Romans were pretty cool until guys like Nero started to rule.
Advertisement
by Pasong Tirad » Mon Mar 29, 2021 6:43 pm
by Ayytaly » Mon Mar 29, 2021 6:45 pm
by Trollzyn the Infinite » Mon Mar 29, 2021 6:53 pm
Pasong Tirad wrote:Here's a good counter-perspective from a Taiwanese-American.
Brian Hioe notes that China has not yet developed the capability to conduct an invasion and a long-term occupation of the island, and may not be able to do so for a few more decades. The PLA's own timeline is to retake Taiwan by the PRC's centennial - 2049 - "with a gap of several decades allowing adequate hypothetical time to build such capacity."
Such an invasion plan would also be known in advance, and the first country to react to such a threat would not be the US - it would be Taiwan. "It is unlikely there would not be some form of international response during that window of time, nor that the Taiwanese government would simply wait with its arms folded during that period for an invasion to take place."
There are other reasons, and the article has a bit of length, but Hioe points out that "fearmongering doesn't help, it lowers the will to resist and, to be blunt, I oftentimes find that it comes from a place of contempt regarding Taiwanese."
"That is, viewing Taiwanese as infantile and unconcerned about the largest threat to their political freedom – when the consistent results of Taiwanese elections show otherwise. A lot of the fearmongering scenarios I've seen also seem to suppose that the Taiwanese government would do nothing and simply wait for an invasion or a blockade or other scenario to take place--a view that basically sees Taiwan as having no agency."
by Pasong Tirad » Mon Mar 29, 2021 7:33 pm
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:Pasong Tirad wrote:Here's a good counter-perspective from a Taiwanese-American.
Brian Hioe notes that China has not yet developed the capability to conduct an invasion and a long-term occupation of the island, and may not be able to do so for a few more decades. The PLA's own timeline is to retake Taiwan by the PRC's centennial - 2049 - "with a gap of several decades allowing adequate hypothetical time to build such capacity."
Such an invasion plan would also be known in advance, and the first country to react to such a threat would not be the US - it would be Taiwan. "It is unlikely there would not be some form of international response during that window of time, nor that the Taiwanese government would simply wait with its arms folded during that period for an invasion to take place."
There are other reasons, and the article has a bit of length, but Hioe points out that "fearmongering doesn't help, it lowers the will to resist and, to be blunt, I oftentimes find that it comes from a place of contempt regarding Taiwanese."
"That is, viewing Taiwanese as infantile and unconcerned about the largest threat to their political freedom – when the consistent results of Taiwanese elections show otherwise. A lot of the fearmongering scenarios I've seen also seem to suppose that the Taiwanese government would do nothing and simply wait for an invasion or a blockade or other scenario to take place--a view that basically sees Taiwan as having no agency."
What he's basically trying to say is that the ROC has the stones to stand up to the CCP.
(pun intended; fuck you, I'm hilarious)
by Nakena » Mon Mar 29, 2021 10:01 pm
by Rusozak » Tue Mar 30, 2021 8:01 am
Nakena wrote:I am fairly certain the ROC will put up a good and heavy fight and there will be severe losses inflicted to the communist aggressors should they try to take Taiwan. All the more when US and other western nations assist them.
Vietnam also offers the possibility of second front in the south, that will keep significant PRC military forces there.
by Glorious Hong Kong » Tue Mar 30, 2021 8:18 am
Pasong Tirad wrote:Here's a good counter-perspective from a Taiwanese-American.
Brian Hioe notes that China has not yet developed the capability to conduct an invasion and a long-term occupation of the island, and may not be able to do so for a few more decades. The PLA's own timeline is to retake Taiwan by the PRC's centennial - 2049 - "with a gap of several decades allowing adequate hypothetical time to build such capacity."
Such an invasion plan would also be known in advance, and the first country to react to such a threat would not be the US - it would be Taiwan. "It is unlikely there would not be some form of international response during that window of time, nor that the Taiwanese government would simply wait with its arms folded during that period for an invasion to take place."
There are other reasons, and the article has a bit of length, but Hioe points out that "fearmongering doesn't help, it lowers the will to resist and, to be blunt, I oftentimes find that it comes from a place of contempt regarding Taiwanese."
"That is, viewing Taiwanese as infantile and unconcerned about the largest threat to their political freedom – when the consistent results of Taiwanese elections show otherwise. A lot of the fearmongering scenarios I've seen also seem to suppose that the Taiwanese government would do nothing and simply wait for an invasion or a blockade or other scenario to take place--a view that basically sees Taiwan as having no agency."
by Nakena » Tue Mar 30, 2021 8:53 am
Rusozak wrote:Nakena wrote:I am fairly certain the ROC will put up a good and heavy fight and there will be severe losses inflicted to the communist aggressors should they try to take Taiwan. All the more when US and other western nations assist them.
