NationStates

Sundiata wrote:

The New California Republic wrote:...wat.

Get people into cities and put them to work.

The New California Republic wrote:

Sundiata wrote:Get people into cities and put them to work.

Nono, that's not what you said. You said "towns waste space". Please, expand on that, I'm dying to know what you mean, as it just seems like a laughably absurd statement to make.

Sundiata wrote:

The New California Republic wrote:Nono, that's not what you said. You said "towns waste space". Please, expand on that, I'm dying to know what you mean, as it just seems like a laughably absurd statement to make.

I just wanted to make you laugh.

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:

San Lumen wrote:I hope he loses his emergency power, resigns or is impeached. Everyone I know hates him now and there is a real possibility he could lose a primary challenge. His replacement if was too resign or be removed would be far more tolerable and has far less of an ego.

Between him and DiBlasio, they really screwed up New Yorkers.

The New California Republic wrote:

Sundiata wrote:I just wanted to make you laugh.

...right. Sure.

San Lumen wrote:

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Between him and DiBlasio, they really screwed up New Yorkers.

Diblasio can’t run again this year fortunately and it’s a strong possibility he is replaced by Andrew Yang. He’s the current front runner for the democratic nomination.

San Lumen wrote:

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Between him and DiBlasio, they really screwed up New Yorkers.

Diblasio can’t run again this year fortunately and it’s a strong possibility he is replaced by Andrew Yang. He’s the current front runner for the democratic nomination.

Sundiata wrote:

The New California Republic wrote:Nono, that's not what you said. You said "towns waste space". Please, expand on that, I'm dying to know what you mean, as it just seems like a laughably absurd statement to make.

I just wanted to make you laugh.

Necroghastia wrote:

Sundiata wrote:I just wanted to make you laugh.

then why'd you say the same thing to a different poster questioning what you said?

Esalia wrote:

Sundiata wrote:It's more desirable than having homeless people, that's disgusting.

We can eliminate homelessness and not herd everyone into cities.

Sundiata wrote:

The New California Republic wrote:...right. Sure.

Seriously speaking, I prefer vertical growth to horizontal growth. That's all.

Odreria wrote:

San Lumen wrote:Diblasio can’t run again this year fortunately and it’s a strong possibility he is replaced by Andrew Yang. He’s the current front runner for the democratic nomination.

I def like Yang, but it seems like Stringer would be alright as well.

The New California Republic wrote:

Sundiata wrote:Seriously speaking, I prefer vertical growth to horizontal growth. That's all.

It still doesn't really explain the very broad brush "towns waste space" statement.

Sundiata wrote:

The New California Republic wrote:It still doesn't really explain the very broad brush "towns waste space" statement.

TL;,Dr: government housing for everyone in cities.

Suriyanakhon wrote:

Esalia wrote:
We can eliminate homelessness and not herd everyone into cities.

Reverse Pol Pot?

Celritannia wrote:

Sundiata wrote:TL;,Dr: government housing for everyone in cities.

What if people don't want to live in cities?

Sundiata wrote:

Suriyanakhon wrote:
Reverse Pol Pot?

I guess, I don't know. You can take the government option if you want but it should exist.

Sundiata wrote:

The New California Republic wrote:It still doesn't really explain the very broad brush "towns waste space" statement.

TL;,Dr: government housing for everyone in cities.

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:

Sundiata wrote:I guess, I don't know. You can take the government option if you want but it should exist.

You do know Pol Pot killed thousands of his countrymen, right?

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:

San Lumen wrote:Diblasio can’t run again this year fortunately and it’s a strong possibility he is replaced by Andrew Yang. He’s the current front runner for the democratic nomination.

Hooray for small blessings at least.

Sundiata wrote:

Celritannia wrote:
What if people don't want to live in cities?

Then it's people's choice if they want to risk being homeless.

The New California Republic wrote:

Sundiata wrote:TL;,Dr: government housing for everyone in cities.

That still doesn't explain it.

Celritannia wrote:

Sundiata wrote:

Then it's people's choice if they want to risk being homeless.

"Live in cities, or die."

How dictatorial of you. Although given your recent comments and ideals, it is not surprising.

San Lumen wrote:

Celritannia wrote:
"Live in cities, or die."

How dictatorial of you. Although given your recent comments and ideals, it is not surprising.

As much as I like cities I agree forcing people to live there is dictatorial.

San Lumen wrote:

Celritannia wrote:
"Live in cities, or die."

How dictatorial of you. Although given your recent comments and ideals, it is not surprising.

As much as I like cities I agree forcing people to live there is dictatorial.

Sundiata wrote:

The New California Republic wrote:That still doesn't explain it.

Government builds or buys apartments from private companies for people in cities. If you don't want it a government apartment then you don't have to take it.