Cekovia wrote:Kenzo-Cyprii wrote:
Arabs are always in a unique position. When victims of an attack or hate crime Arabs are recognized as their own people and culture (s) and as separate from Europe as one can get -racially and culturally. When perpetrators of crimes (especially hate crimes) “they’re white”.
because identity politics in general are focused on redefining everything such that there is always a clear "oppressor" and "oppressed" class. whether the nazis with the jews, the soviets with the kulaks, or the woke with whites. anyone who is bad must be associated with the oppressor group and anyone good with the oppressed, and we will constantly redefine as necessary the meaning of the oppressor and oppressed groups such that all the bad people can be sorted into the former and all the good people into the latter. same thing happened with hispanic george zimmerman in 2012, who then got redefined as white in order to fit the narrative that whites are the sole oppressors of blacks.
There is a broader interesting point to be made about the rehabilitation of certain groups into 'whiteness' as a social construct, both on the part of the right and the left. The GOP for example has made it a project in the last decade plus to reach out to Hispanics as a remedy for their demographic problems, and has been pretty successful in coopting a segment of the Hispanic population - usually conservative and Catholic - to joining with their coalition and convincing them to see themselves as part of the 'white' racial/social class. To that end you see this motif repeated in liberal takes on this event, where the shooter here is perceived as being 'white' because he doesn't have enough 'otherized' characteristics (like obvious religiosity, poverty or new immigrant status) and had a 'normal', if troubled, high school experience.
Just goes to show how mutable 'whiteness' is as a construct that you can have such wild disagreements about their placement on the racial hierarchy that Western culture has constructed for itself.