Chan Island wrote:Unfathomably important and cool things. I am very pro-farm (if you could believe it), and have wistfully thought of what being one would be like.
Not that great, if you're carrying stock. You get trampled underfoot and shat on.
Advertisement
by A-Series-Of-Tubes » Fri Feb 19, 2021 10:12 pm
Chan Island wrote:Unfathomably important and cool things. I am very pro-farm (if you could believe it), and have wistfully thought of what being one would be like.
by Stagnant Axon Terminal » Sat Feb 20, 2021 12:09 am
Nanatsu No Tsuki wrote:the fetus will never eat cake if you abort it
Cu Math wrote:Axon is like a bear with a PH.D. She debates at first, then eats your face.
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:THE MAN'S PENIS HAS LEFT THE VAGINA. IT'S THE UTERUS'S TURN TO SHINE.
by The Blaatschapen » Sat Feb 20, 2021 2:40 am
by Miku the Based » Sat Feb 20, 2021 2:57 am
Lapis Lazului wrote: All I see people eating are a bunch of foods with chemicals that are not okay for you .
by Miku the Based » Sat Feb 20, 2021 3:04 am
Auze wrote:Domestic sheep especially, evolutionally speaking, herbivores should not regularly lose in battle with their food.
by Socialist States of Ludistan » Sat Feb 20, 2021 3:06 am
by Adamede » Sat Feb 20, 2021 6:26 am
Amos-Nuraka wrote:The Blaatschapen wrote:Farms for produce are fine.
Farms for animals are not. We're not living in 1984 anymore.
Animal husbandry has a huge environmental impact that we should drastically reduce.
I mean to be fair animal farming is pretty inefficient and a producer of pollution, so I'm not against getting rid of some of the extremely bad farms. However, my opinion is still farm good.
by Ifreann » Sat Feb 20, 2021 6:47 am
Adamede wrote:Amos-Nuraka wrote:I mean to be fair animal farming is pretty inefficient and a producer of pollution, so I'm not against getting rid of some of the extremely bad farms. However, my opinion is still farm good.
Depends on the setting. There’s plenty of locals where you can’t grow anything but inedible grass and shun that humans can’t eat, but livestock can, and humans in turn eat the livestock.
by Ethel mermania » Sat Feb 20, 2021 7:22 am
by The Blaatschapen » Sat Feb 20, 2021 7:30 am
Adamede wrote:Amos-Nuraka wrote:I mean to be fair animal farming is pretty inefficient and a producer of pollution, so I'm not against getting rid of some of the extremely bad farms. However, my opinion is still farm good.
Depends on the setting. There’s plenty of locals where you can’t grow anything but inedible grass and shrub that humans can’t eat, but livestock can, and humans in turn eat the livestock.
by A-Series-Of-Tubes » Sat Feb 20, 2021 7:35 am
by Ethel mermania » Sat Feb 20, 2021 7:41 am
by Hurdergaryp » Sat Feb 20, 2021 10:14 am
by Ethel mermania » Sat Feb 20, 2021 10:16 am
by The New California Republic » Sat Feb 20, 2021 10:27 am
by Adamede » Sat Feb 20, 2021 10:30 am
The New California Republic wrote:Hurdergaryp wrote:Chickens are rather benign when it comes to said carbon emissions. Also the healthier meat to eat, come to think of it.
I can honestly see that if consumed meat becomes totally synthetic in the future, that it'll probably just be chicken and nothing else.
by The New California Republic » Sat Feb 20, 2021 10:33 am
Adamede wrote:The New California Republic wrote:I can honestly see that if consumed meat becomes totally synthetic in the future, that it'll probably just be chicken and nothing else.
How? The whole point of synthetic meat production is that it would separate meat from the current resources heavy production. I can’t imagine it be any easier or cheaper to grow chicken meat cells versus cow meat cells (or even human meat cells)
by Adamede » Sat Feb 20, 2021 10:35 am
The New California Republic wrote:Adamede wrote:How? The whole point of synthetic meat production is that it would separate meat from the current resources heavy production. I can’t imagine it be any easier or cheaper to grow chicken meat cells versus cow meat cells (or even human meat cells)
Health reasons mainly.
by The New California Republic » Sat Feb 20, 2021 10:37 am
by The New California Republic » Sat Feb 20, 2021 10:39 am
Adamede wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Many times actually. Just look at the plethora of foods that are available now in comparison to before, such as low salt and low sugar options, gluten free, fat free etc.
And how much has that changed the health of our diets? We still eat too much meat, too much red meat, carbs, sugars, etc.
by Adamede » Sat Feb 20, 2021 10:43 am
by The New California Republic » Sat Feb 20, 2021 10:46 am
Adamede wrote:The New California Republic wrote:The mere fact there are options at all is itself a change in diet.
Yah, doesn’t mean that we mostly eat those options. Synthetic chicken would be an option, and a common one, but it’ll never fully replace other meats, just as it hasn’t now whole still Jen gone do the cheapest major meats.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Bormiar, Cyptopir, Experina, Floofybit, Forsher, Hidrandia, Ifreann, Keltionialang, Kerwa, Plan Neonie, Port Carverton, Republics of the Solar Union, Shearoa, Shidei, Theodorable, Tiami, Tungstan
Advertisement