Punished UMN wrote:North Washington Republic wrote:
Xi and Putin have also consolidated power and do have near sole control over their governments, because they imprison or kill any opposition that is a threat to their power. Putin and Xi are the leaders and near absolute rulers of China and Russia for the near future. Even if we drop our opposition to Russia’s attempts to expand influence(which I believe it shouldn’t), Putin doesn’t give two hoots if Xi annexs Taiwan. Why should he? He doesn’t have a reason too.
Which is why we should give him a reason to, the sanctions on Russia are crippling, if we agree to lift those and allow Russia to consolidate its near-abroad in-exchange for some form of diplomatic accord, there could be real progress.
As for your analysis of China, I don't think you're well-enough acquainted with the CCP's internal structure or internal affairs to say that Xi is an absolute ruler. Xi is very popular in China but the actual legal institutions of the PRC are solid enough that it's not a personalist dictatorship.
Lifting the sanctions isn’t going to be enough for Putin. Putin won’t accept anything less than the dismantling of NATO, that would be extremely dangerous for former USSR states. It is a waste of time trying to negotiate with Putin because he cannot be trusted. He wouldn’t approach us this with good faith.
As for the CCP and Xi, I believe that those institutions were there and used to exist, especially with Hu. However, those anti-corruption campaigns that Xi initiated pretty much eradicated those institutions