San Lumen wrote:Indomitable Friendship wrote:
I generally am opposed to laws and think that "order" being dependent on them is a conservative fabrication. Throughout the entirety of tha animal kingdom, ecosystems have "order" without law and I don't think humans are far different, if given the chance. I do think there needs to be environmental/ecological rules, though, with our large population. As for what should happen to the shooter, you know I support firearm access and people handling their own business. Whatever people decided to do with him is their prerogative, no state law needed. I'm not really an anarchist because I think there needs to be an overarching body for the sake of efficiency, but I object to the "govern" in government. I think the State should be more like a service apparatus to the people with lots of horizontal leadership, so, instead of a govern-ment, I would like a service-ment, if that remotely makes sense.
No it makes zero sense. This evil man deserves to go to prison for decades. Somalia is a prefect example of what happens when you don't have a functioning government.
Your idealism has never worked and never will.
No, Somalia is what happens when an African country becomes overpopulated due to Westerners and then exacerbated by Western technology like firearms. Africans did not naturally evolve for a population that big and for that level of development. My "idealism" only applies to Europeans. We do not need and have never needed law enforcement. Our civilizations literally 1st developed from the absence of laws.