Independent Cossack Ukraine wrote:
I see Putin took lessons from Kim Jong Un in imprisoning his cronies.
The Kims took lessons from Putin's predecessors on that exact topic. It seems its all a cycle up there in north Asia.
-The North Polish Union
Advertisement

by Sejny » Fri Apr 08, 2022 7:24 am
Independent Cossack Ukraine wrote:
I see Putin took lessons from Kim Jong Un in imprisoning his cronies.

by Sordhau » Fri Apr 08, 2022 7:31 am
Independent Cossack Ukraine wrote:
I see Putin took lessons from Kim Jong Un in imprisoning his cronies.

by Rusozak » Fri Apr 08, 2022 8:02 am
Picairn wrote:I Tried to Put Russia on Another Path
Bill Clinton just dropped a new essay defending his move to expand NATO.

by Ifreann » Fri Apr 08, 2022 8:09 am
Rusozak wrote:Picairn wrote:I Tried to Put Russia on Another Path
Bill Clinton just dropped a new essay defending his move to expand NATO.
I'm beginning to think ending the Soviet Union was a mistake. They were also totalitarians with a record of human rights abuses, but it wasn't as bad in the 1980's, and at least they stood for something then. They had a cause to believe in towards making a better world even if it backfired horribly. Now Russia has regressed to dark age barbarianism where the only motive is spoils from pillaging and spite towards your enemies. All the tyranny and atrocities, none of the hope for a better tomorrow.

by Utquiagvik » Fri Apr 08, 2022 8:09 am
Rusozak wrote:Picairn wrote:I Tried to Put Russia on Another Path
Bill Clinton just dropped a new essay defending his move to expand NATO.
I'm beginning to think ending the Soviet Union was a mistake. They were also totalitarians with a record of human rights abuses, but it wasn't as bad in the 1980's, and at least they stood for something then. They had a cause to believe in towards making a better world even if it backfired horribly. Now Russia has regressed to dark age barbarianism where the only motive is spoils from pillaging and spite towards your enemies. All the tyranny and atrocities, none of the hope for a better tomorrow.

by Deblar » Fri Apr 08, 2022 8:11 am
About 30 people have been killed after a Russian missile hit a train station in Eastern Ukraine, according to the Ukrainian government.
In a statement, Pavlo Kyrylenko, the head of the Donetsk Regional Military Administration, said the station was full of people trying to evacuate when it was allegedly hit by a missile. In his statement, Krylenko says the missile, an Iskander, was loaded with cluster munitions. NPR has not been able to verify that independently.
Photos shared by Krylenko show the station on fire and bloodied bodies strewn amid abandoned luggage.
The Kremlin and the Russian Ministry of Defense deny any involvement in the attack.
Ukraine says Russian troops have retreated from the capital region and are regrouping in Belarus, and will move on Eastern Ukraine soon.
When those attacks begin, regional authorities warn, civilians may not have a chance to flee, so they have been urging civilians in Donbas and Kharkiv regions to evacuate. From the beginning of this conflict, trains have been used to carry millions of Ukrainians out of country.
In his own statement, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said rescue workers were on the scene and that more than 100 people were injured. "This is an evil that has no limits," he said. "And if it is not punished it will never stop."


by Sejny » Fri Apr 08, 2022 8:13 am
Rusozak wrote:Picairn wrote:I Tried to Put Russia on Another Path
Bill Clinton just dropped a new essay defending his move to expand NATO.
I'm beginning to think ending the Soviet Union was a mistake. They were also totalitarians with a record of human rights abuses, but it wasn't as bad in the 1980's, and at least they stood for something then. They had a cause to believe in towards making a better world even if it backfired horribly. Now Russia has regressed to dark age barbarianism where the only motive is spoils from pillaging and spite towards your enemies. All the tyranny and atrocities, none of the hope for a better tomorrow.

by Sordhau » Fri Apr 08, 2022 8:14 am
Rusozak wrote:Picairn wrote:I Tried to Put Russia on Another Path
Bill Clinton just dropped a new essay defending his move to expand NATO.
I'm beginning to think ending the Soviet Union was a mistake. They were also totalitarians with a record of human rights abuses, but it wasn't as bad in the 1980's, and at least they stood for something then. They had a cause to believe in towards making a better world even if it backfired horribly. Now Russia has regressed to dark age barbarianism where the only motive is spoils from pillaging and spite towards your enemies. All the tyranny and atrocities, none of the hope for a better tomorrow.
Utquiagvik wrote:Rusozak wrote:
I'm beginning to think ending the Soviet Union was a mistake. They were also totalitarians with a record of human rights abuses, but it wasn't as bad in the 1980's, and at least they stood for something then. They had a cause to believe in towards making a better world even if it backfired horribly. Now Russia has regressed to dark age barbarianism where the only motive is spoils from pillaging and spite towards your enemies. All the tyranny and atrocities, none of the hope for a better tomorrow.
If Russia had continued with Gorbachev-like leadership after the fall of the Soviet Union, then the entire war with Ukraine would have never happened. Putin has trouble accepting the reality that Ukraine is independent and should remain that way. If Russia had a leader like Gorbachev, then that leader would be completely fine with Ukraine being independent. Luckily, Putin's Military has become a complete joke at this point, and the chance of Putin actually winning this war is pretty low.

