Diarcesia wrote:The Reformed American Republic wrote:And that's why it is called "Cultural Marxism" by some, even though Marx probably thought class was really one of the only important identities. It's just applying that logic to other areas, though interestingly enough, it can exist without Marxist concepts of class. It is similar to Marixsm (in some areas) and is compatible with it, but it can stand alone too.
Looks like we found a left-wing equivalent to the right's "Social Darwinism."
But yeah, as far as terrorism as "doing violent actions to coerce a government to a specific goal," it's more of a right-wing thing nowadays in the US. A left-wing equivalent would be rebels on the vein of Che Guevara and Fidel Castro. Last year's riots don't fit the definition. And yes, I condemn those riots, too, before you ask.
Exactly. The riots sucked. Burning down Wendy's didn't stop black people from getting killed by cops.
The disorganised and non-united way the riots happened clearly makes it non terrorism.
It was still shitty. Riots suck ass. Don't do them.
The Jan 6th Terrorist attack had a larger goal and was slightly more organized and focused on that larger goal.
Overall, Trump brand terrorism is evil and should stop. Black lives do matter, black people shouldn't be killed over non violent alleged crimes. But burning down shit doesn't change anything.
Oh and fuck corporations that try to use popular political things as a means to sell there cheep Chinese made garbage.











