NATION

PASSWORD

American Politics Thread VI: Can't We All Just Get Along?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Is it no longer possible to collaborate with political opponents at this stage?

It is no longer possible.
232
36%
It is possible.
166
25%
Collaboration is possible if we have similar economic views.
47
7%
Collaboration is possible if we have similar cultural/social views.
106
16%
Why would I collaborate with anyone? Going monke is the best way forward.
102
16%
 
Total votes : 653

User avatar
North Washington Republic
Minister
 
Posts: 3090
Founded: Mar 13, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby North Washington Republic » Thu Jul 22, 2021 1:22 pm

The Black Forrest wrote:
North Washington Republic wrote:
I can relate. When Is was rad trad, I wanted a theocratic Catholic Government. However, I wanted the practice of very other religion to me made illegal and I wanted sodomy to be recriminalized. Basically, I wanted America to turn into the Catholic version of Saudi Arabia.


Considering how well the Catholic hierarchy handled the pedo priests? Pass.


Yeah…I was one of those super homophobic Catholics that blamed the pedo priest problem on gay men in clergy and radical liberalism within the Church.
I’m a Wesleyan Christian center-left American Patriot. 29 year-old male and I live in Minneapolis, Minnesota
Pro: Jesus, The Holy Bible, Constitutional Republic, representative democracy, efficient and comprehensive welfare state, neoconservatism, civic nationalism, cannabis legalization, $15 an hour min.wage, religious liberty, LGBTQIA rights, Law & Order, police, death penalty, sensible reform of law enforcement, racial equity, peace through strength, NATO, EU
Anti: Satan, sin, anarchism, paleoconservatism, communism, libertarianism, fascism, ACAB, racism, populism, Trump(ism), Qanon, Putin, Xi, Taliban.
Economic Left/Right: -0.75. Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.67
My 8values results

GET VACCINATED ASAP AND WEAR A MASK!!!

User avatar
Atomic Testing Museum
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 197
Founded: May 18, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby Atomic Testing Museum » Thu Jul 22, 2021 1:27 pm

Personally I think we should keep Guantanamo Bay ,but we should definitely reform how the prison works so it doesn't violate human rights.

User avatar
The Black Forrest
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 59128
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Black Forrest » Thu Jul 22, 2021 1:30 pm

Sundiata wrote:Same-sex attraction is not a choice anymore than opposite-sex attraction is a choice


Not sure what your point is exactly. Choice is always involved with sex. Figure, features, gender, personality, etc.

, or being made in the image and likeness of God is a choice.


Likeness of god? Massive assumption as how do you verify that claim? For all you know God could look like Alanis Morissette and likes to play skeeball.

Our inclinations are not choices.


Your inclinations guide your choices. People tend to date people with certain characteristics.

Ultimately, homosexual people are people with the same home as heterosexual people, same home as myself.


That is not true. Marriage, visitation rights, children, etc. are not available to many homosexuals.
Last edited by The Black Forrest on Thu Jul 22, 2021 1:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
*I am a master proofreader after I click Submit.
* There is actually a War on Christmas. But Christmas started it, with it's unparalleled aggression against the Thanksgiving Holiday, and now Christmas has seized much Lebensraum in November, and are pushing into October. The rest of us seek to repel these invaders, and push them back to the status quo ante bellum Black Friday border. -Trotskylvania
* Silence Is Golden But Duct Tape Is Silver.
* I felt like Ayn Rand cornered me at a party, and three minutes in I found my first objection to what she was saying, but she kept talking without interruption for ten more days. - Max Barry talking about Atlas Shrugged

User avatar
Biwolfia
Envoy
 
Posts: 212
Founded: May 22, 2021
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Biwolfia » Thu Jul 22, 2021 1:31 pm

The Black Forrest wrote:
Sundiata wrote:Same-sex attraction is not a choice anymore than opposite-sex attraction is a choice


Not sure what your point is exactly. Choice is always involved with sex. Figure, features, gender, personality, etc.

He's saying that you don't choose whether you're homosexual, just like you don't choose whether you're heterosexual.
The Matriarchal Phantasmocracy of Biwolfia

A Class 1.8 Civilization according to this index

User avatar
Rusozak
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6975
Founded: Jun 14, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Rusozak » Thu Jul 22, 2021 1:31 pm

Atomic Testing Museum wrote:Personally I think we should keep Guantanamo Bay ,but we should definitely reform how the prison works so it doesn't violate human rights.


