(
The Blaatschapen should resign

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 29265
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Wed May 31, 2023 5:43 am

The Blaatschapen wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
You would want a Civil Service filled with extreme centrists?


Oh no, the civil service will be full of Lib Dems :(


Our evil orange masterplan for global domination will soon come to fruition...

BWA-HA-HA-HA.

User avatar
Point Blob
Attaché
 
Posts: 98
Founded: Apr 29, 2004
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Point Blob » Wed May 31, 2023 6:56 am

The Archregimancy wrote:
The Blaatschapen wrote:
Oh no, the civil service will be full of Lib Dems :(


Our evil orange masterplan for global domination will soon come to fruition...

BWA-HA-HA-HA.

I dread to imagine what sort of horror the Lib Dems would inflict on everyone.
I mean the Tories won't stop until everyone else is below the poverty line and Labour won't stop until everyone is jailed for thought-crime... so... what flavour of insanity would the LDs inflict, I wonder?

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 29265
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Wed May 31, 2023 6:58 am

Point Blob wrote:
The Archregimancy wrote:
Our evil orange masterplan for global domination will soon come to fruition...

BWA-HA-HA-HA.

I dread to imagine what sort of horror the Lib Dems would inflict on everyone.
I mean the Tories won't stop until everyone else is below the poverty line and Labour won't stop until everyone is jailed for thought-crime... so... what flavour of insanity would the LDs inflict, I wonder?


We'll force you to knit your own muesli.

User avatar
Celritannia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17291
Founded: Nov 10, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Celritannia » Wed May 31, 2023 7:21 am

The Archregimancy wrote:
Point Blob wrote:I dread to imagine what sort of horror the Lib Dems would inflict on everyone.
I mean the Tories won't stop until everyone else is below the poverty line and Labour won't stop until everyone is jailed for thought-crime... so... what flavour of insanity would the LDs inflict, I wonder?


We'll force you to knit your own muesli.


What a truly horrid and dystopian future the Lib Dems propose.

My DeviantArt
Obey
When you annoy a Celritannian
U W0T M8?
Zirkagrad wrote:A person with a penchant for flying lions with long tongues, could possibly be a fan of Kiss. Maybe the classiest nation with a lion with its tongue hanging out. Enjoys only the finest tea.

Nakena wrote:NSG's Most Serene Salad
Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman.
Atheist, Environmentalist, Pansexual, Left-Libertarian.

User avatar
Hirota
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7326
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Hirota » Wed May 31, 2023 9:31 am

The Archregimancy wrote:
The Blaatschapen wrote:
Oh no, the civil service will be full of Lib Dems :(


Our evil orange masterplan for global domination will soon come to fruition...

BWA-HA-HA-HA.
You've done enough damage with Agent Truss already damnit. Go back to running councils in the countryside.
When a wise man points at the moon the imbecile examines the finger - Confucius
Known to trigger Grammar Nazis, Spelling Nazis, Actual Nazis, the emotionally stunted and pedants.
Those affected by the views, opinions or general demeanour of this poster should review this puppy picture. Those affected by puppy pictures should consider investing in an isolation tank.

Economic Left/Right: -3.25, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03
Isn't it curious how people will claim they are against tribalism, then pigeonhole themselves into tribes?

It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
I use obviously in italics to emphasise the conveying of sarcasm. If I've put excessive obviously's into a post that means I'm being sarcastic

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed May 31, 2023 11:03 am

https://news.sky.com/story/raf-recruite ... s-12893684

That will never happen
That didn't happen, they're making it up
There’s no source
You can’t trust [news source]
Maybe it did happen, maybe it didn't, we can't know for sure
It happened but it’s a good thing and not racist
Okay, yes it did happen and the RAF had to pay out for discrimination… but it’s just an isolated incident. <- we are here.
Okay yes, discrimination against white males has been proven under law in basically every UK institution, but that doesn't prove systemic anti-white male discrimination based on progressive ideology. <-We can be here if you want the links.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Wed May 31, 2023 11:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41257
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Wed May 31, 2023 11:30 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:https://news.sky.com/story/raf-recruiters-were-advised-against-selecting-useless-white-male-pilots-to-hit-diversity-targets-12893684

That will never happen
That didn't happen, they're making it up
There’s no source
You can’t trust [news source]
Maybe it did happen, maybe it didn't, we can't know for sure
It happened but it’s a good thing and not racist
Okay, yes it did happen and the RAF had to pay out for discrimination… but it’s just an isolated incident. <- we are here.
Okay yes, discrimination against white males has been proven under law in basically every UK institution, but that doesn't prove systemic anti-white male discrimination based on progressive ideology. <-We can be here if you want the links.


