Advertisement

by Informed Consent » Mon Dec 05, 2022 8:54 am

by The Black Forrest » Mon Dec 05, 2022 8:57 am
Ethel mermania wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
If that was the case and laws were broken, why aren’t they going after his current equipment? Why haven’t they presented what they have?
Talking about conspiracies are fun and useful and you don’t have to present evidence.
The stories were suppressed
https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/02/tech/mus ... index.html

by The Alma Mater » Mon Dec 05, 2022 9:02 am
Ethel mermania wrote:Sordhau wrote:
Did Hunter Biden sexually harass someone? Did he rape someone? Because from what I've read he's had his privacy violated and is therefor the victim here. Unless you have evidence to the contrary?
He was taking cash from the Ukrainians for access to his dad. Whether his dad knew, I dont belive was in the emails.
Fact is Twitter suppressed information that could have effected the election.

by Ethel mermania » Mon Dec 05, 2022 9:03 am

by The Black Forrest » Mon Dec 05, 2022 9:07 am

by Informed Consent » Mon Dec 05, 2022 9:09 am

by The Black Forrest » Mon Dec 05, 2022 9:12 am

by Ethel mermania » Mon Dec 05, 2022 9:15 am
The Black Forrest wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:
Folks may not vote for Biden after understanding what the family was up too.
Maybe in the past when people were concerned about such things. The camps are too divided and support levels would have pretty much remained the same.
Let’s see if Trump is able to secure his nomination when considering all the evidence we have seen over the SCI and special programs files. I will be curious if that had an effect on dropping support for him?

by The Alma Mater » Mon Dec 05, 2022 9:24 am
Ethel mermania wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
Maybe in the past when people were concerned about such things. The camps are too divided and support levels would have pretty much remained the same.
Let’s see if Trump is able to secure his nomination when considering all the evidence we have seen over the SCI and special programs files. I will be curious if that had an effect on dropping support for him?
I would be very surprised if Trump got the nomination.
Back to the point, Twitter by suppressing the story influenced the election. It disparages the story as not true, when in fact it is very true.

by The Black Forrest » Mon Dec 05, 2022 9:24 am
Ethel mermania wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
Maybe in the past when people were concerned about such things. The camps are too divided and support levels would have pretty much remained the same.
Let’s see if Trump is able to secure his nomination when considering all the evidence we have seen over the SCI and special programs files. I will be curious if that had an effect on dropping support for him?
I would be very surprised if Trump got the nomination.
Back to the point, Twitter by suppressing the story influenced the election. It disparages the story as not true, when in fact it is very true.

by Informed Consent » Mon Dec 05, 2022 10:10 am
The Black Forrest wrote:What laws were broken by the Bidens and why aren’t the Republicans going after them….serious versus innuendo and conspiracy?
This will probably be like H’s emails which were going to destroy the democrats and the goverment.
My prediction? 52 “Benghazi” hearings.

by Ethel mermania » Mon Dec 05, 2022 10:17 am
The Black Forrest wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:
I would be very surprised if Trump got the nomination.
Back to the point, Twitter by suppressing the story influenced the election. It disparages the story as not true, when in fact it is very true.
What laws were broken by the Bidens and why aren’t the Republicans going after them….serious versus innuendo and conspiracy?
This will probably be like H’s emails which were going to destroy the democrats and the goverment.
My prediction? 52 “Benghazi” hearings.

by Ifreann » Mon Dec 05, 2022 10:39 am

by Informed Consent » Mon Dec 05, 2022 11:01 am
Ifreann wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:
Folks may not vote for Biden after understanding what the family was up too.
It's so weird how people talk about the Biden family when they just mean Hunter smoking crack or getting hired because his father's a famous politician. Who else in the family is involved? It smacks of the right trying to force a "Biden crime family" meme.

by Gravlen » Mon Dec 05, 2022 11:49 am
Ethel mermania wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
What laws were broken by the Bidens and why aren’t the Republicans going after them….serious versus innuendo and conspiracy?
This will probably be like H’s emails which were going to destroy the democrats and the goverment.
My prediction? 52 “Benghazi” hearings.
Hunter getting paid for being on the board of burisma, is one. Exactly what expertise does he have to be on the board? What Hunter did is unethical if not illegal and was germane to the election.
Interviews with more than a dozen people, including executives and former prosecutors in Ukraine, paint a picture of a director who provided advice on legal issues, corporate finance and strategy during a five-year term on the board, which ended in April of this year.

