NATION

PASSWORD

American Politics VII: Virginia Reel

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Who do you think will win the Virginia Gubernatorial Race?

Terry McAuliffe(D)
57
57%
Glenn Youngkin(R)
43
43%
 
Total votes : 100

User avatar
Pasong Tirad
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11656
Founded: May 31, 2007
Democratic Socialists

Postby Pasong Tirad » Tue Nov 02, 2021 7:53 pm

Are people blaming progressives yet

User avatar
Shrillland
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21108
Founded: Apr 12, 2010
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Shrillland » Tue Nov 02, 2021 7:54 pm

Pasong Tirad wrote:Are people blaming progressives yet


About two or three pages ago, yes.
How America Came to This, by Kowani: Racialised Politics, Ideological Media Gaslighting, and What It All Means For The Future
Plebiscite Plaza 2023
Confused by the names I use for House districts? Here's a primer!
In 1963, Doctor Who taught us all we need to know about politics when a cave woman said, "Old men see no further than tomorrow's meat".

User avatar
Great Algerstonia
Minister
 
Posts: 2617
Founded: Mar 21, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Algerstonia » Tue Nov 02, 2021 7:55 pm

Pasong Tirad wrote:Are people blaming progressives yet

Yes progressives more like progrASSives
Anti: Russia
Pro: Prussia
Resilient Acceleration wrote:After a period of letting this discussion run its course without my involvement due to sheer laziness and a new related NS project, I have returned with an answer and that answer is Israel.

User avatar
Senkaku
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25695
Founded: Sep 01, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Senkaku » Tue Nov 02, 2021 7:55 pm

Pasong Tirad wrote:Are people blaming progressives yet

from NSG to the halls of power
Senkaku wrote:
Skelly Man Dan wrote:
Five bucks says we'll hear that progressives dragged them down instead, and that Democrats need to be even more inoffensive/insubstantial with their ambitions.

from a reporter at politico

Cannot think of a name wrote:
Skelly Man Dan wrote:
Five bucks says we'll hear that progressives dragged them down instead, and that Democrats need to be even more inoffensive/insubstantial with their ambitions.

Why would they keep chasing a fickle voter block who doesn't show up even when they have the options on the table? Total waste of time for them to alienate a reliable voter base chasing a group that thinks sitting on their hands is a political virtue. Hell, I'm in that category, they managed to get me to vote Democrat exactly once...why the fuck should they care about what I say when they can court a group that will give their candidates some of their NPR money and reliably show up as long as the policy doesn't scare them too much?

If this snitty progressive block was as powerful and big as they imagined they could be coalescing around a third party option or elect local party officials working their way up to shape the party and actually become a block worth courting But they'd rather complain on the internet and spout privileged bullshit like abandoning any progress no matter how small to spite literally just themselves but prevent any relief coming to vulnerable people at all and get smug when someone who will work actively against them gets in office like that's accomplishing their goals somehow.

The progressives are at fault because they refuse to exert their power and when they do they don't have the balls to push it to the finish line, instead taking the first setback they can find to justify doomposting. They squandered the change in national conversation that came with Occupy, they squandered the movement from last year. Meanwhile the moderates remain reliable as the sunrise.

If two senators is enough to make you want to take your ball and go home, you're not worth courting. Every election night it's the same shit, people falling all over themselves to put on their "End is Nigh" sandwich boards and wonder why they didn't court the voters who spent the campaign throwing venom and insisting that voting for them is a waste of time.

People need to stop treating their vote like a wish and remember that collect action gets the goods.
agreed honey. send bees

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81311
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue Nov 02, 2021 7:56 pm

Major-Tom wrote:Huh. I figured VA would flip narrowly, but NJ, shit. I figured Murphy would cut it way closer than expected, but a potential loss or even a 1-2pp win in NJ after Biden won it by 16-17? Jesus.

If he loses we should just give up on polls altogether. If progressives had a made a deal maybe this wouldn’t have happened. I’m done with politics. Any campaign I’ve worked on was a fluke none of it truly made any difference.

I expect one party Republican rule soon. If that’s what people want give let them have it.

User avatar
Antipatros
Minister
 
Posts: 2749
Founded: Aug 26, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby Antipatros » Tue Nov 02, 2021 7:57 pm

I know that hysteria is part of the San Lumen brand, but holy shit dude chill out.

