Page 232 of 499

PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:10 am
by San Lumen
Odreria wrote:The problem is the dems don't actually care that Manchin blocks their legislation. If they actually wanted to pass their agenda they wouldn't have intentionally thrown so many senate races


How did they throw races?

PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:14 am
by Dresderstan
Odreria wrote:The problem is the dems don't actually care that Manchin blocks their legislation. If they actually wanted to pass their agenda they wouldn't have intentionally thrown so many senate races

As if anyone in Congress actually cares about the people.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:14 am
by A-Series-Of-Tubes
Major-Tom wrote:
Ifreann wrote:So Manchin now runs America. Nothing can happen that he does not sign off on.


By sheer unfortunate circumstance, sure, you could make that argument.

It's a double-edged sword, if he gets primaried out, we lose that seat or he switches parties and loses us the majority. If we try to keep it as is, he'll keep hindering many portions of the agenda. Oh well.


The one-seat majority is pretty rare. It gives literally every Democrat Senator the same power, but as the most right-wing Democrat Manchin thinks it's his duty to keep a lid on the lefties.

Currently Manchin can break a Democrat bill just by abstaining. That's 49-50 and doesn't activate the VP's tiebreaker. However if one Republican were to die, then at least for a while Manchin would have to vote against his party to stop a bill.

Senators don't die that often. Since 2000 there's been about 1 every 3 years. Half that rate for just Republicans.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:14 am
by Saiwania
I get that people want more money in general, no matter their income. But raising minimum wage to $15/hour won't do the lowest paid workers any good if in the long run, it just causes higher wages to go up as well- hence causing more inflation until the value of a dollar is the same as before.

Maybe it is time to raise minimum wage to $15/hr or maybe its not, but the fact remains that businesses by definition won't want to pay more payroll and taxes than they have to. And some small businesses/start ups can't afford to employ people at $15/hr and certain parts of the country don't have a cost of living anywhere near that high. This is just an issue that'll come up again like the slave state vs free state issue before the US Civil War.

Besides, minimum wage is economically stupid. The real way to get the right wages for everyone is to have the entire labor force unionized. But failing that, minimum wage should be tied to inflation or productivity. There is instead this backwards arrangement where minimum wage stays the same indefinitely, until inflation makes it so that various states raise their wages on their own, far before the federal government bothers to arbitrarily raise the minimum wage by a gigantic amount because the US Congress waited too damn long to do so.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:15 am
by San Lumen
A-Series-Of-Tubes wrote:
Major-Tom wrote:
By sheer unfortunate circumstance, sure, you could make that argument.

It's a double-edged sword, if he gets primaried out, we lose that seat or he switches parties and loses us the majority. If we try to keep it as is, he'll keep hindering many portions of the agenda. Oh well.


The one-seat majority is pretty rare. It gives literally every Democrat Senator the same power, but as the most right-wing Democrat Manchin thinks it's his duty to keep a lid on the lefties.

Currently Manchin can break a Democrat bill just by abstaining. That's 49-50 and doesn't activate the VP's tiebreaker. However if one Republican were to die, then at least for a while Manchin would have to vote against his party to stop a bill.

Senators don't die that often. Since 2000 there's been about 1 every 3 years. Half that rate for just Republicans.


it also depends on who died or resigned. In some states if would be an automatic flip due to the laws governing gubernatorial appointment in the state.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:15 am
by Odreria
San Lumen wrote:
Odreria wrote:The problem is the dems don't actually care that Manchin blocks their legislation. If they actually wanted to pass their agenda they wouldn't have intentionally thrown so many senate races


How did they throw races?

By intervening in the primaries to back candidates like Sara Gideon and Cal Cunningham.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:16 am
by Thermodolia
San Lumen wrote:
Odreria wrote:The problem is the dems don't actually care that Manchin blocks their legislation. If they actually wanted to pass their agenda they wouldn't have intentionally thrown so many senate races


How did they throw races?

