Advertisement

by Galloism » Mon Nov 08, 2021 8:50 am

by Immortan Khan » Mon Nov 08, 2021 9:34 am

by Thermodolia » Mon Nov 08, 2021 10:56 am
Galloism wrote:FBI turned over their high definition video to the prosecution and the defense on Friday. I guess it wasn't destroyed after all.
We haven't seen it yet, but prosecution and defense both stipulated to its authenticity, so it will be used in the trial.

by Christian Confederation » Mon Nov 08, 2021 10:59 am
Thermodolia wrote:Galloism wrote:FBI turned over their high definition video to the prosecution and the defense on Friday. I guess it wasn't destroyed after all.
We haven't seen it yet, but prosecution and defense both stipulated to its authenticity, so it will be used in the trial.
I guess the FBI didn’t want to be gutted by the next republican congress

by Grinning Dragon » Mon Nov 08, 2021 11:42 am


by Galloism » Mon Nov 08, 2021 1:38 pm
Immortan Khan wrote:Man, Grosskreutz's cross was brutal.

by Grinning Dragon » Mon Nov 08, 2021 1:39 pm
by American Legionaries » Mon Nov 08, 2021 1:40 pm
Galloism wrote:Immortan Khan wrote:Man, Grosskreutz's cross was brutal.
Apparently Grosskreutz was just recklessly waving a gun around.
He admitted he pointed his gun at Rittenhouse before Rittenhouse shot him. Then when the ADA did his redirect, he said he didn't *intentionally* point his gun at Rittenhouse.
I do that sometimes. I chase down people gun drawn and then just accidentally point my gun at them. Don't you do that sometimes? It could happen to anyone.

by Neutraligon » Mon Nov 08, 2021 1:41 pm
Galloism wrote:Immortan Khan wrote:Man, Grosskreutz's cross was brutal.
Apparently Grosskreutz was just recklessly waving a gun around.
He admitted he pointed his gun at Rittenhouse before Rittenhouse shot him. Then when the ADA did his redirect, he said he didn't *intentionally* point his gun at Rittenhouse.
I do that sometimes. I chase down people gun drawn and then just accidentally point my gun at them. Don't you do that sometimes? It could happen to anyone.

by Immortan Khan » Mon Nov 08, 2021 1:42 pm
Galloism wrote:Immortan Khan wrote:Man, Grosskreutz's cross was brutal.
Apparently Grosskreutz was just recklessly waving a gun around.
He admitted he pointed his gun at Rittenhouse before Rittenhouse shot him. Then when the ADA did his redirect, he said he didn't *intentionally* point his gun at Rittenhouse.
I do that sometimes. I chase down people gun drawn and then just accidentally point my gun at them. Don't you do that sometimes? It could happen to anyone.

by Immortan Khan » Mon Nov 08, 2021 1:43 pm
Neutraligon wrote:Galloism wrote:Apparently Grosskreutz was just recklessly waving a gun around.
He admitted he pointed his gun at Rittenhouse before Rittenhouse shot him. Then when the ADA did his redirect, he said he didn't *intentionally* point his gun at Rittenhouse.
I do that sometimes. I chase down people gun drawn and then just accidentally point my gun at them. Don't you do that sometimes? It could happen to anyone.
...So basically Grosskreutz should not be able to own a gun, even without the addition of chasing a person down. The number one rule of a gun is you do not point it at someone unless you intend to kill them right?

by Neutraligon » Mon Nov 08, 2021 1:46 pm
Immortan Khan wrote:Neutraligon wrote:...So basically Grosskreutz should not be able to own a gun, even without the addition of chasing a person down. The number one rule of a gun is you do not point it at someone unless you intend to kill them right?
That is correct. Further Grosskreutz knew Rittenhouse was going to the police and also admitted that Rittenhouse was being attacked.

by Grinning Dragon » Mon Nov 08, 2021 1:47 pm
Immortan Khan wrote:Galloism wrote:Apparently Grosskreutz was just recklessly waving a gun around.
He admitted he pointed his gun at Rittenhouse before Rittenhouse shot him. Then when the ADA did his redirect, he said he didn't *intentionally* point his gun at Rittenhouse.
I do that sometimes. I chase down people gun drawn and then just accidentally point my gun at them. Don't you do that sometimes? It could happen to anyone.
I missed it but did the defense go after the Kyle clearing a jam claim? Because in the footage I've seen, it doesn't look like Kyle's hands ever leave the grip and handguard.

by Immortan Khan » Mon Nov 08, 2021 1:48 pm
Neutraligon wrote:Immortan Khan wrote:That is correct. Further Grosskreutz knew Rittenhouse was going to the police and also admitted that Rittenhouse was being attacked.
I have been listening to the trial, and the only reason I can see that the state actually wanted to prosecute is because of backlash. They have nothing.

by Grinning Dragon » Mon Nov 08, 2021 1:49 pm
Neutraligon wrote:Immortan Khan wrote:That is correct. Further Grosskreutz knew Rittenhouse was going to the police and also admitted that Rittenhouse was being attacked.
I have been listening to the trial, and the only reason I can see that the state actually wanted to prosecute is because of backlash. They have nothing.

by Galloism » Mon Nov 08, 2021 1:55 pm
Neutraligon wrote:...So basically Grosskreutz should not be able to own a gun, even without the addition of chasing a person down. The number one rule of a gun is you do not point it at someone unless you intend to kill them right?

by Galloism » Mon Nov 08, 2021 2:49 pm

by The Huskar Social Union » Mon Nov 08, 2021 4:24 pm

by Galloism » Mon Nov 08, 2021 4:31 pm
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Well this was amusing/interesting to watch
So... that should be it basically over right? If he admitted to that?

by The Huskar Social Union » Mon Nov 08, 2021 4:33 pm
Galloism wrote:The Huskar Social Union wrote:Well this was amusing/interesting to watch
So... that should be it basically over right? If he admitted to that?
No not really, but it certainly helps Rittenhouse's case.
The last detective said based on the drone footage it "appeared" Rittenhouse raised his rifle to point at Ziminski prior to being chased. I zoomed way in and I didn't see it, but it was streamed video from the courtroom - not exactly high definition.
On cross, they asked him "here?" "here?" "here?" while repeatedly advancing the video on tiny bits.
Then he said he could see it because he could "pinch to zoom" on his iPhone.

by Seangoli » Mon Nov 08, 2021 6:07 pm
Galloism wrote:Korouse wrote:Should Kyle Rittenhouse go to prison? It would be ironic, since he was defending all the things he would now be persecuted by. He was looking to fight people who were stating a case against the paramilitary state, the prison system, etc. Now it's going to come down on him. By the way you're not some neutral actor when you're walking with a gun in an urban warzone.
There’s really no evidence thus far presented that he was looking to fight anyone.
The prosecution witnesses so far have pointed him to being a naive teenager repeatedly attempting to help people by giving them minor medical aid and putting out fires.

by Grinning Dragon » Mon Nov 08, 2021 6:17 pm

by Thermodolia » Mon Nov 08, 2021 6:21 pm
Grinning Dragon wrote:Got a chuckle out of the exchange between the DA and judge about showing a video about some other dude going back behind the building to confront some dipshits throwing rocks.
Defense: objection, relevance?
DA: it shows the guy confronting the rock throwers
Judge: what does that have to do with anything?
DA: it shows the intent of the group
Judge: The groups isn't on trial, kyle rittenhouse is on trial
DA: oh ok then /sad clown face. nothing further.
by Hankiana » Mon Nov 08, 2021 6:28 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Picairn, Settentrionalia, Washington Resistance Army, Wizlandia
Advertisement