Well, isn't that the point of Gitmo? It's the justice system's blind spot.
NOTE: This nation's government style, policies, and opinions in roleplay or forum 7 does not represent my true beliefs. It is purely for the enjoyment of the game.

User avatar
Senkaku
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26713
Founded: Sep 01, 2012
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Senkaku » Thu Jul 22, 2021 1:33 pm

Atomic Testing Museum wrote:Personally I think we should keep Guantanamo Bay ,but we should definitely reform how the prison works so it doesn't violate human rights.

If you just want a normal prison I’m pretty sure we can build those here instead of maintaining them on hostile foreign islands
Biden-Santos Thought cadre

User avatar
The Temple of the Computer
Diplomat
 
Posts: 566
Founded: May 02, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby The Temple of the Computer » Thu Jul 22, 2021 1:33 pm

The Black Forrest wrote:
Sundiata wrote:Same-sex attraction is not a choice anymore than opposite-sex attraction is a choice


Not sure what your point is exactly. Choice is always involved with sex. Figure, features, gender, personality, etc.

, or being made in the image and likeness of God is a choice.


Likeness of god? Massive assumption as how do you verify that claim? For all you know God could look like Alanis Morissette and like to play skeeball.

Our inclinations are not choices.


Your inclinations guide your choices. People tend to date people with certain characteristics.

Ultimately, homosexual people are people with the same home as heterosexual people, same home as myself.

That is not true. Marriage, visitation rights, children, etc. are not available to many homosexuals.

Everyone knows that God is the manliest man who has ever lived, created the spa- Wait wrong Thread. But yeah how do we know that god is not a Flying Spaghetti Monster?
#FreeNSGRojava

User avatar
The Black Forrest
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 59128
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Black Forrest » Thu Jul 22, 2021 1:34 pm

Rusozak wrote:
Atomic Testing Museum wrote:Personally I think we should keep Guantanamo Bay ,but we should definitely reform how the prison works so it doesn't violate human rights.


Well, isn't that the point of Gitmo? It's the justice system's blind spot.


Different justice systems. Military and civilian.
*I am a master proofreader after I click Submit.
* There is actually a War on Christmas. But Christmas started it, with it's unparalleled aggression against the Thanksgiving Holiday, and now Christmas has seized much Lebensraum in November, and are pushing into October. The rest of us seek to repel these invaders, and push them back to the status quo ante bellum Black Friday border. -Trotskylvania
* Silence Is Golden But Duct Tape Is Silver.
* I felt like Ayn Rand cornered me at a party, and three minutes in I found my first objection to what she was saying, but she kept talking without interruption for ten more days. - Max Barry talking about Atlas Shrugged

User avatar
Punished UMN
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6163
Founded: Jul 05, 2020
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Punished UMN » Thu Jul 22, 2021 1:49 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Sundiata wrote:

Same-sex attraction is not a choice anymore than opposite-sex attraction is a choice, or being made in the image and likeness of God is a choice. Our inclinations are not choices.

Ultimately, homosexual people are people with the same home as heterosexual people, same home as myself.


If it’s not a choice why should they not be allowed to act on those feelings, marry or have children?

I don't agree with Sun by any stretch but that's not a good argument, there are lots of things that aren't a choice that we don't let people do. Acceptance of gay people should approach from the angle of the positive qualities of love between gay couples and not on whether or not it's a choice, the former makes equivalency between love which gay partners have for each other and traditional romantic love, the latter simply equates it to an incurable condition which need only be tolerated and not endorsed or accepted.
Eastern Orthodox Christian. Purgatorial universalist.
Ascended beyond politics, now metapolitics is my best friend. Proud member of the Napoleon Bonaparte fandom.
I have borderline personality disorder, if I overreact to something, try to approach me after the fact and I'll apologize.
The political compass is like hell: if you find yourself on it, keep going.
Pro: The fundamental dignitas of the human spirit as expressed through its self-actualization in theosis. Anti: Faustian-Demonic Space Anarcho-Capitalism with Italo-Futurist Characteristics

User avatar
Myrensis
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5898
Founded: Oct 05, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Myrensis » Thu Jul 22, 2021 1:49 pm

Atomic Testing Museum wrote:Personally I think we should keep Guantanamo Bay ,but we should definitely reform how the prison works so it doesn't violate human rights.