Vietnam also offers the possibility of second front in the south, that will keep significant PRC military forces there.
Would Vietnam really intervene over Taiwan? I know they and the PRC don't have the best relationship but it doesn't seem worth it from a diplomatic standpoint.
by Islamic Holy Sites » Tue Mar 30, 2021 10:58 am
Nakena wrote:Rusozak wrote:
Would Vietnam really intervene over Taiwan? I know they and the PRC don't have the best relationship but it doesn't seem worth it from a diplomatic standpoint.
Well it would be a reverse for Deng's intervention in 1979 and an attack on Taiwan would send shockwaves across the regions and other countries might be next. Neither India or Vietnam will stand idle by. So a combined allied force including Vietnam could open a second front in the south, even if they act purely defensive, Beijing would have to divert significant troops and assets there. Same with India. All things that can deter, delay or make an invasion of Taiwan a lot more difficult.
BREAKING NEWS: Galapagos war 4 might be coming | “Aursi among best Muqaddasi allies,”, says government official | Muqaddasi weapon industry expanding WIP
by Trollzyn the Infinite » Tue Mar 30, 2021 11:07 am
Islamic Holy Sites wrote:Nakena wrote:
Well it would be a reverse for Deng's intervention in 1979 and an attack on Taiwan would send shockwaves across the regions and other countries might be next. Neither India or Vietnam will stand idle by. So a combined allied force including Vietnam could open a second front in the south, even if they act purely defensive, Beijing would have to divert significant troops and assets there. Same with India. All things that can deter, delay or make an invasion of Taiwan a lot more difficult.
Yes, well the reasonable thing to do is to improve relations with China, not declare war on them. As demonstrated when Vietnam gave a huge pain to the French and the USA and managed to defeat them, Vietnam is not worth invading.
by Islamic Holy Sites » Tue Mar 30, 2021 11:20 am
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:Islamic Holy Sites wrote:Yes, well the reasonable thing to do is to improve relations with China, not declare war on them. As demonstrated when Vietnam gave a huge pain to the French and the USA and managed to defeat them, Vietnam is not worth invading.
We should any country try to improve relations with the PRC when Beijing has proven time and again that they possess the exact same imperialist mindset as Washington and Moscow? Worse than the latter two, actually. Moscow and Washington can at least maintain cordial relations with other countries without trying to exert pressure on them. Beijing can't even do that.
BREAKING NEWS: Galapagos war 4 might be coming | “Aursi among best Muqaddasi allies,”, says government official | Muqaddasi weapon industry expanding WIP
by Northern Socialist Council Republics » Tue Mar 30, 2021 11:23 am
Islamic Holy Sites wrote:Well, Vietnam is going to be a huge, sticky mess if China invades and Vietnam is screwed if it attacks China. There is no winner in this situation. Why would they want to go to war with each other?
by Kubra » Tue Mar 30, 2021 12:46 pm
He says, as he speaks a thoroughly normanised language
spears and shields are not really comparable to high explosives and their methods of deliveryGlorious Hong Kong wrote:Pasong Tirad wrote:Here's a good counter-perspective from a Taiwanese-American.
Brian Hioe notes that China has not yet developed the capability to conduct an invasion and a long-term occupation of the island, and may not be able to do so for a few more decades. The PLA's own timeline is to retake Taiwan by the PRC's centennial - 2049 - "with a gap of several decades allowing adequate hypothetical time to build such capacity."
Such an invasion plan would also be known in advance, and the first country to react to such a threat would not be the US - it would be Taiwan. "It is unlikely there would not be some form of international response during that window of time, nor that the Taiwanese government would simply wait with its arms folded during that period for an invasion to take place."
There are other reasons, and the article has a bit of length, but Hioe points out that "fearmongering doesn't help, it lowers the will to resist and, to be blunt, I oftentimes find that it comes from a place of contempt regarding Taiwanese."
"That is, viewing Taiwanese as infantile and unconcerned about the largest threat to their political freedom – when the consistent results of Taiwanese elections show otherwise. A lot of the fearmongering scenarios I've seen also seem to suppose that the Taiwanese government would do nothing and simply wait for an invasion or a blockade or other scenario to take place--a view that basically sees Taiwan as having no agency."
Personally, I've never infantilized Taiwanese people as lacking in agency and in need of "saving". I'm not woke in any way. I just think that despite their ever-constant vigilance, the island is going to be overwhelmed by sheer force of numbers anyway.
