Advertisement

by Corrian » Mon Dec 20, 2021 12:50 pm

by Maricarland » Mon Dec 20, 2021 12:56 pm
Rusozak wrote:Kowani wrote:Manchin’s other problem with BBB: He doesn’t trust poor peopleAfter months of haggling with President Joe Biden and other Democrats, Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) dashed his party’s hopes on Sunday by announcing he wouldn’t vote for the Build Back Better legislation.
Publicly, his biggest gripes are about the cost of the bill. But privately, Manchin has told his colleagues that he essentially doesn’t trust low-income people to spend government money wisely.
In recent months, Manchin has told several of his fellow Democrats that he thought parents would waste monthly child tax credit payments on drugs instead of providing for their children, according to two sources familiar with the senator’s comments.
Continuing the child tax credit for another year is a core part of the Build Back Better legislation that Democrats had hoped to pass by the end of the year. The policy has already cut child poverty by nearly 30%.
Manchin’s private comments shocked several senators, who saw it as an unfair assault on his own constituents and those struggling to raise children in poverty.
Manchin has also told colleagues he believes that Americans would fraudulently use the proposed paid sick leave policy, specifically saying people would feign being sick and go on hunting trips, a source familiar with his comments told HuffPost.
Manchin’s office declined to comment for this story.
In a statement on Sunday, he said he opposed the Build Back Better agenda largely because of its cost.
Why is Manchin a democrat again?

by Kowani » Mon Dec 20, 2021 12:57 pm
Notably, however, Manchin said Monday that he knew from the beginning — five months ago — that negotiations between himself and Democrats would ultimately fail. Nonetheless, he allowed Democrats and Biden to try and appease him.
The way Manchin describes it, Democrats failed to make any meaningful concessions, despite shrinking down programs, and cutting out other major policies like the Clean Electricity Performance Program, Democrats’ biggest idea to cut emissions.
“I knew where they were and I knew what they could and could not do,” Manchin said in the radio interview, calling the shortened programs “disingenuine.” “They just never realized it because they figured ... we can badger and beat one person, that surely we can get enough protesters to make that person uncomfortable.”
Pressure tactics only pushed Manchin to dig deeper in his opposition.
“Well, guess what? I’m from West Virginia,” Manchin said. “I’m not from where they’re from, and they can’t just beat the living crap out of people and think they’ll be submissive. Period.”
Abolitionism in the North has leagued itself with Radical Democracy, and so the Slave Power was forced to ally itself with the Money Power; that is the great fact of the age.

by Maineiacs » Mon Dec 20, 2021 12:59 pm

by Maricarland » Mon Dec 20, 2021 1:04 pm
Kowani wrote:Manchin: “I knew negotiations were going to fail from the beginning”Notably, however, Manchin said Monday that he knew from the beginning — five months ago — that negotiations between himself and Democrats would ultimately fail. Nonetheless, he allowed Democrats and Biden to try and appease him.
The way Manchin describes it, Democrats failed to make any meaningful concessions, despite shrinking down programs, and cutting out other major policies like the Clean Electricity Performance Program, Democrats’ biggest idea to cut emissions.
“I knew where they were and I knew what they could and could not do,” Manchin said in the radio interview, calling the shortened programs “disingenuine.” “They just never realized it because they figured ... we can badger and beat one person, that surely we can get enough protesters to make that person uncomfortable.”
Pressure tactics only pushed Manchin to dig deeper in his opposition.
“Well, guess what? I’m from West Virginia,” Manchin said. “I’m not from where they’re from, and they can’t just beat the living crap out of people and think they’ll be submissive. Period.”
this man got handled with kid gloves for fucking months, are you kidding me
what a fucking baby

by Ifreann » Mon Dec 20, 2021 1:12 pm
Kowani wrote:Manchin: “I knew negotiations were going to fail from the beginning”Notably, however, Manchin said Monday that he knew from the beginning — five months ago — that negotiations between himself and Democrats would ultimately fail. Nonetheless, he allowed Democrats and Biden to try and appease him.
The way Manchin describes it, Democrats failed to make any meaningful concessions, despite shrinking down programs, and cutting out other major policies like the Clean Electricity Performance Program, Democrats’ biggest idea to cut emissions.
“I knew where they were and I knew what they could and could not do,” Manchin said in the radio interview, calling the shortened programs “disingenuine.” “They just never realized it because they figured ... we can badger and beat one person, that surely we can get enough protesters to make that person uncomfortable.”
Pressure tactics only pushed Manchin to dig deeper in his opposition.
“Well, guess what? I’m from West Virginia,” Manchin said. “I’m not from where they’re from, and they can’t just beat the living crap out of people and think they’ll be submissive. Period.”
this man got handled with kid gloves for fucking months, are you kidding me
what a fucking baby

