Genivaria wrote:The Jamesian Republic wrote:
I guess that’s true. I’m not an expert politician and there’s a lot I don’t know. The best thought out plans of the imagination doesn’t shape up to cruelty of the waking world. *sigh* If reform turns into revolution. I needn’t worry. I know my place. My pen my ink and my paper shall be the tools I use. You and the others can take up arms, but my place will be in the shadows and these tools will comfort me and guide me. Eventually I want to sow the seeds of roses to bloom in this post revolutionary world.
This may surprise but not only is there a place for those who nurture and provide for their community in the revolution; those people are in fact a necessity to keep the movement alive.
Community kitchens, tenant strikes, unions, communes, co-opts, there are many forms of power and it follows there are many ways of resisting power.
Chances are you will find me there. Working in the kitchens feeding hungry revolutionaries, joining the strikers and working in the communes and co-opts. So in a way you have brought me hope.
Maricarland wrote:The Jamesian Republic wrote:Since it’s been about 7 months since I have joined this messy chaotic uncertain and at times frightening journey through American politics so I want to ask if this isn’t too off topic, what do you all think of me? I would like to believe I try to bring my thoughts to the table and provide a voice of reason.
As a person, from what I can tell, I think you are fine.
Politically, I find your politics to be a mix between social democracy and neoliberalism, while also being willing to consider other points of view and political ideas.
I think it is admirable you try to bring your thoughts to the table (though the internet culture nowadays, especially on NationStates seems to make this a futile endeavor more often than not, but it can still be helpful discourse from time to time).
I think the idea of voice of reason in online political discussion is kind of a myth, as many people have various reasonings that can contradict each other and it is nigh impossible for reason to win in a single discussion (it takes many discussions), and that is already assuming everyone is discussing in good faith and with intellectual rigor.
Thanks. In politics it’s good to keep an open mind and think about other people as the world of politics is rapidly changing and with it the players and spectators. As for my politics I think that’s accurate. When it comes to debate yeah it’s not an easy thing to win. I admit I say things that contradict my previous statements but I try to stay on point. Yes it’s always hard to tell if faith and rigor is there, but I try to stay in good faith and keep my rigor.