NATION

PASSWORD

France Bans Hijabs for Under 18s

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What do You Think of This?

Laïcité in general should go
61
13%
France shouldn’t have done this, and it’s clear they’ve been targeting Muslims
159
34%
France shouldn’t have done this, but it’s other measures regarding Islam are valid
32
7%
French Muslims should fall in line and follow these rules
58
12%
Hijab is oppressive, why would anyone be against this?
60
13%
Hopefully this will help erode Islam in France
86
18%
Other
14
3%
 
Total votes : 470

User avatar
Insaanistan
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13784
Founded: Nov 18, 2019
Democratic Socialists

Postby Insaanistan » Fri Apr 09, 2021 7:07 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Luminesa wrote:Not Muslim, but I started to choose to wear veils to church when I was about 16. Teenagers definitely have a right to have their religious views and to wear symbols of their religious views.


I'd be fine with it being lowered to 15 or 16.

I know a 13 year old who just decided to wear the hijab all on her own.

You can’t put an age on something like this.
السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركته-Peace be with you!
BLM - Free Palestine - Abolish Kafala - Boycott Israel - Trump lost
Anti: DAESH & friends, IR Govt, Saudi Govt, Israeli Govt, China, anti-semitism, homophobia, racism, sexism, Fascism, Communism, Islamophobia.

Hello brother (or sister),
Unapologetic Muslim American
I’m neither a terrorist nor Iranian.
Ace-ish (Hate it when my friends are right!)
TG for questions on Islam!

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58536
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Fri Apr 09, 2021 7:09 am

Insaanistan wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
I'd be fine with it being lowered to 15 or 16.

I know a 13 year old who just decided to wear the hijab all on her own.

You can’t put an age on something like this.


I'd be happy to discuss details, but the broad principle of a ban for young children alongside a ban on the parent deciding on their behalf should remain. I think 15-16 is a good baseline with a mechanism to allow exceptions. The key is to triangulate a means to protect children who have not decided to wear it, while allowing those who have.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Fri Apr 09, 2021 7:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Vorausen
Envoy
 
Posts: 246
Founded: Mar 13, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby Vorausen » Fri Apr 09, 2021 7:13 am

All I know is that if a law like this were to be passed in America, it would immediately be considered unconstitutional. Unless of course there was evidence that hijabs would be a distraction in class and would start the school environment ( which would be hard to pull off since most school rulebooks say that hats are not allowed "unless it is for religious reasons" and expceptions can be made).

User avatar
Kilobugya
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6878
Founded: Apr 05, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Kilobugya » Fri Apr 09, 2021 7:18 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:I'd be happy to discuss details, but the broad principle of a ban for young children alongside a ban on the parent deciding on their behalf should remain. I think 15-16 is a good baseline with a mechanism to allow exceptions. The key is to triangulate a means to protect children who have not decided to wear it, while allowing those who have.


Well, very very few young children do wear it, if any at all. I think we are just making a big thing of a non-existent problem there. Those who do wear it are mostly older teens.

I definitely agree they shouldn't be forced by their parents to wear it, but banning it altogther for that reason doesn't make sense. I also believe parents shouldn't be allowed to force their children to attend a Christian mass if they don't want to, but we won't ban children from entering churches to enforce it.
Secular humanist and trans-humanist, rationalist, democratic socialist, pacifist, dreaming very high to not perform too low.
Economic Left/Right: -9.50 - Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.69

User avatar
Borderlands of Rojava
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14813
Founded: Jul 27, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Borderlands of Rojava » Fri Apr 09, 2021 7:30 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Insaanistan wrote:I know a 13 year old who just decided to wear the hijab all on her own.

You can’t put an age on something like this.


I'd be happy to discuss details, but the broad principle of a ban for young children alongside a ban on the parent deciding on their behalf should remain. I think 15-16 is a good baseline with a mechanism to allow exceptions. The key is to triangulate a means to protect children who have not decided to wear it, while allowing those who have.


You're really gonna ban a headscarf? I mean ostro, this is a little tyrannical. I don't like forcing kids to wear a veil but I also don't like forcing children not to. The issue is people should be able to dress as they want to. Both extremely pro hijab and vehemently anti hijab people fail to understand this.
Leftist, commie and Antifa Guy. Democratic Confederalist, Anti-racist

"The devil is out there. Hiding behind every corner and in every nook and cranny. In all of the dives, all over the city. Before you lays an entire world of enemies, and at day's end when the chips are down, we're a society of strangers. You cant walk by someone on the street anymore without crossing the road to get away from their stare. Welcome to the Twilight Zone. The land of plague and shadow. Nothing innocent survives this world. If it can't corrupt you, it'll kill you."

User avatar
Vorausen
Envoy
 
Posts: 246
Founded: Mar 13, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby Vorausen » Fri Apr 09, 2021 7:46 am

Borderlands of Rojava wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
I'd be happy to discuss details, but the broad principle of a ban for young children alongside a ban on the parent deciding on their behalf should remain. I think 15-16 is a good baseline with a mechanism to allow exceptions. The key is to triangulate a means to protect children who have not decided to wear it, while allowing those who have.


You're really gonna ban a headscarf? I mean ostro, this is a little tyrannical. I don't like forcing kids to wear a veil but I also don't like forcing children not to. The issue is people should be able to dress as they want to. Both extremely pro hijab and vehemently anti hijab people fail to understand this.


Shouldn't there be some sort of group that ensures religion is not being forced on children and would also try to help ban Islamic laws being enforced in communities? Kind of "a Religious right group?" ensuring that religion and government stay separate?
Last edited by Vorausen on Fri Apr 09, 2021 7:46 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Kilobugya
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6878
Founded: Apr 05, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Kilobugya » Fri Apr 09, 2021 7:56 am

Vorausen wrote:Shouldn't there be some sort of group that ensures religion is not being forced on children and would also try to help ban Islamic laws being enforced in communities? Kind of "a Religious right group?" ensuring that religion and government stay separate?


We have a Constitution and a law ensuring religion and government stay separate.

As for ensuring religion is not being forced on children, if that's really what they wanted to do, they would ban religious schools before 18 (or perhaps 16), not ban headscarves. But no, there is no way they'll do that, because they (the right-wing Senators who promote such kind of laws) send their own children to expensive private Christian schools, and definitely do not want their kids to be mixed with the general population. The real separatists are the rich, not the Muslims.
Secular humanist and trans-humanist, rationalist, democratic socialist, pacifist, dreaming very high to not perform too low.
Economic Left/Right: -9.50 - Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.69

User avatar
Islamic Holy Sites
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8312
Founded: Mar 20, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby Islamic Holy Sites » Fri Apr 09, 2021 8:07 am

Vorausen wrote:
Borderlands of Rojava wrote:
You're really gonna ban a headscarf? I mean ostro, this is a little tyrannical. I don't like forcing kids to wear a veil but I also don't like forcing children not to. The issue is people should be able to dress as they want to. Both extremely pro hijab and vehemently anti hijab people fail to understand this.


Shouldn't there be some sort of group that ensures religion is not being forced on children and would also try to help ban Islamic laws being enforced in communities? Kind of "a Religious right group?" ensuring that religion and government stay separate?

That's the governments job.
#FreeNSGRojava!
FREEDOM, DEMOCRACY, ISLAM
FREE PALESTINE
STAND WITH THE UKRAINIAN PEOPLE
Call me Muqaddasia.
Proud member of the GCN. Host nation of SETZA. Founder/Co-founder of the (now defunct) IDSF Founder/Co-founder and first in command of the (now defunct) UCA. Founder of the (now defunct) ICRD.
BREAKING NEWS: Galapagos war 4 might be coming | “Aursi among best Muqaddasi allies,”, says government official | Muqaddasi weapon industry expanding WIP

User avatar
Fahran
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 22562
Founded: Nov 13, 2017
Democratic Socialists

Postby Fahran » Fri Apr 09, 2021 8:15 am

Vorausen wrote:Shouldn't there be some sort of group that ensures religion is not being forced on children and would also try to help ban Islamic laws being enforced in communities? Kind of "a Religious right group?" ensuring that religion and government stay separate?

There's usually no need for parents to "force" religion on their children, and, in any case, I doubt that happens more often in the Muslim community than in the Jewish community. If you grow up attending a particular religious institution, inundated with particular religious views, attitudes, values, practices, and traditions, and set in a particular identity, you're going to become accustomed to it at a young age. At most, some children might not want to attend church or mosque and their parents, because they exercise authority over them, may force the point. It's not more abusive than anything else parents may do, presuming the child's reason for not wanting to attend is not substantial. In France, we have reason to suspect that the youngest generation of Muslims is more observant than their parents or grandparents. So it's not really an issue of parents forcing religion on children.

In any case, the enforcement of such laws introduces more problems than it really solves and subjugates parental authority over a dependent person for the state as an arbiter where such a role is not necessary, not wanted, and often draconian and discriminatory.
Last edited by Fahran on Fri Apr 09, 2021 8:17 am, edited 1 time in total.

Previous

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 0rganization, Aadhiris, Bear Stearns, British Arzelentaxmacone, Google [Bot], Haganham, Hidrandia, Ifreann, Maximum Imperium Rex, Philjia, Shearoa, Tarsonis, Tiami, Tungstan, United Calanworie, Western Theram, Zurkerx

Advertisement

Remove ads