NationStates

Greater Miami Shores wrote:

Juristonia wrote:yOu HaVe yOuR FaCtS aNd I hAvE mInE

You ignore this part - Under the Trump administration plan, the Pentagon first offered the vaccine to health care workers and their support staff, followed by those with critical national security jobs, and then the workforce over 65 years of age or with prior medical conditions.

Greater Miami Shores wrote:

Rusozak wrote:*Sigh* I thought we were done arguing with the cultists of private citizen Mr. Trump.

Yes I am a Proud Republican Trump Cultists Supporter, with Pride and Honor. It is on my sig. Because I strongly agree at least 99 Percent % with Republican President Donald J Trump and the Republicans on most issues. There is nothing wrong with it.

I strongly disagree at least 99 Percent % with the Democrats and Biden on most issues.

I don't have any problems with persons who support the Democrats and Biden. I don't have any problems with any persons who Post Pro Democrats, Pro Biden Posts. I don't put any persons on ignore for any reasons and I am very proud of it, but I am not the only one on NS.

GMS.

Istoreya wrote:

Greater Miami Shores wrote:Yes I am a Proud Republican Trump Cultists Supporter, with Pride and Honor. It is on my sig. Because I strongly agree at least 99 Percent % with Republican President Donald J Trump and the Republicans on most issues. There is nothing wrong with it.

I strongly disagree at least 99 Percent % with the Democrats and Biden on most issues.

I don't have any problems with persons who support the Democrats and Biden. I don't have any problems with any persons who Post Pro Democrats, Pro Biden Posts. I don't put any persons on ignore for any reasons and I am very proud of it, but I am not the only one on NS.

GMS.

You are aware of the image you are giving of yourself by openly calling yourself a cultist, right? Cults aren't good.

Gravlen wrote:

Greater Miami Shores wrote:You ignore this part - Under the Trump administration plan, the Pentagon first offered the vaccine to health care workers and their support staff, followed by those with critical national security jobs, and then the workforce over 65 years of age or with prior medical conditions.

That's not being ignored.

You complain that Biden wanted to vaccinate the Guantanamo detainees, when it was, in fact, the Trump administration who wanted to do that. Biden stopped the vaccinations, which he shouldn't have.

You whine about Trump administration policies, and you call them America Last.

Greater Miami Shores wrote:

Rusozak wrote:*Sigh* I thought we were done arguing with the cultists of private citizen Mr. Trump.

Yes I am a Proud Republican Trump Cultists Supporter, with Pride and Honor. It is on my sig. Because I strongly agree at least 99 Percent % with Republican President Donald J Trump and the Republicans on most issues. There is nothing wrong with it.

I strongly disagree at least 99 Percent % with the Democrats and Biden on most issues.

I don't have any problems with persons who support the Democrats and Biden. I don't have any problems with any persons who Post Pro Democrats, Pro Biden Posts. I don't put any persons on ignore for any reasons and I am very proud of it, but I am not the only one on NS.

GMS.

Greater Miami Shores wrote:

Dresderstan wrote:There is no point in arguing with GMS so please stop it, it's hopeless, it's like talking to a fucking brick wall. At least a brick wall wouldn't spat out the same talking points over and over again.

I do not have to agree with any persons I strongly disagree with on Republican President Donald J Trump, Republicans, Cuba or any issues on NS, when I and the millions of my fellow Republicans American citizens of the USA, strongly disagree with them.

We are on NS to share, discuss and argue our similar and different views on all issues, with respect towards each other, while strongly disagreeing with each other. These are not just anti Trump threads to agree with each other.

The Persons who have me on ignore don't accept that I can have a different point of view on Republican President Donald J Trump. They don't even put me on ignore on Cuba, my real pet issue on NS.

GMS.

Shrillland wrote:The Daily Mail(so take it as you will) just released this exclusive expose on MTG: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9246917/Marjorie-Taylor-Green-openly-cheated-husband-men-gym.html?fbclid=IwAR2TauYrgChi-AGYASA925dty1EW_2Aq0VDTePXfl_bdILlPg4atwBXDPEQ

Drew Durrnil wrote:

Greater Miami Shores wrote:Yes I am a Proud Republican Trump Cultists Supporter, with Pride and Honor. It is on my sig. Because I strongly agree at least 99 Percent % with Republican President Donald J Trump and the Republicans on most issues. There is nothing wrong with it.

I strongly disagree at least 99 Percent % with the Democrats and Biden on most issues.

I don't have any problems with persons who support the Democrats and Biden. I don't have any problems with any persons who Post Pro Democrats, Pro Biden Posts. I don't put any persons on ignore for any reasons and I am very proud of it, but I am not the only one on NS.

GMS.

*pulls out anime weapons*
weeaboo mode!
As a proud member of the Cancel America cult, I challenge your cult to a duel!

Atheris wrote:

Istoreya wrote:You are aware of the image you are giving of yourself by openly calling yourself a cultist, right? Cults aren't good.