Well in NC they went with the White moderate male over the black progressive female, which is usually odd cause they love IdPol but because she was progressive that just wouldn’t do.

The guy the DNC and State Dems supported would go on to lose one of the easiest elections to win

PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:16 am
by Dresderstan
Thermodolia wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
How did they throw races?

Well in NC they went with the White moderate male over the black progressive female, which is usually odd cause they love IdPol but because she was progressive that just wouldn’t do.

The guy the DNC and State Dems supported would go on to lose one of the easiest elections to win

Doesn't help the guy was having an affair.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:18 am
by Thermodolia
Dresderstan wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:Well in NC they went with the White moderate male over the black progressive female, which is usually odd cause they love IdPol but because she was progressive that just wouldn’t do.

The guy the DNC and State Dems supported would go on to lose one of the easiest elections to win

Doesn't help the guy was having an affair.

Well ya that’s the whole point he couldn’t keep it in his pants

PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:19 am
by San Lumen
Dresderstan wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:Well in NC they went with the White moderate male over the black progressive female, which is usually odd cause they love IdPol but because she was progressive that just wouldn’t do.

The guy the DNC and State Dems supported would go on to lose one of the easiest elections to win

Doesn't help the guy was having an affair.


It should have been kept quiet. In Europe people don't care about those things. The First Lady of France had an affair with a model in New York several years ago and divorced the President shortly after he was elected and few cared.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:20 am
by Odreria
San Lumen wrote:
Dresderstan wrote:Doesn't help the guy was having an affair.


It should have been kept quiet.

idk man he could have waited until after the election to have sex with women other than his wife, but no let's blame it all on the media

PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:20 am
by Dresderstan
San Lumen wrote:
Dresderstan wrote:Doesn't help the guy was having an affair.


It should have been kept quiet. In Europe people don't care about those things. The First Lady of France had an affair with a model in New York several years ago and divorced the President shortly after he was elected and few cared.

Well we're not France, so boo hoo.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:20 am
by San Lumen
Odreria wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
It should have been kept quiet.

idk man he could have waited until after the election to have sex with women other than his wife, but no let's blame it all on the media


His opponent could have just kept it quiet and no one would have found out.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:21 am
by Odreria
San Lumen wrote:
Odreria wrote:idk man he could have waited until after the election to have sex with women other than his wife, but no let's blame it all on the media


His opponent could have just kept it quiet and no one would have found out.

lmfao

PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:23 am
by San Lumen
Dresderstan wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
It should have been kept quiet. In Europe people don't care about those things. The First Lady of France had an affair with a model in New York several years ago and divorced the President shortly after he was elected and few cared.

Well we're not France, so boo hoo.


We should be in that area.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:24 am
by Dresderstan
San Lumen wrote:
Dresderstan wrote:Well we're not France, so boo hoo.


We should be in that area.

Well guess what we're not, so get over it.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:24 am
by Thermodolia
San Lumen wrote:
Dresderstan wrote:Doesn't help the guy was having an affair.


It should have been kept quiet. In Europe people don't care about those things. The First Lady of France had an affair with a model in New York several years ago and divorced the President shortly after he was elected and few cared.

Because literally everyone in France has a mistress. Also France doesn’t care about sex all that much considering they where literally the first nation to legalize homosexual activities.

But the rest of Europe very much does care about infidelity. Like all of Eastern Europe, Germany, and especially the UK. The UK cares about it so much that they forced one of their monarchs to abdicate because he married an American double divorcee

PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:25 am
by A-Series-Of-Tubes
Punished UMN wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
I still think it should have been kept quiet. it was no ones business. The First Lady of France a number of years ago had an affair with a model in New York and few in the country gave a darn.

"True information should be suppressed because it might hurt us politically"

hmmm


SL didn't say that. Actually rather the opposite: "keeping it quiet" requires that both political sides not raise it. That's passing up a chance at political advantage because "moral failings" of a sexual nature really shouldn't be a factor.

