NATION

PASSWORD

Indiana AG: LGBT Parents should be stripped of Rights

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Esalia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1526
Founded: Oct 22, 2020
Democratic Socialists

Postby Esalia » Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:32 am

The Holy Therns wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong here, but it seems to me Sundiata's saying they would like LGBTQ+ people to be celibate, but would not want to legally enforce this.

Which does not mean Sundiata wants to force LGBTQ+ people to be celibate.


The trouble is that they've also claimed they want no separation of church and state.

If a church is made part of governance, it would seem completely and utterly pointless to do so and not attempt to enforce that church's morality.
Formerly Estanglia. Leftie ready to establish Fully Automated Luxury Gay Space CommunismTM under our Marxist Lord Soros.

Nine times out of ten, someone talking about any non-monolithic group as a homogenous, united entity is using them as a boogeyman.

Yeah: Egalitarianism, equality, pro-choice, social democracy
Meh: Labour, the EU
Nah: Pointless discrimination, authoritarianism, Brexit, Trump, both American parties, the Conservatives
I flop between "optimistic about the future" and "pessimistic about the future" every time I go on NSG.

User avatar
Sundiata
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7102
Founded: Sep 27, 2019
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Sundiata » Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:32 am

Turelisa- wrote:No, it isn't. A protected group, a minority, is protected by society from discrimination based on immutable conditions of being - race, sex, disability and age. It's not immoral to be black, to be infirm or aged or disabled, whereas homosexuality is defined by conduct, engaged in voluntarily. Therefore homosexuals ought not be treated as a protected class whose sexual behaviour, which is best kept unseen in privacy and left unspoken of in social discourse, is promoted, equalised, and kept beyond criticism, censure or moral discrimination according to conscience, by the same laws which were fought for and won by true minorities to empower themselves as human beings.

Homosexuality itself is not a choice. While it is a choice for same-sex attracted people to perform homosexual acts, we shouldn't target homosexuals on the basis of their sexuality. To the extent that I agree with you, that would be a bridge too far. It would also be an immoral one, at that. I sincerely believe that the state has a role to protect homosexuals from discrimination.
Last edited by Sundiata on Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:34 am, edited 2 times in total.
Gender: Male
Religion: Catholic (Opus Dei)
Politics: Solidarity (Catholic Social Teaching)
Economics: Rerum Novarum (The Encyclical)
Alignment: Lawful Good

"Don't say, 'That person bothers me.' Think: 'That person sanctifies me.'"
-St. Josemaria Escriva (Founder of Opus Dei)

User avatar
The Holy Therns
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28573
Founded: Jul 09, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Holy Therns » Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:32 am

Celritannia wrote:
The Holy Therns wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong here, but it seems to me Sundiata's saying they would like LGBTQ+ people to be celibate, but would not want to legally enforce this.

Which does not mean Sundiata wants to force LGBTQ+ people to be celibate.


But he would force them not to be in a homosexual relationship, or allow them to have children, and deny them the basic rights and freedoms of heterosexuals.


No, he'd like them to deny themselves these things. Which I find appalling as a moral position, but from what I understand he also thinks this should not be a legally enforced thing.

That's how I understood it, at any rate.
Those who want respect give respect
Your new favorite.
MTF transperson. She/her. Lives in Sweden.
Also, N A N A ! ! !
Gallade wrote:Love, cake, wine and banter. No greater meaning to life (〜^∇^)〜

Ethel mermania wrote:to therns is to transend the pettiness of the field of play into the field of dreams.

User avatar
Turelisa-
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 178
Founded: Sep 25, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Turelisa- » Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:34 am

Atheris wrote:
Turelisa- wrote:
LGBT rights are not motivated by making sexual attraction possible or acceptable. The aim of the agenda is at making homosexual conduct not only legalised but as acceptably open and as valid as heterosexual copulation, upon which the relationship between man and woman, whence human life springs, and is the fundamental basic unit of society.


What's the problem?


The problem is homosexual sexual conduct is consensual sexual abuse. The factor of consent makes anal or oral copulation, with any part of the human body, no more acceptable, at least to me. If two addicts 'consented' to abuse themselves together in an orgy of drink or drugs, it would still be destructivery and morally wrong.
Last edited by Turelisa- on Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:37 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
San Lumen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58050
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
New York Times Democracy

Postby San Lumen » Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:35 am

Turelisa- wrote:
Atheris wrote:
What's the problem?


The problem is homosexual sexual conduct is consensual sexual abuse. The factor of consent makes sodomy, anal or oral, with any part of the human body, no more acceptable, at least to me. If two addicts 'consented' to abuse themselves together in an orgy of drink or drugs, it would still be destructivery and morally wrong.


