Pretty much. Newsom is a corporate puppet, but at least he's not pushing an evangelical agenda.
The recall is very pathetic
Advertisement
by Alcala-Cordel » Tue Sep 14, 2021 8:34 pm
by Cannot think of a name » Tue Sep 14, 2021 8:34 pm
Shrillland wrote:Cannot think of a name wrote:I was gettin' some cigars today which inevitably means I am in contact with the Trumpiest of the Republicans because if I'm being honest, smoking cigars is for douchebags but addiction is addiction. They are certainly working themselves up to believe it's all stolen but even in a support circle where they were trading unfounded conspiracies they couldn't mount much enthusiasm because they live here and even when they try to tell themselves that their positions were majority opinions in the end...nah. California at the moment is not interested in what the Republicans are selling. It's not a closed state, we gave the world Reagan and...ugh...Rush Limbaugh (his local show before going national was my hometown). Just the current Republican Party? No sale.
And California didn't even give us them. Reagan's from my home state, and Limbaugh was just across the river in Cape Girardeau.

by North Washington Republic » Tue Sep 14, 2021 8:35 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:Antipatros wrote:They wanted to try to sneak in Elder through a recall, using a turnout/enthusiasm gap to their advantage.
Now it looks like they want to use it to push the "rigged election" narrative some more. You know, the same narrative that led to this civilian/military confrontation that we're debating. These people make me sick.
I was gettin' some cigars today which inevitably means I am in contact with the Trumpiest of the Republicans because if I'm being honest, smoking cigars is for douchebags but addiction is addiction. They are certainly working themselves up to believe it's all stolen but even in a support circle where they were trading unfounded conspiracies they couldn't mount much enthusiasm because they live here and even when they try to tell themselves that their positions were majority opinions in the end...nah. California at the moment is not interested in what the Republicans are selling. It's not a closed state, we gave the world Reagan and...ugh...Rush Limbaugh (his local show before going national was my hometown). Just the current Republican Party? No sale.

by Tarsonis » Tue Sep 14, 2021 8:35 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:Antipatros wrote:They wanted to try to sneak in Elder through a recall, using a turnout/enthusiasm gap to their advantage.
Now it looks like they want to use it to push the "rigged election" narrative some more. You know, the same narrative that led to this civilian/military confrontation that we're debating. These people make me sick.
I was gettin' some cigars today which inevitably means I am in contact with the Trumpiest of the Republicans because if I'm being honest, smoking cigars is for douchebags but addiction is addiction. They are certainly working themselves up to believe it's all stolen but even in a support circle where they were trading unfounded conspiracies they couldn't mount much enthusiasm because they live here and even when they try to tell themselves that their positions were majority opinions in the end...nah. California at the moment is not interested in what the Republicans are selling. It's not a closed state, we gave the world Reagan and...ugh...Rush Limbaugh (his local show before going national was my hometown). Just the current Republican Party? No sale.
by Cannot think of a name » Tue Sep 14, 2021 8:36 pm
Tarsonis wrote:Proctopeo wrote:>review the process for military action
>not to take orders from anyone unless he was involved
>"No matter what you are told,"
Seems like it was more than just missiles my guy, but literally any conceivable military action. That is to say, he de facto made himself the commander-in-chief for approximately 12 days. Soft coup.
When it comes to nuclear strikes specifically, the President is the one with the final say. While high-ranking military advisers are involved, their involvement is chiefly for the verification process.
And that should he a very sobering thought, when you realize that for 4 years in this country, the guy with final the authority to destroy the world, with no checks on that authority, was Donald Fucking Trump.
by Jeriga » Tue Sep 14, 2021 8:36 pm
The Black Forrest wrote:Antipatros wrote:Well he supposedly called the Chinese government to inform them of his plan as well. That goes one step beyond the line, at least in my view.
It’s not like he called the Premier. He called his counterpart in the Chinese Military.

by Proctopeo » Tue Sep 14, 2021 8:36 pm
The Black Forrest wrote:Immortan Khan wrote:It doesn't matter how you cut it, the fact remains that Milley successfully usurped the entire structure of civilian control over the military which has been the bedrock of civilian-military relations since the dawn of the US as a country. For almost three weeks, the US government was not in control over its own military.
It’s rather fascinating how you guys are “OMG we had a coup!” rather then seeing why the General felt he needed to do it?
Could it be the CandC is not really stable? They way he raged on and on about the loss. They way he encouraged the insurrectionists?
Like it or not the General acted in what he thought was the best interests of the Nation.
Ask yourself his; has he cut off Biden or is the same thing in place? If it’s no? Sorry; not a coup.
Tarsonis wrote:Proctopeo wrote:>review the process for military action
>not to take orders from anyone unless he was involved
>"No matter what you are told,"
Seems like it was more than just missiles my guy, but literally any conceivable military action. That is to say, he de facto made himself the commander-in-chief for approximately 12 days. Soft coup.
When it comes to nuclear strikes specifically, the President is the one with the final say. While high-ranking military advisers are involved, their involvement is chiefly for the verification process.
And that should he a very sobering thought, when you realize that for 4 years in this country, the guy with final the authority to destroy the world, with no checks on that authority, was Donald Fucking Trump.

