NATION

PASSWORD

On the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Regarding the breaking of the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact

Option 1: It’s dishonorable. NAPs matter.
18
45%
Option 2: It’s a justified breaking of a NAP because the Soviets were planning to break it later down the road (please provide proof), hence the German act was preemptive self defense.
12
30%
Option 3: It’s justified in the sense that there are no real rules in war.
10
25%
 
Total votes : 40

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 30594
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Fri May 28, 2021 5:05 am

Unstoppable Empire of Doom wrote:
Kilobugya wrote:
In the late 1930s ? Sure. And Nazi Germany was planing to invade USSR too.



That's a much more dubious claim, and you even admit you've no evidence to show for it. The Russian civil war only ended in 1923, they had other priorities than invading Germany.

No it isn't dubious. It is fact. One of their stated goals during the polish-soviet war was to attain a land border with Germany and invade spreading the revolution to the industrialized west. If you disagree you can go take it up with Lenin.


It does seem odd for Kilobugya to argue that since the Russian civil war only ended in 1923, the Soviets weren't interested in exporting revolution; especially since the 1920 Battle of Warsaw - when the embattled Poles turned back the Soviet invasion of Poland against all the odds - is seen in traditional historiography as perhaps the key moment in stopping immediate post-revolutionary attempts to export the Russian Revolution to the rest of Europe, when Bolshevik ideology was explicitly based on exporting the revolution, and when Lenin was openly arguing that the new Bolshevik state couldn't survive without a revolutionary Germany.

To quote historian Anna Cienciala:

In December 1919, the Red Army was clearly winning the Civil War and the Soviet government sent peace proposals to the Polish government. Pilsudski rejected negotiations, suspecting the Soviets only wanted a breather before attacking Poland. At this time, the French and British were pulling their troops out of Russia and wanted to avert a Polish-Soviet war.

On 8 December 1919, the Allied Supreme Council in Paris proposed a demarcation line between the Polish and Russian "administrations." This line, which was specifically stated not to be the frontier, was roughly equivalent to the eastern border of Russian Poland, which was ethnically Polish, but it had two possible variations in East Galicia (formerly part of Austrian Poland): one of which left Lwow [Ukr L’viv, Rus. Lvov] then predominantly Polish, and the neighboring oil fields, on the Russian side (Line A), while the other left them on the Polish side (Line B). Pilsudski ignored this proposal. His goal was a federation between Poland, Lithuania and Belorussia, and alliance with an independent Ukraine.

Lenin’s aim was to infiltrate the borderlands, set up communist governments there, as well as in Poland, and reach Germany where he expected a socialist (communist) revolution to break out. He also expected revolutions elsewhere, including Italy, but the German revolution was most important to him for he believed that Soviet Russia could not survive without a socialist Germany and the help of its industrial know-how to modernize Russia.


https://acienciala.ku.edu/hist557/lect11.htm

Or perhaps this is as a misunderstanding and/or a matter of nuance.

It is true that the Bolshevik state didn't plan on invading Germany in the period 1918-1920; but that rather ignores the broader context. If they weren't planning on invading Germany, it was only because they expected a revolution (which they would then support) to break out spontaneously, in keeping with Lenin and Trotsky's understanding of the inevitability of revolution in mature capitalist societies and the attempts to set up small-s soviet republics in Bremen and Bavaria. And if they weren't necessarily planning on a military invasion of Germany, then they very much invaded Poland in order to facilitate direct mutual support with the revolutionary German state that wasn't to be. Neither Poland nor the Soviet Union achieved all of their military goals in that war, but the successful Polish defence of Warsaw was one of the turning points in limiting the geographic reach of the Bolshevik revolutions (plural) in the immediate post-war period.

User avatar
The Holy Therns
Post Czar
 
Posts: 30591
Founded: Jul 09, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Holy Therns » Fri May 28, 2021 5:08 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Dolmestan wrote:I think it was just a truce in both party's eyes. Neither side felt they were ready to fight the other side and were not willing to take a risk. Both sides saw each other as too much of a threat to maintain this pact and if Hitler hadn't broken it, Stalin would have, maybe later but it would have happened.


There was no expiration date on the signed paper though.


You act like that mattered to either party in any way.
Platitude with attitude
Your new favorite.
MTF transperson. She/her. Lives in Sweden.
Also, N A N A ! ! !
Gallade wrote:Love, cake, wine and banter. No greater meaning to life (〜^∇^)〜

Ethel mermania wrote:to therns is to transend the pettiness of the field of play into the field of dreams.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163887
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Fri May 28, 2021 5:44 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:Looking at the polls, I’m glad to see that the forum is suitably outraged at the dishonorable conduct surrounding the historical NAP... while at the same time the relative closeness of the polls allows for very interesting and balanced discussions

Maybe read the thread, people generally don't care about it being dishonourable.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Kilobugya
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6878
Founded: Apr 05, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Kilobugya » Fri May 28, 2021 6:44 am

The Archregimancy wrote:It does seem odd for Kilobugya to argue that since the Russian civil war only ended in 1923, the Soviets weren't interested in exporting revolution


Exporting revolution, sure, but that wasn't supposed to be through a good old fashion invasion, but rather through support to local revolutionary movements.

The Archregimancy wrote:Or perhaps this is as a misunderstanding and/or a matter of nuance.

It is true that the Bolshevik state didn't plan on invading Germany in the period 1918-1920; but that rather ignores the broader context. If they weren't planning on invading Germany, it was only because they expected a revolution (which they would then support) to break out spontaneously, in keeping with Lenin and Trotsky's understanding of the inevitability of revolution in mature capitalist societies and the attempts to set up small-s soviet republics in Bremen and Bavaria.


Exactly.

The Archregimancy wrote:And if they weren't necessarily planning on a military invasion of Germany, then they very much invaded Poland in order to facilitate direct mutual support with the revolutionary German state that wasn't to be.


And also to create a cushion to protect the USSR in case the revolution failed in Germany. But it never was a plan for a traditional invasion of Germany, at least not before Hitler and the inevitability of WW2.
Secular humanist and trans-humanist, rationalist, democratic socialist, pacifist, dreaming very high to not perform too low.
Economic Left/Right: -9.50 - Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.69

User avatar
Kubra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17203
Founded: Apr 15, 2006
Father Knows Best State

Postby Kubra » Fri May 28, 2021 10:09 am

The whole Germany plan in the polish-soviet conflict was more of a hail mary than an actual plan. It's telling that the Red Army had been moving units off the western fronts towards far more relevant internal conflicts before tukhachevsky had even gotten to marching.
“Atomic war is inevitable. It will destroy half of humanity: it is going to destroy immense human riches. It is very possible. The atomic war is going to provoke a true inferno on Earth. But it will not impede Communism.”
Comrade J. Posadas

User avatar
Postauthoritarian America
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1195
Founded: Nov 07, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Postauthoritarian America » Fri May 28, 2021 10:44 am

Um it wasn't a "nonagression pact" in any sense of the word, it was an agreement to invade and carve up a sovereign nation that led to further atrocities (Katyn Forest, Warsaw Ghetto). In law no agreement to commit a crime is enforceable. Planning offensive war is a war crime. Arguably the Pact's legality was decided in the negative at Nuremberg.
"The violence of American law enforcement degrades the lives of countless people, especially poor Black people, through its peculiar appetite for their death." | "There are but two parties now: traitors and patriots. And I want hereafter to be ranked with the latter and, I trust, the stronger party." -- Ulysses S. Grant, 1861 | "You don't get mulligans in insurrection." | "Today's Republican Party is America's and the world's largest white supremacist organization." | "I didn't vote to overturn an election, and I will not be lectured by people who did about partisanship." -- Rep. Gerry Connolly |"Republicans...have transformed...to a fascist party engaged in a takeover of the United States of America."

Previous

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Almonaster Nuevo, Ancientania, Brazilcomestoyou, El Lazaro, Google [Bot], Ineva, Khedivate-of-Egypt, Kreushia, Plan Neonie, The H Corporation, The Huskar Social Union, The Vooperian Union, Valrifall, Zancostan

Advertisement

Remove ads