It really shouldn't be a requirement for office that a person be married. Strictly speaking its not, but it clearly biases the voters and on election night there they are, total stranger who has nothing to do with politics, hugging and kissing the winner. In a perfect world, someone better looking who is probably an escort, could be there instead.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:25 am
by Thermodolia
San Lumen wrote:
Dresderstan wrote:Well we're not France, so boo hoo.


We should be in that area.

But we aren’t so he should have kept in his pants

PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:26 am
by San Lumen
Thermodolia wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
It should have been kept quiet. In Europe people don't care about those things. The First Lady of France had an affair with a model in New York several years ago and divorced the President shortly after he was elected and few cared.

Because literally everyone in France has a mistress. Also France doesn’t care about sex all that much considering they where literally the first nation to legalize homosexual activities.

But the rest of Europe very much does care about infidelity. Like all of Eastern Europe, Germany, and especially the UK. The UK cares about it so much that they forced one of their monarchs to abdicate because he married an American double divorcee


That was decades ago.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:28 am
by Odreria
San Lumen wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:Because literally everyone in France has a mistress. Also France doesn’t care about sex all that much considering they where literally the first nation to legalize homosexual activities.

But the rest of Europe very much does care about infidelity. Like all of Eastern Europe, Germany, and especially the UK. The UK cares about it so much that they forced one of their monarchs to abdicate because he married an American double divorcee


That was decades ago.

wow I guess that proves cal cunningham was the perfect candidate and could not have run a better campaign

PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:28 am
by Thermodolia
A-Series-Of-Tubes wrote:
Punished UMN wrote:"True information should be suppressed because it might hurt us politically"

hmmm


SL didn't say that. Actually rather the opposite: "keeping it quiet" requires that both political sides not raise it. That's passing up a chance at political advantage because "moral failings" of a sexual nature really shouldn't be a factor.

It really shouldn't be a requirement for office that a person be married. Strictly speaking its not, but it clearly biases the voters and on election night there they are, total stranger who has nothing to do with politics, hugging and kissing the winner. In a perfect world, someone better looking who is probably an escort, could be there instead.

Nobody is saying that he needed to be married but that because he’s married he shouldn’t be cheating on his wife. Not to mention what he did is actually illegal and could cost him his job.

On top of that he was running for office in a very conservative state. It might not have mattered in a state way up north or on the west coast but it definitely matters in the south.

And for the record Warnock got elected without being married at the time.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:29 am
by A-Series-Of-Tubes
San Lumen wrote:
Dresderstan wrote:Doesn't help the guy was having an affair.


It should have been kept quiet. In Europe people don't care about those things. The First Lady of France had an affair with a model in New York several years ago and divorced the President shortly after he was elected and few cared.


"She did him wrong" so of course it doesn't reflect badly on the President.

Also divorce should never have to be one-sided. Either of them can claim to have initiated divorce, and no-one could prove otherwise. The "grounds for divorce" thing is moralistic crap from the 19th century.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:29 am
by San Lumen
https://www.wbur.org/news/2021/02/26/bo ... l-election

Governor Baker in Massachusetts signed a measure eliminating the special election in Boston if Mayor Walsh is confirmed for Labor Secretary as expected. The regular primary will go ahead in September and the general in November.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:31 am
by Thermodolia
San Lumen wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:Because literally everyone in France has a mistress. Also France doesn’t care about sex all that much considering they where literally the first nation to legalize homosexual activities.

But the rest of Europe very much does care about infidelity. Like all of Eastern Europe, Germany, and especially the UK. The UK cares about it so much that they forced one of their monarchs to abdicate because he married an American double divorcee


That was decades ago.

Dude the UK still doesn’t have no fault divorce, the US is more progressive than the UK when it comes to divorce. It’s still an issue over there.