But since they have brought this to NSGeneral they clearly want some discussion on it as well as criticism, hence why the rest of us are here.
Advertisement
by The New California Republic » Sat Nov 21, 2020 6:31 pm
by Witiland » Sat Nov 21, 2020 6:33 pm
by Parxland » Sat Nov 21, 2020 6:33 pm
The New California Republic wrote:Parxland wrote:
Stop.
No.Parxland wrote:
Nitpicking.
How is it?Parxland wrote:No shit. And how have people gone about doing their own thing on NS if their current region wouldn't let them do it? Do you need a picture to help you understand this?
Why are you even discussing regions lol, this is a discussion in NSGeneral.
The New California Republic wrote:But since they have brought this to NSGeneral they clearly want some discussion on it as well as criticism, hence why the rest of us are here.
by The New California Republic » Sat Nov 21, 2020 6:36 pm
Witiland wrote:The New California Republic wrote:How can "combining all ideologies" while "excluding some" be "implemented correctly"? You are trying to square a circle.
Lets picture this you have a salad right? It has lettuce, eggs, croutons, maybe all the food groups right? But are you going to put ghost peppers in the salad , so someone who hates ghost peppers to eat the salad? In the same way Mutatio Constantism (or as others put it Constantist Pragmatism) is a salad of ideologies and Nazism is the ghost pepper.
Witiland wrote:Also Mutatio Constantism is based on changing from different sides of the political spectrum and Nazism isn't even the most extreme. In fact Fascism is and not all Fascists are racist.
by Senkaku » Sat Nov 21, 2020 6:36 pm
Witiland wrote:The New California Republic wrote:How can "combining all ideologies" while "excluding some" be "implemented correctly"? You are trying to square a circle.
Lets picture this you have a salad right? It has lettuce, eggs, croutons, maybe all the food groups right? But are you going to put ghost peppers in the salad , so someone who hates ghost peppers to eat the salad? In the same way Mutatio Constantism (or as others put it Constantist Pragmatism) is a salad of ideologies and Nazism is the ghost pepper.
Also Mutatio Constantism is based on changing from different sides of the political spectrum and Nazism isn't even the most extreme. In fact Fascism is and not all Fascists are racist.
by Parxland » Sat Nov 21, 2020 6:36 pm
Witiland wrote:The New California Republic wrote:But since they have brought this to NSGeneral they clearly want some discussion on it as well as criticism, hence why the rest of us are here.
I do appreciate your critiques, however I would do like to hear more constructive advice like how to improve it.....
by Senkaku » Sat Nov 21, 2020 6:37 pm
Witiland wrote:The New California Republic wrote:But since they have brought this to NSGeneral they clearly want some discussion on it as well as criticism, hence why the rest of us are here.
I do appreciate your critiques, however I would do like to hear more constructive advice like how to improve it.....
by The New California Republic » Sat Nov 21, 2020 6:37 pm
Parxland wrote:The New California Republic wrote:No.
How is it?
Why are you even discussing regions lol, this is a discussion in NSGeneral.
Here everyone we have a forum-based example of the phrase "talking to a brick wall." Marvel at how every word bounces off the wall's sturdy construction.The New California Republic wrote:But since they have brought this to NSGeneral they clearly want some discussion on it as well as criticism, hence why the rest of us are here.
No.
by Witiland » Sat Nov 21, 2020 6:38 pm
Parxland wrote:Witiland wrote:
I do appreciate your critiques, however I would do like to hear more constructive advice like how to improve it.....
Do like pretty much every new religion or ideology has done before; take inspiration from bits of other ones and build your own from there. I mean, that's the point of your whole idea, right?
by Witiland » Sat Nov 21, 2020 6:41 pm
Senkaku wrote:Witiland wrote:
I do appreciate your critiques, however I would do like to hear more constructive advice like how to improve it.....
"It" isn't anything. There's nothing to improve. You have presented a non-idea. "uwu guys let's just do the good parts of everything and not the bad parts and change things that need to be changed and all get along :3" is not a new contribution to political thought lmfao
by The New California Republic » Sat Nov 21, 2020 6:41 pm
Witiland wrote:The New California Republic wrote:But since they have brought this to NSGeneral they clearly want some discussion on it as well as criticism, hence why the rest of us are here.
I do appreciate your critiques, however I would do like to hear more constructive advice like how to improve it.....
by Parxland » Sat Nov 21, 2020 6:42 pm
Witiland wrote:Parxland wrote:
Do like pretty much every new religion or ideology has done before; take inspiration from bits of other ones and build your own from there. I mean, that's the point of your whole idea, right?
Yes but on a more extreme level essentially. Now I'm not going to take the whole ideology and stuff it in there, instead i want the government to take aspects of each one. So if you were to take out racist aspects of Nazism, its still so radically different from Fascism and still would be Nazism.
by Witiland » Sat Nov 21, 2020 6:43 pm
The New California Republic wrote:Witiland wrote:
I do appreciate your critiques, however I would do like to hear more constructive advice like how to improve it.....
There is actually nothing to improve upon, because there is not enough substance here to actually work with. Thus far there have just been some very vague notions that have been contradictory and opaque.
by UniversalCommons » Sat Nov 21, 2020 6:44 pm
by Witiland » Sat Nov 21, 2020 6:44 pm
Parxland wrote:Witiland wrote:
Yes but on a more extreme level essentially. Now I'm not going to take the whole ideology and stuff it in there, instead i want the government to take aspects of each one. So if you were to take out racist aspects of Nazism, its still so radically different from Fascism and still would be Nazism.
does it favor collectivism/authoritarianism or individualism/libertarianism?
by The New California Republic » Sat Nov 21, 2020 6:44 pm
Witiland wrote:The New California Republic wrote:There is actually nothing to improve upon, because there is not enough substance here to actually work with. Thus far there have just been some very vague notions that have been contradictory and opaque.
Mutatio Constantism is a paradox within itself! I mean a ideology that hates ideology so much it takes from all ideology?!! That's the point, its the closest humanity can get to having a truly centrist non ideological government.
by Witiland » Sat Nov 21, 2020 6:45 pm
UniversalCommons wrote:There can be no ideal form of government because the humans who create government are not ideal. Often the best thing that can be done is synthesis for the best results. Look at the places with the highest standard of living, the greatest degree of freedom, the most crime free existence and synthesize and organize the different elements to get the best results.
by Parxland » Sat Nov 21, 2020 6:48 pm
The New California Republic wrote:Witiland wrote:
Mutatio Constantism is a paradox within itself! I mean a ideology that hates ideology so much it takes from all ideology?!! That's the point, its the closest humanity can get to having a truly centrist non ideological government.
Sorry but this is now really scraping the barrel of the nonsensical.
by The New California Republic » Sat Nov 21, 2020 6:49 pm
by Senkaku » Sat Nov 21, 2020 6:49 pm
Witiland wrote:Senkaku wrote:"It" isn't anything. There's nothing to improve. You have presented a non-idea. "uwu guys let's just do the good parts of everything and not the bad parts and change things that need to be changed and all get along :3" is not a new contribution to political thought lmfao
But you have not answered the question and fail to give any advice other than, "This is not a good idea and makes no sense" rather than "I don't like this I would recommend this blah blah blah..."
by The New California Republic » Sat Nov 21, 2020 6:52 pm
Parxland wrote:does it favor collectivism/authoritarianism or individualism/libertarianism?
by The New California Republic » Sat Nov 21, 2020 6:55 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Cerula, Emotional Support Crocodile, Europa Undivided, Gabeonia, Tepertopia, The Archregimancy, The Kharkivan Cossacks, Tungstan
Advertisement