Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2020 1:52 am
Surely you know the rules of your own democracy. He's probably going to get 300 electoral votes by the end of it, at least. That's 'winning' the election, in case you didn't know.
Because sometimes even national leaders just want to hang out
https://forum.nationstates.net/
Jedi Council wrote:Nakena wrote:
He is not gone yet. And he has still a number of ways how he can remain in office depending on how far the GOP is willing to go, aka having red states assuming direct control over the electors. (yes they can)
Which would be an radical measure. But hey the GOP isnt known for disenfranchising voters. Mitch and Co. would NEVER do somesuch.
All of those would not be fair and square though, which is part of the issue Nazeroth was mentioning g
Nakena wrote:Jedi Council wrote:Oh? So you wouldn't mind putting some money on Trump making a come back?
He is not gone yet. And he has still a number of ways how he can remain in office depending on how far the GOP is willing to go, aka having red states assuming direct control over the electors. (yes they can)
Which would be an radical measure. But hey the GOP isnt known for disenfranchising voters. Mitch and Co. would never do such a thing. Like ever.
Nazeroth wrote:Your using terms like fair and square when talking about groups that include the DNC...you...know that right?
Jedi Council wrote:Greater Miami Shores wrote:Anti Trump statements and calls to give up from Democrat mayors and other politicians is to be expected, for obvious reasons, they are Democrats. GMS.
And because Trump losing is essentially a mathematical certainty at this point.
The networks should have called it today, Trump should have conceded this evening.
Albrenia wrote:Nazeroth wrote:
When it goes through the legal channels sure
Why does this one need a SCOTUS challenge, whereas others did not?
I mean, I'm fine with it happening, if you guys will 'bend the knee' once it falls on its face. I'll certainly accept a ruling in your favour, although I doubt many of your countrymen will.
Nazeroth wrote:
Were a nation of laws after all.
Nazeroth wrote:Albrenia wrote:
Why does this one need a SCOTUS challenge, whereas others did not?
I mean, I'm fine with it happening, if you guys will 'bend the knee' once it falls on its face. I'll certainly accept a ruling in your favour, although I doubt many of your countrymen will.
Nobody has to “bend the knee” to anyone presidents are not kings
Nazeroth wrote:Albrenia wrote:
Why does this one need a SCOTUS challenge, whereas others did not?
I mean, I'm fine with it happening, if you guys will 'bend the knee' once it falls on its face. I'll certainly accept a ruling in your favour, although I doubt many of your countrymen will.
Nobody has to “bend the knee” to anyone presidents are not kings
Albrenia wrote:Nakena wrote:
He is not gone yet. And he has still a number of ways how he can remain in office depending on how far the GOP is willing to go, aka having red states assuming direct control over the electors. (yes they can)
Which would be an radical measure. But hey the GOP isnt known for disenfranchising voters. Mitch and Co. would never do such a thing. Like ever.
If they're willing to kill their democracy by acting like that, they've got much bigger problems than worrying about the Trump presidency resuming.