It is not sexual abuse.

User avatar
Sundiata
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7102
Founded: Sep 27, 2019
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Sundiata » Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:35 am

The Holy Therns wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong here, but it seems to me Sundiata's saying they would like LGBTQ+ people to be celibate, but would not want to legally enforce this.

Which does not mean Sundiata wants to force LGBTQ+ people to be celibate.

Yes, precisely.
Gender: Male
Religion: Catholic (Opus Dei)
Politics: Solidarity (Catholic Social Teaching)
Economics: Rerum Novarum (The Encyclical)
Alignment: Lawful Good

"Don't say, 'That person bothers me.' Think: 'That person sanctifies me.'"
-St. Josemaria Escriva (Founder of Opus Dei)

User avatar
The Holy Therns
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28573
Founded: Jul 09, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Holy Therns » Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:35 am

Turelisa- wrote:
Atheris wrote:
What's the problem?


The problem is homosexual sexual conduct is consensual sexual abuse. The factor of consent makes sodomy, anal or oral, with any part of the human body, no more acceptable, at least to me. If two addicts 'consented' to abuse themselves together in an orgy of drink or drugs, it would still be destructivery and morally wrong.


lol no
Those who want respect give respect
Your new favorite.
MTF transperson. She/her. Lives in Sweden.
Also, N A N A ! ! !
Gallade wrote:Love, cake, wine and banter. No greater meaning to life (〜^∇^)〜

Ethel mermania wrote:to therns is to transend the pettiness of the field of play into the field of dreams.

User avatar
Celritannia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12347
Founded: Nov 10, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Celritannia » Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:36 am

Turelisa- wrote:
Atheris wrote:
What's the problem?


The problem is homosexual sexual conduct is consensual sexual abuse. The factor of consent makes sodomy, anal or oral, with any part of the human body, no more acceptable, at least to me. If two addicts 'consented' to abuse themselves together in an orgy of drink or drugs, it would still be destructivery and morally wrong.


Image
Last edited by Celritannia on Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:37 am, edited 2 times in total.

My DeviantArt
Obey
When you annoy a Celritannian
U W0T M8?
Zirkagrad wrote:A person with a penchant for flying lions with long tongues, could possibly be a fan of Kiss. Maybe the classiest nation with a lion with its tongue hanging out. Enjoys only the finest tea.

Nakena wrote:NSG's Most Serene Salad

Crysuko wrote:My little crony: corruption is magic
Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman.
Atheist, Environmentalist, Pansexual, Left-Libertarian.

User avatar
Atheris
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5678
Founded: Oct 05, 2018
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Atheris » Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:36 am

Turelisa- wrote:
Atheris wrote:
What's the problem?


The problem is homosexual sexual conduct is consensual sexual abuse.

Image
Kannap wrote:It is I, the stranger in the night who cuts the power lines with hedge clippers
Valentine Z wrote:**a m b i e n c e**
Kick cancer's ass for me, Owlograd!
this! just! in! the mods miss spam for 20 minutes again, admins shut down forum for 10; cite "b-b-but we're not full time!!!! we just wittle vowunteews" as legal defense!
The self-proclaimed Resident Shitposter of NSG.
Proudly sex-repulsed ace and bisensual aro. Cis he/him. Trans ally. ADHD.
"To comment is human, to preview, divine." - Godot
Orthodox Preterist non-denominational Christian Universalist.
I write fanfiction (of the non-explicit kind). Fuck you if you judge me.
Pirate Politics are fucking awesome.

User avatar
Nakena
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14150
Founded: May 06, 2017
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Nakena » Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:36 am

Turelisa- wrote:
Atheris wrote:
What's the problem?


The problem is homosexual sexual conduct is consensual sexual abuse. The factor of consent makes sodomy, anal or oral, with any part of the human body, no more acceptable, at least to me. If two addicts 'consented' to abuse themselves together in an orgy of drink or drugs, it would still be destructivery and morally wrong.


Still who would be behind the Agenda you mentioned?
【NAZBOL GANG】

User avatar
Esalia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1526
Founded: Oct 22, 2020
Democratic Socialists

Postby Esalia » Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:40 am

Turelisa- wrote:
Atheris wrote:
What's the problem?


The problem is homosexual sexual conduct is consensual sexual abuse. The factor of consent makes anal or oral copulation, with any part of the human body, no more acceptable, at least to me. If two addicts 'consented' to abuse themselves together in an orgy of drink or drugs, it would still be destructivery and morally wrong.


