NATION

PASSWORD

France Bans Hijabs for Under 18s

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What do You Think of This?

Laïcité in general should go
61
13%
France shouldn’t have done this, and it’s clear they’ve been targeting Muslims
159
34%
France shouldn’t have done this, but it’s other measures regarding Islam are valid
32
7%
French Muslims should fall in line and follow these rules
58
12%
Hijab is oppressive, why would anyone be against this?
60
13%
Hopefully this will help erode Islam in France
86
18%
Other
14
3%
 
Total votes : 470

User avatar
Salus Maior
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27813
Founded: Jun 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Salus Maior » Sun Apr 04, 2021 6:35 pm

Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum wrote:
The Sherpa Empire wrote:It's a piece of clothing. It's not like it's an irreversible surgery or something. France needs to chill the fuck out.
With the order they receive from the Vatican, they forbid the hijab, they say they are against pronography, but they do not refrain from secretly liking the Instagram female models. Right-wing religious nationalism creates enemies, secularism provides freedom.


You're even less comprehensible than usual, Hakinda.
Traditionalist Catholic, Constitutional Monarchist, Habsburg Nostalgic, Distributist, Disillusioned Millennial.

"In any case we clearly see....That some opportune remedy must be found quickly for the misery and wretchedness pressing so unjustly on the majority of the working class...it has come to pass that working men have been surrendered, isolated and helpless, to the hardheartedness of employers and the greed of unchecked competition." -Pope Leo XIII, Rerum Novarum

User avatar
Odreria
Minister
 
Posts: 2309
Founded: Jun 15, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Odreria » Sun Apr 04, 2021 6:40 pm

The Cazistan wrote:
Kowani wrote:that's not what either of those things mean

There you go proving my point, I have better things to do than talk to someone like you.
A bit of advice, You have something like 34 thousand messages on a text based scenario game forum in only 3 or so years. From what I've seen, the majority of it is you jumping into pointless arguments with people and trying to refute them to no end or success.
Go outside or something.

you say my argument doesn't make sense yet you have posted a lot. curious...
Valrifell wrote:
Disregard whatever this poster says
Pro: Christianity, nuclear power, firearms, socialism, environmentalism
Neutral: LGBT, PRC, charter schools, larping
Anti: mind virus, globalism, racism, great reset

User avatar
Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum
Minister
 
Posts: 3046
Founded: Sep 24, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum » Sun Apr 04, 2021 6:46 pm

Salus Maior wrote:
Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum wrote:With the order they receive from the Vatican, they forbid the hijab, they say they are against pronography, but they do not refrain from secretly liking the Instagram female models. Right-wing religious nationalism creates enemies, secularism provides freedom.


You're even less comprehensible than usual, Hakinda.
Does the name Natalia garibotto sound familiar to you, Salus Maior ?
Sosyal Demokrat Kemalist
Zayıf Agnostik
LGBT Destekçisi
-3.13 -4.77
Türk %76,2 ☾☆
Slav %22,4
Çinli %1

User avatar
Salus Maior
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27813
Founded: Jun 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Salus Maior » Sun Apr 04, 2021 6:57 pm

Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum wrote:
Salus Maior wrote:
You're even less comprehensible than usual, Hakinda.
Does the name Natalia garibotto sound familiar to you, Salus Maior ?


Not really, no.
Traditionalist Catholic, Constitutional Monarchist, Habsburg Nostalgic, Distributist, Disillusioned Millennial.

"In any case we clearly see....That some opportune remedy must be found quickly for the misery and wretchedness pressing so unjustly on the majority of the working class...it has come to pass that working men have been surrendered, isolated and helpless, to the hardheartedness of employers and the greed of unchecked competition." -Pope Leo XIII, Rerum Novarum

User avatar
Zurkir
Envoy
 
Posts: 266
Founded: Mar 30, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby Zurkir » Sun Apr 04, 2021 7:25 pm

Salus Maior wrote:
Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum wrote:Does the name Natalia garibotto sound familiar to you, Salus Maior ?


Not really, no.


She’s some Instagram model that the Pope “liked” on Instagram.
National Flag | Nation Overview | The Four Parties
սա ինչ լեզու է

F.T.W.D
It has never been “just a meme”.

Daily Historical Quote: “It is far better to be alone than in bad company.” -George Washington (So based and personally relatable.)

User avatar
Salus Maior
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27813
Founded: Jun 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Salus Maior » Sun Apr 04, 2021 7:28 pm

Zurkir wrote:
Salus Maior wrote:
Not really, no.


