Advertisement

by Hiram Land » Mon Nov 02, 2020 8:02 pm
Слава Україні!
#KyrusiaSoTrue
he/him
uwu
National Information
Unidas et Hyramalunde
Nationbuilder
Old Dispatches
Alternate: Hiramia-Omfew
_____ Hiram Land _____
Hyramas or Bust!
Thank you to Nanako Island for providing help for the signature.
Proud UFN member
RIP UNoE and UoJ

by Torisakia » Mon Nov 02, 2020 8:03 pm

by Nobel Hobos 2 » Mon Nov 02, 2020 8:04 pm

by Shrillland » Mon Nov 02, 2020 8:04 pm
Telconi wrote:Albrenia wrote:
I guess that's one way to look at it. Although that would make one-party systems also considered 'equal'. Since everyone would have the right to vote for The Party.
Well, they would be, but as you said: "unequal doesn't always mean bad". The converse is true as well.
In the instance of what I'm talking about though, things would be both equal and good.
by Bombadil » Mon Nov 02, 2020 8:05 pm
Hiram Land wrote:Tomorrow's Election Day. This is going to be interesting... *munches on popcorn*

by Myrensis » Mon Nov 02, 2020 8:05 pm
Albrenia wrote:Not surprising Boomers would side with Biden, considering Trump's basically given them the Lord Farquaad treatment and said "Some of you will die, but that's a risk I'm willing to take".

by Penguin Union Nation » Mon Nov 02, 2020 8:05 pm
Sungoldy-China wrote:Who wins this election won't change anything.
The real problem for the United States is that ordinary Americans bear the cost of American hegemony, but the benefits of American hegemony are reaped by big companies and big capitalists.
Young people who cannot afford school loans join the army to fight for oil companies and dollars,
Ordinary Americans bear high medical insurance costs to ensure that large medical companies have enough money and experimental materials to support technological leadership
Even Trump did not care about bringing work back to the U.S. from the trade war, but to ensure the technological leadership and patent protection of U.S. companies. His trade agreement was merely to further expand the power and profitability of U.S. companies overseas. The more he signed A trade agreement will further help American companies transfer jobs.

by Telconi » Mon Nov 02, 2020 8:05 pm
Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:Telconi wrote:
I still don't understand how everyone having the same options, that is "Vote for whoever you want who isn't a Nazi/Gun grabber" is unequal, it extends identical voting rights to everyone.
You understand how limiting the available candidates limits the freedom of voters.
Nazis (or whatever) can no longer vote for the candidate they most prefer. Everyone else can. That's not equal voting rights.
I know you'll pretend not to understand, so I have to dumb it down even further. And you'll keep doing that until it's dumbed down so far it no longer makes sense. Well save your fingers, I'm not playing that game.

by Shrillland » Mon Nov 02, 2020 8:05 pm

by The Marlborough » Mon Nov 02, 2020 8:06 pm
Bombadil wrote:The Marlborough wrote:I don't really see how Trump has increased the position of NK in the world considering NK isn't really interested in spreading its influence all that much to begin with. The Trump administration being willing to accept NK as a nuclear power is one of the closer steps towards peace in US-NK relations in a long time. It's especially ridiculous when you consider that SK's own position has been to ease tensions without demanding denuclearization itself.
I don't know, Trump cosying up to Kim has caused China to break the sanctions and start helping NK export coal. Previously China had fallen in line with imposing sanctions but any threat to that relationship will change it pronto. Ideally the pressure should be on China to squeeze NK, not buddy up with NK who have zero intention of doing anything other than whatever they want to do.
The only reason Kim wanted to deal with Trump is for the sanctions from China to be removed.
by Bombadil » Mon Nov 02, 2020 8:07 pm

by Telconi » Mon Nov 02, 2020 8:07 pm
Shrillland wrote:Telconi wrote:
Well, they would be, but as you said: "unequal doesn't always mean bad". The converse is true as well.
In the instance of what I'm talking about though, things would be both equal and good.
Not quite. There's too many people to be ignored for too long. Ultimately, all such guided republics that shield against such a large number of "undesirables" fall and give way to larger democratic franchises or franchises specifically meant to persecute the persecutor. Ask Ian Smith. Ask PW Botha.

