by Tokora » Wed Nov 04, 2020 5:19 pm
by Tokora » Thu Nov 05, 2020 4:54 pm
by Definitely Not Trumptonium » Thu Nov 05, 2020 6:53 pm
by Lamoni » Thu Nov 05, 2020 10:47 pm
Definitely Not Trumptonium wrote:you're assuming obese rednecks rolling down a hill with 8 trillion bullets would lose a war against people who don't know which toilet to use
none of these states would be going anywhere in any hypothetical civil war, america has too many extremists to not finish a full out civil war
(not an x y thanks, most dems/reps are good people ok)
Licana on the M-21A2 MBT: "Well, it is one of the most badass tanks on NS."
Vortiaganica: Lamoni I understand fully, of course. The two (Lamoni & Lyras) are more inseparable than the Clinton family and politics.
Triplebaconation: Lamoni commands a quiet respect that carries its own authority. He is the Mandela of NS.
by The Alma Mater » Thu Nov 05, 2020 11:18 pm
by Kubra » Fri Nov 06, 2020 1:11 am
by Bala Mantre » Fri Nov 06, 2020 1:15 am
Bala Mantre wrote:Except the mirrors are destroyed by the shear power of the Queen of England
5.684 Million Total Cases +120|169,580 Deaths +200|2.9 Million Recovered +3000|Bala Mantrean States to be under lockdown until Feburary 14th, 2021| Prime Minister Ian Pavlow wins his second term|Democrats yell fraud as the Senate and Parliament is now both Republican Dominated
by Shanghai industrial complex » Fri Nov 06, 2020 2:30 am
by Tokora » Fri Nov 06, 2020 6:11 pm
Definitely Not Trumptonium wrote:you're assuming obese rednecks rolling down a hill with 8 trillion bullets would lose a war against people who don't know which toilet to use
none of these states would be going anywhere in any hypothetical civil war, america has too many extremists to not finish a full out civil war
(not an x y thanks, most dems/reps are good people ok)
by Eahland » Fri Nov 06, 2020 7:01 pm
by The Marlborough » Fri Nov 06, 2020 7:25 pm
by The Two Jerseys » Fri Nov 06, 2020 11:28 pm
by Stellar Colonies » Fri Nov 06, 2020 11:54 pm
Floofybit wrote:Your desired society should be one where you are submissive and controlled
Primitive Communism wrote:What bodily autonomy do men need?
Techocracy101010 wrote:If she goes on a rampage those saggy wonders are as deadly as nunchucks
Parmistan wrote:It's not ALWAYS acceptable when we do it, but it's MORE acceptable when we do it.
Theodorable wrote:Jihad will win.
Distruzio wrote:All marriage outside the Church is gay marriage.
Khardsland wrote:Terrorism in its original definition is a good thing.
I try to be objective, but I do have some biases.
North Californian.
Stellar Colonies is a loose galactic confederacy.
The Confederacy & the WA.
Add 1200 years.
by Definitely Not Trumptonium » Sat Nov 07, 2020 11:51 am
Lamoni wrote:Definitely Not Trumptonium wrote:you're assuming obese rednecks rolling down a hill with 8 trillion bullets would lose a war against people who don't know which toilet to use
none of these states would be going anywhere in any hypothetical civil war, america has too many extremists to not finish a full out civil war
(not an x y thanks, most dems/reps are good people ok)
*** 1-day ban for trolling ***
That little disclaimer does not magically excuse trolling.
by Chan Island » Sat Nov 07, 2020 11:56 am
Conserative Morality wrote:"It's not time yet" is a tactic used by reactionaries in every era. "It's not time for democracy, it's not time for capitalism, it's not time for emancipation." Of course it's not time. It's never time, not on its own. You make it time. If you're under fire in the no-man's land of WW1, you start digging a foxhole even if the ideal time would be when you *aren't* being bombarded, because once you wait for it to be 'time', other situations will need your attention, assuming you survive that long. If the fields aren't furrowed, plow them. If the iron is not hot, make it so. If society is not ready, change it.
by The Blaatschapen » Sat Nov 07, 2020 11:59 am
Tokora wrote:This is more of a thought scenario than an actual prediction so some aspects of reality are going to be ignored to focus on other details.