User avatar
Great Algerstonia
Minister
 
Posts: 2617
Founded: Mar 21, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Algerstonia » Tue Nov 02, 2021 7:58 pm

Senkaku wrote:
Pasong Tirad wrote:Are people blaming progressives yet

from NSG to the halls of power

Cannot think of a name wrote:Why would they keep chasing a fickle voter block who doesn't show up even when they have the options on the table? Total waste of time for them to alienate a reliable voter base chasing a group that thinks sitting on their hands is a political virtue. Hell, I'm in that category, they managed to get me to vote Democrat exactly once...why the fuck should they care about what I say when they can court a group that will give their candidates some of their NPR money and reliably show up as long as the policy doesn't scare them too much?

If this snitty progressive block was as powerful and big as they imagined they could be coalescing around a third party option or elect local party officials working their way up to shape the party and actually become a block worth courting But they'd rather complain on the internet and spout privileged bullshit like abandoning any progress no matter how small to spite literally just themselves but prevent any relief coming to vulnerable people at all and get smug when someone who will work actively against them gets in office like that's accomplishing their goals somehow.

The progressives are at fault because they refuse to exert their power and when they do they don't have the balls to push it to the finish line, instead taking the first setback they can find to justify doomposting. They squandered the change in national conversation that came with Occupy, they squandered the movement from last year. Meanwhile the moderates remain reliable as the sunrise.

If two senators is enough to make you want to take your ball and go home, you're not worth courting. Every election night it's the same shit, people falling all over themselves to put on their "End is Nigh" sandwich boards and wonder why they didn't court the voters who spent the campaign throwing venom and insisting that voting for them is a waste of time.

People need to stop treating their vote like a wish and remember that collect action gets the goods.

Why you ignoring me :(
Anti: Russia
Pro: Prussia
Resilient Acceleration wrote:After a period of letting this discussion run its course without my involvement due to sheer laziness and a new related NS project, I have returned with an answer and that answer is Israel.

User avatar
Dresderstan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6904
Founded: Jan 18, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Dresderstan » Tue Nov 02, 2021 7:58 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Major-Tom wrote:Huh. I figured VA would flip narrowly, but NJ, shit. I figured Murphy would cut it way closer than expected, but a potential loss or even a 1-2pp win in NJ after Biden won it by 16-17? Jesus.

If he loses we should just give up on polls altogether. If progressives had a made a deal maybe this wouldn’t have happened. I’m done with politics. Any campaign I’ve worked on was a fluke none of it truly made any difference.

I expect one party Republican rule soon. If that’s what people want give let them have it.

Goodbye then.
23 year old, PA male. Love sports like baseball, hockey and American football, enjoy video games and TV. Music chart nerd, can't live without it. I'm gay. Fuck neo-liberalism

Biden and Trump are traitors to America.
Imagine being shocked about the fact of greed, corruption, and abuse of power in government.
The media is a propaganda tool fueling the two parties hyperpartisanship and killing the country, it's time to end the "freedom of the press"
Violence against the government is and should be accepted by the people, especially when said government wants to and is actively stripping away your constitutional rights.
Remake the Free World, wipe the slate clean, a nation born and baptized in blood and fire shall be reborn again.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81311
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue Nov 02, 2021 7:58 pm

Antipatros wrote:I know that hysteria is part of the San Lumen brand, but holy shit dude chill out.


Why? If someone who leads with 50 plus in every poll loses why should I have any hope left?

User avatar
Pasong Tirad
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11656
Founded: May 31, 2007
Democratic Socialists

Postby Pasong Tirad » Tue Nov 02, 2021 8:00 pm

Senkaku wrote:
Pasong Tirad wrote:Are people blaming progressives yet

from NSG to the halls of power

Classic. Oh yeah dude totally lukewarm centrist McAuliffe lost because of progressives
Last edited by Pasong Tirad on Tue Nov 02, 2021 8:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Zurkerx
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 10960
Founded: Jan 20, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Zurkerx » Tue Nov 02, 2021 8:03 pm

Huh, it has tightened up in Virginia although Youngkin will win. Looks like I was close with predicting the results. As it stands, Youngkin has 50.7% to McAuliffe 48.6%.