Except for Christianity. And Islam. And a majority of religions, actually.

Punished UMN wrote:

Atheris wrote:Except for Christianity. And Islam. And a majority of religions, actually.

Cults in the modern sense aren't defined by belief-system, they're defined by how they interact with the world outside of their belief system, with cults emphasizing removal of contact with people who are not part of the belief system and the use of psychological manipulation to ensure the loyalty of members. You could argue that some denominations of major religions are cults or that some trends within major religions (e.g. Christian and Buddhist monasticism) are cult-like, but there are still key differences in their MO, who has authority, and how this authority is maintained.

Shrillland wrote:The Daily Mail(so take it as you will) just released this exclusive expose on MTG: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9246917/Marjorie-Taylor-Green-openly-cheated-husband-men-gym.html?fbclid=IwAR2TauYrgChi-AGYASA925dty1EW_2Aq0VDTePXfl_bdILlPg4atwBXDPEQ

Spirit of Hope wrote:

Greater Miami Shores wrote:I do not have to agree with any persons I strongly disagree with on Republican President Donald J Trump, Republicans, Cuba or any issues on NS, when I and the millions of my fellow Republicans American citizens of the USA, strongly disagree with them.

We are on NS to share, discuss and argue our similar and different views on all issues, with respect towards each other, while strongly disagreeing with each other. These are not just anti Trump threads to agree with each other.

The Persons who have me on ignore don't accept that I can have a different point of view on Republican President Donald J Trump. They don't even put me on ignore on Cuba, my real pet issue on NS.

GMS.

Pretty sure people who have you on ignore can handle the fact you disagree with them since they participate in the debate with other people who disagree with them. What they can't handle is the fact that you repeat the same lines over and over and that you ignore objective fact.

Shrillland wrote:The Daily Mail(so take it as you will) just released this exclusive expose on MTG: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9246917/Marjorie-Taylor-Green-openly-cheated-husband-men-gym.html?fbclid=IwAR2TauYrgChi-AGYASA925dty1EW_2Aq0VDTePXfl_bdILlPg4atwBXDPEQ

I mean even if it's not true her response was hilarious. The freshman representative is the biggest threat to socialism?

Greater Miami Shores wrote:

Spirit of Hope wrote:
Pretty sure people who have you on ignore can handle the fact you disagree with them since they participate in the debate with other people who disagree with them. What they can't handle is the fact that you repeat the same lines over and over and that you ignore objective fact.



I mean even if it's not true her response was hilarious. The freshman representative is the biggest threat to socialism?

Thank you for your constructive post. I do repeat myself like the broken record I am, lol. Because the post response fits the post not because I want too. As I said they ignore me for the reasons I stated, which I can prove if I ever have too, and I hope I never have too.

I do not ignore objective facts, when they always agree with the person strongly disagreeing with me on Republican President Trump. What a coincidence the objective facts on Republican President Trump always agree with their views based on facts. They never agree with my views based on facts. I will never agree with other persons facts when I strongly disagree with them. They will never agree with my facts when they strongly disagree with them, these are facts, .

Thank you for trying to post a constructive post too me.

GMS.

Atheris wrote:

Greater Miami Shores wrote:Thank you for your constructive post. I do repeat myself like the broken record I am, lol. Because the post response fits the post not because I want too. As I said they ignore me for the reasons I stated, which I can prove if I ever have too, and I hope I never have too.

I do not ignore objective facts, when they always agree with the person strongly disagreeing with me on Republican President Trump. What a coincidence the objective facts on Republican President Trump always agree with their views based on facts. They never agree with my views based on facts. I will never agree with other persons facts when I strongly disagree with them. They will never agree with my facts when they strongly disagree with them, these are facts, .

Thank you for trying to post a constructive post too me.

GMS.

You're not posting facts.

Greater Miami Shores wrote:

Atheris wrote:You're not posting facts.

That is the problem their facts are there opinions, my facts are my opinions. You would strongly disagree with any persons who strongly disagree with you, especially on Republican President Trump or any issues and so would I, and so would all of us on NS and off NS. Don't hold me to a different standard. This also happens with other pro Trump persons posts. But I GMS usually post at least 99 % of the Pro Trump Posts on these related threads. Have you guys not noticed, it is not because I am the only one on NS, it is because I am the one who usually posts.

Thank you for trying to post a constructive post too me.

GMS.

Zurkerx wrote:So, Trump's defense team basically made their case for 3 hours and was mostly by what I heard "he had a 1st Amendment Right to tell his supporters to 'fight' and that he never cited an insurrection". Am I hearing that correctly? Because god damn, that's a poor defense. Not that it matters anyway: he could literally shoot someone on 5th Avenue and they wouldn't convict him, at least in the Senate. How disappointing.

