Advertisement
by Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum » Tue Dec 22, 2020 4:03 am
by Esheaun Stroakuss » Tue Dec 22, 2020 4:14 am
by Deacarsia » Tue Dec 22, 2020 4:21 am
by Thermodolia » Tue Dec 22, 2020 4:42 am
by Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum » Tue Dec 22, 2020 4:47 am
I think porn companies need to work with religious conservatives because I wonder what their fetish world is like. We are in the 21st century, they are still struggling to conquer Jerusalem, it sounds funny to me, I wish they could relax a bit.
by New haven america » Tue Dec 22, 2020 4:51 am
by Neutraligon » Tue Dec 22, 2020 4:56 am
Deacarsia wrote:I cannot even begin to relate how strongly I support this bill from what I know of it.
In an age of rampant censorship of legitimate on-line speech, the suppression of pornography in all of its filthy and disgusting forms is one of the areas where there actually ought to be a massive crackdown. This is particularly important on the Internet, which sadly has become a safe haven for all manner of perverse rubbish.
I hope and pray that this bill becomes a law.
by Dar as Salam » Tue Dec 22, 2020 5:03 am
Ameriganastan wrote:Drongonia wrote:I support this. Porn rots the brain and degeneracy such as this isn't true freedom of expression, that's just a load of cringeworthy American liberalism. Expression of what? Smut? Give me a break lmao.
See, that's just incorrect. Demonizing sexuality is never okay. I'm online friends with plenty of people who draw NSFW art, and I can tell you they're all very friendly and normal people. The fact politicians want to portray people who enjoy it/draw it/etc as these morally deviant weirdos is completely wrong.
by Dar as Salam » Tue Dec 22, 2020 5:05 am
by New Visayan Islands » Tue Dec 22, 2020 5:29 am
Dar as Salam wrote:Ameriganastan wrote:See, that's just incorrect. Demonizing sexuality is never okay. I'm online friends with plenty of people who draw NSFW art, and I can tell you they're all very friendly and normal people. The fact politicians want to portray people who enjoy it/draw it/etc as these morally deviant weirdos is completely wrong.
Degenerate coomers can still be nice people, you can be a nazi and be a nice person, completly unrelated.
Dar as Salam wrote:
If not rotting your brain and intoxicating your body is what you call fun, i'm the most boring person ever.
If you need alcohol to have fun it shows how shallow you are as a person
by SD_Film Artists » Tue Dec 22, 2020 5:38 am
Ameriganastan wrote:Drongonia wrote:I support this. Porn rots the brain and degeneracy such as this isn't true freedom of expression, that's just a load of cringeworthy American liberalism. Expression of what? Smut? Give me a break lmao.
See, that's just incorrect. Demonizing sexuality is never okay. I'm online friends with plenty of people who draw NSFW art, and I can tell you they're all very friendly and normal people. The fact politicians want to portray people who enjoy it/draw it/etc as these morally deviant weirdos is completely wrong.
by An Alan Smithee Nation » Tue Dec 22, 2020 5:55 am
by SD_Film Artists » Tue Dec 22, 2020 5:57 am
Fahran wrote:
The motivation for authoring the bill wasn't prudishness. Rather, it's intended to protect people from revenge porn, illegal hacking, and the uploading of pornographic content without the explicit consent of those who appear in the videos or images concerned.
by Esheaun Stroakuss » Tue Dec 22, 2020 6:34 am
by Clton » Tue Dec 22, 2020 7:20 am
The Marlborough wrote:It says something about people that they think porn sites cannot verify whether or not someone has been raped in a video without it effectively banning porn. Do you not stop to think this may be indicative of something else?
by Punished UMN » Tue Dec 22, 2020 10:06 am
by Kowani » Tue Dec 22, 2020 10:20 am
by Punished UMN » Tue Dec 22, 2020 10:25 am
by The Marlborough » Tue Dec 22, 2020 10:33 am
Clton wrote:The Marlborough wrote:It says something about people that they think porn sites cannot verify whether or not someone has been raped in a video without it effectively banning porn. Do you not stop to think this may be indicative of something else?
also, this applies to fictional depictions
whats Nhentai gonna give the US government when they ask for the forms
whats a r34 artist gonna give the government for his Hatsune Miku art?
HATSUNE MIKU DOSENT EXIST
SHE CANT FILL OUT A FORM
by Dumb Ideologies » Tue Dec 22, 2020 10:34 am
by Suriyanakhon » Tue Dec 22, 2020 10:35 am
by Suriyanakhon » Tue Dec 22, 2020 10:39 am
The Marlborough wrote:It says something about people that they think porn sites cannot verify whether or not someone has been raped in a video without it effectively banning porn. Do you not stop to think this may be indicative of something else?
by West Leas Oros 2 » Tue Dec 22, 2020 10:53 am
Repressio wrote:I'm all for banning it and getting rid of the pornographers themselves. Too many are involved in human trafficking, sexual abuse, and blackmail. Purge the whole industry.
WLO Public News: Outdated Factbooks and other documents in process of major redesign! ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: <error:not found>
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cyptopir, General TN, Google [Bot], Statesburg, Tiami
Advertisement