Cannot think of a name wrote:A-Series-Of-Tubes wrote:
Am I missing something here?Proposition 25, officially the Referendum to Overturn a 2018 Law That Replaced Money Bail System with A System Based on Public Safety Risk, is a California ballot proposition that appeared on the ballot for the general election on November 3, 2020.[1] The "no" side prevailed, resulting in retention of the system of cash bail in the state.[2]
Failing to overturn the law, should leave the law in place?
We're a schizophrenic state (despite everyone in their two minute hate of California thinking we're a hive mind communist state.
In 2018 we got rid of that shit.
So...you know...California politics.
You said you were confused? You don't seem very confused.
I think your problem is that that system combining regular laws, with referendum laws, is a bit TOO flexible. Laws can be attacked before they're "bedded in" and the voters can see if they're better or not. Kind of like the mid-term effect, but with individual laws not whole governments.