by Perikuresu » Fri Apr 08, 2022 8:17 am
Rusozak wrote:Picairn wrote:I Tried to Put Russia on Another Path
Bill Clinton just dropped a new essay defending his move to expand NATO.
I'm beginning to think ending the Soviet Union was a mistake. They were also totalitarians with a record of human rights abuses, but it wasn't as bad in the 1980's, and at least they stood for something then. They had a cause to believe in towards making a better world even if it backfired horribly. Now Russia has regressed to dark age barbarianism where the only motive is spoils from pillaging and spite towards your enemies. All the tyranny and atrocities, none of the hope for a better tomorrow.

by Utquiagvik » Fri Apr 08, 2022 8:20 am
Sordhau wrote:Rusozak wrote:
I'm beginning to think ending the Soviet Union was a mistake. They were also totalitarians with a record of human rights abuses, but it wasn't as bad in the 1980's, and at least they stood for something then. They had a cause to believe in towards making a better world even if it backfired horribly. Now Russia has regressed to dark age barbarianism where the only motive is spoils from pillaging and spite towards your enemies. All the tyranny and atrocities, none of the hope for a better tomorrow.
Capitalism. They regressed toward capitalism.Utquiagvik wrote:If Russia had continued with Gorbachev-like leadership after the fall of the Soviet Union, then the entire war with Ukraine would have never happened. Putin has trouble accepting the reality that Ukraine is independent and should remain that way. If Russia had a leader like Gorbachev, then that leader would be completely fine with Ukraine being independent. Luckily, Putin's Military has become a complete joke at this point, and the chance of Putin actually winning this war is pretty low.
Russia did continue with a Gorbachev-like leadership after the dissolution of the USSR. Gorbachev was a Capitalist. He brought capitalism to Russia. The same Capitalism Yeltsin used to pillage his country. The same Capitalism Putin uses to terrorize and pillage his country, and that of other countries.

by Sejny » Fri Apr 08, 2022 8:23 am
Utquiagvik wrote:Rusozak wrote:
I'm beginning to think ending the Soviet Union was a mistake. They were also totalitarians with a record of human rights abuses, but it wasn't as bad in the 1980's, and at least they stood for something then. They had a cause to believe in towards making a better world even if it backfired horribly. Now Russia has regressed to dark age barbarianism where the only motive is spoils from pillaging and spite towards your enemies. All the tyranny and atrocities, none of the hope for a better tomorrow.
If Russia had continued with Gorbachev-like leadership after the fall of the Soviet Union, then the entire war with Ukraine would have never happened. Putin has trouble accepting the reality that Ukraine is independent and should remain that way. If Russia had a leader like Gorbachev, then that leader would be completely fine with Ukraine being independent. Luckily, Putin's Military has become a complete joke at this point, and the chance of Putin actually winning this war is pretty low.

by Chan Island » Fri Apr 08, 2022 8:24 am
Rusozak wrote:Picairn wrote:I Tried to Put Russia on Another Path
Bill Clinton just dropped a new essay defending his move to expand NATO.
I'm beginning to think ending the Soviet Union was a mistake. They were also totalitarians with a record of human rights abuses, but it wasn't as bad in the 1980's, and at least they stood for something then. They had a cause to believe in towards making a better world even if it backfired horribly. Now Russia has regressed to dark age barbarianism where the only motive is spoils from pillaging and spite towards your enemies. All the tyranny and atrocities, none of the hope for a better tomorrow.
Conserative Morality wrote:"It's not time yet" is a tactic used by reactionaries in every era. "It's not time for democracy, it's not time for capitalism, it's not time for emancipation." Of course it's not time. It's never time, not on its own. You make it time. If you're under fire in the no-man's land of WW1, you start digging a foxhole even if the ideal time would be when you *aren't* being bombarded, because once you wait for it to be 'time', other situations will need your attention, assuming you survive that long. If the fields aren't furrowed, plow them. If the iron is not hot, make it so. If society is not ready, change it.