She’s some Instagram model that the Pope “liked” on Instagram.


Ooooohhhh, that.

Considering most political/public figures don't actually run their own social media pages it was probably some dumb intern that did that.
Traditionalist Catholic, Constitutional Monarchist, Habsburg Nostalgic, Distributist, Disillusioned Millennial.

"In any case we clearly see....That some opportune remedy must be found quickly for the misery and wretchedness pressing so unjustly on the majority of the working class...it has come to pass that working men have been surrendered, isolated and helpless, to the hardheartedness of employers and the greed of unchecked competition." -Pope Leo XIII, Rerum Novarum

User avatar
Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum
Minister
 
Posts: 3046
Founded: Sep 24, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum » Sun Apr 04, 2021 8:52 pm

Salus Maior wrote:
Zurkir wrote:
She’s some Instagram model that the Pope “liked” on Instagram.


Ooooohhhh, that.

Considering most political/public figures don't actually run their own social media pages it was probably some dumb intern that did that.
Don't you think the Pope is a secret fantasy world like typical religious nationalists who use religion and restrict people's freedom. You cannot see the problem here, the problem is not the headscarf or the pope's liking of the female model, the main problem is that Christian radicals attack Muslims, can you see the hypocrisy here. Also my personal opinion is please don't use the word dumb for people who like female bodies.
Image
Last edited by Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum on Sun Apr 04, 2021 8:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Sosyal Demokrat Kemalist
Zayıf Agnostik
LGBT Destekçisi
-3.13 -4.77
Türk %76,2 ☾☆
Slav %22,4
Çinli %1

User avatar
Zizou
Diplomat
 
Posts: 564
Founded: Aug 23, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Zizou » Sun Apr 04, 2021 9:04 pm

Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum wrote:
Salus Maior wrote:
Ooooohhhh, that.

Considering most political/public figures don't actually run their own social media pages it was probably some dumb intern that did that.
Don't you think the Pope is a secret fantasy world like typical religious nationalists who use religion and restrict people's freedom. You cannot see the problem here, the problem is not the headscarf or the pope's liking of the female model, the main problem is that Christian radicals attack Muslims, can you see the hypocrisy here. Also my personal opinion is please don't use the word dumb for people who like female bodies.
Image

I'm going to be honest, I'm not entirely sure what you're getting at. If I understand correctly, you are trying to say a lot of Christians are hypocrites for attacking Muslims for their beliefs? Or are you saying that many religious people are hypocrites in general?
Zizou Vytherov-Skollvaldr
LTN in The Black Hawks
Meishu of the former Red Sun Army
Parxland wrote:It might somehow give me STDs through the computer screen with how often you hop between different groups of people.

User avatar
Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum
Minister
 
Posts: 3046
Founded: Sep 24, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum » Sun Apr 04, 2021 9:12 pm

Zizou wrote:
Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum wrote: Don't you think the Pope is a secret fantasy world like typical religious nationalists who use religion and restrict people's freedom. You cannot see the problem here, the problem is not the headscarf or the pope's liking of the female model, the main problem is that Christian radicals attack Muslims, can you see the hypocrisy here. Also my personal opinion is please don't use the word dumb for people who like female bodies.

I'm going to be honest, I'm not entirely sure what you're getting at. If I understand correctly, you are trying to say a lot of Christians are hypocrites for attacking Muslims for their beliefs? Or are you saying that many religious people are hypocrites in general?
I say my radicalism is bad.
Sosyal Demokrat Kemalist
Zayıf Agnostik
LGBT Destekçisi
-3.13 -4.77
Türk %76,2 ☾☆
Slav %22,4
Çinli %1

User avatar
The Alma Mater
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25619
Founded: May 23, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Alma Mater » Sun Apr 04, 2021 10:57 pm

Necroghastia wrote:
Dofelkvic wrote:With all the beheading, suicidal bombers, and truck drivers purposely driving towards pedestrians and killing them I think they do have a reason to implement such strict rules right now.

So how does telling minors and anyone interested in chaperoning that they can't wear a simple head covering do anything about such incidents?


It forces muslim men to grow up instead of being aroused by the idea of little girls.
Getting an education was a bit like a communicable sexual disease.
It made you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and then you had the urge to pass it on.
- Terry Pratchett, Hogfather

User avatar
Laka Strolistandiler
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5010
Founded: Jul 14, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Laka Strolistandiler » Sun Apr 04, 2021 11:04 pm

Vassenor wrote:Remember, ironic fascism is still fascism.