by Cultural Posadism » Mon Nov 02, 2020 8:08 pm
Kexholm Karelia wrote:America's Foreign Enemies Mostly Hope for a Joe Biden Win
You know this president is improving America’s position on the world stage when our enemies want Biden to win
After four years of relentless effort by President Donald Trump to push back against China, his campaign reached new heights (or lows) Friday when he sought to ban new downloads of WeChat, China’s ubiquitous messaging and payments app, and the wildly popular video-sharing app TikTok.
Nevertheless, the final scorecard is already in: On just about every metric that matters, China is ahead. At every turn, Trump seems to have been outplayed and outsmarted throughout the global trade war that began shortly after he took office.
Consider the trade balance, which Trump seems to regard as the most important measure of success in his effort to get China to play by global trading rules.
China’s trade surplus with the U.S. has grown almost 25% since the start of the Trump presidency, exceeding $300 billion on an annualized basis, writes Jim McCormick of NatWest Markets. And China is nowhere near on track to meet its target of increasing imports from the U.S. under the partial deal (also called “phase 1”) to end the trade conflict, the signal accomplishment of Trump’s tariff tit-for-tat.
Look at China’s powerfully resurgent GDP, the result of its vastly more effective response to the pandemic that began there. China, McCormick notes, is the only country among 48 to have reported a second-quarter gross domestic product number that was higher than at the end of 2019. In the U.S., the worst country when it comes to the coronavirus (as measured by death and infections), the economy shrank 9.5% in the second quarter, a drop that equals an annualized pace of 32.9%, its sharpest downturn since at least the 1940s.
And now the Chinese currency is on a tear, climbing for the eighth week in a row, its longest run of gains since February 2018. Global bond funds are pouring into the country—one that still offers yields. Meanwhile, the dollar is slumping.
Behind these headline numbers also are deeper industrial trends, which again work in China’s favor, helping it pick up global market share in the aftermath of Covid-19 lockdowns. Increasingly, China is supplying the kind of sophisticated machinery that German manufacturers once dominated, like high-end tunnel borers and hydraulic valves and pumps used in wind turbines.
“It’s only a matter of time until Chinese firms are No. 1,” says Ulrich Ackermann, managing director for foreign trade at Germany’s VDMA Mechanical Engineering Industry Association.
Trump’s assaults on WeChat and TikTok are a distraction; there are better ways to mitigate the national security risk Chinese companies may pose by gaining access to U.S. personal data. In any case, lashing out at Chinese tech companies will only slow, not derail, Beijing’s efforts to dominate the 21st century economy.
Take the race to develop batteries, a key to the future of transport, defense and other industries. By 2025, China will have battery facilities with maximum production capacity of about 1.1 terawatt-hours’ worth of cells annually, almost double the rest of the world combined. The White House response? So far, inertia, said Cathy Zoi, chief executive officer of charging-network operator EVgo, and an assistant secretary at the U.S. Department of Energy under President Barack Obama.
The net result of Trump’s efforts to decouple the U.S. and Chinese economies is to push China even further toward self-sufficiency, a strategy set to be enshrined in China’s new five-year plan at a meeting of the Chinese Communist Party Central Committee next month.
This new economic direction is described by the official phrase “dual circulation,” an ambiguous reference to the outward and inward drivers of the Chinese economy. Bottom line: The term “looks set to mark a drive to reduce dependence on imports, particularly of high-end manufacturing equipment and inputs,” writes economist Alicia Garcia-Herrero. “Dual circulation,” she said, is import-substitution by another name.
A Joe Biden presidency, no less than the Trump administration, would grapple with a China set on global domination of 21st century industries by deploying old-fashioned mercantilism, among other retrograde trade policies. How could it do better?
Robert Zoellick, the former U.S. trade representative and World Bank head (and member of the Bloomberg New Economy Forum advisory board), has this advice for the former U.S. vice president, should he win in November: Foreign policy should start at home.
Focusing on domestic issues like public health, immigration and inclusive economic growth will both signal U.S. leadership and appeal to allies, Zoellick wrote in Foreign Affairs.
“From this new base of cooperation,” Zoellick writes, “the U.S. and its partners will be better positioned to address two overarching challenges: the future of free societies and competition with China.”
Europe is ignoring Trump's threats about China
This shift is also seen in the behavior of European governments, which appear increasingly willing to ignore Trump's threats about forging closer ties with China.
A series of European countries are working on deals with the Chinese telecoms company Huawei to develop their 5G networks, despite increasingly aggressive threats from the White House.
UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who Trump was said to have hung up on in a moment of "apoplectic" fury earlier this year for defying the president's threats on Huawei, is pushing ahead with plans to allow the company 5G development rights.
Several other European countries are also pushing ahead with similar deals despite threats from the Trump administration of a new trade war.
Beijing is also demonstrating an increasing ability to wield diplomatic pressure on Europe, even when it counters the wishes of Washington.
The European Union recently removed references to a Chinese campaign of "global disinformation" from an official report into propaganda spread by foreign powers, following diplomatic pressure from Beijing.
As Trump withdraws, China opens its coffers to the world
Europe's reluctance to criticize China may be due in part to the increasing economic dominance of Beijing.
A recent report by the investment bank GP Bullhound suggests that since the European tech markets reopened, China has caught up with the US in terms of investment in European tech companies for the first time since 2018.
China's investment extends to critical scientific investment as well.
The Mail on Sunday newspaper reported this week that Huawei had invested £5 million into a new tech center at Imperial College London.
The investment has triggered controversy because scientists at Imperial have been central to advising the UK government's response to the coronavirus crisis.
What is clear is that with the global economy heading for a deep recession, European governments, public institutions, and companies are increasingly turning toward China for support and investment.
And with public opinion toward the US deteriorating in Europe under Trump's leadership, China's resurgence could well come at America's cost.

