Page 8 of 9
Posted:
Tue Nov 23, 2021 5:38 amby Infected Mushroom
The Two Jerseys wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:US has to try and land troops at some point. Troops are going to be in ships.
You do know that Tomahawks can destroy missile launchers, right?
You can place them in bunkers and subs, or cloak them with stealth etc
Anti-ship missiles can be launched from so many platforms too (air, land, sea, subsurface etc)
Posted:
Tue Nov 23, 2021 5:40 amby Ifreann
Infected Mushroom wrote:The Two Jerseys wrote:You do know that Tomahawks can destroy missile launchers, right?
You can place them in bunkers and subs, or cloak them with stealth etc
Anti-ship missiles can be launched from so many platforms too (air, land, sea, subsurface etc)
Britain will simply use it's cloaking technology, which they got from the Romulans.
Posted:
Tue Nov 23, 2021 5:41 amby Infected Mushroom
Ifreann wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:You can place them in bunkers and subs, or cloak them with stealth etc
Anti-ship missiles can be launched from so many platforms too (air, land, sea, subsurface etc)
Britain will simply use it's cloaking technology, which they got from the Romulans.
The UK makes many of its own weapon systems. It is one of the most technologically advanced countries in terms of military tech.
Posted:
Tue Nov 23, 2021 5:43 amby Picairn
Infected Mushroom wrote:You can place them in bunkers and subs, or cloak them with stealth etc
Anti-ship missiles can be launched from so many platforms too (air, land, sea, subsurface etc)
1) Cloak? CLOAK??? Since when did the world merge with Harry Potter's Universe?
2) The hell is subsurface? Underground? LOL.
Posted:
Tue Nov 23, 2021 6:18 amby Heloin
Infected Mushroom wrote:Ifreann wrote:Britain will simply use it's cloaking technology, which they got from the Romulans.
The UK makes many of its own weapon systems. It is one of the most technologically advanced countries in terms of military tech.
The UK does not have a cloaking system. No country on earth has a cloaking system. This is not something that should need to be said.
Posted:
Tue Nov 23, 2021 8:14 amby Dogmeat
Heloin wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:The UK makes many of its own weapon systems. It is one of the most technologically advanced countries in terms of military tech.
The UK does not have a cloaking system. No country on earth has a cloaking system. This is not something that should need to be said.
It wouldn't matter anyway. The anti-ship missiles would be useless against the Enterprise's shields.
Posted:
Tue Nov 23, 2021 8:18 amby Ifreann
Dogmeat wrote:Heloin wrote:The UK does not have a cloaking system. No country on earth has a cloaking system. This is not something that should need to be said.
It wouldn't matter anyway. The anti-ship missiles would be useless against the Enterprise's shields.
But what if the Romulans have given Britain disruptors as well as cloaking technology?
Posted:
Tue Nov 23, 2021 8:22 amby Dogmeat
Ifreann wrote:Dogmeat wrote:It wouldn't matter anyway. The anti-ship missiles would be useless against the Enterprise's shields.
But what if the Romulans have given Britain disruptors as well as cloaking technology?
That could only be part of a plot by the Romulans to subjugate the British government. And fortunately the Doctor would put an end to that.
Posted:
Tue Nov 23, 2021 8:32 amby Fartsniffage
Heloin wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:The UK makes many of its own weapon systems. It is one of the most technologically advanced countries in terms of military tech.
The UK does not have a cloaking system. No country on earth has a cloaking system. This is not something that should need to be said.
How would you know if they did though? You wouldn't be able to see it.
Posted:
Tue Nov 23, 2021 8:38 amby Ifreann
Fartsniffage wrote:Heloin wrote:The UK does not have a cloaking system. No country on earth has a cloaking system. This is not something that should need to be said.
How would you know if they did though? You wouldn't be able to see it.
The good news is, the cloaking machine works. The bad news is, we can't find it.
Posted:
Tue Nov 23, 2021 8:41 amby The New California Republic
Infected Mushroom wrote:You can place them in bunkers and subs, or
cloak them with stealth etc
I don't think you know what stealth is or how it works.
Posted:
Tue Nov 23, 2021 8:44 amby Ifreann
The New California Republic wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:You can place them in bunkers and subs, or
cloak them with stealth etc
I don't think you know what stealth is or how it works.