Let's say that regardless who wins the election, neither side concedes and the country descends into Balkan level chaos. Eventually the conservative faction reunifies most of the country, however, the states of Washington, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, New York, and all of New England were able to be recieve protection by Canada (unlikely but just roll with it) before they could be reconquered.
If Washington, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan were able to join Canada, would Canada also be willing to annex Oregon and Illinois if they offer or would they be too far south to be manageable? Would New York, Vermont, and New England unify into a single nation, join Canada, or become allied but independent neighboring countries (I've heard that Vermont has a bit of an independence streak). If they did unify, what would the New Nation be called? And how would the US treat the remaining liberal regions in the west?
I personally think that Illinois might be difficult for Canada to also swallow, the Northeast would form a New Nation (no idea on the name), and the US would treat the remaining liberals in the west like an occupied territory under martial law unable to threaten the status quo.
by Tokora » Sat Nov 07, 2020 5:00 pm
Eahland wrote:Vermont was independent for fourteen years before we joined the Union. We can do it again.
(That's more than twice as long as Texas, for those keeping score at home.)
We also have America's laxest weapons laws, and more guns than people. As far as Vermont is concerned, I can carry basically anything I can lift, pretty much anywhere I want, openly or concealed, without a permit. We've sued the Feds repeatedly when they try to change that. Don't think that we're pushovers just because we believe that people have a right to health care and that it's no one's business but yours who you marry.
Stellar Colonies wrote:Not California, along with Oregon and Washington?
Of course, we have more people here than in all of Canada, so annexing us along with the rest of the West Coast would result in them becoming a minority within their own country, which probably wouldn't go over well with them.
In the unlikely situation that the US fell apart and California went its own way, I'd imagine we'd become some sort of junior or equal North American partner to Canada and/or Mexico.
The Blaatschapen wrote:Canada has a population of about 38 million people. New England has 14.8, New York State has 19.4.
And then these other states still going. It's not so much "joining" Canada as it is "taking over" Canada.
by Postauthoritarian America » Sat Nov 07, 2020 10:48 pm
by Kubra » Sun Nov 08, 2020 12:33 am
whoa there you're assuming we'll enfranchise emThe Blaatschapen wrote:Tokora wrote:This is more of a thought scenario than an actual prediction so some aspects of reality are going to be ignored to focus on other details.
Let's say that regardless who wins the election, neither side concedes and the country descends into Balkan level chaos. Eventually the conservative faction reunifies most of the country, however, the states of Washington, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, New York, and all of New England were able to be recieve protection by Canada (unlikely but just roll with it) before they could be reconquered.
If Washington, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan were able to join Canada, would Canada also be willing to annex Oregon and Illinois if they offer or would they be too far south to be manageable? Would New York, Vermont, and New England unify into a single nation, join Canada, or become allied but independent neighboring countries (I've heard that Vermont has a bit of an independence streak). If they did unify, what would the New Nation be called? And how would the US treat the remaining liberal regions in the west?
I personally think that Illinois might be difficult for Canada to also swallow, the Northeast would form a New Nation (no idea on the name), and the US would treat the remaining liberals in the west like an occupied territory under martial law unable to threaten the status quo.
Canada has a population of about 38 million people. New England has 14.8, New York State has 19.4.
And then these other states still going. It's not so much "joining" Canada as it is "taking over" Canada.
by Tokora » Sun Nov 08, 2020 4:52 pm
Kubra wrote:whoa there you're assuming we'll enfranchise emThe Blaatschapen wrote:
Canada has a population of about 38 million people. New England has 14.8, New York State has 19.4.
And then these other states still going. It's not so much "joining" Canada as it is "taking over" Canada.
We will take up the Canadian man's burden, to cviliise and hoserise their poor souls. Only after a long period of transition may they join our company as (seperate but) equals.
by Postauthoritarian America » Mon Nov 09, 2020 10:29 pm
Kubra wrote:whoa there you're assuming we'll enfranchise emThe Blaatschapen wrote:
Canada has a population of about 38 million people. New England has 14.8, New York State has 19.4.
And then these other states still going. It's not so much "joining" Canada as it is "taking over" Canada.
We will take up the Canadian man's burden, to cviliise and hoserise their poor souls. Only after a long period of transition may they join our company as (seperate but) equals.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bagong Timog Mindanao, Ineva, Juansonia, Keltionialang, Kostane, Unmet Player, Varsemia
Advertisement