There is a benefit to having female fighter pilots. Not sure about the racial element.
Last edited by Fartsniffage on Wed May 31, 2023 11:31 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed May 31, 2023 11:33 am

Fartsniffage wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:https://news.sky.com/story/raf-recruiters-were-advised-against-selecting-useless-white-male-pilots-to-hit-diversity-targets-12893684

That will never happen
That didn't happen, they're making it up
There’s no source
You can’t trust [news source]
Maybe it did happen, maybe it didn't, we can't know for sure
It happened but it’s a good thing and not racist
Okay, yes it did happen and the RAF had to pay out for discrimination… but it’s just an isolated incident. <- we are here.
Okay yes, discrimination against white males has been proven under law in basically every UK institution, but that doesn't prove systemic anti-white male discrimination based on progressive ideology. <-We can be here if you want the links.


There is a benefit to having female fighter pilots. Not sure about the racial element.


The story in question concerns how they hired every ethnic minority and female applicant who passed minimum standards from that batch of applicants and still didn't have enough to meet quotas, but didn't want to start hiring white males who passed the standards once that happened. They wanted to stall until the next batch of applicants contained more women and minorities, but they had a whistleblower call them out.

There's also not really a rational for these measures when female fighter pilots already apply. At lower numbers, but apply nonetheless.

He continued: "I noted that the boards have recently been predominantly white male heavy, if we don't have enough BAME and female to board then we need to make the decision to pause boarding and seek more BAME and female from the RF [recruitment force].

"I don't really need to see loads of useless white male pilots, lets [sic] get a [sic] focussed as possible, I am more than happy to reduce boarding if needed to have a balanced BAME/female/Male board."

Another email sent the following day by the same squadron leader to a more senior member of the recruitment team, entitled "BOARDING PROFILE UPDATE", suggested a struggle to hit diversity targets.

"You will note however that the pot for BAME and female is drained," the squadron leader wrote.

"From 336 Cs [candidates] we have c10% female, 5% BAME which we will burn through quickly using the boarding profile proposed.

"As you know we select approx. 45-50% of BAME and female that we board therefore we expect to select c15 female and 7 BAME from the current cohort.

"The demand signal needs to go back to RF [the recruitment force] to focus now on sending all the BAME and female they have.


Eventually they just started doing this shit too;

An informed source alleged that efforts were made around that time to fast-track ethnic minority and female recruits into RAF Halton in Buckinghamshire without previously passing a fitness test. Instead they could take the test on their first day.

This meant they were offered employment - a place on a course - prior to undertaking a pass or fail fitness test, the source said. By contrast, before being offered employment, white men would be required to pass the fitness test first.


At that point it's "Offer them a job even if they don't pass minimum standards. But do not offer one to white men even if they do.".

And, just so we're under no illusions about the extent of anti-white racism and anti-male sexism in the country and its institutions:

Group Captain Dole went on to be awarded an OBE in the 2022 New Years Honours List.

By contrast, his successor, Group Captain Nicholl, chose to resign rather than implement what she deemed to be an "illegal order" to discriminate against white men.


When the army obeys illegal orders they get rewarded, provided it is in service of racism and sexism against the outgroup of the state ideology. I'm sure you can guess the comparison I'm thinking of.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Wed May 31, 2023 2:32 pm, edited 10 times in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Celritannia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17291
Founded: Nov 10, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Celritannia » Wed May 31, 2023 5:15 pm


My DeviantArt
Obey
When you annoy a Celritannian
U W0T M8?
Zirkagrad wrote:A person with a penchant for flying lions with long tongues, could possibly be a fan of Kiss. Maybe the classiest nation with a lion with its tongue hanging out. Enjoys only the finest tea.

Nakena wrote:NSG's Most Serene Salad
Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman.
Atheist, Environmentalist, Pansexual, Left-Libertarian.

User avatar
GCMG
Diplomat
 
Posts: 836
Founded: Jun 24, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby GCMG » Wed May 31, 2023 6:02 pm

Point Blob wrote:
The Archregimancy wrote:
Our evil orange masterplan for global domination will soon come to fruition...

BWA-HA-HA-HA.

I dread to imagine what sort of horror the Lib Dems would inflict on everyone.
I mean the Tories won't stop until everyone else is below the poverty line and Labour won't stop until everyone is jailed for thought-crime... so... what flavour of insanity would the LDs inflict, I wonder?


Orange democratic horror, you say?



