Sicilian Imperial-Capitalist Empire wrote:Nekostan-e Gharbi wrote:
That’s a pretty absurd claim. According to your claim the phrase “all of China” is meaningful and that whenever the class of China satisfies the singleton pattern aka there is one and only one China the China magically becomes more benign and less corrupt. This is clearly not true historically.
Thanks for once again proving that you haven't fully read everything and have just scrambled to type a response.
Reread my post and then maybe rebut it. In context with imperial corruption being different. I even said that it "uniquely existed," ergo it was an unusual circumstance.
What’s your evidence that this is the case though?