I had Youngkin getting 49.51% to McAuliffe getting 48.9%. Suffice to say, I called this one correctly.

As for NJ though, that's a shocker though not all of the blue areas have reported yet. Still, Murphy had an approval rating between 52-55% so this is surprising.
A Golden Civic: The New Pragmatic Libertarian
My Words: Indeed, Indubitably & Malarkey
Retired Admin in NSGS and NS Parliament

Accountant, Author, History Buff, Political Junkie
“Has ambition so eclipsed principle?” ~ Mitt Romney
"Try not to become a person of success, but rather try to become a person of value." ~ Albert Einstein
"Trust, but verify." ~ Ronald Reagan

User avatar
Senkaku
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25695
Founded: Sep 01, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Senkaku » Tue Nov 02, 2021 8:04 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Antipatros wrote:I know that hysteria is part of the San Lumen brand, but holy shit dude chill out.


Why? If someone who leads with 50 plus in every poll loses why should I have any hope left?

"50 plus in every poll" lmao

you're abandoning all hope in the political process overnight because a very close off-year gubernatorial election in a state you don't even live in went against your preferences, if you can't see why people are laughing at that then I don't think anyone can explain it to you
agreed honey. send bees

User avatar
Shrillland
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21108
Founded: Apr 12, 2010
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Shrillland » Tue Nov 02, 2021 8:05 pm

Zurkerx wrote:Huh, it has tightened up in Virginia although Youngkin will win. Looks like I was close with predicting the results. As it stands, Youngkin has 50.7% to McAuliffe 48.6%.

I had Youngkin getting 49.51% to McAuliffe getting 48.9%. Suffice to say, I called this one correctly.

As for NJ though, that's a shocker though not all of the blue areas have reported yet. Still, Murphy had an approval rating between 52-55% so this is surprising.


The biggest problem is there's still two sapphire blue counties that have barely reported, Essex and Passaic. If they start bringing in numbers and Ciattarelli's still leading, then I'll call it for him. Until then, I'm content to wait.
How America Came to This, by Kowani: Racialised Politics, Ideological Media Gaslighting, and What It All Means For The Future
Plebiscite Plaza 2023
Confused by the names I use for House districts? Here's a primer!
In 1963, Doctor Who taught us all we need to know about politics when a cave woman said, "Old men see no further than tomorrow's meat".

User avatar
Corrian
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 73687
Founded: Mar 19, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Corrian » Tue Nov 02, 2021 8:05 pm

Zurkerx wrote:Huh, it has tightened up in Virginia although Youngkin will win. Looks like I was close with predicting the results. As it stands, Youngkin has 50.7% to McAuliffe 48.6%.

I had Youngkin getting 49.51% to McAuliffe getting 48.9%. Suffice to say, I called this one correctly.

As for NJ though, that's a shocker though not all of the blue areas have reported yet. Still, Murphy had an approval rating between 52-55% so this is surprising.

I think NJ will narrow as well. Sounds like some weird reporting there.
My Last.FM and RYM

RP's hosted by me: The Last of Us RP's

Look on the bright side, one day you'll be dead~Street Sects

User avatar
Pasong Tirad
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11656
Founded: May 31, 2007
Democratic Socialists

Postby Pasong Tirad » Tue Nov 02, 2021 8:06 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Antipatros wrote:I know that hysteria is part of the San Lumen brand, but holy shit dude chill out.


Why? If someone who leads with 50 plus in every poll loses why should I have any hope left?

Maybe you should take your break now. Like, literally right now. Consider logging off and maybe touching some grass.

User avatar
Ngelmish
Minister
 
Posts: 3062
Founded: Dec 06, 2009
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ngelmish » Tue Nov 02, 2021 8:07 pm

Pasong Tirad wrote:
Senkaku wrote:from NSG to the halls of power

Classic. Oh yeah dude totally lukewarm centrist McAuliffe lost because of progressives


Progressives didn't lose this election per se, or even particularly, but it is a fundamental problem of American politics that demagogues like Trump or Youngkin get in striking distance to eke out a win in the first place -- and that is something that could be prevented if more people voted more consistently against the possibility, which does necessarily include certain groups of progressive voters.