by Kowani » Mon Dec 20, 2021 1:13 pm
Kowani wrote:Manchin: “I knew negotiations were going to fail from the beginning”Notably, however, Manchin said Monday that he knew from the beginning — five months ago — that negotiations between himself and Democrats would ultimately fail. Nonetheless, he allowed Democrats and Biden to try and appease him.
The way Manchin describes it, Democrats failed to make any meaningful concessions, despite shrinking down programs, and cutting out other major policies like the Clean Electricity Performance Program, Democrats’ biggest idea to cut emissions.
“I knew where they were and I knew what they could and could not do,” Manchin said in the radio interview, calling the shortened programs “disingenuine.” “They just never realized it because they figured ... we can badger and beat one person, that surely we can get enough protesters to make that person uncomfortable.”
Pressure tactics only pushed Manchin to dig deeper in his opposition.
“Well, guess what? I’m from West Virginia,” Manchin said. “I’m not from where they’re from, and they can’t just beat the living crap out of people and think they’ll be submissive. Period.”
this man got handled with kid gloves for fucking months, are you kidding me
what a fucking baby
Sen. Joe Manchin III last week made the White House a concrete counteroffer for its spending bill, saying he would accept a $1.8 trillion package that included universal prekindergarten for 10 years, an expansion of Obamacare and hundreds of billions of dollars to combat climate change, three people familiar with the matter said. But the West Virginia Democrat’s counteroffer excluded an extension of the expanded child tax credit the administration has seen as a cornerstone of President Biden’s economic legacy, the people said, an omission difficult for the White House to accept in the high-stakes negotiations. The people spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the closed-door deliberations. Manchin’s private proposal to the White House — the details of which have not been previously reported — was made just days before a spectacular public collapse in negotiations between the White House and the senator, marked by bitter and personal recriminations that left the status of the talks unclear.[…]
While the precise details of Manchin’s offer remain unclear, it adheres to his repeated demand that Democrats fund its economic programs for 10 years — rather than reducing their top-line cost by funding them for only a few years, people familiar with the matter said.
Manchin’s counteroffer, for instance, included funding universal pre-K for 10 years, rather than partially financing the measure for a few years. Manchin has long been public about his support of prekindergarten education.
On climate change, Manchin backed supporting a scaled-back version of what Democrats had sought — between $500 billion and $600 billion.
[…]
Manchin’s offer also included extending the expansion of the Affordable Care Act approved by Democrats earlier this year — a health care measure that has been a top priority of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.). The full scope of Manchin’s plan was not clear, and it remains possible it included other elements of Biden’s proposals. Despite these potential areas of compromise, Manchin’s rejection of the expanded Child Tax Credit would represent an extraordinarily difficult condition for the administration to support. The White House has repeatedly argued that its one-year expansion of the existing expanded child benefit, approved by Democrats in March as part of Biden’s stimulus, has dramatically reduced child poverty and improved the well-being of millions of poor families. If that program expires at the end of this month — as it now appears likely to — then child poverty could move higher in 2022 in the months before the midterm elections.
In her statement on Sunday, Psaki said that Manchin’s offer to the White House was of the “same size and scope as the President’s framework” that the administration released in October. The statement said that “while that framework was missing key priorities, we believed it could lead to a compromise acceptable to all.”
Abolitionism in the North has leagued itself with Radical Democracy, and so the Slave Power was forced to ally itself with the Money Power; that is the great fact of the age.

