They have to take off from somewhere
Advertisement

by Ethel mermania » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:50 pm

by Latvijas Otra Republika » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:50 pm
Hispida wrote:christ, how morbid is this? here we are, in our bedroom or living room or wherever we are, watching the first european war in 30 years play out in real time. it sounds like something out of a dystopia.

by El Lazaro » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:50 pm
Adamede wrote:Guess its going to be another night of me watching Kyiv live feeds instead of doing homework for me.

by Hispida » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:50 pm
by Adamede » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:51 pm

by The Huskar Social Union » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:52 pm

by A z a n i a » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:52 pm
---
---
---
Basically an alt-history South Africa in which apartheid never happened.09 February 2022✉ News: Sasol confirms oil discovery at Orange Basin offshore well | "We are in the process of identifying potential sites for new nuclear power plants" - Department of Energy | Government finalises preparations for 2022 State of the Nation address | REGIONAL NEWS | Captured militants say Mozambique Jihadists "very weak" | "Zimbabwe remains ineligible for SADC membership" - SADC chairperson

by Hispida » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:53 pm

by The Nihilistic view » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:54 pm
A z a n i a wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:On why Russia's performance is a shitshow;
The expense of having a top of the line tank is basically nothing compared to the cost of actually using it.
Like... Okay, I know this is dumb. But have you ever played Hoi4?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTvRc8fQNBsOstroeuropa wrote:And built an enormous tank army? Five full battlegroups of 24/24/24/24/24 tanks and you go "I'll be goddamn unstoppable!"
And then they just... immediately run out of fuel because you mobilize them all at once, and then they're just big dumb coffins?
Yeah... the reason we're seeing a bunch of stalled Russian convoys and so on is their army is on paper enormous and modern. The problem is they don't have the economy to actually use any of it.
It's one reason why Putin is furious the war isn't over yet. It's making that extremely apparent to the whole world. If he had broken Ukraine in 48 hours we wouldn't be seeing all this embarrassing shit about their logistics nightmare and realizing;
"Russia has 12000 tanks. Oh. No. Russia has 100 Tanks and 19900 fancy iron coffins because they're too poor to actually afford any more than that in actual usage".
On top of this the Russian military appears to have gone for top of the line tanks and aircraft and all that shit and been extremely dismissive of modernizing their fuel trucks and actual logistics network. They're using decades old shit and western experts have told the Ukrainian soldiers and civilians;
"Oh yeah. You can take that thing down with small arms fire. We used to build them like that too lol. If you don't have a Javelin, take a handgun and go hunting for a fuel truck. You'll be killing twenty tanks that way.".
So it has become a total shitshow. As to why Russia hasn't bothered modernizing its logistics system despite the flaws in such a system being well understood, documented, and countermeasures devised, two theories leap to mind.
Because they're massively insecure fucknuggets and so the entire point of modernizing their tanks and so on is because those are "The Cool Things" and they look down on logistics as an annoyance. Or two.
They're actively trying to psyche out the west by having a "Modern military" but genuinely can't afford a modern logistics network to upkeep it as well (that is actually the overwhelmingly more substantial expense). So someone told Putin "We can have 400 modern tanks and a logistics system" and Putin stares ahead and says "And if we didn't expect the tanks to actually be used in a prolonged conflict?"
"Well. We can scrap the logistics system and afford 12000..."
"Do that then.".
Because the alternative was for Russia to have a military about the size of Italies... maybe twice as big if they're committed to doing so. Except the Italian military is actually functional, and Russia's is not.
Look at some comparisons.
Italy spends 30 billion dollars a year and has an army of 90,000.
Russia spends 60 billion dollars a year, and has an army of 1,000,000.
Where do you think they got the savings from? How can they afford to field more than ten times the men and and almost a hundred times more tanks and with full infantry mechanization on only twice the budget?
From that army being basically non-functional. It's just there to look good on paper and be scary. If you expect it to do anything for longer than 48 hours, it evaporates, as we've seen.
Which is why Italy only has 200 tanks and not 12000. It's why they don't have full mechanization. And so on. Because they want a functional military, not a piece of propaganda on how large and modern their military is. Nobody thinks logistics systems are sexy for that kind of propaganda.
Okay, you've made some valid points, but I do have a problem with your analysis. The Russian military command isn't made up of idiots playing dress-up, and I cannot stress this point enough. They definitely understand the importance of logistics, and since we know that this invasion was planned, they definitely knew how they were going to supply the forces committed to the invasion. We're only four (five?) days into the invasion, and, as several others have pointed out on this thread, the coalition encountered similar logistics issues during the Iraq War.
Now I'm not saying that Ukraine is doomed. In fact, I think as more pressure is applied to Russia, there is a chance that they'll walk away from the negotiation table (when negotiations do eventually happen) in relatively good shape.
by Adamede » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:55 pm

