Trial of Derek Chauvin: A Juror Supported What?!

[Shofercia]

Neither do I, especially since her name and face were clearly shown. If there's going to be a mistrial, there's going to be retribution against her. It's the epitome of stupidity.

It will be her fault if this man doesn't go to prison.

A mistrial could lead to another trial, where he'd be convicted. So I doubt that he'd be able to avoid prison. From Google:

In the event of a mistrial, the defendant is not convicted, but neither is the defendant acquitted. An acquittal results from a not guilty verdict and cannot be appealed by the prosecution, overturned by the judge, or retried. When there is a mistrial, however, the case may be retried.

The problem's that the case was going really well for the prosecution and not quite so well for the defense, so a mistrial would benefit Chauvin.

[San Lumen]

It will be her fault if this man doesn't go to prison.

A mistrial could lead to another trial, where he'd be convicted. So I doubt that he'd be able to avoid prison. From Google:

In the event of a mistrial, the defendant is not convicted, but neither is the defendant acquitted. An acquittal results from a not guilty verdict and cannot be appealed by the prosecution, overturned by the judge, or retried. When there is a mistrial, however, the case may be retried.

The problem's that the case was going really well for the prosecution and not quite so well for the defense, so a mistrial would benefit Chauvin.

Hopefully there isn't one.

[Shofercia]

A mistrial could lead to another trial, where he'd be convicted. So I doubt that he'd be able to avoid prison. From Google:



The problem's that the case was going really well for the prosecution and not quite so well for the defense, so a mistrial would benefit Chauvin.

Hopefully there isn't one.

Hopefully

[Ethel mermania]

A mistrial could lead to another trial, where he'd be convicted. So I doubt that he'd be able to avoid prison. From Google:



The problem's that the case was going really well for the prosecution and not quite so well for the defense, so a mistrial would benefit Chauvin.

Hopefully there isn't one.

However it is the defense attorneys job to ask for one if he thinks it would benefit his client. And I think now he has three.

[Kowani]

Damn, I was hoping this wouldn't happen, but here we are, introducing, idiota numero uno: https://www.nbcnews.com/video/judge-war ... 9395525925

This is in NBC, it's a pro-Dem station. Why the fuck would you want to take photos near the Jury Box? She claims ignorance, but that's fucking bullshit. During the initial introduction, the Judge asked the Jury to stay within the lines to avoid broadcast cameras. That means that said lines were fairly visible to anyone in the Courtroom. Why the fuck would you...

And the sad part is that even though this should have no bearing on the trial, since Chauvin is guilty as sin, now a Juror might claim that he or she was intimidated by that idiot, and there's a mistrial claim. Who let that idiot into the Courtroom?

there's always fucking someone

[Kowani]

Use-of-force expert Seth Stouhgton testifies that George Floyd should have never been put in the prone position in the first place because "for 30 years or so it is generally accepted that the prone position is a transitory position used only to handcuff someone." Floyd was already handcuffed. (Nelson seems to disagree with this assessment)

Prosecutor Steve Schleicher is using this 9:29 timeline with Seth Stoughton so Stoughton can basically document all the apparent mistakes made during Chauvin's knee restraint. Professor Stoughton basing his analysis on a reasonable officer in similar situation.

[San Lumen]

Use-of-force expert Seth Stouhgton testifies that George Floyd should have never been put in the prone position in the first place because "for 30 years or so it is generally accepted that the prone position is a transitory position used only to handcuff someone." Floyd was already handcuffed. (Nelson seems to disagree with this assessment)

Prosecutor Steve Schleicher is using this 9:29 timeline with Seth Stoughton so Stoughton can basically document all the apparent mistakes made during Chauvin's knee restraint. Professor Stoughton basing his analysis on a reasonable officer in similar situation.

(Image)

There is absolutely zero excuse for this man to be acquitted or get a mistrial.

[Ethel mermania]

Use-of-force expert Seth Stouhgton testifies that George Floyd should have never been put in the prone position in the first place because "for 30 years or so it is generally accepted that the prone position is a transitory position used only to handcuff someone." Floyd was already handcuffed. (Nelson seems to disagree with this assessment)

Prosecutor Steve Schleicher is using this 9:29 timeline with Seth Stoughton so Stoughton can basically document all the apparent mistakes made during Chauvin's knee restraint. Professor Stoughton basing his analysis on a reasonable officer in similar situation.

(Image)

There is absolutely zero excuse for this man to be acquitted or get a mistrial.

A mistrial has nothing to do with guilt or innocence, but procedure. If the procedure is faulty, he absolutely deserves a mistrial.

[San Lumen]

There is absolutely zero excuse for this man to be acquitted or get a mistrial.

A mistrial has nothing to do with guilt or innocence, but procedure. If the procedure is faulty, he absolutely deserves a mistrial.

Yet there seems to be little one could use as grounds for one.

[Ethel mermania]

A mistrial has nothing to do with guilt or innocence, but procedure. If the procedure is faulty, he absolutely deserves a mistrial.

Yet there seems to be little one could use as grounds for one.

Venue
Depossed testimony not allowed
Anominity of the jurors being breached.

[Center Land]

If he is acquitted there will be rioting. If he is found guilty there will be rioting.

[San Lumen]

Yet there seems to be little one could use as grounds for one.

Venue
Depossed testimony not allowed
Anominity of the jurors being breached.

Where the heck should it be instead?

despossed testimony? What is that?

That one i will give you. It seems some reporters can't follow rules and almost want him to get off. The judge should flat out refuse to to declare a mistrial. This man is beyond guilty.

[Xmara]

If he is acquitted there will be rioting. If he is found guilty there will be rioting.

If he’s acquitted, there’ll be rioting. Not sure if there will be rioting if he’s found guilty though.

[San Lumen]

If he is acquitted there will be rioting. If he is found guilty there will be rioting.

If he’s acquitted, there’ll be rioting. Not sure if there will be rioting if he’s found guilty though.

I doubt there will be rioting if he's found guilty.

[South Americanastan]

If he’s acquitted, there’ll be rioting. Not sure if there will be rioting if he’s found guilty though.

I doubt there will be rioting if he's found guilty.

Unless he's given a death sentence, there's going to be group rioting because they believe the punishment isn't enough.

[San Lumen]

I doubt there will be rioting if he's found guilty.

Unless he's given a death sentence, there's going to be group rioting because they believe the punishment isn't enough.

Minnesota doesn't have the death penalty. It was abolished in 1911.

[Atheris]

I doubt there will be rioting if he's found guilty.

Unless he's given a death sentence, there's going to be group rioting because they believe the punishment isn't enough.

If he's still given a death sentence, there's going to be a group rioting because they feel like he shouldn't get a death sentence.

[Esalia]

If he is acquitted there will be rioting. If he is found guilty there will be rioting.

If he’s acquitted, there’ll be rioting. Not sure if there will be rioting if he’s found guilty though.

You might have some incidents, but I think it should be self-evident that rioting is more likely if he's acquitted than if he's found guilty.

[South Americanastan]

Unless he's given a death sentence, there's going to be group rioting because they believe the punishment isn't enough.

Minnesota doesn't have the death penalty. It was abolished in 1911.

I know.

[Borderlands of Rojava]

If he is acquitted there will be rioting. If he is found guilty there will be rioting.

If Chauvin went to prison for the rest of his life, I doubt people would riot.

Now if he gets manslaughter? Maybe.

[San Lumen]

If he is acquitted there will be rioting. If he is found guilty there will be rioting.

If Chauvin went to prison for the rest of his life, I doubt people would riot.

Now if he gets manslaughter? Maybe.

Unless there is massive bias in the jury based on what ive seen and heard I don't see how hes not convicted.

[Ethel mermania]

Venue
Depossed testimony not allowed
Anominity of the jurors being breached.

Where the heck should it be instead?

despossed testimony? What is that?

That one i will give you. It seems some reporters can't follow rules and almost want him to get off. The judge should flat out refuse to to declare a mistrial. This man is beyond guilty.

Not in the city that burned for weeks in the aftermath.
A deposition is sworn testimony taken preceeding a trial. Who ever testifies at one has the right to counsel. (Though I don't know if it's free). It usually can be introduced as evidence in a trial.
And exposure of the juror.


Now none of these may stick, but its the defense attorneys job to bring it up even if it only delays the inevitable.

[San Lumen]

Where the heck should it be instead?

despossed testimony? What is that?

That one i will give you. It seems some reporters can't follow rules and almost want him to get off. The judge should flat out refuse to to declare a mistrial. This man is beyond guilty.

Not in the city that burned for weeks in the aftermath.
A deposition is sworn testimony taken preceeding a trial. Who ever testifies at one has the right to counsel. (Though I don't know if it's free). It usually can be introduced as evidence in a trial.
And exposure of the juror.


Now none of these may stick, but its the defense attorneys job to bring it up even if it only delays the inevitable.

Where do you propose it be held instead?

[Ethel mermania]

Not in the city that burned for weeks in the aftermath.
A deposition is sworn testimony taken preceeding a trial. Who ever testifies at one has the right to counsel. (Though I don't know if it's free). It usually can be introduced as evidence in a trial.
And exposure of the juror.


Now none of these may stick, but its the defense attorneys job to bring it up even if it only delays the inevitable.

Where do you propose it be held instead?

Some other city in Minnesota.

[Grinning Dragon]

Not in the city that burned for weeks in the aftermath.
A deposition is sworn testimony taken preceeding a trial. Who ever testifies at one has the right to counsel. (Though I don't know if it's free). It usually can be introduced as evidence in a trial.
And exposure of the juror.


Now none of these may stick, but its the defense attorneys job to bring it up even if it only delays the inevitable.

Where do you propose it be held instead?

Chernobyl