by Zurkerx » Mon Dec 20, 2021 1:15 pm
Prima Scriptura wrote:Zurkerx wrote:“There was a DOJ strategy, a state legislative strategy, a state election official strategy, the vice-president strategy. And there was the insurrection strategy:” Trump appears deeply unnerved as the Capitol Hill attack investigation closes in. He is upset and baffled why Meadows shared so much to the committee as well as why others are cooperating. He has also been perturbed by aides invoking the Fifth Amendment in depositions. To him, it makes them look weak and complicit in a crime and has said they are foolish for not following his orders like Bannon did to defy subpoenas. He has even bemoaned McCarthy as being incompetent for not putting Republicans on that committee to defend him (hint: he tried but Pelosi rejected most of his choices). He has denied any wrongdoing and while at the moment his associates aren't worry about criminal indictments, the committee seems to be heading towards an incriminating conclusion.
This comes as Adam Kinzinger said that the committee is examining whether Trump acted criminally in trying to obstruct the certification of the 2020 election results. He did not make a conclusion on that but while not surprising, this is the first we can confirm that they are, in fact, looking at criminal activity. Reportedly too, the DOJ is following the committee's work. Essentially, if prosecution does happen, prosecutors could use the text messages as evidence of criminal obstruction to stop a congressional proceeding if the White House knew election fraud claims to be lies but still used them to stop Biden’s certification. Of course, Trump and his allies have focused on trying to delegitimize the committee but that hasn't done much of anything really.
Speaking of delegitimizing, Trump is Suing the New York A.G. in Attempt to Stop the Inquiry Into His Business. That inquiry is a civil investigation but the AG is seeking to question the former president under oath next month. Trump claims he's being harassed and his Constitutional Rights are being violated. Simply put it, it's another stall technique that will likely fail. All that comes as the new Manhattan DA Alvin Briggs says he will focus on Trump investigations.
To conclude, Trump is feeling the heat and pressure from all sides and feels almost powerless to stop it, especially for how fast the expediting process has been with the courts.
I honestly think that Merrick Garland wants to follow and Gerald Ford’s footsteps and not charge Donald Trump with any crime on the federal level. He would rather Joe Biden pardon Trump and not have to deal with it at all. He either wants to move on from Trump(ism) and/or He’s worried about that charging him would result in a Civil War.

by Spirit of Hope » Mon Dec 20, 2021 1:17 pm
Ifreann wrote:Kowani wrote:Manchin: “I knew negotiations were going to fail from the beginning”Notably, however, Manchin said Monday that he knew from the beginning — five months ago — that negotiations between himself and Democrats would ultimately fail. Nonetheless, he allowed Democrats and Biden to try and appease him.
The way Manchin describes it, Democrats failed to make any meaningful concessions, despite shrinking down programs, and cutting out other major policies like the Clean Electricity Performance Program, Democrats’ biggest idea to cut emissions.
“I knew where they were and I knew what they could and could not do,” Manchin said in the radio interview, calling the shortened programs “disingenuine.” “They just never realized it because they figured ... we can badger and beat one person, that surely we can get enough protesters to make that person uncomfortable.”
Pressure tactics only pushed Manchin to dig deeper in his opposition.
“Well, guess what? I’m from West Virginia,” Manchin said. “I’m not from where they’re from, and they can’t just beat the living crap out of people and think they’ll be submissive. Period.”
this man got handled with kid gloves for fucking months, are you kidding me
what a fucking baby
All this time, what we needed was Joe Biden to jab Manchin in the chest and challenge him to a push-up contest.
Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

by Maricarland » Mon Dec 20, 2021 1:21 pm

by Kowani » Mon Dec 20, 2021 1:25 pm
We’re getting a bit more sense here of the final blow up that led to the demise of the BBB. Apparently the real blow up was that the White House put out a statement last week in which the President said he believed he was making progress on finalizing a Build Back Better deal with Joe Manchin. The key apparently was that he named Manchin specifically rather than Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema or Manchin and the rest of the caucus or whatever else.
In other words, in what was actually a positive and cordial statement he pointed to Manchin by name. In other words, kinda sorta implicitly saying that Manchin was the hold up but that he was optimistic they’d get to a deal. This apparently set Manchin off and led him to torpedo the negotiations and basically the President’s whole domestic agenda. How do we know this? Steven Clemons goes into the details here and Clemons is very close to Manchin.
As Clemons explains, Manchin saw his being named in the statement as “a breach of process, a breach of spirit, a breach of Joe and Joe working this out.” He seems to believe it was Biden’s staff rather than the President himself who committed the lapse. This is what Manchin was apparently referring to this morning when he told a West Virginia talk radio station: “They drove some things, they put some things out that were absolutely inexcusable.”
[…]
None of this changes the reality of the demise of serious climate action or a refundable child tax credit or universal pre-K or a bunch of other things. But it does illuminate the last year and makes clear that ‘getting tough’ on Manchin wasn’t really a tool the White House had in its arsenal. Just putting out a press release that named him and made him feel bad and somehow made him think people would blame him for what was happening made him go postal.
Abolitionism in the North has leagued itself with Radical Democracy, and so the Slave Power was forced to ally itself with the Money Power; that is the great fact of the age.

