Advertisement
by Kowani » Sat Mar 06, 2021 9:24 pm
by San Lumen » Sat Mar 06, 2021 9:37 pm
by A-Series-Of-Tubes » Sat Mar 06, 2021 9:46 pm
by San Lumen » Sat Mar 06, 2021 9:49 pm
A-Series-Of-Tubes wrote:San Lumen wrote:
He never should have resigned and its why I and many other I know will never forgive Senator Gillibrand.
Well I agree he shouldn't have resigned. It was a pretty small offense and the victim said she forgave him for it. Probably one of those things which is too much all at once (being a picture) but which a tougher politician would have lived down.
However, I'm not going to blame anyone who pressured him to resign. If he can't take that then he wasn't cut out for politics after all. He was kicked off a committee or something? That's nothing.
Newspaper? Never heard of it.
by Dresderstan » Sat Mar 06, 2021 9:51 pm
by Kowani » Sat Mar 06, 2021 9:57 pm
by The Black Forrest » Sat Mar 06, 2021 10:25 pm
by Kowani » Sat Mar 06, 2021 10:58 pm
by San Lumen » Sat Mar 06, 2021 11:03 pm
by Shu Chengdu » Sat Mar 06, 2021 11:11 pm
San Lumen wrote:
Excellent. This is one of those things that’s going to happen via state and local action. Democratic candidates for state legislatures should campaign on it as should those for municipal office.
by Kowani » Sun Mar 07, 2021 12:04 am
Biden's executive order will prompt federal agencies to use their websites and social media platforms to share information about voter registration and distribute vote-by-mail applications in the course of regular services.
The order also aims to modernize Vote.gov, an official voter registration site run by the federal government, to improve accessibility and upgrade the user experience.
The rest of the order focuses on strengthening voter access for specific groups more likely to face obstacles to voting. For example, the order will direct the attorney general to establish protocols to provide educational materials about voting for eligible individuals who are being held under the jurisdiction of the Federal Bureau of Prisons.
The order will also establish a steering group on Native American voting rights. Biden's steps to improve voting access will not supersede state laws, as elections are administered by state and local officials.
by Kilobugya » Sun Mar 07, 2021 12:08 am
Senkaku wrote:42% favorability... 47% approval... 57% say he should resign...
by A-Series-Of-Tubes » Sun Mar 07, 2021 1:07 am
San Lumen wrote:
Excellent. This is one of those things that’s going to happen via state and local action. Democratic candidates for state legislatures should campaign on it as should those for municipal office.
by A-Series-Of-Tubes » Sun Mar 07, 2021 1:10 am
by Kowani » Sun Mar 07, 2021 1:19 am
by A-Series-Of-Tubes » Sun Mar 07, 2021 1:58 am
by Kannap » Sun Mar 07, 2021 6:30 am
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy
by Borderlands of Rojava » Sun Mar 07, 2021 6:34 am
by Picairn » Sun Mar 07, 2021 6:34 am
Kannap wrote:Today I'm reminded Snopes is a joke and at best, untrustworthy.
by Kannap » Sun Mar 07, 2021 6:37 am
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy
by Trollzyn the Infinite » Sun Mar 07, 2021 6:39 am
by Vassenor » Sun Mar 07, 2021 6:41 am
Kannap wrote:Borderlands of Rojava wrote:
What happened?Picairn wrote:May I ask for your reasons why?
Things like this often happen.
The "what's true" section literally confirms the claim. The "what's false" sections adds explanation that's irrelevant to the claim. So instead of the claim being confirmed as true, like it should be, it's considered a "mixed bag." This is a pattern that happens whenever it suits them, and it leads to a lack of credibility really.
by Borderlands of Rojava » Sun Mar 07, 2021 6:42 am
Kannap wrote:Borderlands of Rojava wrote:
What happened?Picairn wrote:May I ask for your reasons why?
Things like this often happen.
The "what's true" section literally confirms the claim. The "what's false" sections adds explanation that's irrelevant to the claim. So instead of the claim being confirmed as true, like it should be, it's considered a "mixed bag." This is a pattern that happens whenever it suits them, and it leads to a lack of credibility really.
Although the cake offering reminded some people of Marie Antoinette's alleged "Let Them Eat Cake!" remark about her starving subjects, Sinema's cake was unrelated to her vote.
by Borderlands of Rojava » Sun Mar 07, 2021 6:44 am
Vassenor wrote:Kannap wrote:
Things like this often happen.
The "what's true" section literally confirms the claim. The "what's false" sections adds explanation that's irrelevant to the claim. So instead of the claim being confirmed as true, like it should be, it's considered a "mixed bag." This is a pattern that happens whenever it suits them, and it leads to a lack of credibility really.
"People are saying she did this for X reason. While she did do the thing, it was not for X reason" makes the site untrustworthy, apparently.
by Picairn » Sun Mar 07, 2021 6:47 am
Kannap wrote:The "what's true" section literally confirms the claim. The "what's false" sections adds explanation that's irrelevant to the claim. So instead of the claim being confirmed as true, like it should be, it's considered a "mixed bag." This is a pattern that happens whenever it suits them, and it leads to a lack of credibility really.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Butuni, Infected Mushroom, Roman Khilafa Al Cordoba, Tungstan
Advertisement