NATION

PASSWORD

The New Glass Ceiling or Due Progress?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Opinion?

Biden should’ve let this go up for vote.
58
56%
I support Biden’s executive action on this.
45
44%
 
Total votes : 103

User avatar
Esalia
Minister
 
Posts: 2182
Founded: Oct 22, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Esalia » Thu Jan 28, 2021 2:03 pm

The Republic of Fore wrote:
Cordel One wrote:
Much better idea: pool everyone together and put them into tiers based on skill, not genitals. Also, trans people are legitimate.

No they're not. And there's no reason to combine sports. The world won't end if boys have their thing and girls have another.


Nor would the world end if we let trans people into the sport of the gender they identify as.
Formerly Estanglia.

Pro: Things I think are good.
Anti: Things I think are bad.

User avatar
Postauthoritarian America
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1195
Founded: Nov 07, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Postauthoritarian America » Thu Jan 28, 2021 6:52 pm

The Republic of Fore wrote:
Postauthoritarian America wrote:
In a true democracy the candidate with more votes wins office. In a true democracy politicans representing less than half of the population which creates a quarter of the national wealth don't get to name a third of the judges to the highest court in the land or enact massive tax cuts to enrich their donors. In a true democracy neither the party that resorts to violence and intimidation to attempt to overturn the result of a free, fair and fraudless election nor its leaders get a mulligan. Need I go on?

Elections. Have. Consequences. For Republicans, too. Get used to it.



Ask all the people I said it to for the last four years when they mentioned they voted for Johnson or Stein or stayed home because they couldn't bring themselves to vote for the most qualified Presidential candidate in my lifetime since she was a woman or they didn't like her attitude or BENGHAAAAZIIIII or BUTTER EEEEEEMAIIIILS!!!!!

Elections. Have. Consequences. Nothing is truer in a true democracy.

Four years as secretary of state and 1.5 terms in the Senate doesn't make someone qualified.


Going bankrupt six times after inheriting money is somehow better?
"The violence of American law enforcement degrades the lives of countless people, especially poor Black people, through its peculiar appetite for their death." | "There are but two parties now: traitors and patriots. And I want hereafter to be ranked with the latter and, I trust, the stronger party." -- Ulysses S. Grant, 1861 | "You don't get mulligans in insurrection." | "Today's Republican Party is America's and the world's largest white supremacist organization." | "I didn't vote to overturn an election, and I will not be lectured by people who did about partisanship." -- Rep. Gerry Connolly |"Republicans...have transformed...to a fascist party engaged in a takeover of the United States of America."

User avatar
The Spook Who Sat By The Door
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 44
Founded: Jan 05, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby The Spook Who Sat By The Door » Thu Jan 28, 2021 9:00 pm

Combat sports are going to be off the chain!

I had this crazy idea one day that this could all just be a transient issue.
Beware of the hand when it's coming from the Left,
I ain't trippin', just watch your step. Can't truss it!

User avatar
The Republic of Fore
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1552
Founded: Apr 10, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby The Republic of Fore » Fri Jan 29, 2021 5:02 am

The Greater Ohio Valley wrote:
The Republic of Fore wrote:No they're not.

Yes they are.

The Republic of Fore wrote:And there's no reason to combine sports. The world won't end if boys have their thing and girls have another.

And there’s no reason not to combine sports. The world won’t end if boys and girls complete against each other in the same sports.

1. If you're born with a dick you'll never be a girl.
2. And sure there is, boys will have an unfair advantage.

User avatar
Auzkhia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28954
Founded: Mar 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Auzkhia » Fri Jan 29, 2021 9:14 am

The Republic of Fore wrote:
Postauthoritarian America wrote:
In a true democracy the candidate with more votes wins office. In a true democracy politicans representing less than half of the population which creates a quarter of the national wealth don't get to name a third of the judges to the highest court in the land or enact massive tax cuts to enrich their donors. In a true democracy neither the party that resorts to violence and intimidation to attempt to overturn the result of a free, fair and fraudless election nor its leaders get a mulligan. Need I go on?

Elections. Have. Consequences. For Republicans, too. Get used to it.