Facilitating human rights violations is literally Guantanamo Bay's sole function, 'reforming' it would essentially invalidate the reason for it's existence, there would be no reason to send anybody there as opposed to a normal US prison.

User avatar
Punished UMN
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6163
Founded: Jul 05, 2020
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Punished UMN » Thu Jul 22, 2021 1:50 pm

Myrensis wrote:
Atomic Testing Museum wrote:Personally I think we should keep Guantanamo Bay ,but we should definitely reform how the prison works so it doesn't violate human rights.


Facilitating human rights violations is literally Guantanamo Bay's sole function, 'reforming' it would essentially invalidate the reason for it's existence, there would be no reason to send anybody there as opposed to a normal US prison.

^ Its purpose is to be outside of ordinary legal jurisdiction.
Eastern Orthodox Christian. Purgatorial universalist.
Ascended beyond politics, now metapolitics is my best friend. Proud member of the Napoleon Bonaparte fandom.
I have borderline personality disorder, if I overreact to something, try to approach me after the fact and I'll apologize.
The political compass is like hell: if you find yourself on it, keep going.
Pro: The fundamental dignitas of the human spirit as expressed through its self-actualization in theosis. Anti: Faustian-Demonic Space Anarcho-Capitalism with Italo-Futurist Characteristics

User avatar
Sundiata
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9755
Founded: Sep 27, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Sundiata » Thu Jul 22, 2021 1:51 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Sundiata wrote:

Same-sex attraction is not a choice anymore than opposite-sex attraction is a choice, or being made in the image and likeness of God is a choice. Our inclinations are not choices.

Ultimately, homosexual people are people with the same home as heterosexual people, same home as myself.


If it’s not a choice why should they not be allowed to act on those feelings, marry or have children?

Everyone deserves to have their feelings affirmed as part of a family. I don't want to conflate different topics but I believe that all people deserve the best.
"Don't say, 'That person bothers me.' Think: 'That person sanctifies me.'"
-St. Josemaria Escriva

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87269
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Thu Jul 22, 2021 1:51 pm

Punished UMN wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
If it’s not a choice why should they not be allowed to act on those feelings, marry or have children?

I don't agree with Sun by any stretch but that's not a good argument, there are lots of things that aren't a choice that we don't let people do. Acceptance of gay people should approach from the angle of the positive qualities of love between gay couples and not on whether or not it's a choice, the former makes equivalency between love which gay partners have for each other and traditional romantic love, the latter simply equates it to an incurable condition which need only be tolerated and not endorsed or accepted.


Perhaps I should say its simply who you are. Its not a choice. Gay love is just as positive and beautiful as opposite sex love.

User avatar
North Washington Republic
Minister
 
Posts: 3090
Founded: Mar 13, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby North Washington Republic » Thu Jul 22, 2021 1:52 pm

Punished UMN wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
If it’s not a choice why should they not be allowed to act on those feelings, marry or have children?

I don't agree with Sun by any stretch but that's not a good argument, there are lots of things that aren't a choice that we don't let people do. Acceptance of gay people should approach from the angle of the positive qualities of love between gay couples and not on whether or not it's a choice, the former makes equivalency between love which gay partners have for each other and traditional romantic love, the latter simply equates it to an incurable condition which need only be tolerated and not endorsed or accepted.


I was of the opinion that any and all homosexual attraction was based on pure lust and man’s sinful nature. I didn’t acknowledge the romantic love that same-sex partners have for each other.
I’m a Wesleyan Christian center-left American Patriot. 29 year-old male and I live in Minneapolis, Minnesota
Pro: Jesus, The Holy Bible, Constitutional Republic, representative democracy, efficient and comprehensive welfare state, neoconservatism, civic nationalism, cannabis legalization, $15 an hour min.wage, religious liberty, LGBTQIA rights, Law & Order, police, death penalty, sensible reform of law enforcement, racial equity, peace through strength, NATO, EU
Anti: Satan, sin, anarchism, paleoconservatism, communism, libertarianism, fascism, ACAB, racism, populism, Trump(ism), Qanon, Putin, Xi, Taliban.
Economic Left/Right: -0.75. Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.67
My 8values results

GET VACCINATED ASAP AND WEAR A MASK!!!