And this is why you should live near a zoo. Get better life stories.

This was... not meant to be such a themed post.
Term limits remove power from the People and give it to a piece of paper.

User avatar
Tinhampton
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12333
Founded: Oct 05, 2016
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tinhampton » Thu Jun 01, 2023 1:08 am

Opt-out organ donation is now the law everywhere in the UK after Northern Ireland's law took effect today
The Self-Administrative City of TINHAMPTON (pop. 329,537): Saffron Howard, Mayor (UCP); Alexander Smith, WA Delegate-Ambassador

Authorships & co-authorships: SC#250, SC#251, Issue #1115, SC#267, GA#484, GA#491, GA#533, GA#540, GA#549, SC#356, GA#559, GA#562, GA#567, GA#578, SC#374, GA#582, SC#375, GA#589, GA#590, SC#382, SC#385*, GA#597, GA#607, SC#415, GA#647, GA#656, GA#664
The rest of my CV: Cup of Harmony 73 champions; Philosopher-Queen of Sophia; possibly very controversial; *author of the most popular SC resolution ever
Who am I, really? 47yo Tory woman w/Asperger's; Cambridge graduate; currently reading Divided by Tim Marshall

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 29265
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Thu Jun 01, 2023 3:03 am

Celritannia wrote:
The Archregimancy wrote:
We'll force you to knit your own muesli.


What a truly horrid and dystopian future the Lib Dems propose.


Hirota wrote:You've done enough damage with Agent Truss already damnit. Go back to running councils in the countryside.


My e-mail today from LibDem headquarters: "Stop puppy smuggling now".

Truly the wickedness of our perverse vision for British society knows no end.

I urge all of you to embrace the coming revolution of the slightly disgruntled materially comfortable small-l liberal middle classes and their pro-European academic fellow travellers before it's too late.

User avatar
Democratic Poopland
Diplomat
 
Posts: 727
Founded: Apr 09, 2023
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Democratic Poopland » Thu Jun 01, 2023 3:20 am

Tinhampton wrote:Opt-out organ donation is now the law everywhere in the UK after Northern Ireland's law took effect today

Of course. It's good for people who need it, but this doesn't seem to exactly... Well, define the line of potential and not.

Edit: Actually read it, and it does.
Last edited by Democratic Poopland on Thu Jun 01, 2023 3:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
Poopland discussing digital bombings! DEFCON 12345
I think that Antiquity is the best. | Everything you need to know is in a factbook. | Unless specifiied, all stats are canon! | Moderation links. | I cannot enforce rules. | IC & OOC Leader of my nation is me. IC is just under another name. | eeeee Possibly? Maybe just a confused straight dude. | Auth-Left, Chaotic Evil.

User avatar
The Huskar Social Union
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58281
Founded: Apr 04, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Huskar Social Union » Thu Jun 01, 2023 3:20 am

Stopping puppy smuggling today, Chaos with Ed Davey tomorrow!

When will it end???
Irish Nationalist from Belfast / Leftwing / Atheist / Alliance Party voter
"I never thought in terms of being a leader, i thought very simply in terms of helping people" - John Hume 1937 - 2020



I like Miniature painting, Tanks, English Gals, Video games and most importantly Cheese.


User avatar
Democratic Poopland
Diplomat
 
Posts: 727
Founded: Apr 09, 2023
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Democratic Poopland » Thu Jun 01, 2023 3:28 am

Boris Johnson says he has handed over COVID-19 WhatsApps - BBC News

Let me guess. They're trying to scare us into submission.
Last edited by Democratic Poopland on Thu Jun 01, 2023 4:02 am, edited 2 times in total.
Poopland discussing digital bombings! DEFCON 12345
I think that Antiquity is the best. | Everything you need to know is in a factbook. | Unless specifiied, all stats are canon! | Moderation links. | I cannot enforce rules. | IC & OOC Leader of my nation is me. IC is just under another name. | eeeee Possibly? Maybe just a confused straight dude. | Auth-Left, Chaotic Evil.

User avatar
The Huskar Social Union
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58281
Founded: Apr 04, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Huskar Social Union » Thu Jun 01, 2023 3:37 am

Geraint Davies: Labour MP suspended over behaviour claims

Labour MP Geraint Davies has been suspended from the party after claims of "completely unacceptable behaviour".

Labour said the allegations were "incredibly serious" and encouraged anyone with a complaint to report it to the party.

According to news website Politico, he is accused of subjecting younger colleagues to unwanted sexual attention.

The MP for Swansea West told Politico he did not recognise the allegations.