Congrats, you made me burst out laughing with that first sentence.
Last edited by Esalia on Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
Formerly Estanglia. Leftie ready to establish Fully Automated Luxury Gay Space CommunismTM under our Marxist Lord Soros.

Nine times out of ten, someone talking about any non-monolithic group as a homogenous, united entity is using them as a boogeyman.

Yeah: Egalitarianism, equality, pro-choice, social democracy
Meh: Labour, the EU
Nah: Pointless discrimination, authoritarianism, Brexit, Trump, both American parties, the Conservatives
I flop between "optimistic about the future" and "pessimistic about the future" every time I go on NSG.

User avatar
Turelisa-
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 178
Founded: Sep 25, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Turelisa- » Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:40 am

San Lumen wrote:
Turelisa- wrote:
The problem is homosexual sexual conduct is consensual sexual abuse. The factor of consent makes sodomy, anal or oral, with any part of the human body, no more acceptable, at least to me. If two addicts 'consented' to abuse themselves together in an orgy of drink or drugs, it would still be destructivery and morally wrong.


It is not sexual abuse.


Even though it may be sexually gratifying, its not necessarily healthy. Would you say drug taking was not abusive just because it felt good?

User avatar
Atheris
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5678
Founded: Oct 05, 2018
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Atheris » Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:41 am

Turelisa- wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
It is not sexual abuse.


Even though it may be sexually gratifying, its not necessarily healthy. Would you say drug taking was not abusive just because it felt good?

"it's not necessarily healthy"

Nothing is necessarily healthy. Eating food? Could be poisoned. Drinking water? Could have chemicals. Breathing air? You could live in New York.

If homosexual sex counts as sexual abuse because of sodomy, then so does straight sex because the same thing happens with a different hole.

Learn to argue.
Kannap wrote:It is I, the stranger in the night who cuts the power lines with hedge clippers
Valentine Z wrote:**a m b i e n c e**
Kick cancer's ass for me, Owlograd!
this! just! in! the mods miss spam for 20 minutes again, admins shut down forum for 10; cite "b-b-but we're not full time!!!! we just wittle vowunteews" as legal defense!
The self-proclaimed Resident Shitposter of NSG.
Proudly sex-repulsed ace and bisensual aro. Cis he/him. Trans ally. ADHD.
"To comment is human, to preview, divine." - Godot
Orthodox Preterist non-denominational Christian Universalist.
I write fanfiction (of the non-explicit kind). Fuck you if you judge me.
Pirate Politics are fucking awesome.

User avatar
Celritannia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12347
Founded: Nov 10, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Celritannia » Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:42 am

Turelisa- wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
It is not sexual abuse.


Even though it may be sexually gratifying, its not necessarily healthy. Would you say drug taking was not abusive just because it felt good?


Sex is unhealthy people, don't do it.
Last edited by Celritannia on Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:42 am, edited 1 time in total.

My DeviantArt
Obey
When you annoy a Celritannian
U W0T M8?
Zirkagrad wrote:A person with a penchant for flying lions with long tongues, could possibly be a fan of Kiss. Maybe the classiest nation with a lion with its tongue hanging out. Enjoys only the finest tea.

Nakena wrote:NSG's Most Serene Salad

Crysuko wrote:My little crony: corruption is magic
Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman.
Atheist, Environmentalist, Pansexual, Left-Libertarian.

User avatar
San Lumen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58050
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
New York Times Democracy

Postby San Lumen » Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:42 am

Turelisa- wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
It is not sexual abuse.


Even though it may be sexually gratifying, its not necessarily healthy. Would you say drug taking was not abusive just because it felt good?


Seriously? I would ask how its not healthy but we likely skirting the PG-13 rule here. Drug taking isn't the issue here nor is it related.

You've also given no real evidence children are harming by having same sex parents. The study you shared was fundamentally flawed.

User avatar
Sundiata
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7102
Founded: Sep 27, 2019
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Sundiata » Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:42 am

Turelisa- wrote:
Atheris wrote:
What's the problem?


The problem is homosexual sexual conduct is consensual sexual abuse. The factor of consent makes sodomy, anal or oral, with any part of the human body, no more acceptable, at least to me. If two addicts 'consented' to abuse themselves together in an orgy of drink or drugs, it would still be destructivery and morally wrong.

Ok, it's one thing to be morally opposed to homosexual acts. I get that. I even get the rationale for criminalizing homosexual acts.

But before we go on, I think that we all should acknowledge that homosexuality is not a choice and that we shouldn't criminalize homosexuals for simply being attracted to the same-sex.