by The Black Forrest » Mon Dec 05, 2022 11:56 am
Informed Consent wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:What laws were broken by the Bidens and why aren’t the Republicans going after them….serious versus innuendo and conspiracy?
This will probably be like H’s emails which were going to destroy the democrats and the goverment.
My prediction? 52 “Benghazi” hearings.
If you can get away with destabilizing an entire region for no objective reason, then the happenings in one town will not matter to whatever passes for oversight in these matters.
Meanwhile...
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source= ... H2O_cZ47F7

by The Black Forrest » Mon Dec 05, 2022 11:59 am
Ethel mermania wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
What laws were broken by the Bidens and why aren’t the Republicans going after them….serious versus innuendo and conspiracy?
This will probably be like H’s emails which were going to destroy the democrats and the goverment.
My prediction? 52 “Benghazi” hearings.
Hunter getting paid for being on the board of burisma, is one. Exactly what expertise does he have to be on the board? What Hunter did is unethical if not illegal and was germane to the election.

by Ethel mermania » Mon Dec 05, 2022 12:17 pm
The Black Forrest wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:Hunter getting paid for being on the board of burisma, is one. Exactly what expertise does he have to be on the board? What Hunter did is unethical if not illegal and was germane to the election.
Well many people are on boards for various reasons. Even getting paid for it. My last company was high tech. There were non-high tech industry people on the board.

by The Black Forrest » Mon Dec 05, 2022 12:33 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
Well many people are on boards for various reasons. Even getting paid for it. My last company was high tech. There were non-high tech industry people on the board.
The only thing hunter has to sell is his father.
Still doesn't matter, by suppressing the information American media colluded to interfere with the election. Even if the charges were complete bunk it should not have been suppressed.

by Ethel mermania » Mon Dec 05, 2022 12:38 pm
The Black Forrest wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:
The only thing hunter has to sell is his father.
Still doesn't matter, by suppressing the information American media colluded to interfere with the election. Even if the charges were complete bunk it should not have been suppressed.
Well? I guess if you don’t like the Bidens; I can see this as upsetting. What law did Hunter break?
Still if it’s all political conspiracies in time for the election; why is they press obligated to “front page” them? Why is twitter obligated? I could image if the Press left it a minor story or page 25; people would be complaining.

by Ifreann » Mon Dec 05, 2022 12:44 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
Well? I guess if you don’t like the Bidens; I can see this as upsetting. What law did Hunter break?
Still if it’s all political conspiracies in time for the election; why is they press obligated to “front page” them? Why is twitter obligated? I could image if the Press left it a minor story or page 25; people would be complaining.
Whether I like the bidens or not is immaterial. Whether the times buries the story is immaterial. Twitter, and facebook shut down the accounts talking about it, that is the issue. The information was deliberately suppressed. That is interference in an election.

by The Black Forrest » Mon Dec 05, 2022 12:46 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
Well? I guess if you don’t like the Bidens; I can see this as upsetting. What law did Hunter break?
Still if it’s all political conspiracies in time for the election; why is they press obligated to “front page” them? Why is twitter obligated? I could image if the Press left it a minor story or page 25; people would be complaining.
Whether I like the bidens or not is immaterial. Whether the times buries the story is immaterial. Twitter, and facebook shut down the accounts talking about it, that is the issue. The information was deliberately suppressed. That is interference in an election.

by The Black Forrest » Mon Dec 05, 2022 12:49 pm
Ifreann wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:
Whether I like the bidens or not is immaterial. Whether the times buries the story is immaterial. Twitter, and facebook shut down the accounts talking about it, that is the issue. The information was deliberately suppressed. That is interference in an election.
Didn't it come out years ago that some tabloid rag had been buying and killing stories about Trump? Clearly Americans don't care about press interference in an election.

by Sordhau » Mon Dec 05, 2022 12:51 pm
The Black Forrest wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:
Whether I like the bidens or not is immaterial. Whether the times buries the story is immaterial. Twitter, and facebook shut down the accounts talking about it, that is the issue. The information was deliberately suppressed. That is interference in an election.
And the question remains. What law did Hunter break?

by Ethel mermania » Mon Dec 05, 2022 1:14 pm
The Black Forrest wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:
Whether I like the bidens or not is immaterial. Whether the times buries the story is immaterial. Twitter, and facebook shut down the accounts talking about it, that is the issue. The information was deliberately suppressed. That is interference in an election.
And the question remains. What law did Hunter break?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Celritannia, Chernobyl and Pripyat, Ethel mermania, Fartsniffage, Lysset, Necroghastia, Ostroeuropa, Stellar Colonies, The Two Jerseys, Trivalve, Vikanias
Advertisement