It's when the spaceship turns invisible, duh. Haven't you seen movies?
Posted:
Tue Nov 23, 2021 8:50 amby The New California Republic
Ifreann wrote:The New California Republic wrote:I don't think you know what stealth is or how it works.
It's when the spaceship turns invisible, duh. Haven't you seen movies?
Posted:
Tue Nov 23, 2021 8:54 amby Ifreann
The New California Republic wrote:Ifreann wrote:It's when the spaceship turns invisible, duh. Haven't you seen movies?
Exactly, Britain will just do that with their anti ship missiles.
Posted:
Tue Nov 23, 2021 10:07 amby The Two Jerseys
Ifreann wrote:The New California Republic wrote:
Exactly, Britain will just do that with their anti ship missiles.
No one will know they're there until they splash into the ocean 900 miles from the American fleet.
Posted:
Tue Nov 23, 2021 10:43 amby Infected Mushroom
Isn't battlefield invisibility/cloaking active camouflage already a thing?
Didn't the USA already use it in the Middle East?
Posted:
Tue Nov 23, 2021 10:57 amby The New California Republic
Infected Mushroom wrote:Isn't battlefield invisibility/cloaking active camouflage already a thing?
Didn't the USA already use it in the Middle East?
No.
Posted:
Tue Nov 23, 2021 11:26 amby Heloin
Infected Mushroom wrote:Isn't battlefield invisibility/cloaking active camouflage already a thing?
Didn't the USA already use it in the Middle East?
In Call of Duty maybe.
Posted:
Tue Nov 23, 2021 11:31 amby Infected Mushroom
Heloin wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:Isn't battlefield invisibility/cloaking active camouflage already a thing?
Didn't the USA already use it in the Middle East?
In Call of Duty maybe.
Say after both sides have used lots of missiles and say the US does get to London, could we theoretically get a Call of Duty style firefight in the city streets? British shooters against American shooters running round to try and control important locations?
Posted:
Tue Nov 23, 2021 11:39 amby Heloin
Infected Mushroom wrote:Heloin wrote:In Call of Duty maybe.
Say after both sides have used lots of missiles and say the US does get to London, could we theoretically get a Call of Duty style firefight in the city streets? British shooters against American shooters running round to try and control important locations?
You know if you want an examples of what warfare in the 21st century looks like their are real world conflicts you can look at like Syria, Ukraine, and Armenia rather than fantasying about video games.
Posted:
Tue Nov 23, 2021 11:43 amby Galactic Transylvania
Heloin wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:Say after both sides have used lots of missiles and say the US does get to London, could we theoretically get a Call of Duty style firefight in the city streets? British shooters against American shooters running round to try and control important locations?
You know if you want an examples of what warfare in the 21st century looks like their are real world conflicts you can look at like Syria, Ukraine, and Armenia rather than fantasying about video games.
With the exception of Armenia neither of those are state to state, let alone peer to peer.
Posted:
Tue Nov 23, 2021 12:19 pmby Heloin
Galactic Transylvania wrote:Heloin wrote:You know if you want an examples of what warfare in the 21st century looks like their are real world conflicts you can look at like Syria, Ukraine, and Armenia rather than fantasying about video games.
With the exception of Armenia neither of those are state to state, let alone peer to peer.
*eye twitch* sure, fuck it
Posted:
Tue Nov 23, 2021 5:57 pmby Infected Mushroom
For round 3, from which specific branches abs units do you think the 200 fighters will be drawn for?
Is it the SAS for the British?
Posted:
Tue Nov 23, 2021 7:22 pmby Heloin
Infected Mushroom wrote:For round 3, from which specific branches abs units do you think the 200 fighters will be drawn for?
Is it the SAS for the British?
The Royal Logistic Corps vs the United States Space Force.
Posted:
Tue Nov 23, 2021 9:02 pmby Infected Mushroom
I can’t begin to imagine what the elite special forces could do in close quarters shootout and combat
What do you think about Tokyo Disneyland as a battlefield? I think it’s a great place for each side to showcase their tactics and skills. It’s very 3 dimensional battle space with lots of elevation points and tactical spots to skirmish over.
This is why I picked it for round 3