That isn't just morally repugnant, but a flagrant violation of their natural rights. These are human beings we're talking about, human beings with dignity.
Last edited by Sundiata on Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
Gender: Male
Religion: Catholic (Opus Dei)
Politics: Solidarity (Catholic Social Teaching)
Economics: Rerum Novarum (The Encyclical)
Alignment: Lawful Good

"Don't say, 'That person bothers me.' Think: 'That person sanctifies me.'"
-St. Josemaria Escriva (Founder of Opus Dei)

User avatar
Esalia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1526
Founded: Oct 22, 2020
Democratic Socialists

Postby Esalia » Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:43 am

Turelisa- wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
It is not sexual abuse.


Even though it may be sexually gratifying, its not necessarily healthy. Would you say drug taking was not abusive just because it felt good?


We routinely do things that are unhealthy. Like, on a day-to-day basis.
Formerly Estanglia. Leftie ready to establish Fully Automated Luxury Gay Space CommunismTM under our Marxist Lord Soros.

Nine times out of ten, someone talking about any non-monolithic group as a homogenous, united entity is using them as a boogeyman.

Yeah: Egalitarianism, equality, pro-choice, social democracy
Meh: Labour, the EU
Nah: Pointless discrimination, authoritarianism, Brexit, Trump, both American parties, the Conservatives
I flop between "optimistic about the future" and "pessimistic about the future" every time I go on NSG.

User avatar
Atheris
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5678
Founded: Oct 05, 2018
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Atheris » Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:43 am

Sundiata wrote:
Turelisa- wrote:
The problem is homosexual sexual conduct is consensual sexual abuse. The factor of consent makes sodomy, anal or oral, with any part of the human body, no more acceptable, at least to me. If two addicts 'consented' to abuse themselves together in an orgy of drink or drugs, it would still be destructivery and morally wrong.

Ok, it's one thing to be morally opposed to homosexual acts. I get that. But before we go on, I think that we all should acknowledge that homosexuality is not a choice and that we shouldn't criminalize homosexuals for simply being attracted to the same-sex. That isn't just morally repugnant, but a flagrant violation of their natural rights. These are human beings we're talking about, human beings with dignity.

No fucking way.

Sundiata is saying something I agree with.

When did I enter the fucking mirror dimension?
Kannap wrote:It is I, the stranger in the night who cuts the power lines with hedge clippers
Valentine Z wrote:**a m b i e n c e**
Kick cancer's ass for me, Owlograd!
this! just! in! the mods miss spam for 20 minutes again, admins shut down forum for 10; cite "b-b-but we're not full time!!!! we just wittle vowunteews" as legal defense!
The self-proclaimed Resident Shitposter of NSG.
Proudly sex-repulsed ace and bisensual aro. Cis he/him. Trans ally. ADHD.
"To comment is human, to preview, divine." - Godot
Orthodox Preterist non-denominational Christian Universalist.
I write fanfiction (of the non-explicit kind). Fuck you if you judge me.
Pirate Politics are fucking awesome.

User avatar
Esalia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1526
Founded: Oct 22, 2020
Democratic Socialists

Postby Esalia » Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:45 am

Atheris wrote:
Sundiata wrote:Ok, it's one thing to be morally opposed to homosexual acts. I get that. But before we go on, I think that we all should acknowledge that homosexuality is not a choice and that we shouldn't criminalize homosexuals for simply being attracted to the same-sex. That isn't just morally repugnant, but a flagrant violation of their natural rights. These are human beings we're talking about, human beings with dignity.

No fucking way.

Sundiata is saying something I agree with.

When did I enter the fucking mirror dimension?


Welcome to 2020, where up is down, left is right, and you will routinely agree with your political opponents.
Formerly Estanglia. Leftie ready to establish Fully Automated Luxury Gay Space CommunismTM under our Marxist Lord Soros.

Nine times out of ten, someone talking about any non-monolithic group as a homogenous, united entity is using them as a boogeyman.

Yeah: Egalitarianism, equality, pro-choice, social democracy
Meh: Labour, the EU
Nah: Pointless discrimination, authoritarianism, Brexit, Trump, both American parties, the Conservatives
I flop between "optimistic about the future" and "pessimistic about the future" every time I go on NSG.

User avatar
Celritannia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12347
Founded: Nov 10, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Celritannia » Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:45 am

Sundiata wrote:
Turelisa- wrote:
The problem is homosexual sexual conduct is consensual sexual abuse. The factor of consent makes sodomy, anal or oral, with any part of the human body, no more acceptable, at least to me. If two addicts 'consented' to abuse themselves together in an orgy of drink or drugs, it would still be destructivery and morally wrong.

