Dowaesk wrote:J o J wrote:
If you knew me you would realize I am the opposite of a snowflake. People that wear overly exposing clothing are freaks and disgusting and they need to cover themselves up. I don’t want my little sister to ask why that man is wearing a pair of jeans with massive “stylized” holes in them that show his underwear and thighs when we’re getting lunch at a restaurant. Same for women. Nobody gives a shit about your shoulders except perverts, quit trying to show off and sexualize yourself with a crop top and wear a normal shirt or dress. It’s inexcusable and degenerate, there’s no reason for either sex to be showing all of that.
I agree.
But maybe nakedness and prostitution is part of the Secularism package
That depends on what value you place on sex and how you interpret it really. I don’t think all secularists agree on it. Personally I don’t find prostitution as a legitimate business, but on the other hand what people do in their bedrooms and within their own homes is their business and not the business of the state. While prostitution degrades the moral and interpersonal significance of sexual interaction, and increases the risk of STD transmission, I don’t think it’s in a secular state’s interest (or feasible ability) to outlaw it.
And on the note of secularism, I’ll reiterate my stance that France banning the Hijab for those under 18 is an overstep and misuse of state authority because it’s favoring or disfavoring a certain religion, and the church and state ought to be separate.