Ask all the people I said it to for the last four years when they mentioned they voted for Johnson or Stein or stayed home because they couldn't bring themselves to vote for the most qualified Presidential candidate in my lifetime since she was a woman or they didn't like her attitude or BENGHAAAAZIIIII or BUTTER EEEEEEMAIIIILS!!!!!

Elections. Have. Consequences. Nothing is truer in a true democracy.

Four years as secretary of state and 1.5 terms in the Senate doesn't make someone qualified.

Well we now have someone who was a six term US Senator from 1973-2009 and and a two term Vice President from 2009-2017.

Though I'd prefer the person who was mayor 1981-1989, then a congressman from 1991-2007, and a US senator since 2007.
Esalia wrote:
The Republic of Fore wrote:No they're not. And there's no reason to combine sports. The world won't end if boys have their thing and girls have another.


Nor would the world end if we let trans people into the sport of the gender they identify as.

I reiterate my point about trans people have had that policy in the olympics since 2004 and to my knowledge there hasn't been any openly trans athletes who won a medal.
Me irl. (she/her/it)
IC name: Celestial Empire of the Romans
Imperial-Royal Statement on NS Stats
Factbook Embassy App
Trans Lesbian Non-binary Lady Greco-Roman Pagan Socialist

User avatar
Suriyanakhon
Senator
 
Posts: 3623
Founded: Apr 27, 2020
Democratic Socialists

Postby Suriyanakhon » Fri Jan 29, 2021 9:16 am

The Republic of Fore wrote:1. If you're born with a dick you'll never be a girl.


What does it mean to be a girl?
Resident Drowned Victorian Waif (he/him)
Imāmiyya Shīʿa Muslim

User avatar
Auzkhia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28954
Founded: Mar 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Auzkhia » Fri Jan 29, 2021 9:17 am

Suriyanakhon wrote:
The Republic of Fore wrote:1. If you're born with a dick you'll never be a girl.


What does it mean to be a girl?

Having a penis and a pair of tits?

*shrug*
Me irl. (she/her/it)
IC name: Celestial Empire of the Romans
Imperial-Royal Statement on NS Stats
Factbook Embassy App
Trans Lesbian Non-binary Lady Greco-Roman Pagan Socialist

User avatar
Joohan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6001
Founded: Jan 11, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Joohan » Fri Jan 29, 2021 9:39 am

When Men begin dominating female sports and winning their championships, I imagine the jokes will be hilarious.
If you need a witness look to yourself

There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism!


User avatar
Auzkhia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28954
Founded: Mar 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Auzkhia » Fri Jan 29, 2021 9:42 am

Joohan wrote:When Men begin dominating female sports and winning their championships, I imagine the jokes will be hilarious.

Trans men winning women's sports because their birth certificates originally or used to say female on them is really hilarious. :roll:
Last edited by Auzkhia on Fri Jan 29, 2021 9:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
Me irl. (she/her/it)
IC name: Celestial Empire of the Romans
Imperial-Royal Statement on NS Stats
Factbook Embassy App
Trans Lesbian Non-binary Lady Greco-Roman Pagan Socialist

User avatar
Suriyanakhon
Senator
 
Posts: 3623
Founded: Apr 27, 2020
Democratic Socialists

Postby Suriyanakhon » Fri Jan 29, 2021 12:51 pm

Joohan wrote:When Men begin dominating female sports and winning their championships, I imagine the jokes will be hilarious.


The Olympics has allowed trans women to compete since 2004, yet “men (...) dominating female sports and winning their championships” hasn't happened at all.
Resident Drowned Victorian Waif (he/him)
Imāmiyya Shīʿa Muslim

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Fri Jan 29, 2021 1:34 pm

Joohan wrote:When Men begin dominating female sports and winning their championships, I imagine the jokes will be hilarious.


Oh hey, more scaremongering that isn't actually born out by reality. Guess I need to link the study -again-.

Sport and Transgender People: A Systematic Review of the Literature Relating to Sport Participation and Competitive Sport Policies

Results
In relation to sport-related physical activity, this review found the lack of inclusive and comfortable environments to be the primary barrier to participation for transgender people. This review also found transgender people had a mostly negative experience in competitive sports because of the restrictions the sport’s policy placed on them. The majority of transgender competitive sport policies that were reviewed were not evidence based.

