I'm sure you are very aware what the problem with your post was. This is not a response to that.
Advertisement
by The Holy Therns » Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:59 am
Gallade wrote:Love, cake, wine and banter. No greater meaning to life (〜^∇^)〜
Ethel mermania wrote:to therns is to transend the pettiness of the field of play into the field of dreams.
by Sundiata » Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:00 am
Atheris wrote:Turelisa- wrote:
Even though it may be sexually gratifying, its not necessarily healthy. Would you say drug taking was not abusive just because it felt good?
"it's not necessarily healthy"
Nothing is necessarily healthy. Eating food? Could be poisoned. Drinking water? Could have chemicals. Breathing air? You could live in New York.
If homosexual sex counts as sexual abuse because of sodomy, then so does straight sex because the same thing happens with a different hole.
Learn to argue.
by Nakena » Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:01 am
Nakena wrote:Turelisa- wrote:LGBT rights are not motivated by making sexual attraction possible or acceptable. The aim of the agenda is at making homosexual conduct not only legalised but as acceptably open and as valid as heterosexual copulation, upon which the relationship between man and woman, whence human life springs, and is the fundamental basic unit of society.
And who would be behind this agenda?
by San Lumen » Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:02 am
by Esalia » Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:04 am
Turelisa- wrote:Atheris wrote:"it's not necessarily healthy"
Nothing is necessarily healthy. Eating food? Could be poisoned. Drinking water? Could have chemicals. Breathing air? You could live in New York.
If homosexual sex counts as sexual abuse because of sodomy, then so does straight sex because the same thing happens with a different hole.
Learn to argue.
The male and female sexual organs are compatible. The mouth and anus each has its own single function. They're also lined with soft tissue under which are blood vessels. A dangerous infecting injury to them may easily be inflicted if a certain part of the human body issuing semen carrying psthogens was inserted into them repeatedly and vigorously.
Anyone who thinks these circumstances are normal, healthy and desirous is heading for trouble.
by Western Theram » Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:04 am
news:Gang of goblins charged with racketeering after gang war was interrupted.|Free Ravensburg coins the name of our animal: the Jackaroo
by The Holy Therns » Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:04 am
Sundiata wrote:Atheris wrote:"it's not necessarily healthy"
Nothing is necessarily healthy. Eating food? Could be poisoned. Drinking water? Could have chemicals. Breathing air? You could live in New York.
If homosexual sex counts as sexual abuse because of sodomy, then so does straight sex because the same thing happens with a different hole.
Learn to argue.
Heterosexual sodomy is still sodomy regardless of whether a man and woman are involved. That likewise should not be legally permissible. The basis for laws against sodomy is not targeting homosexuals.
Gallade wrote:Love, cake, wine and banter. No greater meaning to life (〜^∇^)〜
Ethel mermania wrote:to therns is to transend the pettiness of the field of play into the field of dreams.
by Sundiata » Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:06 am
by Turelisa- » Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:11 am
Sundiata wrote:Turelisa- wrote:
I agree. I used to think sodomy should be legal, but now I'm not so sure. There's a case for prosecuting if it occasions ABH or GBH, or is done in public view, or betweenteenagers.
If sodomy is morally wrong and it is wrong for homosexuals then it is wrong for heterosexuals as well. We shouldn't be biased towards homosexuals for being attracted to members of their own sex.
by Atheris » Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:13 am
Turelisa- wrote:Sundiata wrote:If sodomy is morally wrong and it is wrong for homosexuals then it is wrong for heterosexuals as well. We shouldn't be biased towards homosexuals for being attracted to members of their own sex.
I think sodomy is wrong, whether it is homosexual or heterosexual. The fact remains it is the modus operandi of homosexuals, it is an essential part of homosexuality, and its promotion is bound up with activism for equal rights for homosexuals. Opposition to it is conflated with discrimination and hatred against homosexuals, and that's not fair.
by Turelisa- » Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:18 am
San Lumen wrote:Turelisa- wrote:
I agree. I used to think sodomy should be legal, but now I'm not so sure. There's a case for prosecuting if it occassions ABH or GBH, or is done in public, or between teenagers.
Why should it be? Being done in public is one thing but everywhere else it’s quite frankly none of your business.
Lgbt people should be able to be parents. There is zero credible evidence it harms children in any way. As I’ve said before I went to college with someone who had two dads. They are the only family he’s ever known and he turned out just fine. I even met his parents once.
by Western Theram » Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:18 am
Turelisa- wrote:Sundiata wrote:If sodomy is morally wrong and it is wrong for homosexuals then it is wrong for heterosexuals as well. We shouldn't be biased towards homosexuals for being attracted to members of their own sex.
I think sodomy is wrong, whether it is homosexual or heterosexual. The fact remains it is the modus operandi of homosexuals, it is an essential part of homosexuality, the glue that binds the whole orienation, and its promotion is bound up with activism for equal rights for homosexuals. Opposition to it is conflated with discrimination and hatred against homosexuals, and that's not fair.
news:Gang of goblins charged with racketeering after gang war was interrupted.|Free Ravensburg coins the name of our animal: the Jackaroo
by The Free Joy State » Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:19 am
Turelisa- wrote:San Lumen wrote:Why should it be? Being done in public is one thing but everywhere else it’s quite frankly none of your business.