But is it not the case that 300 Spartans are evenly matched vs 700,000 invading Persian forces?
The PLA will be kicked down the bleachers like the guy in that viral video from Hong Kong that 300 got its "This is Sparta" inspiration from.
by Punished UMN » Tue Mar 30, 2021 12:56 pm
by Punished UMN » Tue Mar 30, 2021 12:59 pm
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:Islamic Holy Sites wrote:Yes, well the reasonable thing to do is to improve relations with China, not declare war on them. As demonstrated when Vietnam gave a huge pain to the French and the USA and managed to defeat them, Vietnam is not worth invading.
We should any country try to improve relations with the PRC when Beijing has proven time and again that they possess the exact same imperialist mindset as Washington and Moscow? Worse than the latter two, actually. Moscow and Washington can at least maintain cordial relations with other countries without trying to exert pressure on them. Beijing can't even do that.
by Ayytaly » Tue Mar 30, 2021 8:29 pm
Punished UMN wrote:Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:
We should any country try to improve relations with the PRC when Beijing has proven time and again that they possess the exact same imperialist mindset as Washington and Moscow? Worse than the latter two, actually. Moscow and Washington can at least maintain cordial relations with other countries without trying to exert pressure on them. Beijing can't even do that.
It's called bandwagoning. China isn't the only country for whom the geopolitical status quo is not really advantageous, and as they put the finishing touches on being a superpower, it's very possible that other disgruntled countries (e.g. Russia) will find some way to cooperate with them in-order to piggy-back off of their success. This is basically how the Axis formed in WWII.
by FutureAmerica » Wed Mar 31, 2021 8:39 pm
by FutureAmerica » Wed Mar 31, 2021 8:43 pm
Rusozak wrote:Given the proximity I don't think anyone can defend Taiwan if China is really hell bent. Avenge Taiwan, maybe, but any full scale offensive by China would be over by the time anyone else can respond with significant force.
by FutureAmerica » Wed Mar 31, 2021 8:55 pm
Infected Mushroom wrote:Taiwan is a part of China. I hope for peaceful reunification.
The problem here is the USA, they are trying to divide the Chinese people and make them fight with each other. You only have to look at a world map and ask the real question here... what is America, a North American country, doing an entire giant ocean away in Asia?
At the end of the day, the PRC is minding its own business. Other countries are trying to encroach. But times have changed, this isn’t the 1800s anymore. I think that’s what many governments have to understand.
by Rusozak » Wed Mar 31, 2021 9:47 pm
FutureAmerica wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:Taiwan is a part of China. I hope for peaceful reunification.
The problem here is the USA, they are trying to divide the Chinese people and make them fight with each other. You only have to look at a world map and ask the real question here... what is America, a North American country, doing an entire giant ocean away in Asia?
At the end of the day, the PRC is minding its own business. Other countries are trying to encroach. But times have changed, this isn’t the 1800s anymore. I think that’s what many governments have to understand.
China is also trying to divide the US and create division just like Russia is doing. The PRC is not minding its own business and is trying to influence politics around the World. You are blind if you don't see this.
by Islamic Holy Sites » Thu Apr 01, 2021 2:42 am
FutureAmerica wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:Taiwan is a part of China. I hope for peaceful reunification.
The problem here is the USA, they are trying to divide the Chinese people and make them fight with each other. You only have to look at a world map and ask the real question here... what is America, a North American country, doing an entire giant ocean away in Asia?
At the end of the day, the PRC is minding its own business. Other countries are trying to encroach. But times have changed, this isn’t the 1800s anymore. I think that’s what many governments have to understand.
China is also trying to divide the US and create division just like Russia is doing. The PRC is not minding its own business and is trying to influence politics around the World. You are blind if you don't see this.
BREAKING NEWS: Galapagos war 4 might be coming | “Aursi among best Muqaddasi allies,”, says government official | Muqaddasi weapon industry expanding WIP
by Ethel mermania » Thu Apr 01, 2021 4:11 am
by Kubra » Thu Apr 01, 2021 4:15 am
Plus 3:1 is sort of a very conventional ratio for casualties on the offensive.Ethel mermania wrote:There are 1.4 billion in the PRC, there are 23 million in the ROC. If the PRC loses 3 - 1, they still overwhelm the ROC. If you think xi cares if he kills 15 million citizens and troops to take back Taiwan i got a bridge in Brooklyn i would like to sell you.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: -Abrahamia-, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Hrstrovokia, Maximum Imperium Rex, Nivosea, Port Carverton, Simonia, Tesseris, Valyxias, Zurkerx
Advertisement