Conclusion
Currently, there is no direct or consistent research suggesting transgender female individuals (or male individuals) have an athletic advantage at any stage of their transition (e.g. cross-sex hormones, gender-confirming surgery) and, therefore, competitive sport policies that place restrictions on transgender people need to be considered and potentially revised.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
New Jewlan
Attaché
 
Posts: 91
Founded: Aug 03, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby New Jewlan » Sat Jan 30, 2021 9:23 am

Can't wait to see Mo-na Farrah smash them records; girl power!
Do not click this spoiler!
Pro: Catholicism, Israel, Pro-Life, Nuclear Family, Black Humour, Cultural appropriation, Reggae, Foreign Films, Languages, Conservativism, History of English, Blondes, Bob Ross, Film History, Obscure Wiki pages, Black Ops 1, 90s DNB, TV, Alternative moon landing hypothesis, Surreal Films, Young Earth Creationism, Globe-earth theory, Flat-earth theory, Non-Blondes, British Soap Operas, Govt., Military, Free Speech

Anti: False Religions, Globalism, Communism, Govt., Military, Wrongthink, "Social" Media, Mobile gaming, Feminism, Racism, Terrorism, Climate Alarmism, The Enlightenment, Big Bang, Evolution, Atomisation of Society, Modernism, NASA, Revisionism, Americanisms, Nazism, Anti-Semitism, Revolution, Big Tech, ACAB, Anthropogenic CLIEmate Change

User avatar
Wink Wonk We Like Stonks
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1561
Founded: May 20, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Wink Wonk We Like Stonks » Mon Feb 01, 2021 7:16 am

imagine caring more about sports being "fair" than human rights smh my head
bad reply? a random criminal/civilian will be sent to SweatshopvilleTM. To date, 63+ have been sent. stonks for apotheosis 2024
pronouns i keep in my washed pasta sauce jars: she, they, he; hedonism is based
according to legend, i once wrote:agender mars-colony automated decadent libertarian anti-statist degrowth

*juggling vials of covid vaccine* come get yall's juice

User avatar
Names Are Too Hard
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 162
Founded: Jun 17, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Names Are Too Hard » Mon Feb 01, 2021 2:04 pm

This might be a dumb idea so poke holes all you want, but what if sports were objectively skill based and not based on sex? Like when one goes professional they’re essentially evaluated on a scale and matched with people on the corresponding skill level?
Sometimes words sound good in my head but my tongue make not the words sound good
Typos and bad grammar are likely due to me being on mobile, but might just be cause I’m stupid.
Organized religion bad

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32801
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Des-Bal » Tue Feb 02, 2021 12:59 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Joohan wrote:When Men begin dominating female sports and winning their championships, I imagine the jokes will be hilarious.


Oh hey, more scaremongering that isn't actually born out by reality. Guess I need to link the study -again-.

Sport and Transgender People: A Systematic Review of the Literature Relating to Sport Participation and Competitive Sport Policies



Oh hey it's the bad study again, the one with the fucky methodology that concludes since transgender men are allowed to compete RV allowed to compete all decisions should be arbitrary. It's weird because the only issue people seem to care about is how transgender women stack up to cisgender women and they made no attempt to analyze that.

What happens when you actually investigate the one thing people are talking about?

www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1252764

Oh it turns out that the olympic rules are arbitrary and transgender athletes have an advantage over cisgender women.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32801
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Des-Bal » Tue Feb 02, 2021 1:01 pm

Names Are Too Hard wrote:This might be a dumb idea so poke holes all you want, but what if sports were objectively skill based and not based on sex? Like when one goes professional they’re essentially evaluated on a scale and matched with people on the corresponding skill level?


At what level do we have a cutoff for "professional?" Below a certain level what kind of resources are we putting towards people who aren't even close to the best? I think it's a valid approach but it will almost certainly mean the end of women's professional sports.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Kowani
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44957
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Tue Feb 02, 2021 1:04 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
Oh hey, more scaremongering that isn't actually born out by reality. Guess I need to link the study -again-.

Sport and Transgender People: A Systematic Review of the Literature Relating to Sport Participation and Competitive Sport Policies



Oh hey it's the bad study again, the one with the fucky methodology that concludes since transgender men are allowed to compete RV allowed to compete all decisions should be arbitrary. It's weird because the only issue people seem to care about is how transgender women stack up to cisgender women and they made no attempt to analyze that.