by Maricarland » Mon Dec 20, 2021 1:32 pm

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Mon Dec 20, 2021 1:33 pm

by Zurkerx » Mon Dec 20, 2021 1:34 pm
Kowani wrote:I repeat myselfWe’re getting a bit more sense here of the final blow up that led to the demise of the BBB. Apparently the real blow up was that the White House put out a statement last week in which the President said he believed he was making progress on finalizing a Build Back Better deal with Joe Manchin. The key apparently was that he named Manchin specifically rather than Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema or Manchin and the rest of the caucus or whatever else.
In other words, in what was actually a positive and cordial statement he pointed to Manchin by name. In other words, kinda sorta implicitly saying that Manchin was the hold up but that he was optimistic they’d get to a deal. This apparently set Manchin off and led him to torpedo the negotiations and basically the President’s whole domestic agenda. How do we know this? Steven Clemons goes into the details here and Clemons is very close to Manchin.
As Clemons explains, Manchin saw his being named in the statement as “a breach of process, a breach of spirit, a breach of Joe and Joe working this out.” He seems to believe it was Biden’s staff rather than the President himself who committed the lapse. This is what Manchin was apparently referring to this morning when he told a West Virginia talk radio station: “They drove some things, they put some things out that were absolutely inexcusable.”
[…]
None of this changes the reality of the demise of serious climate action or a refundable child tax credit or universal pre-K or a bunch of other things. But it does illuminate the last year and makes clear that ‘getting tough’ on Manchin wasn’t really a tool the White House had in its arsenal. Just putting out a press release that named him and made him feel bad and somehow made him think people would blame him for what was happening made him go postal.
by Imperial Old Mexico » Mon Dec 20, 2021 1:37 pm
Austria-Bohemia-Hungary wrote:Good to know that one petty, cretinous little man has basically dissolved Congress.

by The Jamesian Republic » Mon Dec 20, 2021 2:03 pm
Sen. Joe Manchin III last week made the White House a concrete counteroffer for its spending bill, saying he would accept a $1.8 trillion package that included universal prekindergarten for 10 years, an expansion of Obamacare and hundreds of billions of dollars to combat climate change, three people familiar with the matter said. But the West Virginia Democrat’s counteroffer excluded an extension of the expanded child tax credit the administration has seen as a cornerstone of President Biden’s economic legacy, the people said, an omission difficult for the White House to accept in the high-stakes negotiations. The people spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the closed-door deliberations. Manchin’s private proposal to the White House — the details of which have not been previously reported — was made just days before a spectacular public collapse in negotiations between the White House and the senator, marked by bitter and personal recriminations that left the status of the talks unclear.[…]
While the precise details of Manchin’s offer remain unclear, it adheres to his repeated demand that Democrats fund its economic programs for 10 years — rather than reducing their top-line cost by funding them for only a few years, people familiar with the matter said.
Manchin’s counteroffer, for instance, included funding universal pre-K for 10 years, rather than partially financing the measure for a few years. Manchin has long been public about his support of prekindergarten education.
On climate change, Manchin backed supporting a scaled-back version of what Democrats had sought — between $500 billion and $600 billion.
[…]
Manchin’s offer also included extending the expansion of the Affordable Care Act approved by Democrats earlier this year — a health care measure that has been a top priority of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.). The full scope of Manchin’s plan was not clear, and it remains possible it included other elements of Biden’s proposals. Despite these potential areas of compromise, Manchin’s rejection of the expanded Child Tax Credit would represent an extraordinarily difficult condition for the administration to support. The White House has repeatedly argued that its one-year expansion of the existing expanded child benefit, approved by Democrats in March as part of Biden’s stimulus, has dramatically reduced child poverty and improved the well-being of millions of poor families. If that program expires at the end of this month — as it now appears likely to — then child poverty could move higher in 2022 in the months before the midterm elections.
In her statement on Sunday, Psaki said that Manchin’s offer to the White House was of the “same size and scope as the President’s framework” that the administration released in October. The statement said that “while that framework was missing key priorities, we believed it could lead to a compromise acceptable to all.”
by Aggicificicerous » Mon Dec 20, 2021 2:06 pm
Kowani wrote:
this man got handled with kid gloves for fucking months, are you kidding me
what a fucking baby

by The Jamesian Republic » Mon Dec 20, 2021 2:07 pm
Aggicificicerous wrote:Kowani wrote:
this man got handled with kid gloves for fucking months, are you kidding me
what a fucking baby
I've said it before and I'll say it again: Biden could force Manchin to follow suit if he wanted to. Just channel a bit of the LBJ. He doesn't want to because he doesn't care. None of them care. Pelosi's too busy explaining how the hundreds of millions she's made off insider trading is fine. Harris at this point probably can't so much as order dinner without running it past her handlers first. Democratic leadership is all rich old people who don't care about helping people. Manchin is their excuse.
by Aggicificicerous » Mon Dec 20, 2021 2:08 pm
The Jamesian Republic wrote:Aggicificicerous wrote:
I've said it before and I'll say it again: Biden could force Manchin to follow suit if he wanted to. Just channel a bit of the LBJ. He doesn't want to because he doesn't care. None of them care. Pelosi's too busy explaining how the hundreds of millions she's made off insider trading is fine. Harris at this point probably can't so much as order dinner without running it past her handlers first. Democratic leadership is all rich old people who don't care about helping people. Manchin is their excuse.
The same can be said for the Republicans


by Kowani » Mon Dec 20, 2021 2:14 pm
Abolitionism in the North has leagued itself with Radical Democracy, and so the Slave Power was forced to ally itself with the Money Power; that is the great fact of the age.

by Kowani » Mon Dec 20, 2021 2:17 pm
The Jamesian Republic wrote:This sounds like a good idea. Why didn’t he just propose this instead? Why act the way he has?
Abolitionism in the North has leagued itself with Radical Democracy, and so the Slave Power was forced to ally itself with the Money Power; that is the great fact of the age.

by The Jamesian Republic » Mon Dec 20, 2021 2:19 pm
Kowani wrote:The Jamesian Republic wrote:This sounds like a good idea. Why didn’t he just propose this instead? Why act the way he has?
Depending on your level of cynicism
-he’s trying to do damage control after being outed as a class-a tier jackass
-it’s all kabuki and Manchin just wants to go back to the stalled negotiations where he’s much more comfortable
-he prefers the image of enacting massive cuts to the “liberal agenda” instead of passing policy in a timely fashion

by Kowani » Mon Dec 20, 2021 2:23 pm
The Jamesian Republic wrote:Kowani wrote:Depending on your level of cynicism
-he’s trying to do damage control after being outed as a class-a tier jackass
-it’s all kabuki and Manchin just wants to go back to the stalled negotiations where he’s much more comfortable
-he prefers the image of enacting massive cuts to the “liberal agenda” instead of passing policy in a timely fashion
It’s still better than nothing. I think the best route to go with is to this
- Back off from BBB for now.
- Work on issues like inflation and the border crisis.
- Once that’s finished perhaps Republicans would be more willing to help.
- Or do none of that and just issue an executive order on it.
Abolitionism in the North has leagued itself with Radical Democracy, and so the Slave Power was forced to ally itself with the Money Power; that is the great fact of the age.

by The Jamesian Republic » Mon Dec 20, 2021 2:27 pm
Kowani wrote:The Jamesian Republic wrote:
It’s still better than nothing. I think the best route to go with is to this
- Back off from BBB for now.
- Work on issues like inflation and the border crisis.
- Once that’s finished perhaps Republicans would be more willing to help.
- Or do none of that and just issue an executive order on it.
This is neither strategically feasible, politically wise, or even slightly realistic
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Belschaft, Elejamie, Google [Bot], Lativs, Skelleftella
Advertisement