by Sordhau » Fri Apr 08, 2022 8:24 am
Perikuresu wrote:Rusozak wrote:
I'm beginning to think ending the Soviet Union was a mistake. They were also totalitarians with a record of human rights abuses, but it wasn't as bad in the 1980's, and at least they stood for something then. They had a cause to believe in towards making a better world even if it backfired horribly. Now Russia has regressed to dark age barbarianism where the only motive is spoils from pillaging and spite towards your enemies. All the tyranny and atrocities, none of the hope for a better tomorrow.
I think Gorbachev was trying to prevent the fall of the USSR, however hardline communists didn't like his reforms, and politicians like Yeltsin jumped at the opportunity to grasp power were part of the reasons why it did ultimately collapse (plus decades of overspending on the military)
Utquiagvik wrote:Sordhau wrote:
Capitalism. They regressed toward capitalism.
Russia did continue with a Gorbachev-like leadership after the dissolution of the USSR. Gorbachev was a Capitalist. He brought capitalism to Russia. The same Capitalism Yeltsin used to pillage his country. The same Capitalism Putin uses to terrorize and pillage his country, and that of other countries.
They do have the same system, but i wish they had a less corrupt leader overall. Yes, Gorbachev was a capitalist, just like Putin, but he wasnt a paranoid sociopath like Putin. Gorbachev wanted to make a more democratic Soviet Union and even allowed countries to break away from the Soviet Union. Putin keeps the nation under a dictator rule, and he wants the Post-Soviet nations to be part of Russia.

by Tarsonis » Fri Apr 08, 2022 8:35 am
Sordhau wrote:Rusozak wrote:
I'm beginning to think ending the Soviet Union was a mistake. They were also totalitarians with a record of human rights abuses, but it wasn't as bad in the 1980's, and at least they stood for something then. They had a cause to believe in towards making a better world even if it backfired horribly. Now Russia has regressed to dark age barbarianism where the only motive is spoils from pillaging and spite towards your enemies. All the tyranny and atrocities, none of the hope for a better tomorrow.
Capitalism. Theyregressedprogressed toward capitalism.

by Sordhau » Fri Apr 08, 2022 8:47 am

by Tarsonis » Fri Apr 08, 2022 8:52 am

by Tarsonis » Fri Apr 08, 2022 9:01 am

by Novus America » Fri Apr 08, 2022 9:02 am
Sordhau wrote:Perikuresu wrote:I think Gorbachev was trying to prevent the fall of the USSR, however hardline communists didn't like his reforms, and politicians like Yeltsin jumped at the opportunity to grasp power were part of the reasons why it did ultimately collapse (plus decades of overspending on the military)
Gorbachev tried to preserve the USSR at the expense of the one thing that made the USSR what it was: Socialism.
It's perfectly understandable that many Communists in the Party didn't want to see all their hard work wasted by allowing the USSR to embrace the very ideology it was founded to oppose.Utquiagvik wrote:They do have the same system, but i wish they had a less corrupt leader overall. Yes, Gorbachev was a capitalist, just like Putin, but he wasnt a paranoid sociopath like Putin. Gorbachev wanted to make a more democratic Soviet Union and even allowed countries to break away from the Soviet Union. Putin keeps the nation under a dictator rule, and he wants the Post-Soviet nations to be part of Russia.
This issue is it doesn't matter how many Gorbachev you have. Gorbachev was a weak leader. His weakness led to Yeltsin, whose incompetence led to Putin and his ruthlessness. You can have 1,000 Gorbachevs in quick succession; there will always be a Yeltsin to take their place, and then a Putin to take his place.
We've already had several Gorbachevs and Yeltsins here in the States. It's only a matter of time before we get our own Putin.

by Independent Cossack Ukraine » Fri Apr 08, 2022 9:15 am
Deblar wrote:About 30 people killed in Russian strike on a packed train station in eastern UkraineAbout 30 people have been killed after a Russian missile hit a train station in Eastern Ukraine, according to the Ukrainian government.
In a statement, Pavlo Kyrylenko, the head of the Donetsk Regional Military Administration, said the station was full of people trying to evacuate when it was allegedly hit by a missile. In his statement, Krylenko says the missile, an Iskander, was loaded with cluster munitions. NPR has not been able to verify that independently.
Photos shared by Krylenko show the station on fire and bloodied bodies strewn amid abandoned luggage.
The Kremlin and the Russian Ministry of Defense deny any involvement in the attack.
Ukraine says Russian troops have retreated from the capital region and are regrouping in Belarus, and will move on Eastern Ukraine soon.
When those attacks begin, regional authorities warn, civilians may not have a chance to flee, so they have been urging civilians in Donbas and Kharkiv regions to evacuate. From the beginning of this conflict, trains have been used to carry millions of Ukrainians out of country.
In his own statement, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said rescue workers were on the scene and that more than 100 people were injured. "This is an evil that has no limits," he said. "And if it is not punished it will never stop."
(Image)

