Kyle Rittenhouse goes to trial

[Vassenor]

Did you pull something reaching that hard for a gotcha?

I mean that's what you always do lol

[Port Caverton]

I mean that's what you always do lol

You do realize that The Two Jerseys was imitating you, right?

[Vassenor]

You do realize that The Two Jerseys was imitating you, right?

If he was he's doing a really shitty job of it. Also engaging in NO U is usually a sign that your argument is falling to pieces around your ears.

[Thermodolia]

Remember folks, jury intimidation is OK when Vass' side does it.

Did you pull something reaching that hard for a gotcha?

Look at the pot calling the kettle black

[Port Caverton]

You do realize that The Two Jerseys was imitating you, right?

If he was he's doing a really shitty job of it. Also engaging in NO U is usually a sign that your argument is falling to pieces around your ears.

Actually he did a pretty good job imo

[Thermodolia]

You do realize that The Two Jerseys was imitating you, right?

If he was he's doing a really shitty job of it. Also engaging in NO U is usually a sign that your argument is falling to pieces around your ears.

And you should know, given that you literally post “NO U” 24/7

[Salus Maior]

General consensus is that it's some combination of the DA pandering for votes and kowtowing to the mob threatening to burn down the city if he doesn't go to jail.

The latter is ironic, since they're the ones calling Kyle a "domestic terrorist"...

Where was this mob? Literally never heard about this before?

Or do you mean the mob threatening to start shit if he does go to jail?

While it's increasingly obvious that Rittenhouse isn't guilty and therefore won't be going to jail, that kind of activity is bad. Why can't we just let the evidence speak for itself, without threatening violent action if it's not the outcome we want?

[The V I C]

If he was he's doing a really shitty job of it. Also engaging in NO U is usually a sign that your argument is falling to pieces around your ears.

Actually he did a pretty good job imo

I dont think he did only in the sense that I don't think it was an imitation. I think he was just calling out Vass's hypocrisy. So I can't say he did a bad job cause I don't think he did "the job" at all. He was just calling Vass out.

[Des-Bal]

If he was he's doing a really shitty job of it. Also engaging in NO U is usually a sign that your argument is falling to pieces around your ears.

Yes that's why it's a perfect impression.

[Suriyanakhon]

You do realize that The Two Jerseys was imitating you, right?

If he was he's doing a really shitty job of it.

That's what made it so spot-on.

[Immortan Khan]

Whoa if I knew there was going to be a roast, I would have brought some barbeque sauce.

[The Black Forrest]

Indeed. I think the worse of it will be he looses the gun.

I'm thinking after that night Rittenhouse is never going to want to hold a gun again.
I mean he was stalked by a psychopathic pedophile who said he wanted to kill him, and then after fighting off the manic ended shooting two members of the angry mob who failed to realize that Rosenbaum was trying to kill him.

That's going to leave some lasting trauma.

You mean the homeless guy with bipolar issues?

As to the trauma? Only time is going to answer that one. He may find he liked it?…..again we shall see over time. The press will be watching especially if he does something majorly wrong…..

[American Legionaries]

Where was this mob? Literally never heard about this before?

Or do you mean the mob threatening to start shit if he does go to jail?

While it's increasingly obvious that Rittenhouse isn't guilty and therefore won't be going to jail, that kind of activity is bad. Why can't we just let the evidence speak for itself, without threatening violent action if it's not the outcome we want?

Because the case will have repercussions beyond just rather Rittenhouse goes to jail.

[USS Monitor]

Weird stuff about May-December romances aside, if Rittenhouse was black he'd still be just a fuckin' kid.

So, we'd all like this to be true, but there is an unfortunate tendency to "age up" black kids and "age down" white kids in the common parlance.

I agree with you that's how it should be, but not likely how it would be.

That's just another reason why courts should not be able to fudge who gets tried as a juvenile and who gets tried as an adult. If you have a definite rule based on age, that leaves one less place for racial bias to creep into the system.