by Hiram Land » Mon Nov 02, 2020 8:09 pm
Слава Україні!
#KyrusiaSoTrue
he/him
uwu
National Information
Unidas et Hyramalunde
Nationbuilder
Old Dispatches
Alternate: Hiramia-Omfew
_____ Hiram Land _____
Hyramas or Bust!
Thank you to Nanako Island for providing help for the signature.
Proud UFN member
RIP UNoE and UoJ
by Bombadil » Mon Nov 02, 2020 8:10 pm
The Marlborough wrote:Bombadil wrote:
I don't know, Trump cosying up to Kim has caused China to break the sanctions and start helping NK export coal. Previously China had fallen in line with imposing sanctions but any threat to that relationship will change it pronto. Ideally the pressure should be on China to squeeze NK, not buddy up with NK who have zero intention of doing anything other than whatever they want to do.
The only reason Kim wanted to deal with Trump is for the sanctions from China to be removed.
There is no point in trying to squeeze NK out of nuclear weapons, especially after Iraq and Libya. North Korea is a nuclear power whether people like it or not. Reducing the number of sanctions and increasing economic ties was a major focus of the summits, with the last two being aimed at getting North Korea to agree to not increase its arsenal in return for an end to sanctions and increased economic ties.

by Borderlands of Rojava » Mon Nov 02, 2020 8:10 pm

by Torisakia » Mon Nov 02, 2020 8:10 pm

by Shrillland » Mon Nov 02, 2020 8:11 pm
Telconi wrote:Shrillland wrote:
Not quite. There's too many people to be ignored for too long. Ultimately, all such guided republics that shield against such a large number of "undesirables" fall and give way to larger democratic franchises or franchises specifically meant to persecute the persecutor. Ask Ian Smith. Ask PW Botha.
I mean, if you take the "Evil prevails" attitude, then everything is pretty pointless, isn't it?

by Hiram Land » Mon Nov 02, 2020 8:11 pm
Слава Україні!
#KyrusiaSoTrue
he/him
uwu
National Information
Unidas et Hyramalunde
Nationbuilder
Old Dispatches
Alternate: Hiramia-Omfew
_____ Hiram Land _____
Hyramas or Bust!
Thank you to Nanako Island for providing help for the signature.
Proud UFN member
RIP UNoE and UoJ

by Cultural Posadism » Mon Nov 02, 2020 8:11 pm

by Farnhamia » Mon Nov 02, 2020 8:13 pm

by Borderlands of Rojava » Mon Nov 02, 2020 8:13 pm

by Penguin Union Nation » Mon Nov 02, 2020 8:13 pm

by The Marlborough » Mon Nov 02, 2020 8:13 pm
Bombadil wrote:The Marlborough wrote:There is no point in trying to squeeze NK out of nuclear weapons, especially after Iraq and Libya. North Korea is a nuclear power whether people like it or not. Reducing the number of sanctions and increasing economic ties was a major focus of the summits, with the last two being aimed at getting North Korea to agree to not increase its arsenal in return for an end to sanctions and increased economic ties.
Sure, but the net result was simply that China resumed trade in breaking sanctions and have helped prop Kim up. He also gave plenty of kudos to Kim internally just for meeting up and saying what a great guy he was.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Democratic Poopland, EuroStralia, Fractalnavel, Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States, Kerwa, The Merry-Men, Valrifall, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement