Page 28 of 146

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 12:11 pm
by The Black Forrest
Katganistan wrote:
Ifreann wrote:What is this reasonable doubt you speak of?

Apparently it's reasonable to doubt that cutting off someone's air for ten minutes and refusing to let EMTs help him would kill someone.


But....but...resisting.....eating drugs.....

The police really need to stop rallying around scum like Chauvin. It makes them all look bad.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 12:18 pm
by Ethel mermania
The Black Forrest wrote:
Katganistan wrote:Apparently it's reasonable to doubt that cutting off someone's air for ten minutes and refusing to let EMTs help him would kill someone.


But....but...resisting.....eating drugs.....

The police really need to stop rallying around scum like Chauvin. It makes them all look bad.

Tbf i don't see a lot of cops rallying around Chauvin. The most damming testimony from the prosecution has been from cops.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 12:35 pm
by Alcala-Cordel
Ethel mermania wrote:
The Black Forrest wrote:
But....but...resisting.....eating drugs.....

The police really need to stop rallying around scum like Chauvin. It makes them all look bad.

Tbf i don't see a lot of cops rallying around Chauvin. The most damming testimony from the prosecution has been from cops.

I've seen quite a few in my area, as well as with thec op defenders. A few days ago I even drove past some people with a "Free Chauvin" sign near their blue line flag.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 12:38 pm
by Ethel mermania
Alcala-Cordel wrote:
Ethel mermania wrote:Tbf i don't see a lot of cops rallying around Chauvin. The most damming testimony from the prosecution has been from cops.

I've seen quite a few in my area, as well as with thec op defenders. A few days ago I even drove past some people with a "Free Chauvin" sign near their blue line flag.


Ick.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 12:58 pm
by Fahran
Laka Strolistandiler wrote:Yes they do. If a person is worthless to the society why should this parasite live?
People like this (race slur) only suck the social support out of the pockets of the decent hard-working taxpayers (and yes I am a working taxpayer if you want to know).

Most people have value or the potential for value. George Floyd had a family, had hopes and dreams, had paid taxes in the past, and, at one point, was a pillar of his local community, speaking out against gang violence and giving a voice to millions who struggle with poverty, crime, and addiction. Floyd's lifelong struggles seems to have revolved around his drug addiction. G-d shaped each and every one of us though. While it may interest society to punish us for our transgressions, that does not mean that we're worthless.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 1:39 pm
by Kowani

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 1:41 pm
by The New California Republic

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 1:54 pm
by The Black Forrest
Ethel mermania wrote:
The Black Forrest wrote:
But....but...resisting.....eating drugs.....

The police really need to stop rallying around scum like Chauvin. It makes them all look bad.

Tbf i don't see a lot of cops rallying around Chauvin. The most damming testimony from the prosecution has been from cops.


Well? If they our like my cousin has reported; they say the public thing and then they say what they really think amongst themselves. Even recently she told my wife; her dead fiancé said some rather ugly things which really surprised me.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 1:56 pm
by Kowani
found the graph they used in the trial
Image

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 1:59 pm
by Atheris
Kowani wrote:found the graph they used in the trial
-snip-

Looks like that rules out the "he had a drug overdose" defense.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 2:14 pm
by Kowani

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 2:26 pm
by Kowani

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 2:37 pm
by Rusozak
Atheris wrote:
Kowani wrote:found the graph they used in the trial
-snip-

Looks like that rules out the "he had a drug overdose" defense.


But what will they use for racial dogwhistling now?

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 2:54 pm
by Omniabstracta
Rusozak wrote:
Atheris wrote:Looks like that rules out the "he had a drug overdose" defense.


But what will they use for racial dogwhistling now?

Clearly he was uhh, just allergic to the fentanyl! That’s why it’s still able to be the drugs that killed him.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 3:04 pm
by Risottia


I am starting to think that shooting Chauvin while he was kneeling on Floyd's neck should have been considered a case of legitimate use of force in defence of the victim of an armed criminal.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 3:49 pm
by Postauthoritarian America
Laka Strolistandiler wrote: TRIGGER WARNING: THE AUTHOR OF THIS POST IS A WHITE SUPREMACIST (but I’m half black so don’t ban me pls)
As a white supremacist, my opinion is somewhat biased, but I believe that he is not guilty. There was a direct threat to the officer’s life from the scourge of (race slur that I can use because I’m half-black), the junkie clearly died from overdose, not asphyxiation and anything else, he had an extensive crime record (personally I don’t think that people like him even deserve to live), he literally swallowed the drugs not to get busted, and the funniest thing is that he said that he can’t breathe while sitting in a squad car.
Yep, this thugs life sure does matter.


Everything you "know" is wrong.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 4:17 pm
by Ethel mermania
Risottia wrote:


I am starting to think that shooting Chauvin while he was kneeling on Floyd's neck should have been considered a case of legitimate use of force in defence of the victim of an armed criminal.

In general I am pretty pro-cop. That said, I agree with that conclusion. If someone pulled out a piece and shot Chauvin without a warning, and used a "saving a life" defense. I wouldn't convict.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 4:23 pm
by Madrinpoor
Ethel mermania wrote:
Vorausen wrote:My honest opinion on what will happen (don't get triggered please, it's what I think will happen) is drumroll, please.......


Not guilty. That's right not guilty. If there is any reasonable doubt about a case and a charge, then it definitely shouldn't be a guilty verdict. You have to have absolutely no doubt that Derek Chauvin committed second-degree intentional murder. But there is plenty of reasonable doubt in this case. Now would I like to see Derel Chauvin go to jail and get punished, absolutely! But remember you have to separate what you want and your emotions from law and justice. If they decide on guilty, the justice system has failed Derek Chauvin.

There are other charges against Chauvin. I dont disagree he may not be convicted on the murder 2 charge. I would be very surprised if he doesn't get convicted on murder 3, or the manslaughter charges.

Manslaughter almost certainly is going to land, at least in my relatively uneducated understanding of the law. And so would third degree murder, and if the jury decides it is a hate crime then it could be second degree murder too, on the assumption that Chauvin killed Floyd because he's black. It's a bit of a stretch, but the first two should put Chauvin away for a long, long time.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 5:45 pm
by Shofercia


Kowani News continues to be awesome!


Ethel mermania wrote:
Risottia wrote:
I am starting to think that shooting Chauvin while he was kneeling on Floyd's neck should have been considered a case of legitimate use of force in defence of the victim of an armed criminal.

In general I am pretty pro-cop. That said, I agree with that conclusion. If someone pulled out a piece and shot Chauvin without a warning, and used a "saving a life" defense. I wouldn't convict.


I wouldn't either.


Madrinpoor wrote:
Ethel mermania wrote:There are other charges against Chauvin. I dont disagree he may not be convicted on the murder 2 charge. I would be very surprised if he doesn't get convicted on murder 3, or the manslaughter charges.

Manslaughter almost certainly is going to land, at least in my relatively uneducated understanding of the law. And so would third degree murder, and if the jury decides it is a hate crime then it could be second degree murder too, on the assumption that Chauvin killed Floyd because he's black. It's a bit of a stretch, but the first two should put Chauvin away for a long, long time.


Manslaughter landed quite some time ago. We're now debating whether it's manslaughter, murder 3, or murder 2. I'd be shocked and appalled if Chauvin walks. I think it's murder 2 at this point.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 5:58 pm
by San Lumen
Madrinpoor wrote:
Ethel mermania wrote:There are other charges against Chauvin. I dont disagree he may not be convicted on the murder 2 charge. I would be very surprised if he doesn't get convicted on murder 3, or the manslaughter charges.

Manslaughter almost certainly is going to land, at least in my relatively uneducated understanding of the law. And so would third degree murder, and if the jury decides it is a hate crime then it could be second degree murder too, on the assumption that Chauvin killed Floyd because he's black. It's a bit of a stretch, but the first two should put Chauvin away for a long, long time.


I hope your right. I don't have faith in the justice system to convict cops of wrongdoing.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 7:00 pm
by Katganistan
Ethel mermania wrote:
The Black Forrest wrote:
But....but...resisting.....eating drugs.....

The police really need to stop rallying around scum like Chauvin. It makes them all look bad.

Tbf i don't see a lot of cops rallying around Chauvin. The most damming testimony from the prosecution has been from cops.

It's good to see them doing the right thing. There is a lot of pressure not to get involved but this guy's acts and history are insupportable.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 7:02 pm
by Katganistan
Atheris wrote:
Kowani wrote:found the graph they used in the trial
-snip-

Looks like that rules out the "he had a drug overdose" defense.

Lord knows Chauvinists have been screaming that one loudly enough.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 7:06 pm
by Fahran
Risottia wrote:


I am starting to think that shooting Chauvin while he was kneeling on Floyd's neck should have been considered a case of legitimate use of force in defence of the victim of an armed criminal.

It sounds like it, though I would not recommend that unless you plan on getting into a shoot-out with the police.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 7:25 pm
by Zurkir
Risottia wrote:


I am starting to think that shooting Chauvin while he was kneeling on Floyd's neck should have been considered a case of legitimate use of force in defence of the victim of an armed criminal.


Because that’s something else that we need. Partisan vigilantes shooting down cops based on personal judgement. And considering the misconceptions of what “unnecessary force” is - half the cops in the nation would be dead if that one caught on. (Predicts to hear “Good” in response to this.) Besides I thought “armed lunatics playing at hero” was a no no...

Chauvin’s fellow officers should’ve stopped him or made it clear he needed to ease up, and they didn’t. That’s negligence on their part.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 9:30 pm
by The Alma Mater
Zurkir wrote:..

Chauvin’s fellow officers should’ve stopped him or made it clear he needed to ease up, and they didn’t. That’s negligence on their part.


Were they not cops in training, with Chauvin their teacher ?