Istoreya wrote:

Greater Miami Shores wrote:That is the problem their facts are there opinions, my facts are my opinions. You would strongly disagree with any persons who strongly disagree with you, especially on Republican President Trump or any issues and so would I, and so would all of us on NS and off NS. Don't hold me to a different standard. This also happens with other pro Trump persons posts. But I GMS usually post at least 99 % of the Pro Trump Posts on these related threads. Have you guys not noticed, it is not because I am the only one on NS, it is because I am the one who usually posts.

Thank you for trying to post a constructive post too me.

GMS.

No, you are still fundamentally misunderstanding facts for opinions. Facts do not change based on opinion. For example, flat earthers have the opinion that the earth is flat. The earth is not flat, flat earthers simply ignore facts. It isn't the case that the earth being round is just an opinion. It is a fact which certain people are stupidly blind to.

Shrillland wrote:

Our Last Thread

The stimulus is being debated and amended and mutilated, the Trump trial seems to be heading to another acquittal, and B.1.351 variant-Covid is about to sweep the nation. What else will happen in the US? Stay on this thread to find out with news from Kowani, electoral analysis from Shrillland and San Lumen, civil debate from NSG, uncivil debate from the same NSG, and next week's weather forecast with chief meteorologist Jenny Greenteeth. In the mentime, you all know the rules, play nice, wear your masks, get your shots, and get the vaccine, too.


Plebiscite Plaza 2021, your home for ballot initiatives for the year.

First up is an amendment that would lead to redistricting reform. The amendment would allow the state 10-member redistricting commission(made up of 4 Democrats, 4 Republicans, and 2 non-partisans) to approve a new legislative map by majority vote if a single party holds both legislative houses. Currently, it requires a two-thirds majority when a party holds both. Second, the amendment would require prisoners to be counted in the census according to their last known residence rather than the prison they're in. Third, it would require the state to count non-citizens when it comes to redistricting. Fourth, State Senate district would no longer be bound to the "block-on'-border" requirement, meaning that (A), city blocks could now be divided into different districts, and (B), the commission is no longer required to take adjacent towns or city blocks on the borders of districts in mind when drawing maps. Currently, they have to ensure that towns or blocks are placed in such a way as to make neighbouring districts equal in population and the districts can't have a greater population difference between them than the population of that border town or block. Fifth, it would permanently cap the State Senate at 63 seats, and sixth, it moves up the deadline for redistricting to November 1, 2021(and so on) from January 1, 2022(and so on).

Amendment number two would create a constitutional right to clean water, clean air, and a healthful environment.

[spoiler=Pennsylvania]The first amendment, to be voted on on May 18 like the others, would amend the constitution to prohibit the denial or abridgement of rights based on race or ethnicity, primarily to stop Affirmative Action.

Amendments number two and three both regard emergency declarations. Two would limit emergency declarations issued by the governor to no more than 21 days unless the legislature votes for an extension. The amendment would also allow the legislature to pass laws regarding how these declarations can be managed. Three would allow the legislature to unilaterally extend or terminate a governor's emergency declaration by a simple majority vote. This resolution could not be vetoed by the governor.

Atheris wrote:

Punished UMN wrote:Cults in the modern sense aren't defined by belief-system, they're defined by how they interact with the world outside of their belief system, with cults emphasizing removal of contact with people who are not part of the belief system and the use of psychological manipulation to ensure the loyalty of members. You could argue that some denominations of major religions are cults or that some trends within major religions (e.g. Christian and Buddhist monasticism) are cult-like, but there are still key differences in their MO, who has authority, and how this authority is maintained.

I was just making a joke about how the Abrahamic religions, Buddhism, and a few others I'm too bored to name technically count as cults since they revolve around the worship and/or veneration of one person (specifically Abraham, Jesus, Mohammed (pbuh), and Gautama).

Greater Miami Shores wrote:

Atheris wrote:You're not posting facts.

That is the problem their facts are there opinions, my facts are my opinions.

You would strongly disagree with any persons who strongly disagree with you, especially on Republican President Trump or any issues and so would I, and so would all of us on NS and off NS. Don't hold me to a different standard.

This also happens with other pro Trump persons posts.

But I GMS usually post at least 99 % of the Pro Trump Posts on these related threads. Have you guys not noticed, it is not because I am the only one on NS, it is because I am the one who usually posts.

Thank you for trying to post a constructive post too me.

GMS.

Zurkerx wrote:So, Trump's defense team basically made their case for 3 hours and was mostly by what I heard "he had a 1st Amendment Right to tell his supporters to 'fight' and that he never cited an insurrection". Am I hearing that correctly? Because god damn, that's a poor defense. Not that it matters anyway: he could literally shoot someone on 5th Avenue and they wouldn't convict him, at least in the Senate. How disappointing.

Atheris wrote:

Drew Durrnil wrote:*pulls out anime weapons*
weeaboo mode!
As a proud member of the Cancel America cult, I challenge your cult to a duel!

*pulls out anime weapons*
weeaboo mode!
*screams in depression and existential dread*

Drew Durrnil wrote:

Atheris wrote:*pulls out anime weapons*
weeaboo mode!
*screams in depression and existential dread*

I'm gonna sig this real quick