by Tarsonis » Fri Apr 08, 2022 9:42 am
Independent Cossack Ukraine wrote:Deblar wrote:About 30 people killed in Russian strike on a packed train station in eastern UkraineAbout 30 people have been killed after a Russian missile hit a train station in Eastern Ukraine, according to the Ukrainian government.
In a statement, Pavlo Kyrylenko, the head of the Donetsk Regional Military Administration, said the station was full of people trying to evacuate when it was allegedly hit by a missile. In his statement, Krylenko says the missile, an Iskander, was loaded with cluster munitions. NPR has not been able to verify that independently.
Photos shared by Krylenko show the station on fire and bloodied bodies strewn amid abandoned luggage.
The Kremlin and the Russian Ministry of Defense deny any involvement in the attack.
Ukraine says Russian troops have retreated from the capital region and are regrouping in Belarus, and will move on Eastern Ukraine soon.
When those attacks begin, regional authorities warn, civilians may not have a chance to flee, so they have been urging civilians in Donbas and Kharkiv regions to evacuate. From the beginning of this conflict, trains have been used to carry millions of Ukrainians out of country.
In his own statement, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said rescue workers were on the scene and that more than 100 people were injured. "This is an evil that has no limits," he said. "And if it is not punished it will never stop."
(Image)
That meme is a very apt description of the Russian Army. My father's old boss (who is a Belarusian Jew who escaped the USSR BTW) told me how his grandfather came home with a motorcycle and a bed stolen from Germany. He told me how the Red Army looted everything. Even an Opel car factory was taken by Russia and became the Pobeda (Victory) car company. Worst was when he said "Sadly, many of the babies born in Eastern Europe after the war were half-Russian." in reference to mass rape. Just goes to show that the Russian Army has a pretty bad, far-reaching history of war crimes. All they did was replace the oppressive evil of Nazi Germany with their own oppressive evil. They even re-opened concentration camps as gulags and the Soviets hated and killed Jews too. Only difference is the flag. (For reference, I am also Jewish and the part of my family that survived the Nazi concentration camps had all their property stolen by the Russians, hence why they all left Poland/Lithuania/Germany. My Ukrainian side left before the war, thankfully.)

by Democratic Communist Federation » Fri Apr 08, 2022 10:48 am
Ifreann wrote:Oh, well, in that case.
[color=#ff0000]Member,[/color] [url=https://www.nationstates.net/nation=democratic_communist_federation/detail=factbook/id=870177][color=#ff0000][u]Antifa Dialectical metaRealism[/u][/color][/url]
by Sordhau » Fri Apr 08, 2022 10:50 am
Novus America wrote:Sordhau wrote:
Gorbachev tried to preserve the USSR at the expense of the one thing that made the USSR what it was: Socialism.
It's perfectly understandable that many Communists in the Party didn't want to see all their hard work wasted by allowing the USSR to embrace the very ideology it was founded to oppose.
This issue is it doesn't matter how many Gorbachev you have. Gorbachev was a weak leader. His weakness led to Yeltsin, whose incompetence led to Putin and his ruthlessness. You can have 1,000 Gorbachevs in quick succession; there will always be a Yeltsin to take their place, and then a Putin to take his place.
We've already had several Gorbachevs and Yeltsins here in the States. It's only a matter of time before we get our own Putin.
Gorbachev was a die hard socialist, which is why he failed when the far more pragmatic Deng succeeded.
(well economically at least, the Warsaw Pact, the nationality problem, the oversized military (you no when I of all people say your military is oversized you have an issue) were not problems Deng had).
Gorbachev tried to make the self sufficient government owned corporations but retained strict price controls and a government monopoly on raw materials.
If a widget requires 1 unit of aluminum to make, you can only buy that from one source for 10, but have to sell it for 5, and you get no monetary subsidies. How does that even work? Of course it does not and did not. His weird attempt at market socialism was the problem, not capitalism per se.
Gorbachev was trying to reform socialism, not introduce capitalism.
Deng rather gradually liberalized prices while slowly spinning off state assets into a combination of private and state owned corporations which where not expected to be fully profitable right away, and rather got significant subsidies and protections.
Deng ironically at least in part used Hamilton, List, and the American School/American system (which is not the post modern neoliberalism that plagued the US from the 1970s onward with disastrous results) as inspiration.
Of course Deng’s approach led to the zombie company issue later but still, it was definitely a more effective approach.
Deng despite his problems and brutality was actually smart. Gorbachev was actually quite willing to be brutal (ordered several massacres) but he was an idiot.
There is irony here though, you criticizing socialists claiming the Soviet Union was not socialist, saying it is a “no true socialist” argument, while claiming not true socialist against Gorbachev.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cannot think of a name, Corporate Collective Salvation, Dreria, Eahland, El Lazaro, Elejamie, Ethel mermania, Huosheng, Neoncomplexultra, Southland, The Ambis, The Jamesian Republic, The Pirateariat
Advertisement