by Tarsonis » Tue Sep 14, 2021 8:37 pm
Jeriga wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
It’s not like he called the Premier. He called his counterpart in the Chinese Military.
I mean I don't see how saying you'll give top secret information and break opsec to warn the enemy of an impending attack makes you a hero. Stopping the attack does. Not making it easier for the enemy to repulse the attack

by Tarsonis » Tue Sep 14, 2021 8:38 pm
Proctopeo wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
It’s rather fascinating how you guys are “OMG we had a coup!” rather then seeing why the General felt he needed to do it?
Some people? Subvert civilian control of the military? To cope???Could it be the CandC is not really stable? They way he raged on and on about the loss. They way he encouraged the insurrectionists?
Cool motive, still extralegal action by a military official. Off a hunch that the President may have done something... which he didn't seem to have a substantial inclination to do, might I add.Like it or not the General acted in what he thought was the best interests of the Nation.
Lots of people have done stupid shit under the presence of acting towards "the best interests of the nation".Ask yourself his; has he cut off Biden or is the same thing in place? If it’s no? Sorry; not a coup.
Ain't no rule saying the end result of a coup can't then promptly hand control back over to the next guy. Though tbh we don't have full confidence that he actually did. It's not like Biden's mental health is much better...Tarsonis wrote:And that should he a very sobering thought, when you realize that for 4 years in this country, the guy with final the authority to destroy the world, with no checks on that authority, was Donald Fucking Trump.
And in turn, a very drunkening thought, when you realize that Donald Trump had that power for four years and didn't do anything with it.
by Cannot think of a name » Tue Sep 14, 2021 8:38 pm
Tarsonis wrote:Cannot think of a name wrote:I was gettin' some cigars today which inevitably means I am in contact with the Trumpiest of the Republicans because if I'm being honest, smoking cigars is for douchebags but addiction is addiction. They are certainly working themselves up to believe it's all stolen but even in a support circle where they were trading unfounded conspiracies they couldn't mount much enthusiasm because they live here and even when they try to tell themselves that their positions were majority opinions in the end...nah. California at the moment is not interested in what the Republicans are selling. It's not a closed state, we gave the world Reagan and...ugh...Rush Limbaugh (his local show before going national was my hometown). Just the current Republican Party? No sale.
this is the dumbest take I've ever heard. Cigars are the shit, no matter what side of the spectrum you're on. Hell I was a hardline conservative 10 years ago, and I would describe my ideal cigars as "El Presidentes" er go, the kind I thought Castro would smoke.
Cigars are dope dude, now quit bitching and pair it with a nice scotch.

by North Washington Republic » Tue Sep 14, 2021 8:39 pm

by North Washington Republic » Tue Sep 14, 2021 8:40 pm
Tarsonis wrote:Cannot think of a name wrote:I was gettin' some cigars today which inevitably means I am in contact with the Trumpiest of the Republicans because if I'm being honest, smoking cigars is for douchebags but addiction is addiction. They are certainly working themselves up to believe it's all stolen but even in a support circle where they were trading unfounded conspiracies they couldn't mount much enthusiasm because they live here and even when they try to tell themselves that their positions were majority opinions in the end...nah. California at the moment is not interested in what the Republicans are selling. It's not a closed state, we gave the world Reagan and...ugh...Rush Limbaugh (his local show before going national was my hometown). Just the current Republican Party? No sale.
this is the dumbest take I've ever heard. Cigars are the shit, no matter what side of the spectrum you're on. Hell I was a hardline conservative 10 years ago, and I would describe my ideal cigars as "El Presidentes" er go, the kind I thought Castro would smoke.
Cigars are dope dude, now quit bitching and pair it with a nice scotch.
by Jeriga » Tue Sep 14, 2021 8:40 pm
North Washington Republic wrote:NBC calls election for Newsom

by Tarsonis » Tue Sep 14, 2021 8:41 pm

by The Lone Alliance » Tue Sep 14, 2021 8:41 pm
Yeah....Tarsonis wrote:And that should he a very sobering thought, when you realize that for 4 years in this country, the guy with final the authority to destroy the world, with no checks on that authority, was Donald Fucking Trump.

by Tarsonis » Tue Sep 14, 2021 8:43 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:Tarsonis wrote:
this is the dumbest take I've ever heard. Cigars are the shit, no matter what side of the spectrum you're on. Hell I was a hardline conservative 10 years ago, and I would describe my ideal cigars as "El Presidentes" er go, the kind I thought Castro would smoke.
Cigars are dope dude, now quit bitching and pair it with a nice scotch.
Lanceros for me because Starbuck in Battlestar Galactica and Hannibal from A-Team smoked them. Sort of throws a spanner into insisting that I wasn't influenced in smoking cigars.

by San Lumen » Tue Sep 14, 2021 8:43 pm

by The Black Forrest » Tue Sep 14, 2021 8:43 pm
by Cannot think of a name » Tue Sep 14, 2021 8:44 pm
North Washington Republic wrote:Tarsonis wrote:
this is the dumbest take I've ever heard. Cigars are the shit, no matter what side of the spectrum you're on. Hell I was a hardline conservative 10 years ago, and I would describe my ideal cigars as "El Presidentes" er go, the kind I thought Castro would smoke.
Cigars are dope dude, now quit bitching and pair it with a nice scotch.
I quit Tobacco entirely. I now only smoke medical cannabis.

by Tarsonis » Tue Sep 14, 2021 8:44 pm
by Alcala-Cordel » Tue Sep 14, 2021 8:44 pm
North Washington Republic wrote:NBC calls election for Newsom

by Antipatros » Tue Sep 14, 2021 8:44 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:Antipatros wrote:Well, it's not only Nazi Germany. There are more examples.
I'm not convinced that a Cold War gone hot would be preceded by formal declarations of war either.
Yeah, your other example wasn't really accurate and your third was...Soviet Russia. So...three for three.
He basically said that America would follow procedure in the use of our most powerful weapon. You guys keep pressing this like it's the worst thing in the world but it just sounds to me like the built in failsafes doing their job.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Breosia, The Huskar Social Union
Advertisement