Ok, it's one thing to be morally opposed to homosexual acts. I get that. I even get the rationale for criminalizing homosexual acts.


Oh boy....
Last edited by Celritannia on Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:46 am, edited 1 time in total.

My DeviantArt
Obey
When you annoy a Celritannian
U W0T M8?
Zirkagrad wrote:A person with a penchant for flying lions with long tongues, could possibly be a fan of Kiss. Maybe the classiest nation with a lion with its tongue hanging out. Enjoys only the finest tea.

Nakena wrote:NSG's Most Serene Salad

Crysuko wrote:My little crony: corruption is magic
Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman.
Atheist, Environmentalist, Pansexual, Left-Libertarian.

User avatar
Western Theram
Envoy
 
Posts: 262
Founded: Aug 05, 2020
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Western Theram » Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:46 am

Turelisa- wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
It is not sexual abuse.


Even though it may be sexually gratifying, its not necessarily healthy. Would you say drug taking was not abusive just because it felt good?

yes, addiction is a physical and mental illness, there is a difference between recreational use and dependence, but that'isnt the topic. what youre saying an also apply to heterosexual sex shouldthey be celibate as well?
The Allied Communes of The Black Savanna Ⓐ//Ⓔ
Post-Modern Tech, mutualism, legal drugs and anarchist paramilitaries
Member of LITA and GSDP

✰ Free Market, Anti-Capitalist ✰
News: Western Theram is ranked 200,004th in the world and 4th in The Allied Communes of The Black Savanna for Largest Mining Sector, scoring -6 on the Blue Sky Asbestos Index.

User avatar
Turelisa-
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 178
Founded: Sep 25, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Turelisa- » Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:53 am

Atheris wrote:
Turelisa- wrote:
Even though it may be sexually gratifying, its not necessarily healthy. Would you say drug taking was not abusive just because it felt good?

"it's not necessarily healthy"

Nothing is necessarily healthy. Eating food? Could be poisoned. Drinking water? Could have chemicals. Breathing air? You could live in New York.

If homosexual sex counts as sexual abuse because of sodomy, then so does straight sex because the same thing happens with a different hole.

Learn to argue.


The male and female sexual organs are compatible. The mouth and anus each has its own single function. They're also lined with soft tissue under which are blood vessels. A dangerous infecting injury to them may easily be inflicted if a certain part of the human body issuing semen carrying psthogens was inserted into them repeatedly and vigorously. These parts of the body, if copulated, are merely passive, unresponsive to stimulus, and their owner therefore, becomes the mere passive object of the will of the active partner, Anyone who thinks these circumstances are normal, healthy and desirous is heading for trouble.
Last edited by Turelisa- on Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:07 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Sundiata
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7102
Founded: Sep 27, 2019
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Sundiata » Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:55 am

Celritannia wrote:
Sundiata wrote:Ok, it's one thing to be morally opposed to homosexual acts. I get that. I even get the rationale for criminalizing homosexual acts.


Oh boy....

The state should not imprison people for being attracted to persons of the same-sex.
Last edited by Sundiata on Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
Gender: Male
Religion: Catholic (Opus Dei)
Politics: Solidarity (Catholic Social Teaching)
Economics: Rerum Novarum (The Encyclical)
Alignment: Lawful Good

"Don't say, 'That person bothers me.' Think: 'That person sanctifies me.'"
-St. Josemaria Escriva (Founder of Opus Dei)

User avatar
San Lumen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58050
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
New York Times Democracy

Postby San Lumen » Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:57 am

Sundiata wrote:
Celritannia wrote:
Oh boy....

The state should not imprison people for being attracted to persons of the same-sex.

I’m glad to hear you think that however you don’t believe they should have equal rights.

User avatar
Turelisa-
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 178
Founded: Sep 25, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Turelisa- » Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:59 am

Sundiata wrote:
Celritannia wrote:
Oh boy....

The state should not imprison people for being attracted to persons of the same-sex.


I agree. I used to think sodomy should be legal, but now I'm not so sure. There's a case for prosecuting if it occasions ABH or GBH, or is done in public view, or betweenteenagers.
Last edited by Turelisa- on Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:00 am, edited 1 time in total.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 21st Century Rome, Aguaria Major, Britannic New England, Exalted Inquellian State, Genivaria, Great Algerstonia, Hospe, Hurdergaryp, Ifreann, Krasny-Volny, Nakena, Norcialki, Odreria, Paddy O Fernature, Picairn, Roegerland, Shidei, Suimede, The Blaatschapen, The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp, The Huskar Social Union, The Reformed American Republic, Universil-Unoyz Wintarros, Valentine Z, Whitemore

Advertisement

Remove ads