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87269
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Thu Jul 22, 2021 1:53 pm

Sundiata wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
If it’s not a choice why should they not be allowed to act on those feelings, marry or have children?

Everyone deserves to have their feelings affirmed as part of a family. I don't want to conflate different topics but I believe that all people deserve the best.


You contradicting yourself. You say that you believe that acting on same sex feelings is a sin and want that enshrined into law yet you turn around and say everyone deserves to have their feelings affirmed as part of a family. You cannot have it both ways.

User avatar
Sundiata
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9755
Founded: Sep 27, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Sundiata » Thu Jul 22, 2021 1:53 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Punished UMN wrote:I don't agree with Sun by any stretch but that's not a good argument, there are lots of things that aren't a choice that we don't let people do. Acceptance of gay people should approach from the angle of the positive qualities of love between gay couples and not on whether or not it's a choice, the former makes equivalency between love which gay partners have for each other and traditional romantic love, the latter simply equates it to an incurable condition which need only be tolerated and not endorsed or accepted.


Perhaps I should say its simply who you are. Its not a choice. Gay love is just as positive and beautiful as opposite sex love.

Gay people are seeking love as they are inclined.
"Don't say, 'That person bothers me.' Think: 'That person sanctifies me.'"
-St. Josemaria Escriva

User avatar
Atomic Testing Museum
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 197
Founded: May 18, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby Atomic Testing Museum » Thu Jul 22, 2021 1:55 pm

I still don't think we should get rid of Guantanamo Bay. That place is kind of the United States and is a part of heritage. We already lost so much of our land to various countries in the pacific ocean. We may have gotten it on bad terms ,but that doesn't mean we should just give it up. we can spruce it up or something.

User avatar
Senkaku
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26713
Founded: Sep 01, 2012
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Senkaku » Thu Jul 22, 2021 1:57 pm

Punished UMN wrote:Acceptance of gay people should approach from the angle of the positive qualities of love between gay couples and not on whether or not it's a choice, the former makes equivalency between love which gay partners have for each other and traditional romantic love, the latter simply equates it to an incurable condition which need only be tolerated and not endorsed or accepted.

I guess going from being compared to lepers to being compared to straight people is an improvement but I was told equality would feel better
Biden-Santos Thought cadre

User avatar
Punished UMN
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6163
Founded: Jul 05, 2020
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Punished UMN » Thu Jul 22, 2021 1:57 pm

Atomic Testing Museum wrote:I still don't think we should get rid of Guantanamo Bay. That place is kind of the United States and is a part of heritage. We already lost so much of our land to various countries in the pacific ocean. We may have gotten it on bad terms ,but that doesn't mean we should just give it up. we can spruce it up or something.

"Our illegal colonial possession that is just a military base and prison camp is part of our heritage"
Fucking who's heritage lmfao. This has to be parody
Eastern Orthodox Christian. Purgatorial universalist.
Ascended beyond politics, now metapolitics is my best friend. Proud member of the Napoleon Bonaparte fandom.
I have borderline personality disorder, if I overreact to something, try to approach me after the fact and I'll apologize.
The political compass is like hell: if you find yourself on it, keep going.
Pro: The fundamental dignitas of the human spirit as expressed through its self-actualization in theosis. Anti: Faustian-Demonic Space Anarcho-Capitalism with Italo-Futurist Characteristics

User avatar
Punished UMN
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6163
Founded: Jul 05, 2020
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Punished UMN » Thu Jul 22, 2021 1:58 pm

Senkaku wrote:
Punished UMN wrote:Acceptance of gay people should approach from the angle of the positive qualities of love between gay couples and not on whether or not it's a choice, the former makes equivalency between love which gay partners have for each other and traditional romantic love, the latter simply equates it to an incurable condition which need only be tolerated and not endorsed or accepted.

