GuessTheAltAccount wrote:For me it's usually less on policy, and more on what is or isn't reasonable to presume of those who disagree with us on policy.
I'm left-wing on gay marriage, but right-wing on the notion that we shouldn't chalk opposition to gay marriage up to homophobia.
I'm left-wing on abortion rights, but right-wing on the notion that we shouldn't chalk opposition to them up to misogyny. (Or whatever is the most popularly presumed motive this week; it always seems to change; sometimes I wonder if we should do a poll.)
Granted, these sort of disagreements DO generally make me wonder if I'm on the wrong side of the issue, but thus far I've never had quite enough doubt to vote for any right-wing parties over them. I do wish there could be some consequences for those who invoke the above questionable assumptions without harming LGBTQ individuals or abortion patients in the process, though. :/
. . .
Motives aside, I find my most right-wing opinions on policy itself tend to be around surveillance and facial recognition technology.
. . .
I think more than anything the problem with the political spectrum is it's a false dichotomy. As if the only reason to support facial recognition is because you're more conservative; as in traditional; even though it's anything but traditional. And what would that make someone who, let's say, is more supportive of religion than I am but less comfortable with facial recognition scanners?
I'm left wing on racial justice but I'm right wing on the idea that black people can't be racist. I'm left wing on supporting the right of Muslims to practice Islam but right wing on the question of "is Islam totally peaceful?"