What happens when you actually investigate the one thing people are talking about?

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1252764

Oh it turns out that the olympic rules are arbitrary and transgender athletes have an advantage over cisgender women.

I mean
just from a cursory overview of the study they're citing, the advantage seems to lessen (and in certain areas) disappear over time
so, we do as the study's authors suggest and lengthen the waiting time for olympic level competition after transitioning
American History and Historiography; Political and Labour History, Urbanism, Political Parties, Congressional Procedure, Elections.

Servant of The Democracy since 1896.


Historian, of sorts.

Effortposts can be found here!

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Tue Feb 02, 2021 1:07 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
Oh hey, more scaremongering that isn't actually born out by reality. Guess I need to link the study -again-.

Sport and Transgender People: A Systematic Review of the Literature Relating to Sport Participation and Competitive Sport Policies



Oh hey it's the bad study again, the one with the fucky methodology that concludes since transgender men are allowed to compete RV allowed to compete all decisions should be arbitrary. It's weird because the only issue people seem to care about is how transgender women stack up to cisgender women and they made no attempt to analyze that.

What happens when you actually investigate the one thing people are talking about?

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1252764

Oh it turns out that the olympic rules are arbitrary and transgender athletes have an advantage over cisgender women.


And when you read the rest of the article you find out that said study has its own methodological problems.

In 2015, she published the first study of transgender women and athletic performance and found that trans women ran at least 10 percent slower after beginning hormones. And, relatively speaking, they did no better against cisgender female runners than they had previously done against cisgender men.

Harper said Roberts’ methodology is solid, but she sees some limitations in the study. In an assessment shared with NBC News, she questioned the lack of data on participants’ individual training habits. She also noted there was no coordination between when subjects started hormones and when they took their annual fitness test.

“The tests were placed into three bins,” Harper said. “One bin of tests that took place in the first year after the start of hormone therapy, one bin of tests that took place between one to two years of hormone therapy, and a third bin that took place between two and two and a half years after the initiation of hormone therapy.”

Lumping the data together could blur out changes that occurred within a 12-month period “and might distort the results notably,” she theorized.

The fact that the trans women were still faster after two years could be due to differences in training intensity, she speculated. But the pushup and situp tests involve muscular strength, technique, muscular endurance and cardiovascular endurance, and “are probably good proxies for success in many team sports.”


And also states that it also confers no advantage.

He also underscored the data he compiled was on adults: The average age of the airmen he studied was 26. A transgender woman who transitions before or at puberty, “doesn't really have any advantage” when it comes to athletic performance, he said. “So that young lady should be allowed to compete with all the other people who are born women.”

[...]

Harper, who was a consultant on the IOC’s current recommendations, said the real takeaway from Roberts’ study is that transgender women ultimately do reach parity with cis women in athletic tasks. She, however, doesn’t think Roberts’ findings mean sporting organizations need to require two years of testosterone suppression before trans women can compete against cisgender women.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32801
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Des-Bal » Tue Feb 02, 2021 1:12 pm

Kowani wrote:I mean
just from a cursory overview of the study they're citing, the advantage seems to lessen (and in certain areas) disappear over time
so, we do as the study's authors suggest and lengthen the waiting time for olympic level competition after transitioning

Of course they do, nobody's said testosterone is a placebo. When we see some more studies I wouldn't mind learning where the point the IOC was looking for actually is. As long as we're insisting there is no issue though I don't think there's room for an actual discussion.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Munkcestrian RepubIic
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1984
Founded: May 05, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Munkcestrian RepubIic » Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:33 pm

This only makes me even prouder to have endorsed Biden back in August.
MUNKCESTRIAN REPUBLIC
FORTITERDEFENDITTRIUMPHANS

formerly Munkchester — formerly Munkcestrian Republic — he/him/his
Pro-Slavery Alliance

Previous

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Ancientania, Eahland, Hammer Britannia, Nanatsu no Tsuki, Shearoa, Shidei, Statesburg, The Holy Therns, The Two Jerseys, Valentine Z

Advertisement

Remove ads