I guess going from being compared to lepers to being compared to straight people is an improvement but I was told equality would feel better

Still has to be a pecking order in society, you know? Straights and gays may be in the same caste but cannot be allowed to touch the Brahmin.
Eastern Orthodox Christian. Purgatorial universalist.
Ascended beyond politics, now metapolitics is my best friend. Proud member of the Napoleon Bonaparte fandom.
I have borderline personality disorder, if I overreact to something, try to approach me after the fact and I'll apologize.
The political compass is like hell: if you find yourself on it, keep going.
Pro: The fundamental dignitas of the human spirit as expressed through its self-actualization in theosis. Anti: Faustian-Demonic Space Anarcho-Capitalism with Italo-Futurist Characteristics

User avatar
The Temple of the Computer
Diplomat
 
Posts: 566
Founded: May 02, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby The Temple of the Computer » Thu Jul 22, 2021 1:58 pm

Punished UMN wrote:
Atomic Testing Museum wrote:I still don't think we should get rid of Guantanamo Bay. That place is kind of the United States and is a part of heritage. We already lost so much of our land to various countries in the pacific ocean. We may have gotten it on bad terms ,but that doesn't mean we should just give it up. we can spruce it up or something.

"Our illegal colonial possession that is just a military base and prison camp is part of our heritage"
Fucking who's heritage lmfao. This has to be parody

Will anyone think of the poor, poor torturers!
#FreeNSGRojava

User avatar
Heloin
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26091
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Heloin » Thu Jul 22, 2021 2:02 pm

Atomic Testing Museum wrote:I still don't think we should get rid of Guantanamo Bay. That place is kind of the United States and is a part of heritage. We already lost so much of our land to various countries in the pacific ocean. We may have gotten it on bad terms ,but that doesn't mean we should just give it up. we can spruce it up or something.

What is a more proud part of American heritage than torture, sexual abuse, and indefinite detention without trial.

User avatar
The Temple of the Computer
Diplomat
 
Posts: 566
Founded: May 02, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby The Temple of the Computer » Thu Jul 22, 2021 2:02 pm

Heloin wrote:
Atomic Testing Museum wrote:I still don't think we should get rid of Guantanamo Bay. That place is kind of the United States and is a part of heritage. We already lost so much of our land to various countries in the pacific ocean. We may have gotten it on bad terms ,but that doesn't mean we should just give it up. we can spruce it up or something.

What is a more proud part of American heritage than torture, sexual abuse, and indefinite detention without trial.

USA! USA! USA! USA!
#FreeNSGRojava

User avatar
North Washington Republic
Minister
 
Posts: 3090
Founded: Mar 13, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby North Washington Republic » Thu Jul 22, 2021 2:03 pm

Sundiata wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
Perhaps I should say its simply who you are. Its not a choice. Gay love is just as positive and beautiful as opposite sex love.

Gay people are seeking love as they are inclined.


Do you agree with Pope Francis that same-sex couples should have a right to a civil marriage(a legal marriage, NOT one that is preformed by the Church)
I’m a Wesleyan Christian center-left American Patriot. 29 year-old male and I live in Minneapolis, Minnesota
Pro: Jesus, The Holy Bible, Constitutional Republic, representative democracy, efficient and comprehensive welfare state, neoconservatism, civic nationalism, cannabis legalization, $15 an hour min.wage, religious liberty, LGBTQIA rights, Law & Order, police, death penalty, sensible reform of law enforcement, racial equity, peace through strength, NATO, EU
Anti: Satan, sin, anarchism, paleoconservatism, communism, libertarianism, fascism, ACAB, racism, populism, Trump(ism), Qanon, Putin, Xi, Taliban.
Economic Left/Right: -0.75. Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.67
My 8values results

GET VACCINATED ASAP AND WEAR A MASK!!!

User avatar
Sundiata
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9755
Founded: Sep 27, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Sundiata » Thu Jul 22, 2021 2:09 pm

San Lumen wrote:You contradicting yourself. You say that you believe that acting on same sex feelings is a sin and want that enshrined into law yet you turn around and say everyone deserves to have their feelings affirmed as part of a family. You cannot have it both ways.

Everyone deserves to have a mother and father but those that don't still deserve a high quality of life in their absence. A person, particularly one who is homosexual should not be cast away from society.
"Don't say, 'That person bothers me.' Think: 'That person sanctifies me.'"
-St. Josemaria Escriva

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Barinive, Cerespasia, Cerula, Cyptopir, Dimetrodon Empire, Dogmeat, Enormous Gentiles, Google [Bot], Likhinia, Shearoa, Stratonesia, Zadanar

Advertisement

Remove ads