Shrillland wrote:American Legionaries wrote:
Well the idea I'd floated before was a sliding cap, something to the effect of "Highest paid member of the organization cannot make more than X number of the lowest paid member"
Under such a system the executives of a company could expand to increase their own incomes, they would just need to increase the wages of lower employees by an equal percentage.
Ultimately, any income cap is pointless because incomes aren't the problem, capital gains are.
I mean, arguably they're both the problem, but yes, a cap such as described wouldn't entirely stop the ballooning wealth of these ultra-capitalists because their wealth has ballooned mostly via capital gains.
Frankly, I'm not a finance person, and I couldn't tell you what I think should be done, I've absorbed enough of Gallo's lectures via sheer blunt force trauma to know that you can't just treat capital gains as income without opening up a nasty can of worms, but that's about it.