User avatar
Dresderstan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6904
Founded: Jan 18, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Dresderstan » Tue Nov 02, 2021 8:08 pm

Pasong Tirad wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
Why? If someone who leads with 50 plus in every poll loses why should I have any hope left?

Maybe you should take your break now. Like, literally right now. Consider logging off and maybe touching some grass.

Yes please, Lumen, you keep saying you're gonna take a break but you never actually do.
23 year old, PA male. Love sports like baseball, hockey and American football, enjoy video games and TV. Music chart nerd, can't live without it. I'm gay. Fuck neo-liberalism

Biden and Trump are traitors to America.
Imagine being shocked about the fact of greed, corruption, and abuse of power in government.
The media is a propaganda tool fueling the two parties hyperpartisanship and killing the country, it's time to end the "freedom of the press"
Violence against the government is and should be accepted by the people, especially when said government wants to and is actively stripping away your constitutional rights.
Remake the Free World, wipe the slate clean, a nation born and baptized in blood and fire shall be reborn again.

User avatar
Shrillland
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21108
Founded: Apr 12, 2010
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Shrillland » Tue Nov 02, 2021 8:09 pm

Another call to make:

Boston Mayor: Michelle Wu

There, see? Progressives got something.
How America Came to This, by Kowani: Racialised Politics, Ideological Media Gaslighting, and What It All Means For The Future
Plebiscite Plaza 2023
Confused by the names I use for House districts? Here's a primer!
In 1963, Doctor Who taught us all we need to know about politics when a cave woman said, "Old men see no further than tomorrow's meat".

User avatar
Antipatros
Minister
 
Posts: 2749
Founded: Aug 26, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby Antipatros » Tue Nov 02, 2021 8:09 pm

Corrian wrote:
Zurkerx wrote:Huh, it has tightened up in Virginia although Youngkin will win. Looks like I was close with predicting the results. As it stands, Youngkin has 50.7% to McAuliffe 48.6%.

I had Youngkin getting 49.51% to McAuliffe getting 48.9%. Suffice to say, I called this one correctly.

As for NJ though, that's a shocker though not all of the blue areas have reported yet. Still, Murphy had an approval rating between 52-55% so this is surprising.

I think NJ will narrow as well. Sounds like some weird reporting there.

NJ is kind of a question mark at the moment, at least according to Nate Cohn.

I'm just going to keep waiting for returns to come in.

User avatar
Zurkerx
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 10960
Founded: Jan 20, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Zurkerx » Tue Nov 02, 2021 8:10 pm

Shrillland wrote:
Zurkerx wrote:Huh, it has tightened up in Virginia although Youngkin will win. Looks like I was close with predicting the results. As it stands, Youngkin has 50.7% to McAuliffe 48.6%.

I had Youngkin getting 49.51% to McAuliffe getting 48.9%. Suffice to say, I called this one correctly.

As for NJ though, that's a shocker though not all of the blue areas have reported yet. Still, Murphy had an approval rating between 52-55% so this is surprising.


The biggest problem is there's still two sapphire blue counties that have barely reported, Essex and Passaic. If they start bringing in numbers and Ciattarelli's still leading, then I'll call it for him. Until then, I'm content to wait.


Correct which is why I'm still a bit skeptical Ciattarelli will win although it wasn't projected to be this close: that's what is surprising here.

Corrian wrote:
Zurkerx wrote:Huh, it has tightened up in Virginia although Youngkin will win. Looks like I was close with predicting the results. As it stands, Youngkin has 50.7% to McAuliffe 48.6%.

I had Youngkin getting 49.51% to McAuliffe getting 48.9%. Suffice to say, I called this one correctly.

As for NJ though, that's a shocker though not all of the blue areas have reported yet. Still, Murphy had an approval rating between 52-55% so this is surprising.

I think NJ will narrow as well. Sounds like some weird reporting there.