And that’s just why I was fascist some time ago.
Don’t worry, now I’m strasserist so nothing basically changed bruh
||||||||||||||||||||
I am not a Russian but a Cameroonian born in this POS.
An autocratic semi feudal monarchy with elements of aristocracy. Society absurdly hierarchical, cosplaying Edwardian Britain. A British-ish colonial empire incorporating some partially democratic nations who just want some WMD’s
Pronouns up to your choice I can be a girl if I want to so refer to me as she/her.
I reserve the right to /stillme any one-liners if my post is at least two lines long

User avatar
Glorious Hong Kong
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1357
Founded: Nov 01, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Glorious Hong Kong » Sun Apr 04, 2021 11:52 pm

I'm against this and I'm leaning against laicite in general because of authoritarian nonsense such as this and because laicite inherently conflicts with freedom of expression. Headscarves are totally fine by me. No one should ever have the right to tell anyone else what they can and can't wear or what they can and can't say. Muslim women are entitled to wear a headscarf. Non-Muslims are entitled to educate children about religious intolerance in a religious studies class by showing pre-existing cartoons of Mohammed without fear of getting fired, jailed, or beheaded. Fair is fair is fair is fair. Muslim women are being oppressed twice over by their male relatives for not covering up and by the state for covering up.

I generally consider myself anti-feminist and I'm sympathetic to a number of MRA viewpoints. I'm no fan of MeToo, Women's March, or GamerGate SJWs masquerading as "journalists". But still. No one has a right to tell women what they can and can't wear or what they can and can't do with their bodies.

#HerBodyHerChoice

The other measures taken to combat radical Islam in light of recent Islamist-inspired terror attacks and beheadings on French soil are also fine by me. Interior Minister Jean Castex has come out against the proposal. Emmanuel Macron has managed to strike a delicate balance between enabling religious extremism and quashing religious forms of free expression. For all the accusations of neoliberalism and being out-of-touch, I still prefer him to Marine Le Pen (who once cozied up to Putin and Assad, a huge turnoff for me at the time of the last presidential election) and I strongly prefer him to the Islamist-enabling wokists and apologists on the Left.
LIBERATE HONG KONG. REVOLUTION OF OUR TIMES. CCP DELENDA EST.
VIVE LE FRANCE. JE SUIS SAMUEL PATY. I STAND WITH EUROPE AND ISRAEL AGAINST RADICAL ISLAM.
ALL LIVES MATTER.
Wuhan coronavirus is racist but Japanese encephalitis is A-OK. The CCP has nothing to do with this double standard whatsoever. Nothing to see here.
The case against communism
Definition of radical Islam

User avatar
Nakena
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15010
Founded: May 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Nakena » Mon Apr 05, 2021 12:06 am

Laka Strolistandiler wrote:
Vassenor wrote:Remember, ironic fascism is still fascism.

And that’s just why I was fascist some time ago.
Don’t worry, now I’m strasserist so nothing basically changed bruh


As for fascist, they come very rarely to NSG anymore and prefer to stay in their regions.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68114
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Mon Apr 05, 2021 12:12 am

The Alma Mater wrote:
Necroghastia wrote:So how does telling minors and anyone interested in chaperoning that they can't wear a simple head covering do anything about such incidents?


It forces muslim men to grow up instead of being aroused by the idea of little girls.


Ah yes, casual sexism in action.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Dofelkvic
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 11
Founded: Mar 24, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby Dofelkvic » Mon Apr 05, 2021 12:34 am

Necroghastia wrote:
Dofelkvic wrote:With all the beheading, suicidal bombers, and truck drivers purposely driving towards pedestrians and killing them I think they do have a reason to implement such strict rules right now.

So how does telling minors and anyone interested in chaperoning that they can't wear a simple head covering do anything about such incidents?


I did not think that through, I just realized they could just do all those incidents in front of a church so banning hijabs won't do much to prevent it.

User avatar
The Alma Mater
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25619
Founded: May 23, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Alma Mater » Mon Apr 05, 2021 12:46 am

Vassenor wrote:
The Alma Mater wrote:
It forces muslim men to grow up instead of being aroused by the idea of little girls.


Ah yes, casual sexism in action.


