Vivolkha wrote:The Archregimancy wrote:The Moroccans do rather better out of this than either the Israelis or the Palestinians.
It terms of Moroccan-Israeli relations, it merely regularises a situation that already exists de facto (50,000 Israeli tourists visit Morocco each year under normal circumstances, and Morocco is notably more welcoming of its historical and current Jewish population than most Arab countries). The only practical differences it'll make are official embassies rather than 'trade delegations' and direct flights once COVID isn't an issue.
The real losers aren't the Palestinians, it's POLISARIO and the Sahrawis. In return for merely making de jure what was already de facto between Israel and Morocco, the Moroccans get US recognition of their control of Western Sahara (80% of which they already control anyway), undermining any attempts towards international recognition by POLISARIO or the self-proclaimed Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic.
So looking at the realpolitik rather than the moral rights or wrongs of the situation, the Moroccans are likely feeling fairly smug this morning.
This. Out of all the recent Arab-Israeli deals, this is by far the worst one.Nekostan-e Gharbi wrote:To be serious even Iran-style elections are way better than China and North Korea.
Strictly true, though calling those "elections" is quite the stretch. Still, this does not imply that Iranian elections are democratic, they are not.
Sure but they are probably already more democratic than most places in the region.