As Shrill said, Passaic and Essex have not turn in their results fully. Somehow, both areas are only reporting 1-2% of counted ballots.
A Golden Civic: The New Pragmatic Libertarian
My Words: Indeed, Indubitably & Malarkey
Retired Admin in NSGS and NS Parliament

Accountant, Author, History Buff, Political Junkie
“Has ambition so eclipsed principle?” ~ Mitt Romney
"Try not to become a person of success, but rather try to become a person of value." ~ Albert Einstein
"Trust, but verify." ~ Ronald Reagan

User avatar
Kowani
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44696
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Tue Nov 02, 2021 8:10 pm


data reporting error n the state's here-HOD might not have flipped after all
hold off on that one
Abolitionism in the North has leagued itself with Radical Democracy, and so the Slave Power was forced to ally itself with the Money Power; that is the great fact of the age.




The triumph of the Democracy is essential to the struggle of popular liberty


Currently Rehabilitating: Martin Van Buren, Benjamin Harrison, and Woodrow Wilson
Currently Vilifying: George Washington, Theodore Roosevelt, and Jimmy Carter

User avatar
Senkaku
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25695
Founded: Sep 01, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Senkaku » Tue Nov 02, 2021 8:11 pm

Ngelmish wrote:
Pasong Tirad wrote:Classic. Oh yeah dude totally lukewarm centrist McAuliffe lost because of progressives


Progressives didn't lose this election per se, or even particularly, but it is a fundamental problem of American politics that demagogues like Trump or Youngkin get in striking distance to eke out a win in the first place -- and that is something that could be prevented if more people voted more consistently against the possibility, which does necessarily include certain groups of progressive voters.

the blame game here is less bitching out progressives for not turning out in VA (iirc Princess Blanding underperformed quite a bit vs. expectations) and more blaming them for the stalling of the infrastructure bills (which in turn is alleged to be the primary cause of McAuliffe's defeat)
agreed honey. send bees

User avatar
Shrillland
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21108
Founded: Apr 12, 2010
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Shrillland » Tue Nov 02, 2021 8:13 pm

Senkaku wrote:
Ngelmish wrote:
Progressives didn't lose this election per se, or even particularly, but it is a fundamental problem of American politics that demagogues like Trump or Youngkin get in striking distance to eke out a win in the first place -- and that is something that could be prevented if more people voted more consistently against the possibility, which does necessarily include certain groups of progressive voters.

the blame game here is less bitching out progressives for not turning out in VA (iirc Princess Blanding underperformed quite a bit vs. expectations) and more blaming them for the stalling of the infrastructure bills (which in turn is alleged to be the primary cause of McAuliffe's defeat)


That's a cause, certainly. The other is the incoherent stance the party has on solutions for systemic racism and how the Republicans are using it to wield the CRT club.
How America Came to This, by Kowani: Racialised Politics, Ideological Media Gaslighting, and What It All Means For The Future
Plebiscite Plaza 2023
Confused by the names I use for House districts? Here's a primer!
In 1963, Doctor Who taught us all we need to know about politics when a cave woman said, "Old men see no further than tomorrow's meat".

User avatar
Kowani
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44696
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Tue Nov 02, 2021 8:13 pm

Kowani wrote:

data reporting error n the state's here-HOD might not have flipped after all
hold off on that one

Now projected to be a tie (50/50)
Abolitionism in the North has leagued itself with Radical Democracy, and so the Slave Power was forced to ally itself with the Money Power; that is the great fact of the age.




The triumph of the Democracy is essential to the struggle of popular liberty


Currently Rehabilitating: Martin Van Buren, Benjamin Harrison, and Woodrow Wilson
Currently Vilifying: George Washington, Theodore Roosevelt, and Jimmy Carter

User avatar
Senkaku
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25695
Founded: Sep 01, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Senkaku » Tue Nov 02, 2021 8:14 pm

Shrillland wrote:
Senkaku wrote:the blame game here is less bitching out progressives for not turning out in VA (iirc Princess Blanding underperformed quite a bit vs. expectations) and more blaming them for the stalling of the infrastructure bills (which in turn is alleged to be the primary cause of McAuliffe's defeat)


That's a cause, certainly. The other is the incoherent stance the party has on solutions for systemic racism and how the Republicans are using it to wield the CRT club.

who has been holding up the infrastructure bills, remind me
agreed honey. send bees

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: El Lazaro, Majestic-12 [Bot], Perchan, Point Blob, Ryemarch, Stellar Colonies, The Great Nevada Overlord, Torrocca, Zeharlur

Advertisement

Remove ads