Kubra wrote:Whoopsie, missed a post.Austria-Bohemia-Hungary wrote:Probs why the US Army trialled the Namer in 2012.
Anyways, yes, that they did, before ultimately settling on having troops just use the new MRAP's (dubious move, given the programmes cost).
In any case, the point still stands: the Bradley was not terribly suited to the conflict it really saw its longest combat record in.
...and? My point is that it's stupid to shit on the Bradley's designers for, y'know. Not planning for something they literally had no plans of doing. I'm certain the BMP-1 and -2 did wonderfully in the Chechen Wars.