Israeli/American Strike on Iran? Now With Murdered Scientist

[Orostan]

Iran has the right to all the nukes they want considering what the US has done and is doing to them.

[Iranian Union States]

It's January all over again reeee

Aye, it's been a bad year for Iran concerning assassinations. They lost Soleimani and now this guy. Both losses must've stung.

One of the justifications the Iranian regime had for its authoritarian and inhumane actions was to keep Iran "safe". They took pride in being untouchable and not wartorn in a region like the middle east. I would say this has been a good year for Iranians that are against the regime. Excluding the constant war anxiety

[Silvedania]

The world doesn't need another war. At least, not this year.

[Langenia]

Aye, it's been a bad year for Iran concerning assassinations. They lost Soleimani and now this guy. Both losses must've stung.

One of the justifications the Iranian regime had for its authoritarian and inhumane actions was to keep Iran "safe". They took pride in being untouchable and not wartorn in a region like the middle east. I would say this has been a good year for Iranians that are against the regime. Excluding the constant war anxiety

Right you are, sir, right you are. Despite their facade, the regime must feel at least SOME fear from having US forces so close, and powerful units at that.

[The Jamesian Republic]

Reading this thread reminds me of this quote from the Sixth Harry Potter Movie
“ Why is it that something happens it is always you three?”
Professor McGonagall

[Pope Saint Peter the Apostle]

Seems like a well-executed assassination. Can't say I'm too sad that the "father" of the Iranian nuclear program was executed.

I wonder if this was agreed on during the Pompeo-Bibi-MBS meeting.

[Orostan]

One of the justifications the Iranian regime had for its authoritarian and inhumane actions was to keep Iran "safe". They took pride in being untouchable and not wartorn in a region like the middle east. I would say this has been a good year for Iranians that are against the regime. Excluding the constant war anxiety

Right you are, sir, right you are. Despite their facade, the regime must feel at least SOME fear from having US forces so close, and powerful units at that.

Of course they're afraid, that's why they want nukes. The US has a record of destroying countries that don't have nuclear bombs that will not surrender their natural resources.

[Ifreann]

Iran has the right to all the nukes they want considering what the US has done and is doing to them.

Could we have fewer nukes, actually?

[Orostan]

Iran has the right to all the nukes they want considering what the US has done and is doing to them.

Could we have fewer nukes, actually?

Redistribute the nukes!

[Iranian Union States]

Iran has the right to all the nukes they want considering what the US has done and is doing to them.

Could we have fewer nukes, actually?

Can we just not have nukes?

[The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp]

Welp, might as well just copy paste what i said from the other thread here

Iraq war 2.0 time. Say hello to isis 2.0 in 2030.

This is very shitty news but atleast the Trumpers cant hide behind the "BuT TrUmP dIdnt StArT A wAr" defence anymore.

[Old Tanokiana]

Right you are, sir, right you are. Despite their facade, the regime must feel at least SOME fear from having US forces so close, and powerful units at that.

Of course they're afraid, that's why they want nukes. The US has a record of destroying countries that don't have nuclear bombs that will not surrender their natural resources.[/quote]

*Ahem* Japan was the unfortunate bloke *Ahem*

[Ifreann]

Could we have fewer nukes, actually?

Can we just not have nukes?

That sounds good.

[Silvedania]

Could we have fewer nukes, actually?

Can we just not have nukes?

I feel like many disasters could be prevented if people didn't have nukes

[Pope Saint Peter the Apostle]

Iran is a party to the NPT. It appears like this scientist was working on developing nukes in violation of the NPT, at least based on the IAEA findings and the scientists' refusal to discuss with the IAEA.

[Iranian Union States]

We live in a time where people interacting with each other online can be killing each other tomorrow.

[Old Tanokiana]

Can we just not have nukes?

I feel like many disasters could be prevented if people didn't have nukes

That's what Nukes have evolved to. Who has the bigger cock bomb?

[Langenia]

Right you are, sir, right you are. Despite their facade, the regime must feel at least SOME fear from having US forces so close, and powerful units at that.

Of course they're afraid, that's why they want nukes. The US has a record of destroying countries that don't have nuclear bombs that will not surrender their natural resources.

*Ahem* Japan was the unfortunate bloke *Ahem*[/quote]

I mean, Japan brought that on itself, or rather, the Japanese government brought it on its people.

[Iranian Union States]

Iran is a party to the NPT. It appears like this scientist was working on developing nukes in violation of the NPT, at least based on the IAEA findings and the scientists' refusal to discuss with the IAEA.

Iran backed out from any nuclear agreement ever since the US baked out from the nuclear deal. They aren't really part of anything at this point. Rightfully so.

[Jerzylvania]

I fear this will trace back to the US and destablize things for awhile.

I agree. And there's a high probability of some form of retaliatory action by Iran. Could be an assassination, could be an attack. Could be both.

[Pope Saint Peter the Apostle]

Iran is a party to the NPT. It appears like this scientist was working on developing nukes in violation of the NPT, at least based on the IAEA findings and the scientists' refusal to discuss with the IAEA.

Iran backed out from any nuclear agreement ever since the US baked out from the nuclear deal. They aren't really part of anything at this point. Rightfully so.

Iran is still a party to the NPT.

[Silvedania]

Of course they're afraid, that's why they want nukes. The US has a record of destroying countries that don't have nuclear bombs that will not surrender their natural resources.

*Ahem* Japan was the unfortunate bloke *Ahem*

I mean, Japan brought that on itself, or rather, the Japanese government brought it on its people.[/quote]
They did bomb the US first, but that was no reason for the US to harm that many civilians when bombing those cities

[Langenia]

I fear this will trace back to the US and destablize things for awhile.

I agree. And there's a high probability of some form of retaliatory action by Iran. Could be an assassination, could be an attack. Could be both.

Don't tell me. This time they're gonna launch ballistic missiles at Israel and the US bases in Iraq and the Gulf states.

[Iranian Union States]

Iran backed out from any nuclear agreement ever since the US baked out from the nuclear deal. They aren't really part of anything at this point. Rightfully so.

Iran is still a party to the NPT.

They really don't care.

[Old Tanokiana]

*Ahem* Japan was the unfortunate bloke *Ahem*

I mean, Japan brought that on itself, or rather, the Japanese government brought it on its people.

They did bomb the US first, but that was no reason for the US to harm that many civilians when bombing those cities[/quote]

Okay that's enough derailing into how Hiroshima and Nagasaki were war crimes. Back to the topic, does Iran have the balls to possibly tell it's lackeys in Syria and Lebanon to commit a Haram?