Lgbt people should be able to be parents. There is zero credible evidence it harms children in any way. As I’ve said before I went to college with someone who had two dads. They are the only family he’s ever known and he turned out just fine. I even met his parents once.
Have you ever been in a loving relationship with another man, and sodomy has formed the way in which you and he have expressed the physical side of your relationship?
by San Lumen » Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:22 am
Turelisa- wrote:San Lumen wrote:Why should it be? Being done in public is one thing but everywhere else it’s quite frankly none of your business.
Lgbt people should be able to be parents. There is zero credible evidence it harms children in any way. As I’ve said before I went to college with someone who had two dads. They are the only family he’s ever known and he turned out just fine. I even met his parents once.
Have you ever been in a loving relationship with another man, and sodomy has formed the way in which you and he have expressed the physical side of your relationship? I know you are openly homosexual, but not all homosexuals like it, and I don't want to judge.
by Sundiata » Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:24 am
Turelisa- wrote:Sundiata wrote:If sodomy is morally wrong and it is wrong for homosexuals then it is wrong for heterosexuals as well. We shouldn't be biased towards homosexuals for being attracted to members of their own sex.
I think sodomy is wrong, whether it is homosexual or heterosexual. The fact remains it is the modus operandi of homosexuals, it is an essential part of homosexuality, and its promotion is bound up with activism for equal rights for homosexuals. Opposition to it is conflated with discrimination and hatred against homosexuals, and that's not fair.
by Vistulange » Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:26 am
Sundiata wrote:Turelisa- wrote:
I agree. I used to think sodomy should be legal, but now I'm not so sure. There's a case for prosecuting if it occasions ABH or GBH, or is done in public view, or betweenteenagers.
If sodomy is morally wrong and it is wrong for homosexuals then it is wrong for heterosexuals as well. We shouldn't be biased towards homosexuals for being attracted to members of their own sex.
by Kungsu » Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:27 am
(Emphasis mine)Turelisa- wrote:LGBT rights are not motivated by making sexual attraction possible or acceptable. The aim of the agenda is at making homosexual conduct not only legalised but as acceptably open and as valid as heterosexual copulation, which is the glue that binds the relationship between man and woman, whence human life springs, and is the fundamental basic unit of society.
by Sundiata » Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:30 am
Turelisa- wrote:San Lumen wrote:Why should it be? Being done in public is one thing but everywhere else it’s quite frankly none of your business.
Lgbt people should be able to be parents. There is zero credible evidence it harms children in any way. As I’ve said before I went to college with someone who had two dads. They are the only family he’s ever known and he turned out just fine. I even met his parents once.
Have you ever been in a loving relationship with another man, and sodomy has formed the way in which you and he have expressed the physical side of your relationship? I know you are openly homosexual, but not all homosexuals like it, and I don't want to judge.
by San Lumen » Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:31 am
Sundiata wrote:Turelisa- wrote:
Have you ever been in a loving relationship with another man, and sodomy has formed the way in which you and he have expressed the physical side of your relationship? I know you are openly homosexual, but not all homosexuals like it, and I don't want to judge.
Come on man.
by Turelisa- » Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:31 am
San Lumen wrote:Turelisa- wrote:
Have you ever been in a loving relationship with another man, and sodomy has formed the way in which you and he have expressed the physical side of your relationship? I know you are openly homosexual, but not all homosexuals like it, and I don't want to judge.
Im not going to discuss my private life here.
I'd like to know what credible scientific evidence you have for why LGBT people shouldnt be parents other than the bogus study you shared.
by San Lumen » Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:33 am
Turelisa- wrote:San Lumen wrote:Im not going to discuss my private life here.
I'd like to know what credible scientific evidence you have for why LGBT people shouldnt be parents other than the bogus study you shared.
The answer required is either yes or no. I certainly don't want to discuss what you do in your bed.
by Nakena » Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:34 am
Atheris wrote:Turelisa- wrote:
I think sodomy is wrong, whether it is homosexual or heterosexual. The fact remains it is the modus operandi of homosexuals, it is an essential part of homosexuality, and its promotion is bound up with activism for equal rights for homosexuals. Opposition to it is conflated with discrimination and hatred against homosexuals, and that's not fair.
You're definitely practicing the latter.
by Kungsu » Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:38 am
by Western Theram » Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:38 am
Turelisa- wrote:San Lumen wrote:Im not going to discuss my private life here.
I'd like to know what credible scientific evidence you have for why LGBT people shouldnt be parents other than the bogus study you shared.
The answer required is either yes or no. I certainly don't want to discuswhat you do in your bed. As I said, some homosexuals eschew sodomy. I have never approved of it.
news:Gang of goblins charged with racketeering after gang war was interrupted.|Free Ravensburg coins the name of our animal: the Jackaroo
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Corporate Collective Salvation, Cyptopir, Duvniask, El Lazaro, New Ciencia, Plan Neonie, Rusozak, Shrillland, The Black Forrest
Advertisement