At best its disingenuous. It’s leaves out things like all the conservative “cut and run” talk when there was suggestions to get out.
Advertisement
by The Black Forrest » Sun Aug 15, 2021 2:37 pm
by Punished UMN » Sun Aug 15, 2021 2:38 pm
The Black Forrest wrote:Senkaku wrote:I mean it literally would have been simpler, but it wouldn’t have made the point that that whole paragraph makes, which I assume is what they actually wanted to communicate
At best its disingenuous. It’s leaves out things like all the conservative “cut and run” talk when there was suggestions to get out.
by Kowani » Sun Aug 15, 2021 2:38 pm
by Atomic Testing Museum » Sun Aug 15, 2021 2:38 pm
by Salus Maior » Sun Aug 15, 2021 2:39 pm
by Immortan Khan » Sun Aug 15, 2021 2:39 pm
by Chess Guy » Sun Aug 15, 2021 2:39 pm
Washington Resistance Army wrote:Chess Guy wrote:George Washington, William Wallace, Osama bin Laden. Names that will live as long as men are free.
https://cdn.quotesgram.com/img/63/14/17 ... laden1.gif
OBL died like a bitch and Washington owned slaves, they can both pound sand.
by Salus Maior » Sun Aug 15, 2021 2:40 pm
The Black Forrest wrote:Senkaku wrote:I mean it literally would have been simpler, but it wouldn’t have made the point that that whole paragraph makes, which I assume is what they actually wanted to communicate
At best its disingenuous. It’s leaves out things like all the conservative “cut and run” talk when there was suggestions to get out.
by Chess Guy » Sun Aug 15, 2021 2:41 pm
Immortan Khan wrote:It's fine to call Alabamans X pejorative about being uneducated brutes because of Y social issue but calling the Taliban the same thing for murdering girls because they want to read is a step too far.
Absolute state of shitty Western postcolonials.
by Baltenstein » Sun Aug 15, 2021 2:41 pm
by Punished UMN » Sun Aug 15, 2021 2:41 pm
Chess Guy wrote:Immortan Khan wrote:It's fine to call Alabamans X pejorative about being uneducated brutes because of Y social issue but calling the Taliban the same thing for murdering girls because they want to read is a step too far.
Absolute state of shitty Western postcolonials.
The Taliban doesn't murder girls, please cut out the lying
by Gallia- » Sun Aug 15, 2021 2:42 pm
Punished UMN wrote:Gallia- wrote:
Only Americans qualify as human under the religious cult that constitute the US State Department, in this analogy.
Everyone else is somewhere between "useful inanimate object", like a chair or a hammer, and "wild angry animal" like a badger or wolf.
Schmitt had some spicy critiques but also fell into a trap of pigeonholing. It's not just liberals in the Western concept. ISIS cannot do the same thing (towards infidels). Neither could Hitlerites (towards the Jews).
Plenty of groups have sworn issues that are redlines or whatever. Most groups can be reasoned with to some extent, whether it's something like converting a religion, or at least hashing out a deal over lunch. Afghans are rational people who, historically, tend to be powerfully independent folks. As long as you let them rule their country how they want, they don't really care about other stuff. The British were able to grok this after their first bout. Maybe America will figure it out too, and work out a deal with the Taliban that lets them build railroads or mineral mines in the country.
The State Department will fuck that up too though unless they purge neocons and ideological radicals from the party clique. Pragmatists need to be brought in who can look past ideological differences toward common goals.
You're right of course, Schmitt was blinded by his dedication to the Nazi Party in his later writings to see his own biases, but his writings can be extrapolated to those ideologies as well.
The Black Forrest wrote:Punished UMN wrote:Reminds me of an observation, I believe by Schmitt, that liberals are one of the few groups incapable of negotiating the end to a war, because liberal ideology fundamentally does not acknowledge the legitimacy of its enemies to negotiate peace, and so the only form of peace a liberal can accept is the total destruction of the groups it views as its enemies. While less idealistic ideologies are inclined to view war as a matter of conflicting interests, liberals don't accept that their enemies have legitimate, strategic interests, only that they, as a people, are barbaric and must be crushed.
Wouldn’t it have been simpler to write:
I don’t like liberals!
by The Reformed American Republic » Sun Aug 15, 2021 2:42 pm
Gallia- wrote:The Reformed American Republic wrote:The Taliban are mostly savages, though I'm still for pulling out.
Yes, we know you're racist against Pashtuns. Most people can put that aside and hash out a deal with different cultures and belief systems, even if they find their beliefs distasteful, though.
You can't really reason with ISIS though, because they're ideological extremists, which is kind of like the United States State Department in a way.
by Washington Resistance Army » Sun Aug 15, 2021 2:43 pm
by Luminesa » Sun Aug 15, 2021 2:43 pm
by Kowani » Sun Aug 15, 2021 2:43 pm
by Rusozak » Sun Aug 15, 2021 2:44 pm
by Chess Guy » Sun Aug 15, 2021 2:44 pm
Luminesa wrote:Chess Guy wrote:OBL's wife rushed to protect him, he calmly shoot up, his head towering above her, looking the man who would kill him calmly in the eye as he gave him a clean shot.
I’ve been avoiding your stupid comments like the plague but here’s something to make people laugh, since you like YouTube links so much:
The Dr. Cox Rebuttal
by Salus Maior » Sun Aug 15, 2021 2:44 pm
by Luminesa » Sun Aug 15, 2021 2:45 pm
by Old Tyrannia » Sun Aug 15, 2021 2:45 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Cyptopir, Duvniask, Eahland, Hidrandia, Ifreann, La Xinga, Port Carverton, The Kharkivan Cossacks, The Mazzars, Tungstan, Zancostan
Advertisement