[Hurtful Thoughts]

Yeah, well, they're not. Most of history saw adulthood the way biology itself sees it; as including the teen years. The fact that people can't even point out this obvious reality without facing the Qanon-esque tactic of being smeared as a pedophile drives home the need to make "half your age plus seven" the legal standard already. (It'd have the added bonus of giving possessive fathers one less thing to get his daughter's one-year-older boyfriend on, while doing more about the creepy old guys who go after "barely legal" girls.)

If Kyle Rittenhouse were black, there would be no doubt that he is an adult.

Weird stuff about May-December romances aside, if Rittenhouse was black he'd still be just a fuckin' kid.

Back to the tangent though, the age of consent is 18 in Wisconsin while the age of consent in Illinois is 17.

Hence why being tried in Wisconsin as a juvinile despite his state of residence declaring him an adult.

[Galloism]

Weird stuff about May-December romances aside, if Rittenhouse was black he'd still be just a fuckin' kid.

Back to the tangent though, the age of consent is 18 in Wisconsin while the age of consent in Illinois is 17.

Hence why being tried in Wisconsin as a juvinile despite his state of residence declaring him an adult.

He's being tried as an adult.

For carrying a weapon as a child.

[The Two Jerseys]

Back to the tangent though, the age of consent is 18 in Wisconsin while the age of consent in Illinois is 17.

Hence why being tried in Wisconsin as a juvinile despite his state of residence declaring him an adult.

He's being tried as an adult.

For carrying a weapon as a child.

*confused Jackie Chan noises*

[Hurtful Thoughts]

He's being tried as an adult.

For carrying a weapon as a child.

*confused Jackie Chan noises*

"We do not condone vigilantism"
Meanwhile in Seattle

using the names Thorn, Buster Doe, Green Reaper, The Mantis, Prodigy, Gemini, No Name, Catastrophe, Thunder 88, Penelope, and Phoenix Jones. Other members included "Red Dragon",Midnight Jack, Karma, SkyMan, El Caballero,and "Purple Reign".

The group stopped four people pretending to be law enforcement from robbing a blind man whose pockets they purported to be lawfully searching

[The Two Jerseys]

*confused Jackie Chan noises*

"We do not condone vigilantism"
Meanwhile in Seattle

using the names Thorn, Buster Doe, Green Reaper, The Mantis, Prodigy, Gemini, No Name, Catastrophe, Thunder 88, Penelope, and Phoenix Jones. Other members included "Red Dragon",Midnight Jack, Karma, SkyMan, El Caballero,and "Purple Reign".

The group stopped four people pretending to be law enforcement from robbing a blind man whose pockets they purported to be lawfully searching

Me in this timeline.

[The Lone Alliance]

I mean that's what you always do lol

One person throwing a bottle in a bag is an unprovoked mob assault now. Huh.

Also one of them threw a bottle in a bag at him which could totally have been a Molotov cocktail despite not being on fire. Totally justified.

I know right, it's totally proportional to shoot someone dead if they throw a coke bottle at you.

So regret after shooting someone for the capital crime of throwing a coke bottle at him means he was never there to cause harm. Huh.

Can you at least admit now that you were wrong about this?

[Des-Bal]

He's being tried as an adult.

For carrying a weapon as a child.

I've seen this happen a couple times, at least this one's a misdemeanor.

[Galloism]

One person throwing a bottle in a bag is an unprovoked mob assault now. Huh.

Also one of them threw a bottle in a bag at him which could totally have been a Molotov cocktail despite not being on fire. Totally justified.

I know right, it's totally proportional to shoot someone dead if they throw a coke bottle at you.

So regret after shooting someone for the capital crime of throwing a coke bottle at him means he was never there to cause harm. Huh.

Can you at least admit now that you were wrong about this?

I hope you weren’t expecting an answer to this.

[Utquiagvik]

h

[Salus Maior]

While it's increasingly obvious that Rittenhouse isn't guilty and therefore won't be going to jail, that kind of activity is bad. Why can't we just let the evidence speak for itself, without threatening violent action if it's not the outcome we want?

Because the case will have repercussions beyond just rather Rittenhouse goes to jail.

True, like whether the right to self defense is upheld or not.

[Great Algerstonia]

h

-e is innocent!