"None of them, as far as I know, has been lodged as complaints with the Labour Party or Parliament," he said.

"If I have inadvertently caused offence to anyone, then I am naturally sorry as it is important that we share an environment of mutual and equal respect for all."

The BBC has contacted Mr Davies for comment but has so far received no response.

Mr Davies has been administratively suspended from the party pending an investigation into the allegations.

This means he can not sit as a Labour MP while the investigation is ongoing, although he remains the member of Parliament for Swansea West and will sit as an independent.

Politico, which first reported the allegations, said it had spoken to more than 20 people who worked with Mr Davies in Parliament, including serving MPs and current and former Labour Party staff.

=CONTINUES=
Irish Nationalist from Belfast / Leftwing / Atheist / Alliance Party voter
"I never thought in terms of being a leader, i thought very simply in terms of helping people" - John Hume 1937 - 2020



I like Miniature painting, Tanks, English Gals, Video games and most importantly Cheese.


User avatar
The Notorious Mad Jack
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1579
Founded: Nov 05, 2018
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby The Notorious Mad Jack » Thu Jun 01, 2023 3:45 am

Tinhampton wrote:Opt-out organ donation is now the law everywhere in the UK after Northern Ireland's law took effect today

Already opted out of this. If my blood ain't good enough, my organs aren't either.
Totally not MadJack, though I hear he's incredibly smart and handsome.

User avatar
Forsher
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21521
Founded: Jan 30, 2012
New York Times Democracy

Postby Forsher » Thu Jun 01, 2023 5:01 am

Saor Alba wrote:I am of the opinion that civil servants should not be allowed to strike over policy, and if they do then they should just be fired. The alternative is allowing elected governments to appoint civil servants.


Unless they go on strike because, I dunno, Marcus Rashford scored a goal, what on earth does that leave them able to strike over?
That it Could be What it Is, Is What it Is

Stop making shit up, though. Links, or it's a God-damn lie and you know it.

The normie life is heteronormie

We won't know until 2053 when it'll be really obvious what he should've done. [...] We have no option but to guess.

User avatar
Forsher
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21521
Founded: Jan 30, 2012
New York Times Democracy

Postby Forsher » Thu Jun 01, 2023 5:28 am

Hirota wrote:I ideally want a civil service filled with people who do not have their private opinions influence their ability to do their work and may lead them to obstruct the policies of the democratically elected government on the basis of their personal morality - hence the "nonpartisan."


Look I can get the idea that, say, I shouldn't be working in a Ministry of Transport or something but if you made me a civil servant working on something I currently have no particular interest in like, say... hmm, this is quite tricky, Canada, I would quite quickly develop an opinion about Canada, which would quite quickly result in the capacity of those opinions to influence my work.

And, on the flip side, if you keep hiring hacks who do whatever they're told to the best of their ability, you end up with hacks at best and Eichmann kill all the poor at worst. Indeed, this is one of the leading theories of why everything costs so much in the Anglosphere... because you don't have subject experts, you end up with no-one saying "that can't work, stop investigating it" and thus spend all this money hiring consultants that are subject experts who tell the PPE graduate manager "that can't work, we investigated it, here's the bill". On the other hand, I'm pretty sure that can't explain why it costs twenty million pounds to build a walking and cycling bridge over two train tracks (and their overhead wires, admittedly) and that's apparently what we'll be doing shortly. (Alas, I can't find a picture of the proposed bridges which might help explain things.)
That it Could be What it Is, Is What it Is

Stop making shit up, though. Links, or it's a God-damn lie and you know it.

The normie life is heteronormie

We won't know until 2053 when it'll be really obvious what he should've done. [...] We have no option but to guess.

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 62662
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Thu Jun 01, 2023 8:18 am

The Archregimancy wrote:
Celritannia wrote:
What a truly horrid and dystopian future the Lib Dems propose.


Hirota wrote:You've done enough damage with Agent Truss already damnit. Go back to running councils in the countryside.


My e-mail today from LibDem headquarters: "Stop puppy smuggling now".

Truly the wickedness of our perverse vision for British society knows no end.

I urge all of you to embrace the coming revolution of the slightly disgruntled materially comfortable small-l liberal middle classes and their pro-European academic fellow travellers before it's too late.



I am in favour of puppy smuggling.

Provided they get smuggled to me.
The Blaatschapen should resign

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aguaria Major, Ardeall, Blothia, Cachard Calia, Gyergyoszentmiklos, Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum, Hidrandia, Old Temecula, Ovstylap, Tarsonis, Tyrannical Nannerland

Advertisement

Remove ads