Quite a lot of terrorism is indeed caused by sexually underdeveloped men.
Getting an education was a bit like a communicable sexual disease.
It made you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and then you had the urge to pass it on.
- Terry Pratchett, Hogfather

User avatar
Insaanistan
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13784
Founded: Nov 18, 2019
Democratic Socialists

Postby Insaanistan » Mon Apr 05, 2021 5:56 am

The Alma Mater wrote:
Necroghastia wrote:So how does telling minors and anyone interested in chaperoning that they can't wear a simple head covering do anything about such incidents?


It forces muslim men to grow up instead of being aroused by the idea of little girls.

Uhhh... what?
السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركته-Peace be with you!
BLM - Free Palestine - Abolish Kafala - Boycott Israel - Trump lost
Anti: DAESH & friends, IR Govt, Saudi Govt, Israeli Govt, China, anti-semitism, homophobia, racism, sexism, Fascism, Communism, Islamophobia.

Hello brother (or sister),
Unapologetic Muslim American
I’m neither a terrorist nor Iranian.
Ace-ish (Hate it when my friends are right!)
TG for questions on Islam!

User avatar
Insaanistan
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13784
Founded: Nov 18, 2019
Democratic Socialists

Postby Insaanistan » Mon Apr 05, 2021 5:59 am

Dofelkvic wrote:With all the beheading, suicidal bombers, and truck drivers purposely driving towards pedestrians and killing them I think they do have a reason to implement such strict rules right now.

You know said groups target and hate Muslims more than they do Christian Europeans, right?
Most terrorist attacks happen in the Middle East.
Also, in a large portion of terrorist attacks in Europe, said terrorists also knowing kill Muslims, such as one case where the first person the terrorist killed was a hijabi.

Additionally, how is otherizing and ostracizing Muslims going to decrease terrorism rather than increase it?
السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركته-Peace be with you!
BLM - Free Palestine - Abolish Kafala - Boycott Israel - Trump lost
Anti: DAESH & friends, IR Govt, Saudi Govt, Israeli Govt, China, anti-semitism, homophobia, racism, sexism, Fascism, Communism, Islamophobia.

Hello brother (or sister),
Unapologetic Muslim American
I’m neither a terrorist nor Iranian.
Ace-ish (Hate it when my friends are right!)
TG for questions on Islam!

User avatar
The Free Joy State
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 16402
Founded: Jan 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Free Joy State » Mon Apr 05, 2021 6:32 am

I mean, if we're talking about tiny girls who are too young to have any opinion of their own about a religion... maybe they'd have something of a point (if they were extending it to other worn religious symbols).

But teenagers are old enough to have started forming their own minds on their religion, and -- at the end of the day -- the hijab is not the burka. The measure is also clearly aimed at Islam (making it more discriminatory than the general understanding of state secularism, which ought not to favour or disfavour any religion).

And, it should be up to girls to choose what they wear. It's not something that should be forced on them by the government anymore than it should be forced on them by anyone else.

However, it has not happened yet. And, if it's anything like the last time this was raised, it probably will not.
"If there's a book that you want to read, but it hasn't been written yet, then you must write it." - Toni Morrison

My nation does not represent my beliefs or politics.

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Mon Apr 05, 2021 6:36 am

The Free Joy State wrote:I mean, if we're talking about tiny girls who are too young to have any opinion of their own about a religion... maybe they'd have something of a point (if they were extending it to other worn religious symbols).

But teenagers are old enough to have started forming their own minds on their religion, and -- at the end of the day -- the hijab is not the burka. The measure is also clearly aimed at Islam (making it more discriminatory than the general understanding of state secularism, which ought not to favour or disfavour any religion).

And, it should be up to girls to choose what they wear. It's not something that should be forced on them by the government anymore than it should be forced on them by anyone else.

However, it has not happened yet. And, if it's anything like the last time this was raised, it probably will not.

This is pretty much my position as well

User avatar
Insaanistan
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13784
Founded: Nov 18, 2019
Democratic Socialists

Postby Insaanistan » Mon Apr 05, 2021 7:24 am

The Free Joy State wrote:I mean, if we're talking about tiny girls who are too young to have any opinion of their own about a religion... maybe they'd have something of a point (if they were extending it to other worn religious symbols).

But teenagers are old enough to have started forming their own minds on their religion, and -- at the end of the day -- the hijab is not the burka. The measure is also clearly aimed at Islam (making it more discriminatory than the general understanding of state secularism, which ought not to favour or disfavour any religion).

And, it should be up to girls to choose what they wear. It's not something that should be forced on them by the government anymore than it should be forced on them by anyone else.