by Utquiagvik » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:55 pm

by El Lazaro » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:55 pm

by Ethel mermania » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:55 pm
by Adamede » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:55 pm
Hispida wrote:i guess this is what lenin meant when he said "there are decades when weeks happen and weeks when decades happen."
by Adamede » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:56 pm

by South Pacific Manufacturing » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:56 pm

by Des-Bal » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:56 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:So how does the nato airbases these planes are flying out of not become a legitimate target of the war?
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Senkaku » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:57 pm
Hispida wrote:i guess this is what lenin meant when he said "there are decades when weeks happen and weeks when decades happen."

by Kowani » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:57 pm
A z a n i a wrote:
This probably allows Russia to station nuclear weapons in Belarus if they weren't already allowed to, right?
Abolitionism in the North has leagued itself with Radical Democracy, and so the Slave Power was forced to ally itself with the Money Power; that is the great fact of the age.
by Adamede » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:57 pm
El Lazaro wrote:Adamede wrote:Probably because NATO will nuke Russia if they start attacking NATO airbases. Two can play at that game. Anyway is that how they're being delivered?
Stop pushing the “we’re one step way from a nuclear war” narrative, nuclear war won’t happen unless someone has literally nothing to lose and the threat levied against them is just one step below nuclear war. Killing a few soldiers doesn’t put anyone in a position where they want to start a nuclear war.

by The Commonwealth of Tennessee » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:58 pm

by El Lazaro » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:59 pm
A z a n i a wrote:
This probably allows Russia to station nuclear weapons in Belarus if they weren't already allowed to, right?
Also, you can't fault Lukashenko for trying to project some semblance of democracy.
by Adamede » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:59 pm
South Pacific Manufacturing wrote:Adamede wrote:Probably because NATO will nuke Russia if they start attacking NATO airbases. Two can play at that game. Anyway is that how they're being delivered?
I dont think Nato will Nuke russia Due to Danger of the People and The Land. if russia bombs nato airbases i think they would just Join the war and Attack russia.
by Adamede » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:59 pm

by A z a n i a » Sun Feb 27, 2022 5:00 pm
El Lazaro wrote:A z a n i a wrote:This probably allows Russia to station nuclear weapons in Belarus if they weren't already allowed to, right?
Also, you can't fault Lukashenko for trying to project some semblance of democracy.
Belarus pretending to be anything close to democracy is even dumber than North Korea pretending to, the people still know it’s a load of crap.
---
---
---
Basically an alt-history South Africa in which apartheid never happened.09 February 2022✉ News: Sasol confirms oil discovery at Orange Basin offshore well | "We are in the process of identifying potential sites for new nuclear power plants" - Department of Energy | Government finalises preparations for 2022 State of the Nation address | REGIONAL NEWS | Captured militants say Mozambique Jihadists "very weak" | "Zimbabwe remains ineligible for SADC membership" - SADC chairperson
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Australian rePublic, Hurdergaryp, The Holy Therns, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement