Seems to be an independent group, I.e. not part of the Belarusian government.
Advertisement
by Luxenermy » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:19 pm
by Adamede » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:19 pm
The Grand World Order wrote:New Baltenstein wrote:
He is definitely sick. Very, very sick. The more interesting question is, is his inner echelon seeing it (I mean, they must see it) and have they decided to just go along with it or is there some "Valkyrie" style plot already in the making?
I don't mean a vague "sick in the head" kind of deal, I mean something along the lines of "Putin has found out he's got a condition that will kill him, ergo he puts the hammer down on trying to establish his reputation as the hero who brought Russia back to its glory." We'll never know unless Putin were to actually come out and announce it, but it's something I wonder about.
As of right now it's unproven.El Lazaro wrote:Russia has refused to give any actual number afaik and all of their statements regarding losses have been very provably dishonest. The most recent estimates have been from Ukraine on Saturday, with over 4000 Russian soldiers and hundreds of both Ukrainian combatants and civilians dead, over a thousand civilians injured. Military deaths are likely altered to some degree and civilian casualty counts may be much larger than has been counted.
Weren't there mobile crematoriums moving with the Russians or was that debunked

by El Lazaro » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:19 pm

by Tarsonis » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:20 pm

by Luminesa » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:21 pm

by Gallia- » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:21 pm

by Latvijas Otra Republika » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:23 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:-snip- logistics

by Kowani » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:24 pm
Abolitionism in the North has leagued itself with Radical Democracy, and so the Slave Power was forced to ally itself with the Money Power; that is the great fact of the age.

by Latvijas Otra Republika » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:24 pm
Gallia- wrote:There are pictures of the crematoriums.
Immolation probably eases the transport burden aside from the political purposes of fighting a secret invasion. A truck can now carry 10-100x as many corpses with urns versus coffins.

by Gallia- » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:25 pm

by El Lazaro » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:28 pm
Gallia- wrote:There are pictures of the crematoriums.
Immolation probably eases the transport burden aside from the political purposes of fighting a secret invasion. A truck can now carry 10-100x as many corpses with urns versus coffins.

by Kowani » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:31 pm
Abolitionism in the North has leagued itself with Radical Democracy, and so the Slave Power was forced to ally itself with the Money Power; that is the great fact of the age.

by Hispida » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:32 pm

by Utquiagvik » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:33 pm

by SD_Film Artists » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:33 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:On why Russia's performance is a shitshow;
The expense of having a top of the line tank is basically nothing compared to the cost of actually using it.
Like... Okay, I know this is dumb. But have you ever played Hoi4?
And built an enormous tank army? Five full battlegroups of 24/24/24/24/24 tanks and you go "I'll be goddamn unstoppable!"
And then they just... immediately run out of fuel because you mobilize them all at once, and then they're just big dumb coffins?
Yeah... the reason we're seeing a bunch of stalled Russian convoys and so on is their army is on paper enormous and modern. The problem is they don't have the economy to actually use any of it.
It's one reason why Putin is furious the war isn't over yet. It's making that extremely apparent to the whole world. If he had broken Ukraine in 48 hours we wouldn't be seeing all this embarrassing shit about their logistics nightmare and realizing;
"Russia has 12000 tanks. Oh. No. Russia has 100 Tanks and 19900 fancy iron coffins because they're too poor to actually afford any more than that in actual usage".
On top of this the Russian military appears to have gone for top of the line tanks and aircraft and all that shit and been extremely dismissive of modernizing their fuel trucks and actual logistics network. They're using decades old shit and western experts have told the Ukrainian soldiers and civilians;
"Oh yeah. You can take that thing down with small arms fire. We used to build them like that too lol. If you don't have a Javelin, take a handgun and go hunting for a fuel truck. You'll be killing twenty tanks that way.".
So it has become a total shitshow. As to why Russia hasn't bothered modernizing its logistics system despite the flaws in such a system being well understood, documented, and countermeasures devised, two theories leap to mind.
Because they're massively insecure fucknuggets and so the entire point of modernizing their tanks and so on is because those are "The Cool Things" and they look down on logistics as an annoyance. Or two.
They're actively trying to psyche out the west by having a "Modern military" but genuinely can't afford a modern logistics network to upkeep it as well (that is actually the overwhelmingly more substantial expense). So someone told Putin "We can have 400 modern tanks and a logistics system" and Putin stares ahead and says "And if we didn't expect the tanks to actually be used in a prolonged conflict?"
"Well. We can scrap the logistics system and afford 12000..."
"Do that then.".
Because the alternative was for Russia to have a military about the size of Italies... maybe twice as big if they're committed to doing so. Except the Italian military is actually functional, and Russia's is not.
Look at some comparisons.
Italy spends 30 billion dollars a year and has an army of 90,000.
Russia spends 60 billion dollars a year, and has an army of 1,000,000.
Where do you think they got the savings from? How can they afford to field more than ten times the men and and almost a hundred times more tanks and with full infantry mechanization on only twice the budget?
From that army being basically non-functional. It's just there to look good on paper and be scary. If you expect it to do anything for longer than 48 hours, it evaporates, as we've seen.
Which is why Italy only has 200 tanks and not 12000. It's why they don't have full mechanization. And so on. Because they want a functional military, not a piece of propaganda on how large and modern their military is. Nobody thinks logistics systems are sexy for that kind of propaganda.
They have an army they can actually afford on their budget, modernized where possible within their means, and then infantry for the rest. Russia doesn't. When you look at comparatives like this, it becomes extremely obvious why Russia is struggling.
They're a mid-rate power trying to field the army of a global superpower.
by Adamede » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:33 pm

by Hispida » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:34 pm

by Garthram » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:34 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:On why Russia's performance is a shitshow;
The expense of having a top of the line tank is basically nothing compared to the cost of actually using it.
Like... Okay, I know this is dumb. But have you ever played Hoi4?
And built an enormous tank army? Five full battlegroups of 24/24/24/24/24 tanks and you go "I'll be goddamn unstoppable!"
And then they just... immediately run out of fuel because you mobilize them all at once, and then they're just big dumb coffins?
Yeah... the reason we're seeing a bunch of stalled Russian convoys and so on is their army is on paper enormous and modern. The problem is they don't have the economy to actually use any of it.
It's one reason why Putin is furious the war isn't over yet. It's making that extremely apparent to the whole world. If he had broken Ukraine in 48 hours we wouldn't be seeing all this embarrassing shit about their logistics nightmare and realizing;
"Russia has 12000 tanks. Oh. No. Russia has 100 Tanks and 19900 fancy iron coffins because they're too poor to actually afford any more than that in actual usage".
On top of this the Russian military appears to have gone for top of the line tanks and aircraft and all that shit and been extremely dismissive of modernizing their fuel trucks and actual logistics network. They're using decades old shit and western experts have told the Ukrainian soldiers and civilians;
"Oh yeah. You can take that thing down with small arms fire. We used to build them like that too lol. If you don't have a Javelin, take a handgun and go hunting for a fuel truck. You'll be killing twenty tanks that way.".
So it has become a total shitshow. As to why Russia hasn't bothered modernizing its logistics system despite the flaws in such a system being well understood, documented, and countermeasures devised, two theories leap to mind.
Because they're massively insecure fucknuggets and so the entire point of modernizing their tanks and so on is because those are "The Cool Things" and they look down on logistics as an annoyance. Or two.
They're actively trying to psyche out the west by having a "Modern military" but genuinely can't afford a modern logistics network to upkeep it as well (that is actually the overwhelmingly more substantial expense). So someone told Putin "We can have 400 modern tanks and a logistics system" and Putin stares ahead and says "And if we didn't expect the tanks to actually be used in a prolonged conflict?"
"Well. We can scrap the logistics system and afford 12000..."
"Do that then.".
Because the alternative was for Russia to have a military about the size of Italies... maybe twice as big if they're committed to doing so. Except the Italian military is actually functional, and Russia's is not.
Look at some comparisons.
Italy spends 30 billion dollars a year and has an army of 90,000.
Russia spends 60 billion dollars a year, and has an army of 1,000,000.
Where do you think they got the savings from? How can they afford to field more than ten times the men and and almost a hundred times more tanks and with full infantry mechanization on only twice the budget?
From that army being basically non-functional. It's just there to look good on paper and be scary. If you expect it to do anything for longer than 48 hours, it evaporates, as we've seen.
Which is why Italy only has 200 tanks and not 12000. It's why they don't have full mechanization. And so on. Because they want a functional military, not a piece of propaganda on how large and modern their military is. Nobody thinks logistics systems are sexy for that kind of propaganda.
They have an army they can actually afford on their budget, modernized where possible within their means, and then infantry for the rest. Russia doesn't. When you look at comparatives like this, it becomes extremely obvious why Russia is struggling.
They're a mid-rate power trying to field the army of a global superpower.
by Adamede » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:34 pm

by The Huskar Social Union » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:34 pm

by The Huskar Social Union » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:35 pm
by Adamede » Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:35 pm
The Huskar Social Union wrote:I think Kiev is gona be in a very rough shape come the morning.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Australian rePublic, Hurdergaryp, The Holy Therns, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement