North Sonovia wrote:Kowani wrote:Oh, I understand
i just don't agree
no
both sides want to change the constitution to better enact their version of a "proper" america
the left is just louder about it (despite the fact that the closest effort to changing the constitution in the modern day comes from conservatives pushing for a "balanced budget")
left
Alright. And even if that was or wasn't exactly the case, it wasn't the point. I'm asking for opinions on it, as in, should it be removed in your opinions? (I'd disagree, well, because I have common sense.) Should it be edited at all? What if we got into a devastating war or were preparing for one? With tensions rising in the middle-east, it's surely a possibility, isn't it? Would you optionally quarter a soldier? If so, would an ineffective and dysfunctional Department of Defense be the only reason, or would you do that out of pure patriotism? That's what I mean to ask, and I think I'll quote this quote in my first post just to make sure people reading understand me here.
there's no grounds for it to be removed
from a military perspective, housing soldiers in people's houses is just inefficient and blurs the line between civilian and combatant
from any other perspective, it exhibits a chilling effect, stifling criticism of the war, and is ripe for abuse
anyway, no
war in the Middle East would have no bearing on US troop allocations at home
nobody in that region has a navy that could reach to invade the US even if they were suicidal enough to try
as for voluntarily quartering soldiers
no, no i would not
whole "anti-war" thing that comes with being a leftist