Can Homophobia Be Justified?

[Genivaria]

It is an insult to God to change his definitions

Why should we non-Christians care about the opinion of a fake sky daddy?

Not even all Christians agree with him, regardless though that's all irrelevant to what the laws of our society should be.
Idk where he's from but the US isn't Iran.

[Gongsi]

Why?

It is an insult to God to change his definitions

The nation and its laws are not ruled by God and his definitions. That would be a theocracy.

And the New Testament does specifically state multiple times to not force your religious beliefs onto others not of your faith. So advocating forcing Christian morals as law on non-Christians is also against God.

[Novokria]

It is an insult to God to change his definitions

Is it? Why should secular society give a shit?

Well when God shows his Anger the secular society also experiences his Anger

[Senkaku]

Is it? Why should secular society give a shit?

Well when God shows his Anger the secular society also experiences his Anger

This is true, we’re all having to read your posts

[The New California Republic]

Is it? Why should secular society give a shit?

Well when God shows his Anger the secular society also experiences his Anger

Sure, sure.

[Istoreya]

Is it? Why should secular society give a shit?

Well when God shows his Anger the secular society also experiences his Anger

This doesn't explain why we should be scared of the idea of someone who, according to the terms of society, doesn't exist.

[Genivaria]

Is it? Why should secular society give a shit?

Well when God shows his Anger the secular society also experiences his Anger

Cool story beo, get back to us when that happens.

[Necroghastia]

Is it? Why should secular society give a shit?

Well when God shows his Anger the secular society also experiences his Anger

It is an insult to God to change his definitions

1. where is the definition you are citing from?
2. how do we know that definition is from a higher power?
3. why does your own tradition of "marriage" supersede all others? what makes others less valid?

also why would a supposedly perfect being get that angry over something like this

[Novokria]

Well when God shows his Anger the secular society also experiences his Anger

Cool story beo, get back to us when that happens.

Beo? what is this suppose to mean?

[Genivaria]

Cool story beo, get back to us when that happens.

Beo? what is this suppose to mean?

Typo, I meant bro.
Posting from a phone.

[Istoreya]

Cool story beo, get back to us when that happens.

Beo? what is this suppose to mean?

Probably a typo of bro. Of all the replies you pick, that's the one you choose? Is that because you don't have a proper answer for the rest?

[The Grandest Empire]

Because the Traditional definition of Marriage should not be changed

That is taking away people's rights. And the traditional definition is wrong, for that matter.

gay "marraige" is not a right. It is a sin. It is unnatural and very sinful.

[Novokria]

Beo? what is this suppose to mean?

Probably a typo of bro. Of all the replies you pick, that's the one you choose? Is that because you don't have a proper answer for the rest?

I thought it was some insult or something so please stay out of it

[Neutraligon]

Is it? Why should secular society give a shit?

Well when God shows his Anger the secular society also experiences his Anger

It has been close to 2 decades and god doesn't seem to care, if he does, tough cookies.

[Genivaria]

That is taking away people's rights. And the traditional definition is wrong, for that matter.

gay "marraige" is not a right. It is a sin. It is unnatural and very sinful.

I don't accept sin as a concept so I don't see why I should care.
Do you have anything tangible to say on the matter?

[Neutraligon]

That is taking away people's rights. And the traditional definition is wrong, for that matter.

gay "marraige" is not a right. It is a sin. It is unnatural and very sinful.

Sin does not exist, marriage itself is unnatural depending on what you mean by natural.

[Ellbonnia]

All I'll say is that God's a sad, sad deity if someone's sexuality is all that's needed to send him into a world-ending rage.

"How dare those two men love each other! Oh, the humanity!"

[Istoreya]

Probably a typo of bro. Of all the replies you pick, that's the one you choose? Is that because you don't have a proper answer for the rest?

I thought it was some insult or something so please stay out of it

It was a criticism of your argument and posting style. If you think what I said was wrong, go give it to the mods. I'm still waiting for you to provide an actual reply - why should atheists care about angering God?

[Necroghastia]

That is taking away people's rights. And the traditional definition is wrong, for that matter.

gay "marraige" is not a right. It is a sin. It is unnatural and very sinful.

sin? that's just, like, your opinion man
and any kind of marriage is unnatural
the internet is unnatural
shoes are unnatural

[Esalia]

That is taking away people's rights. And the traditional definition is wrong, for that matter.

gay "marraige" is not a right. It is a sin. It is unnatural and very sinful.

Marriage itself is unnatural, I see nothing wrong with that.

[The New California Republic]

Probably a typo of bro. Of all the replies you pick, that's the one you choose? Is that because you don't have a proper answer for the rest?

I thought it was some insult or something so please stay out of it

If you talk about this on a public forum then you should expect people to see it and respond to it.

[Goraria]

Is it? Why should secular society give a shit?

Well when God shows his Anger the secular society also experiences his Anger

You religious or something? Not trying to be rude here but I’m just saying.

[Zul-ar]

Is it? Why should secular society give a shit?

Well when God shows his Anger the secular society also experiences his Anger

So let me get this chain of logic here:

Why shouldn't we change the traditional definition of marriage? -> We shouldn't change God's definitions
Why shouldn't we change God's definitions? -> It would be an insult to God
Why shouldn't we insult God? -> We would incur his wrath
Why does God's wrath matter? -> ???

Now, all you need to prove is that God's wrath should matter to us, which is only true if God is not a myth but a real being. Though, I'm sure you have plenty of evidence for the existence of God, right...?

[Istoreya]

I thought it was some insult or something so please stay out of it

If you talk about this on a public forum then you should expect people to see it and respond to it.

If Novo outright told me "I no longer want to have this conversation with you" I'd respect that. But dodging questions and going "but you insult me " is not that.

[Genivaria]

gay "marraige" is not a right. It is a sin. It is unnatural and very sinful.

Marriage itself is unnatural, I see nothing wrong with that.

Oh yeah also lol at people appealing to naturalism via the internet.