However, it has not happened yet. And, if it's anything like the last time this was raised, it probably will not.


I dunno know about the last bit. Islamophobia is at record highs in France. I hope it doesn’t pass, but I don’t think it won’t.
السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركته-Peace be with you!
BLM - Free Palestine - Abolish Kafala - Boycott Israel - Trump lost
Anti: DAESH & friends, IR Govt, Saudi Govt, Israeli Govt, China, anti-semitism, homophobia, racism, sexism, Fascism, Communism, Islamophobia.

Hello brother (or sister),
Unapologetic Muslim American
I’m neither a terrorist nor Iranian.
Ace-ish (Hate it when my friends are right!)
TG for questions on Islam!

User avatar
Fahran
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 22562
Founded: Nov 13, 2017
Democratic Socialists

Postby Fahran » Mon Apr 05, 2021 8:02 am

Shanghai industrial complex wrote:I think it's wrong to assume that Muslims will bring hijabs. As far as I know, hijabs are very secular.

Emphasis mine. They're not. For instance, the cultural debate between Nasserites and the predecessors of the Muslim Brotherhood on the subject had the secularists explicitly discouraging Egyptian women from wearing even the hijab whereas the Muslim Brotherhood, up until today, has been supportive of encouraging women to wear the hijab. Nobody who isn't influenced by the Saudis wants women in Egypt to wear a niqab. In fact, the niqab and burqa are seen as broadly inappropriate attire for women in much of the Dar as-Salaam, where the chador and hijab tend to be preferred.

Shanghai industrial complex wrote:Burka,Niqab and Chador they need to be banned.The old grandmother would also wear a square scarf on her head like hijabs .If I can see your face, how much difference is there between a hijabs and a hat?We should pay more attention to whether the religious doctrinal requirements are harmful to women's rights and interests,does it achieve gender equality.

I would argue that Islam, like most religions, has no intrinsic interest in the promotion of gender equality and that twisting Islam into being about gender equality first and foremost is dishonest at best and blasphemous at worst. That's not to say Islam doesn't, on occasion, do nice things for women and have some conception of fairness. But religion is definitely not about being progressive and/or liberal on the whole, and it really shouldn't be. Religions are, in many cases, about our relationship with G-d or upholding Dharma or something along those lines.
Last edited by Fahran on Mon Apr 05, 2021 8:03 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Fahran
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 22562
Founded: Nov 13, 2017
Democratic Socialists

Postby Fahran » Mon Apr 05, 2021 8:05 am

Comfed wrote:“Opinions against the government position aren’t conducive to unity, let’s ban criticism of the government.”

We actually do often ban/criminalize/stigmatize political opinions that lie beyond the Overton Window, and most of those opinions would not be conducive to the maintenance of a liberal or multicultural order.

User avatar
Kilobugya
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6878
Founded: Apr 05, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Kilobugya » Mon Apr 05, 2021 8:08 am

Insaanistan wrote:I dunno know about the last bit. Islamophobia is at record highs in France. I hope it doesn’t pass, but I don’t think it won’t.


I agree with you that islamophobia is at very preoccupying level in France. And other forms of xenophobia too (racism against Black people or gypsies, antisemitism, LGBTphobia, ...). But what will determine if the law will pass or not is more subtle political calculus from LREM (Macron's party) regarding the 2022 election, where they hope to face Marine Le Pen but yet be seen as centrist enough to actually defeat her. It's very sad, indeed, to use teenaged girls as mere pawns for political tactics, but that's what Macron has been doing since the beginning - he doesn't personally cares one way or another about them.
Secular humanist and trans-humanist, rationalist, democratic socialist, pacifist, dreaming very high to not perform too low.
Economic Left/Right: -9.50 - Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.69

User avatar
Fahran
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 22562
Founded: Nov 13, 2017
Democratic Socialists

Postby Fahran » Mon Apr 05, 2021 8:10 am

The Cazistan wrote:Islam will overtake the west in general through immigration or native reversion.

Based. My incessant shilling for the rightful Caliph, Abdullah II of Jordan, will pay off insh-llah.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Eahland, Emotional Support Crocodile, Europa Undivided, Grinning Dragon, Lysset, Neu California, North Korea Choson, Orifna, Pasong Tirad, Risottia, Spirit of Hope, The Great Furrican Empire, The Xenopolis Confederation, Tungstan

Advertisement

Remove ads